Elsevier

Environmental Science & Policy

Volume 45, January 2015, Pages 79-91
Environmental Science & Policy

Effect of company size on potential for REACH compliance and selection of safer chemicals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Many small and medium-sized enterprises and some larger firms are unaware of REACH.

  • Large firms have a better grasp of REACH and its implications than smaller companies.

  • Education of small companies is required for effective implementation of REACH.

  • Many companies want help with tools to manage REACH requirements and communications.

  • Companies want more information on chemical composition and related health impacts.

Abstract

REACH represents a global paradigm shift in chemical regulation, and it has introduced a new, complex regulatory process to which chemical producers and users throughout supply chains must adapt. This paper presents results of survey research to illustrate whether and how the business members of a large Scandinavian trade organization understand and comply with REACH. It also explores how these businesses obtain information about the chemicals they use in their products, and whether they feel that the information they have is sufficient to meet their needs. In addition, the paper describes how business size affects these issues. The survey results show that, at the time of this study, many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and a number of larger firms were unaware of REACH. Survey results consistently showed that the size of a company is an important factor in both understanding of and compliance with REACH, with respondents from large firms having a better grasp of REACH and its implications than smaller companies. An effective implementation of REACH will require, at the most basic level, more attention to educating EU companies, especially smaller ones, on how and why REACH applies to them. Survey respondents who were aware of REACH and its applicability to their firms also reported the types of support they needed in order to better understand and comply with the regulation, with nearly 40% of all respondents expressing a need for help with data systems or tools to manage REACH requirements and communicate REACH requirements to suppliers and customers. Many companies reported needing more information from their suppliers on chemical composition and related health impacts of materials and products. Ensuring that this information is readily available throughout supply chains is essential to reducing the negative impacts of chemicals and products on human health and the environment.

Introduction

Synthetic chemicals are essential to most industrial processes and formulated products, yet it continues to be difficult for product manufacturers to obtain useful information about chemical hazards and the risks associated with chemicals’ various applications. In addition, with today's complex and globally dispersed supply chains, the vast number of businesses and other actors that purchase components and finished products find it challenging – if not impossible – to know the identity of chemicals that make up those products. It is common for businesses not to know which chemicals compose finished products or the hazards and risks associated with those chemicals (Scruggs and Ortolano, 2011).

In 2006, the European Union passed sweeping new legislation to control the use of hazardous chemicals: the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). The law applies to most chemicals (both new and existing) produced in or imported into the EU in quantities above 1 tonne/producer/year, as well as to chemical mixtures, and to finished products (known as “articles” in REACH). Full or partial exemptions exist for medicinal products, food additives, cosmetics, polymers, and radioactive substances, as well as for substances classified as waste, chemical intermediates, unaltered minerals, ores, oil, gas and coal, chemicals used exclusively for research, or those that are solely transported through the EU (REACH, 2006, UK REACH Competent Authority, 2012). The regulation became effective in 2007, with requirements phased in through 2018. In some respects, REACH has placed the burden of proof on chemical producers, who must provide basic information about their products to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) before placing them on the European market, a requirement dubbed “no data, no market”. The data gathering and information reporting requirements are unprecedented worldwide, and those requirements increase with production volume and for chemicals designated as of higher concern (based on their potential health or environmental effects) (REACH, 2006). Since REACH extends to European imports, it has effectively raised chemical reporting standards internationally, and several nations around the world are considering, or are in the process of, enacting similar legislation.

In many ways, REACH represents a global paradigm shift in chemical regulation, and it has introduced a new, complex regulatory process to which chemical producers and users throughout supply chains must adapt. The European Commission recently expressed concern that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are not keeping pace with REACH and may need additional accommodation in order to meet the regulation's requirements (European Commission, 2013a).

This paper presents results of survey research to illustrate whether and how the business members of a large Scandinavian trade organization understand and comply with REACH. It also explores how these businesses obtain information about the chemicals they use in their products, and whether they feel that the information they have is sufficient to meet their needs. In addition, the paper describes how business size affects these issues.

Section snippets

The REACH regulation

In an effort to improve management and reduce the use of hazardous chemicals, REACH requires that: (1) chemical producers provide basic information on the identity and hazardous properties of their products as a condition of placing them on the market, with higher data requirements for higher production-volume chemicals; (2) suppliers of articles containing chemicals placed on the Candidate List for designation as Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) communicate sufficient information

Methods

We designed a survey instrument based on knowledge gained from our previous case study interviews as well as information gained at REACH-related conferences and meetings in the EU. We worked with a staff member of a large Scandinavian industry organization4

Results

Of the 656 emails sent to companies in the sample, 612 (93%) were received successfully by a company representative; 44 emails were returned. We received 220 (36%) responses; of these, nine respondents did not fully complete the survey and six opted out, resulting in a total of 205 (33%) complete responses. Table 2 shows the distribution of the 205 survey respondents among the groups.

A survey question asked, “What is your company's role in the supply chain?” Respondents could choose from any

Limitations

Several elements of the study potentially limit the applicability of the results. First, the nature and size of the sample limits the strength of the findings. While we surveyed a significant portion of members within this industry organization, the sample is restricted to members of this particular trade association, which may be inherently more (or less) knowledgeable about REACH compared to other industry sectors. Furthermore, respondents may represent a subset of firms that are more engaged

Conclusions

In targeting a group of Scandinavian businesses located throughout consumer product supply chains, this study provides another unique data set to potentially inform ECHA's design of REACH-related assistance and support systems for SMEs. This study complements several other studies on REACH understanding, compliance, and effects of company size, and adds potentially useful data about information needs and flows in supply chains. The combined results may provide valuable input to ECHA's 2018

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the collaborating industry organization for making this survey possible. We are also grateful to the numerous respondents who gave their time to complete the survey as well as the pre-testers who helped us to improve our survey instrument. In addition, we thank Jessica Sebring and Rachel Moore for assistance with the figures and the literature review, respectively, and the anonymous reviewer whose helpful comments improved this paper. The research described in this article was

References (15)

  • C. Scruggs et al.

    Creating safer consumer products: the information challenges companies face

    Environ. Sci. Policy

    (2011)
  • C. Scruggs

    Reducing hazardous chemicals in consumer products: proactive company strategies

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2013)
  • J.J. Boog et al.

    Impact REACH op het MKB

    (2013)
  • EEF

    REACH: Awareness, Activity, and Perceptions

    (2012)
  • European Chemicals Agency

    Survey of 2013 SME Registrants: Summary of Results

    (2014)
  • European Commission

    Ecodesign Your Future: How Ecodesign can Help the Environment by Making Products Smarter

    (2012)
  • European Commission

    Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions in accordance with Article 117(4) of REACH and Article 46(2) of CLP, and a review of certain elements of REACH in line with Articles 75(2), 138(2), 138(3) and 138(6) of REACH

    (2013)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (12)

  • Firm size, government capacity, and regional environmental regulation: Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence from China

    2017, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    Researchers who subscribe to the enterprise scale effect theory believe that public policy outcomes can be explained by firm behavior, including both strategic adaptation and intention to influence public policy. Scruggs et al. (2015) find in the chemical industry that larger firms have a better grasp of the global paradigm shift in chemical regulation and its implications than smaller firms. The larger the firm, the more resources it can assign to generating political connections, and ultimately, influencing a looser environmental policy (Salamon and Siegfried, 1977; Shaffer, 1995).

  • Improving information flow on chemicals in electronic products and E-waste to minimize negative consequences for health and the environment

    2016, Resources, Conservation and Recycling
    Citation Excerpt :

    In industry interviews that included two representatives, both a senior manager (with a title such as Director of Environment, Health, and Safety or Manager of Safety, Environmental, and Regulatory Affairs) and a scientist from the company’s in-house chemicals management team participated. While we acknowledge the potential for industry representatives to be less than forthcoming with chemicals-related information, we generally followed an interviewing approach with which the first author previously had success in achieving candid industry interviews (see Scruggs and Ortolano, 2011; Scruggs, 2013; Scruggs and Van Buren, 2014), and the industry results discussed herein align with the results from this previous work (see also Scruggs et al., 2015for additional similar results from a survey of business representatives). Many actors throughout the electronics product chain are interested in understanding a product’s chemical content and the properties and/or possible hazards associated with the chemicals present.

  • Measuring the recyclability of e-waste: An innovative method and its implications

    2016, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    The achieved results in Fig. 1 can contribute to choosing a recycling process, even for emerging e-waste. EPR policies can provide producers incentives for eco-design (more sustainable and easily recyclable electronics) as they may be faced with the financial or physical burden of recycling their electronics after use (Scruggs et al., 2015). Each bar shown in Fig. 1 shows the range of recyclability for a certain type of electronics.

  • Implementation of the chemicals regulation REACH - Exploring the impact on occupational health and safety management among Swedish downstream users

    2015, Safety Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    A final objective was to probe informants’ awareness, understanding and opinion of DNELs, both in relation to building of exposure scenarios as well as in comparison to OELs. Because REACH is a comparably new regulation and indications are that knowledge about it or at least the specific requirements in it are low (e.g. Scruggs et al., 2015) we chose a convenience sample strategy, described in detail in the following sections. We wished to get the perspective from professionals in workplace chemical risk management, employees and authorities.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text