Human neurospheres derived from the fetal central nervous system are regionally and temporally specified but are not committed

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.03.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Proliferating single cells were isolated from various CNS regions (telencephalon, diencephalon, midbrain, cerebellum, pons and medulla, and spinal cord) of human fetal cadavers at 13 weeks of gestation and grown as neurospheres in long-term cultures. We investigated whether neural stem cells (NSCs) or progenitors within spheres have specific regional or temporal characteristics with regard to growth, differentiation, and region-specific gene expression, and whether these molecular specifications are reversible. Regardless of regional origin, all of the neurospheres were found to contain cells of different subtypes, which suggests that multipotent NSCs, progenitors or radial glial cells co-exist with restricted neuronal or glial progenitors within the neurospheres. Neurospheres from the forebrain grew faster and gave rise to significantly more neurons than did those from either the midbrain or hindbrain, and regional differences in neuronal differentiation appeared to be sustained during long-term passage of neurospheres in culture. There was also a trend towards a reduction in neuronal emergence from the respective neurospheres over time in culture, although the percentages of neurons generated from cerebellum-derived neurospheres increased dramatically. These results suggest that differences in neuronal differentiation for the various neurospheres are spatially and temporally determined. In addition, the properties of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-, glutamate-, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-expressing cells derived from neurospheres of the respective CNS regions appear to be regionally and temporally different. Isolated human neurospheres from different CNS compartments expressed distinctive molecular markers of regional identity and maintained these patterns of region-specific gene expression during long-term passage in vitro. To determine the potential of human neurospheres for regional fate plasticity, single spheres from the respective regions were co-cultured with embryonic day 16.5 (E16.5 d) mouse brain slices. Specific cues from the developing mouse brain tissues induced the human neurospheres to express different marker genes of regional identity and to suppress the expression of their original marker genes. Thus, even the early regional identities of human neurospheres may not be irreversible and may be altered by local inductive cues. These findings have important implications for understanding the characteristics of growth, differentiation, and molecular specification of human neurospheres derived from the developing CNS, as well as the therapeutic potential for neural repair.

Introduction

Multipotent neural stem cells (NSCs) or progenitors derived from the developing or adult central nervous system (CNS) can be isolated in culture and propagated in the presence of mitogens (for review, see Gage, 2000). One technique for growing these cells involves the generation of free-floating spherical aggregates, which are termed ‘neurospheres’. This method was developed a number of years ago for rodent tissues (Reynolds and Weiss, 1992). Subsequently, the technique was adapted for generating human neurospheres from postmortem fetal CNS tissues, using a variety of growth factors (Svendsen et al., 1997, Flax et al., 1998, Carpenter et al., 1999, Vescovi et al., 1999, Ostenfeld et al., 2000, Caldwell et al., 2001). Human neurospheres have great potential for cell therapy applications and as a model for studying human development and disease (Flax et al., 1998, Fricker et al., 1999, Vescovi et al., 1999, Ostenfeld et al., 2000, Englund et al., 2002, Park et al., 2002a).

Neurospheres from rodents or humans consist of both multipotent stem cells and more restricted progenitors at different stages of differentiation and, as such, are considered to comprise a heterogeneous population of neural precursor cells (Reynolds and Weiss, 1996, Svendsen and Caldwell, 2000, Suslov et al., 2002). Oligonucleotide microarray technology, which facilitates large-scale screening of gene expression in stem cells from a wide range of tissues, has been used to show that isolated human NSC populations are heterogeneous and have variable patterns of gene expression (Suslov et al., 2002). In addition to the cellular heterogeneity that occurs within neurospheres, there is evidence that rodent and human neurospheres are regionally specified. Neurospheres isolated from different regions of the developing or adult brain display unique characteristics with regard to growth, differentiation, and gene expression (Hitoshi et al., 2002, Ostenfeld et al., 2002, Horiguchi et al., 2004).

Regional patterning in the developing mammalian brain is partially regulated by restrictive region-specific regulatory gene expression patterns within the germinal zone, which is composed of stem cells and their progenitor cell progenies. Thus, NSCs, together with their progeny, are poised to receive inductive signals that establish regional identity in vivo. Mouse neurospheres isolated from different regions of the brain display region-specific gene expression patterns, although commitment to this regional identity is not absolute and can be altered by local inductive cues (Hitoshi et al., 2002, Santa-Olalla et al., 2003). Furthermore, timing seems to be encoded in the NSCs or progenitors, which means that they have positional information as well as temporal information, manifested as stage-dependent changes in the NSCs or progenitors (Temple, 2001). The neurospheres derived from the rat brain produce progressively fewer neurons, but the number of glial cells increases with the number of passages in vitro (Ostenfeld et al., 2002). Finally, there are significant differences in neurosphere growth patterns between the rat, mouse, and humans (Ginis and Rao, 2003, Snyder et al., 2004). However, the temporal patterns of growth, differentiation, and gene expression in these cultures and the precise cellular composition of human neurospheres have not been fully clarified.

In this study, NSCs or progenitors were isolated from the respective regions of the developing human CNS and grown in long-term cultures as neurospheres. We investigated whether NSCs or progenitors within neurospheres have specific regional and/or temporal characteristics with regard to growth, differentiation, and gene expression during expansion in culture and whether the characteristics of gene expression can be reversed by local environmental factors.

Section snippets

Culture of human neural progenitor cells

Human fetal tissue from cadavers at 13 weeks of gestation was obtained with full patient consent and the approval of the research ethics committee of Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. The methods of acquisition conformed to NIH and Korean Government guidelines. The CNS tissue was divided into the following six pieces: telencephalon, diencephalon, mesencephalon (midbrain), cerebellum, pons and medulla, and spinal cord. Each tissue was freshly dissected, dissociated in trypsin

Neurosphere formation by fetal human CNS tissue and cellular composition of the neurospheres

Proliferating single cells isolated from whole CNS regions (telencephalon, diencephalon, midbrain, cerebellum, pons and medulla, and lumbar segment of the spinal cord) of human fetal cadavers at 13 weeks of gestation gave rise to free-floating spheres or cell clusters that could be identified by their phase-bright appearance, regular cell membranes, and diffraction rings (Fig. 1A).

Previously, the neurosphere assay has been used to suggest that NSCs from rodent neurospheres can self-renew and

Summary and conclusions

In this work, proliferating single cells, which were isolated from various CNS regions of a human fetal cadaver at 13 weeks of gestation, were grown in culture as neurospheres using mitogen treatment and passaged in long-term culture following dissociation of the spheres in bulk. The spheres from different CNS regions were found to contain cells of different subtypes, which expressed more than one of the cell-type-specific proteins. This suggests that multipotent NSCs, progenitors, and radial

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grants (to KIP) from the Stem Cell Research Center, which is funded by the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology, and from the Yonsei University Research Fund of 1998. We also acknowledge grants from the March of Dimes, Project ALS, Children's Neurobiological Solutions, and NINDS.

References (75)

  • E. Hartfuss et al.

    Characterization of CNS precursor subtypes and radial glia

    Dev. Biol.

    (2001)
  • M. Jain et al.

    GABAergic immunoreactivity is predominant in neurons derived from expanded human neural precursor cells in vitro

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2003)
  • C.B. Johansson et al.

    Neural stem cells in the adult human brain

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1999)
  • P. Levitt et al.

    Early divergence and changing proportions of neuronal and glial precursor cells in the primate cerebral ventricular zone

    Dev. Biol.

    (1983)
  • P. Malatesta et al.

    Neuronal or glial progeny: regional differences in radial glia fate

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • T. Miyata et al.

    Asymmetric inheritance of radial glial fibers by cortical neurons

    Neuron

    (2001)
  • H. Nakamura

    Regionalization of the optic tectum: combinations of gene expression that define the tectum

    Trend Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • B. Navarro-Galve et al.

    “Is there any need to argue..." about the nature and genetic signature of in vitro neural stem cells

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2006)
  • M. Olsson et al.

    Specification of mouse telencephalic and mid-hindbrain progenitors following heterotopic ultrasound-guided embryonic transplantation

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • T. Ostenfeld et al.

    Human neural precursor cells express low levels of telomerase in vitro and show diminishing cell proliferation with extensive axonal outgrowth following transplantation

    Exp. Neurol.

    (2000)
  • T. Ostenfeld et al.

    Regional specification of rodent and human neurospheres

    Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res.

    (2002)
  • M. Parmar et al.

    Regional specification of neurosphere cultures derived from subregions of embryonic telencephalon

    Mol. Cell. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • L. Pevny et al.

    The stem-cell menagerie

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • B.A. Reynolds et al.

    Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell

    Dev. Biol.

    (1996)
  • C.N. Svendsen et al.

    Neural stem cells in the developing central nervous system: implications for cell therapy through transplantation

    Prog. Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • C.N. Svendsen et al.

    Long-term survival of human central nervous system progenitor cells transplanted into a rat model of Parkinson's disease

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1997)
  • A.L. Vescovi et al.

    Isolation and cloning of multipotential stem cells from the embryonic human CNS and establishment of transplantable human neural stem cell lines by epigenetic stimulation

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1999)
  • A. Alvarez-Buylla et al.

    A unified hypothesis on the lineage of neural stem cells

    Nat. Rev., Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • A. Bulfone et al.

    Spatially restricted expression of Dlx-1, Dlx-2 (Tes-1), Gbx-2, and Wnt-3 in the embryonic day 12.5 mouse forebrain defines potential transverse and longitudinal segmental boundaries

    J. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • M.A. Caldwell et al.

    Growth factors regulate the survival and fate of cells derived from human neurospheres

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2001)
  • L.S. Campos

    Neurospheres: insights into neural stem cell biology

    J. Neurosci. Res.

    (2004)
  • B.H. Choi

    Glial fibrillary acid protein in radial glia of early human fetal cerebrum: a light and electron immunocytochemical study

    J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.

    (1986)
  • D. Dahl et al.

    Vimentin, the 57.000 molecular weight protein of fibroblast filaments, is the major cytoskeleton component in immature glia

    Eur. J. Cell Biol.

    (1981)
  • C.A. Davis et al.

    Expression patterns of the homeo box-containing genes En-1 and En-2 and the proto-oncogene int-l diverge during mouse development

    Genes Dev.

    (1988)
  • D.D. Eisenstat et al.

    DLX-1, DLX-2, and DLX-5 expression define distinct stages of basal forebrain differentiation

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1999)
  • G. Fishell

    Neural precursors adopt regional identities in response to local cues

    Development

    (1995)
  • J.D. Flax et al.

    Engraftable human neural stem cells respond to developmental cues, replace neurons, and express foreign proteins

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (107)

    • Neural stem cell therapy—Brief review

      2018, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
    • Next generation organoids for biomedical research and applications

      2018, Biotechnology Advances
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent studies on a number of human fetal tissues suggest the existence of fetal stem cells, which display distinct features and differentiation potentials from adult stem cells. For instance, stem cell populations have been identified and isolated from a number of human fetal tissues like neuroretina (Zhou et al., 2015), kidney (Da Sacco et al., 2017), heart muscle (Leung et al., 2015), skeletal muscle (Alexander et al., 2016), pancreas (Bonfanti et al., 2015), intestine (Fernandez Vallone et al., 2016), and brain (Kallur et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2006), which are proliferative, self-renewing, and maintain tissue specific gene signatures when cultured in vitro. For instance, fetal enterospheres can be established from proliferative progenitors derived from human fetal intestinal tissues at gestational week 10 and the correspondingly-aged mouse fetal intestinal tissues at embryonic day 16.5 (Fordham et al., 2013).

    • Insights in spatio-temporal characterization of human fetal neural stem cells

      2017, Experimental Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several studies have reported region-specific differences for hfNSCs expanded as neurospheres in vitro (Hitoshi et al., 2002; Horiguchi et al., 2004; Kallur et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2006; Ostenfeld et al., 2002). First, neurospheres from the forebrain grew faster than NSCs obtained from caudal brain areas (Horiguchi et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006), and second, differences in the neurogenic potential and the neuronal phenotypes obtained after NSCs differentiation have been described, depending on the brain area of origin. In addition, these differences in neuronal differentiation appeared to be sustained during long-term passage of neurospheres in culture (Kim et al., 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text