Biodiversity of mycobiota throughout the Brazil nut supply chain: From rainforest to consumer
Introduction
Brazil nuts are one of the most important products extracted from the Amazon rainforest region. Trees of Bertholletia excelsa grow wild, reaching up to 60 m, take 12 years to bear fruit and may live up to 500 years. The Amazon rainforest has multiple ecosystems with a huge biodiversity, which plays an important role in the global weather balance. The equatorial climate is hot and humid, with an average temperature of 26 °C and relative humidity of 80–95%. Brazil nut production is considered totally organic and environmentally correct, since no chemical products are used to control pests and weeds and nor is there the need for fertilizers. It also favors a unique biodiversity of fungal species different from those found in cultivated areas.
Studies on the presence of fungi and aflatoxins in Brazil nuts have been investigated elsewhere (Arrus et al., 2005, Baquião et al., 2012, Baquião et al., 2013, Calderari et al., 2013, Gonçalves et al., 2012, Iamanaka et al., 2014, Massi et al., 2014). All of these studies have shown the high occurrence of Aspergillus section Flavi in Brazil nut samples. However, few studies have been carried out on the changes of Brazil nut mycobiota from rainforest to consumer, considering the different environments which exist until the nuts are consumed.
In the studies on Brazil nut mycobiota, the most commonly isolated species were Aspergillus flavus, A. nomius, A. pseudonomius, A. niger, A. tamarii, Penicillium glabrum, P. citrinum, Penicillium spp., Rhizopus spp., Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium spp., Phialemonium spp., Phaeoacremonium spp, among others (Calderari et al., 2013, Gonçalves et al., 2012, Olsen et al., 2008, Freire et al., 2000, Bayman et al., 2002, Reis et al., 2012) and A. bertholletius a new species described recently, belonging to A. section Flavi (Taniwaki et al., 2012). More recently a new species of Penicillium named P. excelsum was also isolated from Brazil nuts and its ecosystem (Taniwaki et al., 2015).
Over the last few decades, molecular studies have proven to be a valuable tool for identification of fungi. The application of molecular techniques has helped to overcome problems of the traditional methods and have revealed the existence of a much larger number of species than was known previously, many of them not yet identified or formally accepted. Besides that, the molecular identification is often faced with the limitation of sequences deposited in databases such as NCBI and MycoBank, which cannot contemplate all Brazilian fungal biodiversity. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the mycobiota of Brazil nuts from the Amazon rainforest to consumer, using traditional methods for identification and, when available, molecular techniques and production of extrolites from the isolates as a tool for species identification. Additionally, the potential for mycotoxin and other metabolite production was analyzed for species in A. section Flavi and A. section Nigri.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Sampling. A total of 172 Brazil nut samples (114 in shell and 58 shelled), each of approximately 2 Kg, was collected at different stages of: rainforest (57 samples in pods), street markets (54 samples, of which 32 were in shell and 22 shelled), processing at the manufacturing plants (40 samples, of which 21 in shell and 19 shelled) and supermarkets (21 samples, of which 4 in shell and 17 shelled). In the Amazon rainforest which corresponds to Amazonas and Pará states, around 5 pods of Brazil
Results
Mycobiota of Brazil nuts. A huge diversity of fungi was found in several samples throughout the Brazil nut production chain, collected in the rainforest, processing plants, street markets and supermarkets. The frequency of occurrence, the average infection rate, the range of infection and the water activity of the kernel and shell samples are shown in Table 1, Table 2, respectively. The water activity average in samples of Brazil nut kernels ranged from 0.956 in the rainforest to 0.482 in the
Discussion
Because Brazil nuts come from the Amazon rainforest, most common good agricultural practices do not apply during harvesting when pods are falling down from the 30–60 m high trees. The pods can remain in contact with soil for long periods in the humid tropical forest until they are collected. During this period microorganism proliferation will take place and fungal infection may occur because of the porosity of the shells and the pods, or through the action of insects, birds and other physical
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, (MAPA, Process 578485/2008-7) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Process 2011/50136-0).
References (34)
- et al.
Microbiological and aflatoxin evaluation of Brazil nut pods and the effects of unit processing operations
J. Food Prot.
(2005) - et al.
Mycoflora and mycotoxins in field samples of Brazil nuts
Food Control
(2012) - et al.
Polyphasic approach to the identification of Aspergillus section Flavi isolated from Brazil nuts
Food Chem.
(2013) - et al.
The biodiversity of Aspergillus section Flavi in Brazil nuts: from rainforest to consumer
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(2013) - et al.
Moulds in food spoilage
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(1996) - et al.
Standardized high performance liquid chromatography of 182 mycotoxins and other fungal metabolites based on alkylphenone retention indices and UV-VIS spectra (diode array detection)
J. Chromatogr. A
(1987) - et al.
Brazil nuts are subject to infection with B and G aflatoxin-producing fungus, Aspergillus pseudonomius
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(2014) - et al.
Mycobiota and mycotoxins in Brazil nut samples from different states of the Brazilian Amazon region
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(2012) - et al.
Mycobiota and mycotoxins of almonds and chestnuts with special reference to aflatoxins
Food Res. Int.
(2012) - et al.
Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus
Stud. Mycol.
(2014)
Two new aflatoxin producing species, and an overview of Aspergillus section Flavi
Stud. Mycol.
Aspergillus on tree nuts
Mycopathologia
Fungos contaminates e produtores de aflatoxinas em castanhas do Pará (Bertholletia excelsa HUMB & BONPL 1808)
Acta Amazon
Mycoflora and mycotoxins in Brazilian black pepper, white pepper and Brazil nuts
Mycopathologia
Association of moulds to foods
Molecular analysis of Aspergillus section Flavi isolated from Brazil nuts
World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
Association of morphology and mycotoxin production with vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. tamarii
Mycologia
Cited by (18)
Assessment of early harvest in the prevention of aflatoxins in peanuts during drought stress conditions
2023, International Journal of Food MicrobiologyEffect of controlled atmosphere, vacuum packaging and different temperatures on the growth of spoilage fungi in shelled pecan nuts during storage
2021, Food ControlCitation Excerpt :The consumption of foods such as nuts (fresh or processed), although nutritionally important, may result in human exposure to mycotoxins, especially aflatoxins (Cunha et al., 2018; RASFF, 2019). Aflatoxins are secondary metabolism products of several fungi, such as Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus nomius, Aspergillus pseudonomius, Aspergillus pseudotamarii, among others (Frisvad et al., 2019; Massi et al., 2014; Pitt & Hocking, 2009, p. 524; Taniwaki et al., 2017). Fungal contamination can occur during plant development by plant pathogens, especially at harvest, since the nuts are commonly manually collected from the ground.
Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid against Aspergillus nomius in Brazil nuts
2020, Food MicrobiologyCitation Excerpt :Among the main contaminants of Brazil nuts is Aspergillus nomius, a fungus belonging to the Flavi section, with potential to produce four types of aflatoxins (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2) (Olsen et al., 2008; Moore et al., 2015; Taniwaki et al., 2017). Aflatoxins (AFs) are a group of extremely toxic and carcinogenic secondary metabolites that can contaminate foodstuffs in the field, during storage or after processing (Arrus et al., 2005; Baquião et al., 2012; Taniwaki et al., 2017). Therefore, the development of methods to reduce the growth of aflatoxigenic fungi and thus the production of aflatoxins is of interest to industry and public health authorities, to reduce consumption of nuts not submitted to a validated conservation process (ICMSF, 2015).
Fungal communities in rice cultivated in different Brazilian agroclimatic zones: From field to market
2020, Food MicrobiologyCitation Excerpt :A. amstelodami), A. chevalieri, P. citrinum and Penicillium spp., and also other species such as Aspergillus parasiticus, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus ornatus, A. terreus and Penicillium funiculosum. Xerophilic Aspergillus species formerly classified in Eurotium are able to grow at water activities lower than 0.75 (Pitt, 1975; Marin et al., 1998; Pitt and Hocking, 2009; Taniwaki et al., 2017). A. penicillioides one of the most xerophilic fungi known (Stevenson et al., 2017), was found in 4 and 11% of samples from markets in wetland and dryland, respectively.
Taxonomy of Aspergillus section Flavi and their production of aflatoxins, ochratoxins and other mycotoxins
2019, Studies in MycologyCitation Excerpt :For example, A. minisclerotigenes has been found mostly in South America (Pildain et al. 2008), while A. aflatoxiformans, A. cerealis and A. austwickii, reported as A. flavus SBG, are most common in Africa and Thailand (Probst et al. 2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, Mutegi et al. 2012, Guezlane-Tebibel et al. 2013). Interestingly, many of the (recently) described species producing mycotoxins have been found in foods and are quite common: A. aflatoxiformans (also reported under its synonym A. parvisclerotigenus) (in African corn, Perrone et al. 2014a,b; Mexican and Nigerian sesame, Ezekiel et al. 2014, this study; edible mushrooms, Ezekiel et al. 2013b; peanut, Frisvad et al. 2005), A. arachidicola (in wild peanuts, Pildain et al. 2008; in Brazil nuts, Gonçalves et al. 2012a,b, Calderari et al. 2013, Taniwaki et al. 2017; in corn, Viaro et al. 2017), A. austwickii (stored rice grains and sesame kernels, this study), A. caelatus (in Brazil nuts, Gonçalves et al. 2012a,b, Taniwaki et al. 2017; in peanuts, Guezlane-Tebibel et al. 2013, Martins et al. 2017), A. cerealis (rice and maize grains, this study; peanut, Carvajal-Campos et al. 2017), A. luteovirescens (in Brazil nuts, Gonçalves et al. 2012a,b, Calderari et al. 2013, Taniwaki et al. 2017), A. nomius (in Brazil nuts, Olsen et al. 2008, Gonçalves et al. 2012a,b, Calderari et al. 2013, Massi et al. 2014, Taniwaki et al. 2017; in cocoa Copetti et al. 2011), A. pseudonomius (in Brazil nuts, Massi et al. 2014, Taniwaki et al. 2017) and to a lesser extent A. novoparasiticus (in corn, Viaro et al. 2017), A. pseudocaelatus (in corn, Viaro et al. 2017; in Brazil nuts, Taniwaki et al. 2017), and A. pseudotamarii (in Brazil nuts, Calderari et al. 2013, Taniwaki et al. 2017). Originally, A. pseudotamarii was found in tea field soil (Ito et al. 2001), A. luteovirescens in silkworm environments (Peterson et al. 2001), A. nomius in bees and in soil and silkworm excrements (Kurtzman et al. 1987, Ito et al. 1998), and A. novoparasiticus as a clinical isolate (Gonçalves et al. 2012a,b).