Elsevier

Flora

Volume 248, November 2018, Pages 76-86
Flora

Structural variation among leaves in Aechmea distichantha Lem. (Bromeliaceae) rosettes, considering apical and basal differences

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2018.08.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Anatomical features may define positive strategies for water acquisition and storage.

  • The degree of methyl-esterification of pectins in bromeliad leaves, at different positions along the rosette, can maximize water storage.

  • The water storage tissue has higher plasticity index than other leaf tissues at different positions along the rosette.

  • Cell elongation and elasticity depend on the maintenance of HGAs with high methyl-esterified in water storage tissue.

Abstract

In tank-dependent bromeliads, leaves may exhibit anatomical and functional differences along the apical and basal regions, or according to the different positions in the rosette. Thus, the apical region of the leaf may invest in photosynthetic tissues, while the basal one invests in structures for water and nutrient storage. We suppose here, that differences among the tissue functions are strongly related to anatomical traits, especially the degree of methyl-esterification of pectins in the cell walls, at different positions along the rosette. Thus, the aims of this study were to quantify anatomical variations and describe the pectin composition of the cell wall, along the Aechmea distichantha Lem. rosette, to assess how the different tissues varied. We found that the water storage tissue showed higher variation between the apex and the base of the leaves than the other tissues, with higher expansion between the fourth leaf in development and the outer leaf in the rosette. Moreover, its cells were intensely labeled for epitopes of high methyl-esterified HGs, recognize by JIM7 antibody. The presence of pectin with high methyl-esterified groups in water storage tissue provides greater cell wall elasticity. The chlorenchyma showed the lowest Relative Distance Plasticity Index values, and its development in A. distichantha seems to occur early, in a very young leaf and inside the rosette tank.

Introduction

Among the Brazilian plant physiognomy, the campo rupestre vegetation stands out for the great diversity of species and remarkable heterogeneity of habitats (Conceição et al., 2007; Jacobi et al.,2007). In this habitat, rocky outcrops with low availability of nutrients and water determine a great diversity of xeromorphic species (Porembski, 2007), including tank-dependent bromeliads (Rapini et al., 2008; Takahashi and Mercier, 2011). The tanks are made up by densely overlapping leaf bases (rosette), where water and organic compounds are absorbed by absorptive foliar trichomes (peltate scales) and stored in specialized water storage tissues (Benzing, 1976, 2000; Givnish et al., 2014; Males and Griffiths, 2017; Popp et al., 2003; Schmidt and Zotz, 2001). The peltate scales are the most notable and adaptive feature in bromeliads and replace the water uptake role of the root system (Benzing, 1976, 2000; Tomlinson, 1969). In tank-dependent bromeliads, leaves may exhibit anatomical and functional differences along the apical and basal regions (Freschi et al., 2010) or according to different positions in the rosette, which should be determinant for bromeliad adaptation. In general, the apical region of the leaf invests in photosynthetic tissues, while the basal one invests in structures for water and nutrient storage (Freschi et al., 2010; Schmidt and Zotz, 2001). However, there are no studies that quantify the anatomical variations between the apex and the base of leaves at different positions in the rosette.

In addition to anatomical organization, the cell structure may define positive strategies for water acquisition and storage. During plant organ development or environmental condition variations, the cell walls are continually assembled, disassembled, and deformed (Caffall and Mohnen, 2009; Palin and Geitmann, 2012). The pectic constitution of the cell wall is dynamic, and functionally associated with primary tissue functions. Pectin is one of the most abundant components in cell wall matrix, constituting up to 35% of the primary walls of non-grass monocots (Jones et al., 1997; Mohnen, 2008). It is structurally and functionally the most complex polysaccharide (Palin and Geitmann, 2012), with a significant impact on the physico-chemical properties of the cell matrix (Mohnen, 2008). Pectins form a heterogeneous group of rich galacturonic acid polysaccharides (Cosgrove, 1997) that may occur in three main domains: rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I), rhamnogalacturonan II (RG-II), and homogalacturonans (HGs) (Albersheim et al., 2011; Pérez et al., 2003; Ridley et al., 2001; Willats et al., 2001). HGs is the most abundant in the primary cell wall matrix of land plants (Ridley et al., 2001; Willats et al., 2001), representing 60% of the total pectins (Mohnen, 2008; O’Neill et al., 1990). They are synthesized in the high methyl-esterified form (Palin and Geitmann, 2012), and can be modified to the low methyl-esterified form during plant development (Xiao and Anderson, 2013). The process of methyl-esterification changes the functionality of pectins in the cell wall and, consequently, affects tissue function (Albersheim et al., 2011). However, few studies address the variation in cell wall pectin during leaf development, especially in monocots (Carpita, 1984, 1989; Yapo, 2010).

Differences in the degree of pectins methyl-esterification in bromeliad leaves, at different positions along the rosette, can maximize water storage in the water storage tissue. Herein, we investigated tissue variations, including immunocytochemical changes of the cell wall along the Aechmea distichantha Lem. rosette. Histometric variations and changes in cell wall composition, between the apex and base of leaves at different positions in the rosette, drive the major questions of this study: (a) Are there structural differences between proximal and distal leaves of bromeliad tanks? (b) Considering different positions along the A. distichantha rosette, and between apex and base positions, which leaf tissues are more plastic? (c) What is the magnitude of these differences?

Section snippets

Study system

The study was carried out in the National Park of Serra da Canastra (S20°08′ 16.1′'W46°47′18.2′'), Sacramento city, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The park is in the Cerrado biome, and most of its area is covered by grassland formations or rocky outcrops (MMA/IBAMA, 2005). Along the rocky outcrops, Aechmea distichantha (Bromeliaceae) occurs as a lithophytic species (Fig. 1A), with prominent tanks formed by the leaf bases overlapping in the rosette. The leaves are succulent, slightly green to reddish on

Structural analysis

At the L1 (inner leaf) apex and base, both leaf surfaces were covered by peltate scales whose shields were slightly elevated on the leaf surface (Fig. 2A–E). The scale senescence began at the apex of L4 (intermediate leaf) and occurred until the fall of the shield (Fig. 2F–G). At the leaf base the scales were still complete (Fig. 2H–I). On L8 (outer leaf), the shields of the scales, when still there, were fully sustained on the leaf blade (Fig. 2J). The leaves were hypostomatic and the stomata

Discussion

Several species of bromeliads are adapted to xeric environments, and thus invested in adaptive structures that facilitate water absorption and storage in their tissues, such as the formation of tanks, the presence of peltate scales and water storage tissues (Benzing, 2000). The compartmentalization of functions in the leaf apex-base regions, and the dependence on the leaf position in the rosette has been evaluated in some bromeliad species (Proença and Sajo, 2004; Souza and Neves, 1996).

Conclusion

Herein, we showed that in the leaves of A. distichantha the water storage tissue has higher variation than other leaf tissues, mostly because of the differences of cell elongation and elasticity. However, cell elongation and elasticity depend on the maintenance of pectins with high methyl-esterified groups in the cell wall, as we demonstrate here. Besides that, the water storage tissue has the higher variation between the apex and base, showing that the primary function of water storage is

Funding

This work was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES [MH scholarship 2015/2016]; FAPEMIG; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq (for a scholarship granted to D.C. Oliveira).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dra. Rafaela Forzza and Dr. Leonardo Melo Versieux, for plant species determination. They also thank the Laboratório Multiusuário de Microscopia de Alta Resolução (LaBMic) for ultrastructural analysis.

References (55)

  • B. Ridley et al.

    Pectin: structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalcturonide-related signaling

    Phytochemistry

    (2001)
  • C.A. Takahashi et al.

    Nitrogen metabolism in leaves of a tank epiphytic bromeliad: characterization of a spatial and functional division

    J. Plant Physiol.

    (2011)
  • B.M. Yapo

    Improvement of the compositional quality of monocot pectin extracts contaminated with glucuronic acid-containing components using a step-wise purification procedure

    Food Bioprod. Process.

    (2010)
  • G. Zotz et al.

    How much water is in the tank? Model calculations for two epiphytic Bromeliads

    Ann. Bot.

    (1999)
  • P. Albersheim et al.

    Plant Cell Walls: From Chemistry to Biology

    (2011)
  • D.H. Benzing

    Bromeliad trichomes: structure, function and ecological significance

    Selbyana

    (1976)
  • D.H. Benzing

    Bromeliaceae: Profile of an Adaptive Radiation

    (2000)
  • L. Brighigna et al.

    Structural characteristics of mesophyll in some Tillandsia species

    Phytomorphology

    (1984)
  • N.C. Carpita

    Cell wall development in maize coleoptiles

    Plant Physiol.

    (1984)
  • M.H. Clausen et al.

    A monoclonal antibody to feruloyated-(1→4)-β-D-galactan

    Planta

    (2004)
  • A.A. Conceição et al.

    Floristics, structure and soil of insular vegetation in four quartzite-sandstone outcrops of "Chapada Diamantina", Northeast Brazil

    Braz. J. Bot.

    (2007)
  • D. Cosgrove

    Assembly and enlargement of the primary cell wall in plants

    Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (1997)
  • W.C. Dickison

    Integrative Plant Anatomy

    (2000)
  • A. Fahn et al.

    Xerophytes. Encyclopedia of Plant Taxonomy

    (1992)
  • E.M. Herman et al.

    Arabinogalactan-rich glycoproteins are localized on the cell surface and in intravacuolar multivesicular bodies

    Plant Physiol.

    (1992)
  • C.M. Jacobi et al.

    Plant communities on ironstone outcrops: a diverse and endangered Brazilian ecosystem

    Biodivers. Conserv.

    (2007)
  • D.A. Johansen

    Plant Microtechnique

    (1940)
  • View full text