Horse meat scandal – A wake-up call for regulatory authorities
Section snippets
Background
Global incidences of food mis-description and adulteration are increasing and international food trade is disrupted by frequent disputes over food safety and quality requirements. The recent controversies surrounding horse meat scandal forces authorities to enforce stringent regulations on food adulterations.
The term adulteration refers “to make impure by adding extraneous, improper, or inferior ingredients”. In the case of meat, it is considered as economic adulteration in which partial or
Regulatory authorities and analytical capabilities
Food control authorities are constantly upgrading their systems to identify food source and monitor the quality to ensure that proper processing has taken place and labeling information reflects the actual contents. Regular monitoring to counteract fraud has become inevitable for the authorities to assure safe, unadulterated and quality food. Labeling is the primary means of communication between producers and consumers. Although labeling policies differ widely in nature, material facts and
Perspectives
Accidental mislabeling or fraudulent practices need to be controlled by legal authorities by frequent monitoring procedures at all levels starting from slaughterhouses, processors up to the ends of supply chain. Science based technological advancements in detection methods to combat fraud or accidental mislabeling need to be considered and adapted by authorities. For instance, recent advances in ‘omic’ technologies such as identification of peptide biomarkers specific to a particular meat
Concluding remarks
It is widely accepted that consumers have the right to know and choose what they want to eat. In addition to material facts and other useful safety information, description on authenticity related issues would certainly boost consumer confidence on the products. Legitimate allowances for low level presence along with warning on other meat traces may help to alleviate problems associated with meat authenticity. A collective action by continuous monitoring scheme along with improved detection
Acknowledgment
The author gratefully acknowledges the support and encouragement of Abu Dhabi Food Control Authority (ADFCA).
References (7)
- et al.
Recent technological advances for the determination of food authenticity
Trends in Food Science & Technology
(2006) - et al.
Peptide biomarkers as a way to determine meat authenticity
Meat Science
(2011) - et al.
Religious values informing halal meat production and the control and delivery of halal credence quality
Agriculture and Human Values
(2008)
Cited by (173)
Detection of adulteration of Alpaca (Vicugna pacos) meat using a portable NIR spectrometer and NIR-hyperspectral imaging
2024, Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisDeep learning based on the Vis-NIR two-dimensional spectroscopy for adulteration identification of beef and mutton
2024, Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisHealth based animal and meat safety cooperative communities
2023, Food ControlReview on food quality assessment using machine learning and electronic nose system
2023, Biosensors and Bioelectronics: XChasing the honey money: Transparency, trust, and identity crafting in the Aotearoa New Zealand mānuka honey sector
2023, Journal of Rural Studies