Elsevier

Food Chemistry

Volume 345, 30 May 2021, 128773
Food Chemistry

Analytical Methods
Microfluidic colorimetric analysis system for sodium benzoate detection in foods

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128773Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A MCA system for SBA concentration detection in food samples is developed.

  • Modified Janovsky reaction with two layer reagents are coated in paper-microchip.

  • SBA concentrations of 15 commercial food samples are measured.

  • The measurement results deviate by no more than 6.0% versus official method.

Abstract

Sodium benzoate (SBA) is a widely-used additive for preventing food spoilage and deterioration and extending the shelf life. However, the concentration of SBA must be controlled under safe regulations to avoid damaging human health. Accordingly, this study proposes a microfluidic colorimetric analysis (MCA) system composing of a wax-printed paper-microchip and a self-made smart analysis equipment for the concentration detection of SBA in common foods and beverages. In the presented method, the distilled SBA sample is mixed with NaOH to obtain a nitro compound and the compound is then dripped onto the reaction area of the paper-microchip, which is embedded with two layers of reagents (namely acetophenone and acetone). The paper-microchip is heated at 120 °C for 20 min to cause a colorimetric reaction and the reaction image is then obtained through a CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) device and transmitted to a cell-phone over a WiFi connection. Finally, use the self-developed RGB analysis software installed on the cell-phone to obtain the SBA concentration. A calibration curve is constructed using SBA samples with known concentrations ranging from 50 ppm (0.35 mM) to 5000 ppm (35 mM). It is shown that the R + G + B value (Y) of the reaction image and SBA concentration (X) are related via Y = −0.034 X +737.40, with a determination coefficient of R2 = 0.9970. By measuring the SBA concentration of 15 commercially available food and beverage products, the actual feasibility of the current MCA system can be demonstrated. The results show that the difference from the measurement results obtained using the macroscale HPLC method does not exceed 6.0%. Overall, the current system provides a reliable and low-cost technique for quantifying the SBA concentration in food and drink products.

Introduction

Preservatives are widely used in the food, beverage, drug and cosmetics industries to reduce microbial spoilage, maintain freshness, enhance the nutritional quality and prolong the shelf life (Piper, & Piper, 2017). Among the many preservatives available nowadays, sodium benzoate (SBA, with the chemical symbol NaC7H5O2 or C6H5CO2Na) is one of the most commonly employed. When dissolved in water, SBA exists in the form of sodium salt of benzoic acid, but it will be converted into active benzoic acid under acidic conditions, thus providing the same preservation mechanism as benzoic acid. However, SBA has much higher water solubility than benzoic acid and is more stable in the atmosphere. Consequently, it is much more commonly used (Hamzah, Yusof, Salleh, & Bakar, 2011). SBA is a particularly effective preservative since it has strong lipophilicity, and hence easily penetrates the cell membrane and enters the cell. It then interferes with the permeability of microbial cell membranes, such as those of mold and bacteria, thereby inhibiting the absorption of the amino acid by the cell membrane and providing a strong antiseptic effect (del Olmo, Calzada, & Nuñez, 2017). Although SBA has a strong toxicity to microorganisms, the toxicity of its sodium salt is very low. Nonetheless, the concentration of SBA in foods must be carefully controlled to avoid damaging human health. Thus, the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) of the World Health Organization (WHO) has specified an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of just 5 mg/kg body weight (WHO, 2000).

Many analytical methods are available for detecting SBA or benzoic acid, including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Le, Ngo, Le, & Huong, 2019), liquid chromatography (LC) (Özgür & Kasapoğlu 2019), capillary electrochromatography (CEC) (Tang et al., 2017), surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) (Xue et al., 2020), spectrophotometry (Fujiyoshi et al., 2018, Wang et al., 2020), ion chromatography (IC) (Wang et al., 2013), paper spray mass spectrometry (PS-MS) (Yu et al., 2018), and immunoassays (Li et al., 2018). (For the comparison of the properties of several analytical methods for SBA determination, please refer to Supplementary Materials Table S1). However, these methods are expensive and slow, and often require additional extraction or sample preparation steps, which further increase the analysis time. In addition, they usually require the services of trained operators. Therefore, the use of these methods is limited to well-equipped laboratories manned by professional staff. In other words, low-cost, reliable and straightforward methods for the rapid screening of SBA in food and beverage samples are still lacking.

Microfluidic device analysis systems, also known as Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC) or Micro-Total Analysis Systems (µTAS), are a rapidly growing field (Yang et al., 2018, Chen et al., 2018, Lee and Fu, 2018, Ravanfar et al., 2018, Tseng et al., 2018, Loo et al., 2019, Nguyen et al., 2019a, Hsiao et al., 2020) with many advantages over traditional benchtop systems, including reduced sample and reagent volumes ranging from a few microns to several millimeters, a lower cost, a simpler operation, a faster response time, and better portability. Microfluidic devices have found widespread use in many different fields recently, including biochemical analysis, food processing, food diagnostics, chemical processing, pharmaceutical research and development, chemical synthesis, and environmental testing (Liu et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2018a, Yang et al., 2018a, Dayao et al., 2019, Iranifam and Al Lawati, 2019, Nguyen et al., 2019b, Kamankesh et al., 2020). Microfluidic-based analysis equipment based on rapid detection, convenience, and low cost is generally considered to be superior to traditional food safety and quality analysis methods. Accordingly, the development of microfluidic devices and platforms for food testing purposes has attracted considerable attention in the recent literature. For example, Wu et al. (Wu et al., 2020) presented a rapid microfluidic detection platform using a micro-spectrometer detection device for the concentration measurement of preservatives in food. The feasibility of the device was demonstrated by comparing the concentration measuring results acquired for 15 commercial food samples with those obtained using conventional macroscale methods. It was shown that the detection error of the proposed method was less than 7.5%. The general versatility of the platform was further demonstrated by performing the concentration measurement of sulfur dioxide, sorbic acid, formaldehyde, and benzoic acid samples. The corresponding determination coefficients were found to be R2 = 0.9933, 0.9956, 0.9968 and 0.9961, respectively.

Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) (Guzman et al., 2018, Ma et al., 2018, Liu et al., 2018b, Yang et al., 2018b, Fu et al., 2019, Trofimchuk et al., 2020) provide a particularly attractive solution for analytical applications due to their low cost, ease of fabrication, simple operation and absence of external driving systems (Fu and Wang, 2018, Kung et al., 2019, Zhu et al., 2019). Hence, the current study presents a MCA system for SBA concentration measurement, which consists of a paper-microchip and a self-made smart analysis device comprising a micro-temperature controller, a power source, and a detection box integrated with a CMOS device, a WiFi transmission system, and a cell-phone installed with self-developed RGB analysis software. In the presented method, the sample of interest is distilled and is then reacted with NaOH solution and calcinated to form a nitro compound. The compound is dripped onto the reaction area of the paper microchip and undergoes a colorimetric reaction with two embedded regents (acetophenone and acetone) under the effects of heating at 120 °C for 20 min. The reaction image is captured by the CMOS device and transmitted to a smartphone over a WiFi connection. Finally, use the self-developed RGB software installed on the cell-phone to obtain the SBA concentration. The feasibility of the current system is demonstrated by comparing the measurement results acquired for the SBA concentrations of 15 commercially available food and beverage samples with those obtained using two conventional macroscale methods.

Section snippets

Paper-microchip preparation

Fig. 1(a)–(c) illustrate the basic procedures in the design and fabrication process of the paper-microchip. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the paper-microchip consists of a detection / reaction area of 8 mm in diameter, which is defined by an impermeable wax ring with a thickness of 1.2 mm. The paper-microchip was fabricated on qualitative filter paper with a thickness of 0.2 mm and a pore size of 6 µm (Advantec Toyo Kaisha, Ltd., Japan) using a commercial wax printer (Fig. 1(b)). Then, the

Macroscale SBA detection using UV spectrophotometry method

1 mL standard SBA solutions with known concentrations of 50 ~ 5000 ppm (0.35 ~ 35 mM) were placed in test tubes with 2 mL of acetone and 1 mL of 0.1 M NaOH to produce a Janovsky reaction. After 10 min, the solutions changed to a purple color and their absorbance values were measured at a wavelength of 555 nm using a UV/VIS absorption spectrometer (V-730, Jasco Com., Japan). The corresponding results are shown in Fig. S3 (see Supplementary Materials). The results show that the relationship

Conclusion

This study has proposed a simple microfluidic colorimetric analysis (MCA) system based on a modified Janovsky reaction for the detection of SBA in commercial food and drink products. In the proposed method, an SBA solution is distilled from the sample of interest and is then reacted with NaOH to produce a nitro compound. The compound is coated on the reaction area of a paper-microchip embedded with two reagents (acetophenone and acetone) and is heated at 120 °C for 20 min to prompt a

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Chien-Hsuan Ko: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Data curation. Chan-Chiung Liu: Data curation, Writing - original draft, Supervision. Kuan-Hong Chen: Investigation. Fuu Sheu: Investigation. Lung-Ming Fu: Data curation, Writing - original draft, Supervision. Szu-Jui Chen: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Data curation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan for the financial support of this study under Grant Nos. MOST 106-2314-B-006-085 -MY3, MOST 106-2221-E-006-253-MY3, MOST 107-2622-B-006-007 -CC2, and MOST 108-2622-E-006-026-CC2.

References (39)

Cited by (32)

  • Finger pump microfluidic detection system for methylparaben detection in foods

    2023, Food Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Accordingly, there is an outstanding requirement for simpler and cheaper alternatives for conducting MP determination. Microfluidic devices also called as microfluidic total analysis system (μTAS), Lab-On-a-Chip (LOC) (Chen et al., 2018; Hsu et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2018; Ko et al., 2021; Al Haddabi et al., 2017; Ravanfar et al., 2018; Loo et al., 2019) or a micro paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) (Fu et al., 2021; Laurenciano et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2017; Trofimchuk et al., 2020; Hao et al., 2021; Sousa et al., 2021), a large number of advantages to traditional laboratory equipment, including a low reagent consumption, reduced waste production, minimal energy consumption, reduced waste production, miniaturization, a rapid response time, and high portability (Laurenciano et al., 2021). Accordingly, many microfluidic devices and platforms for food testing have been proposed in recent years.

  • Light-shading reaction microfluidic PMMA/paper detection system for detection of cyclamate concentration in foods

    2023, Food Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    The application of microfluidic systems to food safety monitoring technology has attracted growing interest in recent years (Trofimchuk et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Jing et al., 2021; Farahmandi et al., 2021). Microfluidic systems can be broadly divided into three main categories, namely lab-on-a-chip (de OS Santos et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022), lab-on-paper (Ko et al., 2021; Fu et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021) and hybrid chip/paper devices (Tseng et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022). Microfluidic systems are cheap, easy to produce, light weight and physically small.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

These authors contributed equally to this paper.

View full text