Axial mechanical and structural characterization of keratoconus corneas
Introduction
Keratoconus (KC) affects roughly 1 in 2000 people and is characterized by progressive paracentral corneal thinning and steepening (Rabinowitz, 1998). As a result, the cornea takes on a conical shape leading to myopia, astigmatism, and markedly reduced visual acuity. The onset of keratoconus typically occurs in childhood to early adulthood and progresses before stabilizing by the fourth decade (Gordon-Shaag et al., 2015; Bykhovskaya et al., 2016). The pathogenesis of KC is commonly accepted to involve both environmental and genetic factors, with environmental factors possibly acting as triggers for the condition in genetically predisposed individuals. Among environmental factors are eye rubbing, atopy, and UV exposure, while genome wide association studies (GWAS) and genome wide linkage studies (GWLS) have identified numerous genes related to KC (Gordon-Shaag et al., 2015; Bykhovskaya et al., 2016). Regardless of the specific pathogenesis, abnormal collagen structure in the KC cornea is thought to weaken overall mechanical properties thus resulting in the formation of the hallmark cone in response to intraocular pressure (IOP).
The healthy human cornea possesses a unique collagen structure, which has been proposed to play a key role in the maintenance of corneal shape, biomechanics, and in turn visual acuity (Winkler et al., 2013; Kling and Hafezi, 2017). 3-dimensional second harmonic generation imaging (3D-SHG) has shown that lamellae in the anterior cornea branch and anastomose with one another and run at oblique angles relative to Bowman's layer, while in the posterior cornea, lamellae run parallel to the anterior and posterior limiting lamina with significantly reduced branching (Jester et al., 2010a, Jester et al., 2010b; Winkler et al., 2011a, Winkler et al., 2011b; Winkler et al., 2013). It has also been established that there are bow spring fibers which extend from Bowman's layer and intertwine with deeper fibers (Morishige et al., 2011; Winkler et al., 2011; Mercatelli et al., 2017). Recent studies have also shown that these structural differences are associated with distinctly different mechanical properties in the cornea leading to increased mechanical stiffness and elastic modulus in the anterior cornea that is two to three fold higher than the posterior cornea (Winkler et al., 2011; Petsche et al., 2012; Dias et al., 2013; Dias and Ziebarth, 2013; Mikula et al., 2016). The KC cornea stands in stark contrast to the healthy cornea, both in regard to mechanics (Andreassen et al. 1980; Edmund 1988, 1989; Scarcelli, Besner et al. 2014, 2015) as well as collagen structure (Meek et al., 2005; Morishige et al., 2007; Morishige, Shin-gyou-uchi et al., 2014). Specifically, Morishige et al. have shown that collagen structure varies axially in the KC cornea when compared to the healthy cornea (Morishige et al., 2007; Morishige, Shin-gyou-uchi et al., 2014). Given that collagen structure is inextricably tied to biomechanical properties and that KC structure from anterior to posterior varies significantly compared to healthy corneas, it is expected that biomechanical properties will also vary in the axial direction.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the axial variation in mechanical properties of keratoconic corneal buttons using acoustic radiation force elastic microscopy (ARFEM). For structural comparison to biomechanical results, collagen architecture was qualitatively evaluated in KC corneal buttons, and then quantitatively analyzed in KC button obtained from a patient that had received Epikeratophakia (Epi-KP) using 3D-SHG. The analysis of the Epi-KP button allowed for the assessment of lamellar collagen branching point density (BPD) in both the KC cornea and overlying Epi-KP lenticule, allowing for direct comparison in the same sample.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
All samples were procured with approval from the University of California, Irvine, the Institutional Review Board (UCI IRB #20054276), and in accordance with the Tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. A total of 7 keratoconus (KC) buttons were used in this study that were obtained from the Gavin Herbert Eye Institute (UCI, Irvine, Ca). For ARFEM studies, 3 kC buttons were obtained on ice in Optisol immediately after surgery and stored at 4 °C; mechanical testing was performed within three days
Results
The elastic moduli for the anterior KC corneas as measured by ARFEM were 1.46 ± 0.23 kPa (Pa), 1.39 ± 0.51 kPa, and 2.17 ± 0.32 kPa. The elastic moduli for the posterior KC corneas were 0.94 ± 0.19 kPa, 0.68 ± 0.26 kPa, and 1.28 ± 0.63 kPa. The mean elastic modulus in the anterior region of the KC corneas (1.67 ± 0.44 kPa) was found to be significantly greater than the mean elastic modulus of the posterior region of the KC corneas (0.97 ± 0.30 kPa) (p < 0.05), while both were markedly less than
Discussion
The axial distribution of mechanical properties in the cone region of KC buttons was investigated using ARFEM along with BPD in a KC button obtained from a patient who had previously been treated with epikeratophakia to measure of collagen structural complexity. Additional KC corneas were imaged using SHG microscopy to qualitatively elucidate varying complexity in collagen architecture. Compared to published results also using ARFEM, the overall elastic modulus in the KC cornea is roughly half
Conclusion
In this study it was found that the anterior KC cornea is roughly twice as stiff as the posterior KC cornea and that this may be related to depth dependent changes in collagen architecture. ARFEM elasticity measurements in the anterior and posterior KC cornea were compared against the collagen architecture of healthy and KC regions of an epikeratophakic sample, and also against a backscattered SHG images taken in KC buttons. There is a clear reduction in interweaving in the KC cone region when
Funding
Supported in part by NEI EY024600 and EY018665, and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. RPB-203478.
References (33)
- et al.
Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas
Exp. Eye Res.
(1980) - et al.
Anterior and posterior corneal stroma elasticity after corneal collagen crosslinking treatment
Exp. Eye Res.
(2013) - et al.
Anterior and posterior corneal stroma elasticity assessed using nanoindentation
Exp. Eye Res.
(2013) - et al.
Compliance profile of the human cornea as measured by atomic force microscopy
Micron
(2012) - et al.
Measurement of corneal elasticity with an acoustic radiation force elasticity microscope
Ultrasound Med. Biol.
(2014) Keratoconus
Surv. Ophthalmol.
(1998)- et al.
Elastic modulus and collagen organization of the rabbit cornea: epithelium to endothelium
Acta Biomater.
(2014) - et al.
Elastic microfibril distribution in the cornea: differences between normal and keratoconic stroma
Exp. Eye Res.
(2017) - et al.
Genetics in Keratoconus: where are we?
Eye Vis (Lond)
(2016) Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes
Acta Ophthalmol.
(1988)
Corneal topography and elasticity in normal and keratoconic eyes. A methodological study concerning the pathogenesis of keratoconus
Acta Ophthalmol. Suppl.
The genetic and environmental factors for keratoconus
BioMed Res. Int.
Evaluating corneal collagen organization using high-resolution nonlinear optical macroscopy
Eye Contact Lens
Evaluating corneal collagen organization using high resolution non linear optical (NLO) macroscopy
Eye Contact Lens
Corneal biomechanics - a review
Ophthalmic Physiol. Optic.
Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
Cited by (22)
Optical coherence elastography for assessing the influence of intraocular pressure on elastic wave dispersion in the cornea
2022, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Tissue stiffness is an important biomechanical property that helps the cornea maintain its aspheric geometry and therefore its refractive power and visual function (Girard et al., 2015; Hon et al., 2017; Matalia et al., 2017; Mikula et al., 2018; Whitford et al., 2015).
Biomechanics of the keratoconic cornea: Theory, segmentation, pressure distribution, and coupled FE-optimization algorithm
2021, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsCitation Excerpt :The mechanical behavior of the cornea depends on its geometry, e.g., thickness, curvature, and topography as well as material properties, which in-turn relies on the microstructure of the stroma. KC is most likely a disease that involves substantial biological-mechanical interactions; pathological changes of the tissue structure alter the mechanical properties of the cornea, which in turn affect the gross shape of the cornea under IOP leading to a conical shape followed by myopia, astigmatism, and markedly reduced visual acuity (Mikula et al., 2018). Non-contact tonometry has recently gained interest as a diagnostic tool in ophthalmology and as an alternative method for characterizing the dynamic mechanical behavior of the cornea (Dorronsoro et al., 2012).
Unveiling the lamellar structure of the human cornea over its full thickness using polarization-resolved SHG microscopy
2023, Light: Science and ApplicationsThe Corneal Ectasia Model of Rabbit: A Validity and Stability Study
2023, Bioengineering