Elsevier

Food Microbiology

Volume 64, June 2017, Pages 179-185
Food Microbiology

Sanitizer efficacy in preventing cross-contamination of heads of lettuce during retail crisping

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.01.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Soaking with electrolyzed water prevented cross-contamination among lettuce heads and controlled bacterial populations during a triple use of crisping water.

  • Soaking of inoculated Romaine lettuce with electrolyzed water significantly reduced the population of Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes compared to tap water and commercial acid sanitizers.

  • No difference was noted between tap water and commercial acid sanitizers in reducing foodborne pathogens on lettuce.

Abstract

This study was conducted to provide information regarding mitigation of cross-contamination through the use of sanitizer during crisping at retail outlets. Seven non-inoculated heads and one inoculated head (≈5 log CFU/g) of lettuce were placed into commercial sink filled with 76 L of tap water (TW), electrolyzed water (EW, free chlorine: 43 ± 6 ppm), lactic acid and phosphoric acid-based sanitizer (LPA, pH 2.89), or citric acid-based sanitizer (CA, pH 2.78) and soaked for 5 min. Two subsequent batches (eight non-inoculated heads per batch) were soaked in the same solution. Soaking with EW significantly reduced the population of S. enterica (2.8 ± 1.5 log CFU/g), E. coli O157:H7 (3.4 ± 1.1 log CFU/g), and L. monocytogenes (2.6 ± 0.7 log CFU/g) inoculated on Romaine lettuce compared to TW, LPA, and CA (p < 0.05). On Red leaf lettuce, EW significantly reduced populations of S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7, but not L. monocytogenes compared to other treatments. No significant difference was noted between TW, LPA, and CA in reducing foodborne pathogens (p > 0.05) or preventing cross-contamination. Soaking with EW prevented cross-contamination among lettuce heads and controlled bacterial populations in crisping water for three consecutive batches. EW may be an effective option as a sanitizer to minimizing the cross-contamination of leafy greens during the retail crisping.

Introduction

Leafy vegetables are considered to present the greatest concern with regard to microbiological hazards of fresh produce (FAO/WHO, 2008) and were identified as presenting the greatest risk for food regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (CSPI, 2009). According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), produce was the top food category responsible for 643 outbreaks (19% of total outbreaks) and 20,456 illnesses (24% of total illnesses) between 2004 and 2013 in the United States (CSPI, 2015). Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (especially E. coli O157:H7), S. enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes are the primary pathogens of concern for leafy vegetables such as lettuce and spinach (Castillo and Rodríguez-García, 2004, Heaton and Jones, 2008, Herman et al., 2015).

Microbiological safety and quality of leafy vegetables can be improved through washing. Typically produce is washed with potable water with/without chemical antimicrobial agents for the primary purpose of removing soil and debris. Washing can reduce the population of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms, improve appearance, and potentially extend shelf-life of produce (Artés et al., 2009, Herdt and Feng, 2009). According to the U.S. Food Code (section 3–302.15 Washing Fruits and Vegetables), chemical sanitizing agents approved by the FDA (e.g. sodium hypochlorite, specified in 21 CFR 173.315) and as specified under § 7–204.12 of the Food Code may be used for washing fruits and vegetables (FDA, 2013). Wash water can serve as a vehicle for microbial cross-contamination of product, especially when the water is reused without addition of sanitizing agents (Gil et al., 2009). The addition of a sanitizing agent to water intended for the washing of fresh vegetables has been recommended to prevent transfer and survival of pathogens during washing (Sapers, 2001, FDA, 2009, Gil et al., 2009, Luo et al., 2012).

Chlorine is the most widely used sanitizer in the food industry because of its broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, relative low cost, and minimal negative effect on product quality (Luo et al., 2012, Parish et al., 2003, Sapers, 2014). There are many alternatives to the use of chlorine including peroxyacetic acid, organic acids (lactic, citric, and acetic acids), and electrolyzed water. There are different types of EW: acidic electrolyzed water (AEW), neutral electrolyzed water (NEW), and basic electrolyzed water (BEW; alkaline electrolyzed water) (Kim et al., 2000, Hsu, 2005, Huang et al., 2008, Artés et al., 2009). AEW has been shown to be effective in reducing or inactivating foodborne pathogens on lettuce (Park et al., 2001, Park et al., 2008, Koseki et al., 2004, Keskinen et al., 2009), spinach (Park et al., 2008), cabbage, lemons, tomatoes (Pangloli et al., 2009), and apples (Graça et al., 2011). NEW or slightly acidic electrolyzed water (pH 5.0–6.5) has received much greater attention by the food industry since skin irritation is reduced, chlorine odor limited, and increased stability at near-neutral pH compared to AEW (Len et al., 2002, Ayebah and Hung, 2005, Abadias et al., 2008, Waters et al., 2014).

Although sales of fresh-cut/bagged salad has steadily increased in popularity due to its convenience, the sales of heads of lettuce are still one of the top 10 vegetables purchased in US supermarkets (Cook, 2012). Most major retail grocery stores and supermarkets employ a crisping practice for leafy greens to improve consumer acceptance. Crisping typically involves the submersion of commodities in water (with or without sanitizers) for up to 10 min followed by refrigeration, which gives products a fresh look and crisp texture. Leafy greens such as Romaine lettuce, loose leaf lettuce, and kale may require crisping since they are easily dehydrated during storage and distribution (California Department of Public Health, 2012, Defense Commissary Agency, 2012). Crisping may result in cross-contamination through the transfer of pathogens from contaminated commodities. Indeed, crisping has been suspected of facilitating cross-contamination of lettuce linked with an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak that occurred in Montana in 1995 (Ackers et al., 1998). A paucity of research has focused on the microbiological safety of retail crisping practices.

Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of sanitizers including chlorine, organic acids, and EW in reducing microbial loads on leafy vegetables (Gil et al., 2009, Nou and Luo, 2010, Barrera et al., 2012, Luo et al., 2012, Davidson et al., 2013; Palma-Salgado et al., 2014). Most studies have focused on industry type processing and reduction of microbiological population on commodity rather the control of microbes in the wash water. Often fresh-cut/shredded lettuce is the test commodity of choice and processing done under pilot scale for evaluating a sanitizers’ efficacy against foodborne pathogens. In the present study, the efficacy of commercially available electrolyzed water concentrate and acid-based sanitizers in preventing cross-contamination during crisping in a retail setting (e.g., supermarkets) was investigated. The ability of the sanitizers to reduce foodborne pathogens (E. coli O157:H7, S. enterica, and L. monocytogenes) on whole heads of lettuce was also investigated.

Section snippets

Bacterial strains

Nalidixic acid-resistant S. enterica, E. coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes which were associated with fresh produce outbreaks were provided by Dr. Joshua Gurtler (Eastern Region Research Center, USDA, Wyndmoor, PA): S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Newport H1275 (sprout outbreak), S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Stanley H0558 (sprout outbreak), S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Montevideo G4639 (raw tomato outbreak), L. monocytogenes L008 (serotype 4b, Canadian coleslaw/cabbage

Natural flora on whole heads of lettuce

Population of natural flora on whole heads of lettuce prior to treatment is shown in Fig. 1. Heads of Romaine lettuce consistently harbored significantly higher (P < 0.001) populations (4.9 ± 0.8 log CFU/g) of natural microbiota than Red leaf lettuce (4.3 ± 0.3 log CFU/g). The population of natural microbiota associated with Romaine and Red leaf lettuce in the present study is consistent with previous reports. Allende et al. (2004) reported the population of mesophilic bacteria, lactic acid

Conclusion

Very little attention has been paid to the microbial safety practices involving the submersion (washing, crisping, etc.) of produce in retail settings. This study simulated the soaking of lettuce in retail settings in association with the practice of crisping. Under conditions evaluated, a commercial concentrated electrolyzed water antimicrobial was most effective in controlling microbial populations in wash water, preventing cross-contamination, and reducing foodborne pathogens on whole

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge USDA HATCH project NJ10170 and PuriCore, Inc.

References (48)

  • S.Y. Hsu

    Effects of flow rate, temperature and salt concentration on chemical and physical properties of electrolyzed oxidizing water

    J. Food Eng.

    (2005)
  • Y.R. Huang et al.

    Application of electrolyzed water in the food industry

    Food Control

    (2008)
  • D.A. Jensen et al.

    Cross contamination of Escherichia coli O157: H7 between lettuce and wash water during home-scale washing

    Food Microbiol.

    (2015)
  • L.A. Keskinen et al.

    Efficacy of chlorine, acidic electrolyzed water and aqueous chlorine dioxide solutions to decontaminate Escherichia coli O157: H7 from lettuce leaves

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • C. Kim et al.

    Roles of oxidation-reduction potential in electrolyzed oxidizing and chemically modified water for the inactivation of food-related pathogens

    J. Food Prot.

    (2000)
  • S. Koseki et al.

    Effect of mild heat pre-treatment with alkaline electrolyzed water on the efficacy of acidic electrolyzed water against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and S. enterica on lettuce

    Food Microbiol.

    (2004)
  • F. López-Gálvez et al.

    Prevention of Escherichia coli cross-contamination by different commercial sanitizers during washing of fresh-cut lettuce

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • Y.G. Luo et al.

    A pilot plant scale evaluation of a new process aid for enhancing chlorine efficacy against pathogen survival and cross-contamination during produce wash

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • D.F. Maffei et al.

    Microbiological quality of organic and conventional vegetables sold in Brazil

    Food Control

    (2013)
  • S. Palma-Salgado et al.

    Whole-head washing, prior to cutting, provides sanitization advantages for fresh-cut Iceberg lettuce (Latuca sativa L.)

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • P. Pangloli et al.

    Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on produce by use of electrolyzed water under simulated food service operation conditions

    J. Food Prot.

    (2009)
  • G.M. Sapers

    Disinfection of contaminated produce with conventional washing and sanitizing technology

  • M.R. Wachtel et al.

    Cross-contamination of lettuce with Escherichia coli O157: H7

    J. Food Prot.

    (2002)
  • B.W. Waters et al.

    Effect of chlorine-based sanitizers properties on corrosion of metals commonly found in food processing environment

    J. Food Eng.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Disinfecting agents for controlling fruits and vegetable diseases after harvest

      2021, Food Losses, Sustainable Postharvest and Food Technologies
    • Influence of product volume on water antimicrobial efficacy and cross-contamination during retail batch washing of lettuce

      2020, International Journal of Food Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The use of water antimicrobials was demonstrated previously to control microbial populations in wash water and minimize cross-contamination in retail processing of produce. ( Jung et al., 2017). However, in that study only 8 heads of lettuce were washed per batch which may not adequately reflect typical retail processing practices.

    • Inactivation of bacteria on fresh produce by batch wash ozone sanitation

      2019, Food Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Often, wash treatments (e.g., chlorine-based and acid-based sanitizers) occur during the retail practice of ‘crisping’—the submersion of produce for a specified period to time—to improve consumer acceptance. Here, the addition of a sanitizer can serve two purposes: i) inactivation of microorganisms on the produce and ii) prevention of cross-contamination during the crisping process (Ackers et al., 1998; Jung, Jang, Guo, Gao, & Matthews, 2017). Sanitizers each carry their own advantages as well as limitations; thus alternative approaches to fresh produce washing are continuously being considered.

    • A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of electrolyzed water treatments in reducing foodborne pathogens on different foods

      2018, Food Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      First of all, one of the possible reasons for the continued unexplained variation could be due to the differences in the food groups. For the meta-analysis and meta-regressions on lettuce, different varieties of lettuce were used by different authors such as romaine (Afari et al., 2015, 2016; Jung, Jang, Guo, Gao, & Matthews, 2017), iceberg (Abadias, Usall, Oliveira, Alegre, & Vinas, 2008; Afari et al., 2015) and red leaf (Jung et al., 2017). For tomatoes, round red and cherry tomatoes were used while the greatest variety in the product type occurred in the analysis of meats.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text