EUO Collaborative Review – Priority Article
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2020.11.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Context

Management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is guided in part by accurate clinical staging. The role of imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), in initial staging remains controversial.

Objective

To systematically review the studies of MRI and/or PET/CT in the staging of newly diagnosed PCa with respect to tumor (T), nodal (N), and metastatic (M) staging (TNM staging).

Evidence acquisition

We performed a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE and Web of Science databases between 2012 and 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines.

Evidence synthesis

A total of 139 studies (83 on T, 47 on N, and 24 on M status) were included. Ninety-nine (71%) were retrospective, 39 (28%) were prospective, and one was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Most studies on T staging examined MRI, while PET/CT was used primarily for N and M staging. Sensitivity for the detection of extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node invasion ranged widely. When imaging was incorporated into existing risk tools, gain in accuracy was observed in some studies, although these findings have not been replicated. For M staging, most favorable results were reported for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, which demonstrated significantly better performance than conventional imaging.

Conclusions

A variety of studies on modern imaging techniques for TNM staging in newly diagnosed PCa exist. For T and N staging, reported sensitivity of imaging modalities such as MRI or PET/CT varied widely due to data heterogeneity, small sample size, and low event rates resulting in large confidence intervals and a high level of uncertainty. Therefore, uniformity in data presentation and standardization on this topic are needed. The most promising technique for M staging, which was evaluated recently in an RCT, is PSMA-PET/CT.

Patient summary

We performed a systematic review of currently available imaging modalities to stage newly diagnosed prostate cancer. With respect to local tumor and lymph node assessment, performance of imaging ranged widely. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed favorable results for the detection of distant metastases.

Introduction

While localized prostate cancer (PCa) is curable using surgery or radiation therapy, cure remains unlikely in the presence of metastatic disease. Therefore, appropriate assessment of the extent of PCa at diagnosis is critical in guiding initial treatment.

Current guidelines recommend abdominopelvic imaging as well as bone scintigraphy in selected men with intermediate-risk disease and in all men with high-risk disease [1]. Unfortunately, conventional imaging with computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy suffer from a lack of sensitivity and specificity in identifying metastatic cancer, which has prompted the search for new imaging techniques with better diagnostic accuracy [2]. For local tumor and lymph node (LN) staging, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has gained more and more attention. In 2012, the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standardized MRI reporting by introducing the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) and updated this version in collaboration with the American College of Radiology to PIRADS v2 in 2015 [3].

Hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or PET/MRI combines the advantages of morphological and anatomical information derived by CT/MRI with additional functional (metabolic/biochemical activity) information provided by PET. By using MRI instead of CT, ionization radiation is spared. Newer tracers, such as 18 F-sodiumfluoride (NaF), 18 F-/11C-choline, 18 F-fluciclovine (FACBC), and 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have recently been developed and analyzed further. Introduced in 2012, the 68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-[68Ga-(HBED-CC)] (68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC or 68Ga-PSMA-11) revolutionized PCa imaging. PSMA, a large extracellular type-2 transmembrane glycoprotein, is highly overexpressed in PCa and can easily be targeted by this ligand for imaging purposes [4].

While PET/CT is already widely adopted within staging of recurrent PCa, only few studies reported on its role for primary staging [5].

This prompted us to perform a systematic review of the current literature on modern imaging modalities for tumor (T), nodal (N), and metastatic (M) staging (TNM staging) of newly diagnosed PCa.

Section snippets

Search strategy

We performed a systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE and Web of Science databases between 2012 and 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines [6].

The search strategy used the following keywords and/or free texts: (“prostate cancer” OR “prostate neoplasm”) AND (“MRI” OR “PET CT”) AND (“staging” OR “tumor stage” OR “lymph nod*” OR “metastas*”). Furthermore, cited references from selected articles and from review

Evidence synthesis

The heterogeneity of the studies entailed that summary statistics from different studies could not be combined meta-analytically. Hence, we summarized the results narratively.

Conclusions

A variety of studies on modern imaging techniques for TNM staging in newly diagnosed PCa exist. For T and N staging, reported sensitivity of imaging modalities such as mpMRI or PET/CT varied widely, preventing clear recommendations. For M staging, the most promising technique is PSMA-PET/CT.

References (150)

  • I.G. Jeong et al.

    Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for clinically high risk prostate cancer in 922 radical prostatectomies

    J Urol

    (2013)
  • K.G. Nepple et al.

    Concordance of preoperative prostate endorectal MRI with subsequent prostatectomy specimen in high-risk prostate cancer patients

    Urol Oncol

    (2013)
  • B.H. Park et al.

    Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

    J Urol

    (2014)
  • D. Raskolnikov et al.

    The role of magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy in stratifying men for risk of extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy

    J Urol

    (2015)
  • R. Renard-Penna et al.

    Accuracy of high resolution (1.5 tesla) pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging prostate cancer in candidates for radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective study

    Urol Oncol

    (2013)
  • O. Ruprecht et al.

    MRI of the prostate: interobserver agreement compared with histopathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy

    Eur J Radiol

    (2012)
  • M. Sauer et al.

    Accuracy of multiparametric MR imaging with PI-RADS V2 assessment in detecting infiltration of the neurovascular bundles prior to prostatectomy

    Eur J Radiol

    (2018)
  • N. Schieda et al.

    Evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) PI-RADS scoring system for assessment of extra-prostatic extension in prostatic carcinoma

    Eur J Radiol

    (2015)
  • D.M. Somford et al.

    The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2013)
  • K.J. Tay et al.

    Defining the incremental utility of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at standard and specialized read in predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer

    Eur Urol

    (2016)
  • C.-W. Tsao et al.

    Combining prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score increases the diagnostic power of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer pathological stage

    J Chin Med Assoc

    (2013)
  • J.V. Hegde et al.

    Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2013)
  • L. Budaus et al.

    Initial experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy

    Eur Urol

    (2016)
  • A. Herlemann et al.

    68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer

    Eur Urol

    (2016)
  • European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines: prostate cancer....
  • A. Liberati et al.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • P.F. Whiting et al.

    QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

    Ann Intern Med

    (2011)
  • S. Alessi et al.

    Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients

    Eur Radiol

    (2019)
  • I. Berger et al.

    Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT vs. mpMRI for locoregional prostate cancer staging: correlation with final histopathology

    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis

    (2018)
  • A. Billing et al.

    Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice

    World J Urol

    (2015)
  • B.N. Bloch et al.

    Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI

    Eur Radiol

    (2012)
  • L. Boesen et al.

    Prostate cancer staging with extracapsular extension risk scoring using multiparametric MRI: a correlation with histopathology

    Eur Radiol

    (2015)
  • I. Caglic et al.

    Defining the incremental value of 3D T2-weighted imaging in the assessment of prostate cancer extracapsular extension

    Eur Radiol

    (2019)
  • Y. Cerantola et al.

    Can 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect prostate cancer extracapsular extension?

    Can Urol Assoc J

    (2013)
  • Y. Chong et al.

    Value of diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T for prediction of extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer: a preliminary study

    Am J Roentgenol

    (2014)
  • F. Cornud et al.

    Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1 mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5 Tesla: Should we reconsider the indirect signs of extracapsular extension according to the D’Amico tumor risk criteria?

    Eur J Radiol

    (2012)
  • F. Counago et al.

    Role of 3.0 T multiparametric MRI in local staging in prostate cancer and clinical implications for radiation oncology

    Clin Transl Oncol

    (2014)
  • A.J. Cybulski et al.

    Added value of MRI tractography of peri-prostatic nerve plexus to conventional T2-WI in detection of extra-capsular extension of prostatic cancer

    La Radiol Med

    (2019)
  • O. de Cobelli et al.

    Predicting pathological features at radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • S. Dekalo et al.

    68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Does it predict adverse pathology findings at radical prostatectomy?

    Urol Oncol

    (2019)
  • C. Dominguez et al.

    Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting extracapsular extension in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer

    Int Braz J Urol

    (2018)
  • U. Falagario et al.

    Staging accuracy of multiparametric MRI in Caucasian and African American patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

    J Urol

    (2020)
  • W.P. Fendler et al.

    68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detects the location and extent of primary prostate cancer

    J Nucl Med

    (2016)
  • T.S. Feng et al.

    Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging localizes established extracapsular extension of prostate cancer

    Urol Oncol

    (2015)
  • M. Ghafoori et al.

    The value of prostate MRI with endorectal coil in detecting seminal vesicle involvement in patients with prostate cancer

    Iran J Radiol

    (2015)
  • B. Grubmuller et al.

    PSMA ligand PET/MRI for primary prostate cancer: staging performance and clinical impact

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2018)
  • M. Gupta et al.

    Initial risk stratification and staging in prostate cancer with prostatic-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a first-stop-shop

    World J Nucl Med

    (2018)
  • K.H. Hole et al.

    Routine pelvic MRI using phased-array coil for detection of extraprostatic tumour extension: accuracy and clinical significance

    Eur Radiol

    (2013)
  • F. Jaderling et al.

    Preoperative staging using magnetic resonance imaging and risk of positive surgical margins after prostate-cancer surgery

    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis

    (2019)
  • F. Jaderling et al.

    Accuracy in local staging of prostate cancer by adding a three-dimensional T2-weighted sequence with radial reconstructions in magnetic resonance imaging

    Acta Radiol Open

    (2018)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

      2023, European Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      While mpMRI has augmented the paradigm for PCa diagnosis, accumulating evidence supports the use of PSMA PET for greater accuracy in detecting the index lesion and secondary lesions [17]. Although mpMRI has demonstrated accuracy of >90% in identifying index lesions, its accuracy in identifying secondary foci and smaller clinically significant PCa (csPCa) lesions is less established [18,19]. On per-lesion analysis, mpMRI misses between 16% and 25.4% of csPCa tumor foci [20], and significantly underestimates the actual tumor volume in comparison to whole-gland histology [17,21].

    • Nascent Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity Drives Evolution and Resistance to Intense Hormonal Therapy

      2021, European Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The range of residual tumor volumes lends itself to several possible strategies for patient management determined according to prognostic factors at baseline. Combined with MRI, which is increasingly common for staging and guiding biopsies of primary prostate cancer [29], and a series of straightforward immunostains readily available in most hospital laboratories, use of a commercial cancer sequencing panel would provide enough information to determine the probability of response to NADT according to the five-factor model. For patients in the INR group, those with the largest residual tumor volumes often harbored three or four histogenomic factors, and thus may benefit from either immediate surgery (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) or systemic chemotherapy before surgery.

    • Case of the Season: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron-Emission Tomography (PET)-MRI to Evaluate Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Response

      2021, Seminars in Roentgenology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, these new reporting criteria have not yet been validated in the literature. The performance of MRI and PSMA PET for the detection of SVI varies.9 One analysis found that PSMA PET was superior for SVI while MRI was superior for extraprostatic extension.10

    • Patterns of Recurrence, Detection Rates, and Impact of 18-F Fluciclovine PET/CT on the Management of Men With Recurrent Prostate Cancer

      2021, Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several PSMA binding ligands exist and studies have generally shown superior diagnostic performance when compared to other radiotracers in the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following definitive therapy.22 However, FACBC PET/CT has been shown to be better in detecting localized curable recurrence as PSMA accumulates in the bladder and appears to obscure avid findings.23–29 In conclusion, FACBC PET/CT detects recurrent prostate cancer with improved detection rates with increasing PSA levels.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text