Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 174, 15 March 2015, Pages 48-54
Field Crops Research

Potassium management in potato production in Northwest region of China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Potassium increased tuber yield, enhanced commercial rate, mean tuber weight and starch content, reduced sugar content.

  • In nearly 80% of the trials soil K was negative balance at current K application levels.

  • The critical level of soil exchangeable K at 90% relative yield was 105 mg kg−1.

  • Potassium could be recommended by relationships between yield response and agronomic efficiency and between uptake K and yield.

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to study response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L) yield and quality to potassium (K) application, soil indigenous K supply (IKS) and productivity (IKP), K use efficiency and critical level of soil test K to establish scientific methods for K management in potato production. Results indicated that K application increased tuber yield by a range of −2.8 to 7.2 Mg ha−1 with an average of 3.2 Mg ha−1, 90% positive responses. Potassium application produced an average of 4.9 percentage more commercial rate, 11.3 g more mean tuber weight and 0.4 percentage more tuber starch content and 0.2 percentage less tuber sugar content than those of treatment without K application. The average agronomic efficiency of potassium (AEK) was 30.2 kg tuber kg−1 K2O, 56% observations was in 10–40 kg tuber kg−1 K2O. 79.2% of the observations showed negative K balance in potato fields with an average of 101.7 kg K ha−1 deficit. 87.5% of all the observations showed positive benefit from K application with an average return of US$715 ha−1. The average IKS and IKP was 141.8 kg K ha−1 and 25.9 Mg ha−1 which can be explained 25% and 30% of variations, respectively, by soil exchangeable K. Significant negative quadratic relationship (R2 = 0.75, P < 0.01) between yield response and relative yield, and significant linear relationship (R2 = 0.80, P < 0.01) between yield response and AEK were obtained. There was a significant relationship (R2 = 0.74, P < 0.01) between total uptake K by potato plant and total tuber yield. The critical level of soil exchangeable K at 90% relative yield was 105 mg kg−1 which can be a reference for K recommendation.

Introduction

Potato is one of the main vegetable crops. China is now the world's largest potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) producer and the output has reached 93 million tons in 2012. The Northwest region of China is the main potato production region with a planting area of nearly 2 million ha and a total tuber production of 29 million tons, accounting for 36% and 31% of total area and production in China, respectively.

Potato is high K requirement crop. It takes up K in quantities much greater than those of N and P (Panagiotopoulos, 1995). On an average, potato removed about 91 kg K2O ha−1 at the yield of 29 Mg ha−1 (Moinuddin et al., 2005). Duan et al. (2013) found that the average uptake of K by rainfed potato and irrigated potato in Inner Mongolia of China was 82.2 and 221.7 kg K2O ha−1 at the yield of 14.9 and 35.7 Mg ha−1, respectively. Potassium is a quality element. The positive effect of K fertilization is greater on tuber quality than on yield (Kavvadias et al., 2012). Potassium is partially responsible for light-colored chips characteristic through a positive influence on lowering the sugar, amino acid, and tyrosine content in potatoes, which tend to darken the chips (Wilcox et al., 1968, Cummings and Wilcox, 1968). It also plays an important role for maintaining tone and vigor of the plants.

Farmers traditionally applied nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizers but neglected K fertilizer in potato production of Northwestern China, due to a conception of sufficient soil K in this region. As a result, potato plants acquired K from native soil, leading to mining of soil K reserves and decrease of soil K supply, adversely affected tuber yields/quality (Khan et al., 2012). There is great potential to improve both yield and quality of potato to a great extent with balanced use of N, P and K. However, farmers did not know how much K should be applied due to lack of scientific information and method for K recommendations.

The commonly used methods for K recommendations for crops are based on soil testing and sometimes can be used effectively for guiding fertilizer applications (Hannan et al., 2011), but the critical level of soil test K should be determined. The alternative way is to make fertilizer recommendation based on yield response and agronomic efficiency, which was successfully used in fertilizer recommendation for wheat and maize (Chuan et al., 2013, Xu et al., 2014). Another method for K recommendation is based on K balance in soil plant systems and the recommended rate of K should be at least the amount of K removed by crop products.

However, information on yield/quality response to K application, K use efficiency, soil K supply and productivity, the relationship between potato tuber yield and plant uptake K and the critical level of soil test K in potato systems are not available. The purpose of this study is to: (1) determine agronomic and economic response of potato to K application, (2) determine supply capacity of soil K and the critical level of soil test K, (3) establish scientific basis for K recommendation for potato production.

Section snippets

Field trials

Total of 192 field trials were conducted in farm's fields during 2003–2013 in Inner Mongolia, Gansu, Qinghai and Ningxia provinces, the main potato production regions in Northwest China. The sites and number of trials were listed in Table 1. Each trial had two treatments: (1) Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK); (2) Nitrogen and phosphorus (NP). The amount of N, P2O5 and K2O applied was recommended based on Agro Services International (ASI) systematic approach (Hunter, 1980, Portch and

Tuber yield response to K application

Potassium application significantly (P < 0.001) affected tuber yield compared with treatments without K fertilization (Table 3). The average yield response was 3.2 Mg ha−1 with a range from −2.8 to 7.2 Mg ha−1. Frequency distribution indicated that about 90% of the trials showed positive response to K application and 44.8% (n = 192) was less than 2 Mg ha−1, 36.5% was in 2–4 Mg ha−1 and 18.8% was more than 5 Mg ha−1 (Fig. 1a). Other studies also showed significant tuber yield response to K fertilization (

Conclusions

Application of K fertilizer increased potato tuber yield in 90% of the observations by an average of 3.2 Mg ha−1, increased commercial tuber rate, mean tuber weight and starch content, reduced sugar content. The average AEK was 30.2 kg tuber kg−1 K2O and the average net income through K application was US$ 715 ha−1. At current K application levels, soil K was mined in nearly 80% of the observations. Soil exchangeable K could explain 25% and 30% of variation for IKS and IKP. There were significant

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) for the financial support. The Contribution of Professor Li Youhong from Ningxia Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Professor Chen Zhanquan from Qinghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences are greatly appreciated.

References (35)

  • L. Chuan et al.

    Establishing a scientific basis for fertilizer recommendations for wheat in China: yield response and agronomic efficiency

    Field Crops Res.

    (2013)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Fertilizer recommendation for maize in China based on yield response and agronomic efficiency

    Field Crops Res.

    (2014)
  • A.H. AbdelGadir et al.

    The effect of different levels of additional potassium on yield and industrial qualities of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in an irrigated arid region

    Am. J. Potato Res.

    (2003)
  • G.A. Cummings et al.

    Effect of potassium on quality factors-fruits and vegetables

  • J.R. Davenport et al.

    Does potassium fertilizer form, source, and time of application influence potato yield and quality in Columbia basin?

    Am. J. Potato Res.

    (2001)
  • Y. Duan et al.

    Response of potato to fertilizer application and nutrient use efficiency in Inner Mongolia

    Better Crops

    (2013)
  • J.S. Grewal et al.

    Critical levels of available potassium for potato in alluvial soils of Punjab

    Indian J. Agric. Sci.

    (1979)
  • J.S. Grewal et al.

    Effect of potassium nutrition on frost damage and yield of potato plants on alluvial soils of the Punjab (India)

    Plant Soil

    (1980)
  • N.U. Haase

    Estimation of dry matter and starch concentration in potatoes by determination of underwater weight and near infrared spectroscopy

    J. Potato Res. The Netherlands

    (2003)
  • A. Hannan et al.

    Using soil potassium adsorption and yield response models to determine potassium fertilizer rates for potato crop on a calcareous soil in Pakistan

    Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.

    (2011)
  • A.H. Hunter

    Laboratory and Greenhouse Techniques for Nutrient Survey to Determine the Soil Amendments Required for Optimum Plant Growth

    (1980)
  • V. Kavvadias et al.

    Nitrogen and potassium fertilization responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cv. Spunta

    Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.

    (2012)
  • M.Z. Khan et al.

    Potato tuber yield and quality as affected by rates and sources of potassium fertilizer

    J. Plant Nutr.

    (2012)
  • D. Knudsen et al.

    Lithium, sodium and potassium

  • R.S. Krik et al.

    Pearson's Composition and Analysis of Foods

    (1991)
  • P. Kumar et al.

    Influence of source and time of potassium application on potato growth, yield, economics and crisp quality

    Potato Res.

    (2007)
  • D.F. Leikam et al.

    Providing flexibility in phosphorus and potassium fertilizer recommendations

    Better Crops

    (2003)
  • Cited by (54)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text