Elsevier

Fisheries Research

Volume 209, January 2019, Pages 67-74
Fisheries Research

Genetic evidence for regional philopatry of the Bull Shark (Carcharhinus leucas), to nursery areas in estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico and western North Atlantic ocean

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Nursery areas are critical zones for the reproductive and biological cycle of Bull shark.

  • Differences in mtDNA and homogeneity in nuclear DNA was found for juveniles among nurseries.

  • Genetic results suggest female philopatry for explaining the genetic differences observed.

  • No genetic differences for adults were found with any genetic marker.

  • Results relay need for effective management of nursery habitats for bull shark. populations.

Abstract

Nursery areas are critical for the reproductive cycle and biological requirements of Bull Sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) as they increase the survival of populations. Females tend to be philopatric to these areas as documented in estuaries from Australia, and inferred in the northern Gulf of Mexico and western North Atlantic Ocean, but not yet confirmed in these regions. In coastal waters of the southeastern United States, several sites have been proposed as nurseries for the Bull Shark, but little is known about how adult females utilize these areas during parturition. Philopatry for the Bull Shark was evaluated by comparing sequences of the mitochondrial DNA control-region (mtDNA-CR) and 8 microsatellite loci in juveniles and neonates from four previously reported nursery areas in United States (US) coastal waters; three in the northern Gulf of Mexico (Texas, Louisiana and Charlotte Harbor, Florida) and one in the western North Atlantic Ocean (Indian River Lagoon, Florida). A group of adult individuals from the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean off the southeastern US were used to test genetic differences owed to limited gene flow between both regions. The analysis of genetic variation with the mtDNA-CR showed no differences among nurseries within the Gulf but significant differences when comparing the nursery areas of the two regions (Gulf vs Atlantic). In contrast, genetic homogeneity was observed among nursery areas within and between regions with the nuclear microsatellites suggesting male biased dispersal among regions. In addition, adult individuals from each of these two broad regions (Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean) showed no significant differentiation with any of the markers characterized in this study. These patterns of genetic differences support evidence for philopatry, further relaying the importance of protection and effective management of critical nursery habitats for future conservation of the species.

Introduction

The Bull Shark is a cosmopolitan coastal species with late sexual maturation and a long pregnancy (∼10–11 months; Compagno, 1984) that uses estuarine and freshwater nursery areas to enhance its survival (Curtis et al., 2011; Heupel and Simpfendorfer, 2011). Offspring typically inhabit these areas for extended periods of time (Thorburn and Rowland, 2008; Curtis et al., 2011) away from most predators, and with suitable prey availability. Regional philopatry for females has been documented in nurseries from Australia (Tillett et al., 2012), and used (although not strictly confirmed) to explain genetic differences between samples from the northern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic (Karl et al. 2011). This evidence highlights the importance of properly characterizing the nursery areas for Bull Sharks throughout its worldwide range.

In coastal waters of the southeastern United States, multiple sites have been proposed as nursery areas for the Bull Shark based on studies that aimed to unravel the dynamics of neonates and juveniles within the estuaries they inhabit. These nurseries include estuaries along the coasts of Florida, Louisiana and Texas (Simpfendorfer et al., 2005; Curtis et al., 2011; Blackburn et al., 2007; Froeschke et al., 2010a,b), but little is known about how adult females utilize these areas while giving birth, since the number of tagged adults in these areas is very low (Carlson et al., 2010; Brunnschweiler et al., 2010) and there is only one genetic study that characterized Bull Shark samples from different localities in the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic (Karl et al., 2011). To date, the genetic variability of juveniles among the different nursery areas found along the southeastern coast of the US is unknown, but differences in catches based on the analysis of fisheries data (Curtis et al. 2011) together with the potential philopatry of females towards birthing areas, suggest the possibility that genetic differences may exist.

Nursery areas are critical zones where gravid females of coastal shark species give birth and where their young spend their initial period of life which may last from a few weeks up to several years in length (Castro, 1993). Such sites are identified because of the remarkable abundance of neonate/juveniles, long residence times, and repeated use as compared to nearby non-nursery areas (Heupel et al., 2007). Additionally, females of several shark species (e.g. Lemon Shark Negaprion brevirostris; Blacktip Shark Carcharhinus limbatus; Scalloped Hammerhead Sphyrna lewini, and Sandbar Shark Carcharhinus plumbeus) tend to display philopatric behaviour to specific sites which are also used as birthing areas (Hueter, 1998; Hueter et al., 2005; Chapman et al., 2015). Regional philopatry in the present study is classified as the repeated utilization of a specific nursery region by adults for reproduction, but not necessarily to a specific birthing area within that region (see Chapman et al., 2015).

In general, philopatry would result in genetic differences between sites at a regional scale whereas for specific (or natal) philopatry these differences would be at small scales (Tillett et al., 2012, Feldheim et al., 2014) for the maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA haplotypes. However such differences may not be replicated by characterizing biparentally inherited nuclear DNA loci, as has been reported for many marine species (Rassmann et al.,1997; Lyrholm et al., 1999; Pardini et al., 2001; Engelhaupt et al., 2009), including an increasing number of shark species known to display philopatric behaviour in some regions (Hueter et al., 2005; Chapman et al., 2015), such as the Bull Shark Carcharhinus leucas (Karl et al., 2011; Tillett et al., 2012), the Blacktip Shark Carcharhinus limbatus (Keeney et al., 2005) and the Scalloped Hammerhead Sphyrna lewini (Chapman et al., 2009).

Sharks tend to be species with low reproductive potential due to late maturity and low fecundity and are more likely to suffer severe population reductions caused by overfishing, habitat degradation and other factors (Musick et al., 2000; Dulvy et al. 2014). Many shark species currently lack data regarding key biological parameters, fisheries landings, and population status that are required to design effective conservation strategies. An estimated one-quarter of the world’s chondrichthyan fishes (including sharks, rays, skates, and chimaeras) are classified as threatened (Dulvy et al., 2014). To safeguard the survival of shark species, it is necessary to develop directed conservation strategies that include measures to protect vulnerable early life-history stages. Accordingly, the proper identification, delineation, and management of nursery areas are crucial for the conservation of the species that use them (Heithaus, 2007).

Significant commercial and recreational fisheries for carcharhinid sharks, including Bull Sharks, have occurred in US Atlantic waters for many decades but increased in the mid-1980’s. Bull Sharks typically represent a small percentage of total large coastal shark landings in the US Atlantic, however landings of this species can be variable (Morgan et al., 2009; NMFS, 2012). The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has categorized the Bull Shark as "Near Threatened" worldwide. Fisheries-dependent data infer an estimated 12% increase in relative abundance of Bull Sharks in the western North Atlantic from 1994 to 2009 (Carlson et al., 2012) and increased juvenile abundance in estuarine waters of Texas (Froeschke et al., 2010a,b), although local population decreases have also been reported (O’Connell et al., 2007). The stock status of this species in US waters is not known (NMFS, 2006).

In order to evaluate the hypothesis of philopatric behaviour for female Bull Sharks in the northern Gulf of Mexico and US Atlantic waters, the genetic divergence among sites was compared using mtDNA-CR sequences and nuclear DNA microsatellite markers, in samples of immature individuals from four different nursery areas and also verified the genetic signal for adults in adjacent offshore waters. Our sampling design and methodological approach provides evidence of philopatry toward nurseries as the most probable explanation of the genetic differences we observed.

Section snippets

Sample collection and DNA extraction

Tissue samples (fin clips and muscle) from a total of 175 Bull Shark specimens were collected (Fig. 1), with 139 of these from neonates or small juveniles (immature sharks) obtained of four different nurseries within two main regions in US waters; three in the northern Gulf of Mexico at Sabine Lake, Texas (Tex: n = 37); Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana (Lou: n = 28); and Charlotte Harbor, Florida (CH; n = 42) and one in the western North Atlantic Ocean within the Indian River Lagoon, Florida (IRL;

Gene diversity

An 826 base pairs (bp) fragment from the mtDNA-CR was obtained for 139 immature individuals containing eight polymorphic sites featuring seven transitions and one transversion that resulted in 10 haplotypes for samples in nursery areas (Table 1). The mean haplotype and nucleotide diversity was low (Hd = 0.62 ± 0.013; π = 0.0011 ± 0.0008), with all nursery locations displaying similar values (range from 0.50 to 0.66). For regional locations composed entirely of adults (n = 36), samples from the

Gene diversity

Genetic variation estimated with mtDNA-CR was relatively low for haplotypic (Hd = 0.59) and nucleotide (π = 0.001) diversity, respectively. For microsatellites the levels of variation differed across loci; with higher values for the non-specific markers compared to those loci isolated for the Bull Shark, that include Cl17, that was nearly monomorphic, except for locations CH, Tex and Lou (Supplementary table S1). This result is not in agreement with what Pirog et al. (2015) reported at marker (

Conclusion

Many shark species, including the Bull Shark, currently lack critical data regarding genetics and population status that are required to design appropriate fisheries conservation strategies. In this study we detected a pattern of female philopatry for the Bull shark to nursery areas within estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico and western North Atlantic Ocean. The genetic differences in mtDNA-CR sequences coupled with genetic homogeneity exhibited by microsatellite nuclear DNA between juvenile

Funding

This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México (CONACYT Project 253381); and Programa de Apoyos a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica PAPIIT, UNAM, México (Project IN208112). Sample collection for this study was supported in part by funding from the Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration (Project F-43); and by State of Florida Saltwater Recreational Fishing License monies. NSLA would like to

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to scientists from FWC-FWRI’s Fisheries-Independent Monitoring Program for collecting bull sharks for this study. We greatly appreciate bull shark fin clips provided by Jonathan Davis of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Matt Scripter of Florida Institute of Technology, Eric Reyier of Kennedy Space Center Ecological Program, and by Cape Canaveral Scientific. We are grateful also to Brett Falterman of the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, and Erica Atkins from the

References (64)

  • D.H. Adams et al.

    Preliminary assessment of a neashore nursery ground for the scalloped hammerhead off the Atlantic Coast of Florida

    (2007)
  • F.W. Allendorf et al.

    Use of allelic frequencies to describe population structure

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1981)
  • J.C. Avise

    Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species

    (2000)
  • C.W. Bangley et al.

    Increased abundance and nursery habitat use of the bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas) in response to a changing environment in a warm-temperate estuary

    Sci. Rep.

    (2018)
  • Y. Benjamini et al.

    The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency

    Ann. Stat.

    (2001)
  • J.K. Blackburn et al.

    Delineation of bull shark nursery areas in the inland and coastal waters of Louisiana

    Am. Fish. Soc. Symp.

    (2007)
  • J.M. Brunnschweiler et al.

    Oceans apart? Short-term movements and behaviour of adult bull sharks Carcharhinus leucas in Atlantic and Pacific oceans determined from pop-off satellite archival tagging

    J. Fish. Biol.

    (2010)
  • J.K. Carlson et al.

    Habitat use and movement patterns of bull sharks Carcharhinus leucas determined using pop-up satellite archival tags

    J. Fish. Biol.

    (2010)
  • J.K. Carlson et al.

    Relative abundance and size of coastal sharks derived from commercial shark longline catch and effort data

    J. Fish. Biol.

    (2012)
  • J.I. Castro

    The sharks nursery of Bulls Bay, South Carolina, with a review of the shark nurseries of the south-western coast of the United States

    Environ. Biol. Fishes

    (1993)
  • D.D. Chapman et al.

    Tracking the fin trade: genetic stock identification in western Atlantic scalloped hammerhead sharks Sphyrna lewini

    Endanger. Species Res.

    (2009)
  • D.D. Chapman et al.

    There and Back again: a review of residency and return migrations in sharks, with implications for population structure and management

    Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci.

    (2015)
  • L.J.V. Compagno

    FAO species catalogue. Vol. 4

    Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 2 – Carcharhiniformes

    (1984)
  • T.H. Curtis et al.

    Seasonal distribution and habitat associations of bull sharks in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida: a 30-year synthesis

    Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.

    (2011)
  • C.L. Dudgeon et al.

    A review of the application of molecular genetics for fisheries management and conservation of sharks and rays

    J. Fish. Biol.

    (2012)
  • N.K. Dulvy et al.

    Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays

    Elife

    (2014)
  • D.A. Earl et al.

    STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method

    Conserv. Genet. Resour.

    (2012)
  • D. Engelhaupt et al.

    Female philopatry in coastal basins and male dispersion across the North Atlantic in a highly mobile marine species, the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus)

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • L. Excoffier et al.

    An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis

    Mol. Ecol. Resour.

    (2010)
  • K.A. Feldheim et al.

    Two decades of genetic profiling yields first evidence of natal philopatry and long-term fidelity to parturition sites in sharks

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • P. Feutry et al.

    Whole mitogenome sequencing refines population structure of the critically endangered sawfish Pristis pristis

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2015)
  • P. Feutry et al.

    Inferring contemporary and historical genetic connectivity from juveniles

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2017)
  • J.R. Freeland

    Molecular Ecology

    (2005)
  • J. Froeschke et al.

    Environmental influences on the occurrence of coastal sharks in estuarine waters

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2010)
  • J.T. Froeschke et al.

    An empirical test of the “shark nursery area concept” in Texas bays using a long-term fisheries-independent data set

    Aquat. Biol.

    (2010)
  • FWC (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission)

    Florida Saltwater Recreational Fishing Regulations

    (2018)
  • T.A. Hall

    BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT

    Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.

    (1999)
  • M.R. Heithaus

    Nursery areas as essential shark habitats: a theoretical perspective

    Am. Fish. Soc.

    (2007)
  • M.R. Heupel et al.

    Estuarine nursery areas provide a low-mortality environment for young bull sharks Carcharhinus leucas

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2011)
  • M.R. Heupel et al.

    Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2007)
  • R.E. Hueter

    Bycatch and Catch-Release Mortality of Small Sharks and Associated Fishes in the Estuarine Nursery Grounds of Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor. Final Report

    (1994)
  • R.E. Hueter

    Philopatry, natal homing and localised stock depletion in sharks

    Shark News

    (1998)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Reliance of young sharks on threatened estuarine habitats for nutrition implies susceptibility to climate change

      2022, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The effects of ocean warming upon ectotherm elasmobranch physiology are expected to differ in relation to species-specific traits such as body size and habitat use, with greatest predicted negative effects upon swimming performance for juveniles restricted to nursery areas (Lear et al., 2019). Some marine predators, including bull sharks, exhibit reproductive philopatry with females returning to known nursery areas giving birth to their young (Klein et al., 2019; Laurrabaquio-A et al., 2019; Tillett et al., 2012). In the northern Atlantic, female bull sharks have been found to make use of the warmer temperatures promoted by climate change to give birth in new estuaries further north (Bangley et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text