Discussion
Reply to: “Recycled” volatiles in mantle derived diamonds—Evidence from nitrogen and noble gas isotopic data

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.026Get rights and content

Abstract

In a reinterpretation of our published rare gas data obtained on polycrystalline diamonds from the Orapa kimberlite (Botswana) [C.E. Gautheron, P. Cartigny, M. Moreira, J.W. Harris and C.J. Allègre, Evidence for a mantle component shown by rare gases, C. and N isotopes in polycrystalline diamonds from Orapa (Botswana), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 240 (2005) 559–572.], Mohapatra and Honda [R.K. Mohapatra, and M. Honda, “Recycled” volatiles in mantle derived diamonds—evidence from nitrogen and noble gas isotopic data, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., this issue, 2006.] claim that mixing between a-priori defined proportions of subducted seawater, subducted recycled oceanic crust, recycled sediments, air and the mantle would be more appropriate to account for the observations. This view sharply contrasts with our conclusions that the chemical and isotope compositions of rare gases record diamond formation from mantle-derived fluid(s) together with mantle post-crystallization radiogenic/nucleogenic/fissiogenic ingrowth and preferential diffusion of the lightest atoms out of the diamonds in the mantle [C.E. Gautheron, P. Cartigny, M. Moreira, J.W. Harris and C.J. Allègre, Evidence for a mantle component shown by rare gases, C and N isotopes in polycrystalline diamonds from Orapa (Botswana), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 240 (2005) 559–572.]. We present here reasons why the alternative view of Mohapatra and Honda [R.K. Mohapatra and M. Honda, “Recycled” volatiles in mantle derived diamonds—evidence from nitrogen and noble gas isotopic data, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., this issue, 2006.] is not supportable.

Section snippets

On the subduction of rare gases

The evidence for the mixing model of Mohapatra and Honda [2] is presented in two figures (40Ar/36Ar vs. 129Xe/130Xe and 36Ar/130Xe and 84Kr/130Xe vs. 129Xe/130Xe) in which there is a “recycled/subducted” endmember lying on one side, with the other endmember, on the opposite side, being the mantle. Mohapatra and Honda thus agree with our main conclusion, namely that a “mantle component” [1] is present within our samples. The discussion centers on whether some subducted volatiles may or may not

On the fractionation of stable isotopes at mantle temperatures

It is generally accepted that peridotite-related diamonds form from mantle-related carbon [6], [7]. Only some eclogitic diamonds might form from subducted carbon and these would have odd isotopic values (e.g. sulfur, oxygen, carbon) (e.g. [6], [7]). In our study [1], the identification of similar mantle-like Xe-patterns within both polycrystalline peridotitic and eclogitic diamonds was taken as further support for derivation from the same source. In addition, both monocrystalline and

Conclusions

We thus question the arguments presented by Mohapatra and Honda [2] proposing that there is some obvious subducted component(s) in the rare gases found in polycrystalline diamonds. The chemical isotopic composition of rare gases in polycrystalline diamonds from Orapa can be best explained on the basis of mantle fluids and post-crystallization radiogenic/nucleogenic/fissiogenic ingrowths and diffusion out of the diamond. We believe that this is the simplest way to account for our observations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewer for his comments which helped improving both clarity and tone of our reply.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text