LED pre-exposure shines a new light on drought tolerance complexity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and rocket (Eruca sativa)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104240Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Exposure to varying Red:Blue LED light ratios promoted morphological and physiological development of lettuce and rocket.

  • LED treatments which promoted highest antioxidant activity and ABA concentration resulted in decreased drought tolerance.

  • Increased stomatal number and aperture area due to LED pre-exposure correlated with drought sensitivity only in rocket.

  • Photomorphogenic and drought tolerance responses were species-specific.

Abstract

We investigated the morphological and physiological bases of drought tolerance in rocket (Eruca sativa) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seedlings as induced by pre-exposure to different ratios of red (R) and blue (B) LED light. Seedlings were grown for 17–18 days under white (control), 100R:0B, 75R:25B, 50R:50B, 25R:75B, or 0R:100B LED lighting at 156 μmol/m2/s. All seedlings were moved under white fluorescent lights 17–18 days after sowing. Half the seedlings were then droughted for 7 days, followed by re-irrigation for 7 days, while the other seedlings remained fully irrigated. Exposure to combined red and blue wavelengths promoted morphological development (leaf area, number of open leaves, leaf specific weight), as well as pigment (chlorophyll, carotenoids) and secondary metabolite (flavonoid) biosynthesis in both species. Morphological and physiological characteristics were more enhanced by monochromatic red or blue light exposure in lettuce than in rocket. Rocket grown under combined R:B lighting, and lettuce grown under 100 % red or blue LED light suffered most from drought (in the form of lower relative water content (RWC) and increased membrane leakage), despite increased ABA concentrations and antioxidant activity at mid-drought. In lettuce, but not in rocket, there was a positive residual effect of LED pre-treatment on fresh weight of droughted and re-irrigated plants. Increased concentrations of antioxidant metabolites did not correlate with tolerance to drought. All combined R:B light treatments increased stomatal density in both rocket and lettuce. All LED regimes which resulted in increased stomatal aperture area per unit leaf area (AALA) (μm2 aperture/cm2 leaf) resulted in decreased RWC at the end of drought. Stomatal AALA was negatively correlated with end-drought RWC (r = -0.89, p = 0.02) in rocket, but not in lettuce. The relationship between stomatal development and antioxidant activity on drought tolerance appears to be species-specific. The benefits provided to two leafy green species when grown under LED lights must be balanced against the resulting vulnerability to drought.

Introduction

The complex mechanisms by which plants tolerate or respond to drought involve chemical signaling and gene expression at the molecular level and altered morphology and physiology at the organism level. Drought, defined as the lack of sufficient water in the plant root zone to sustain maximum growth and productivity (Deikman et al., 2012), is one of the leading contributors to global crop loss (Lesk et al., 2016). Plant tolerance to drought can result from genetic adaptation and/or to horticultural practice and is expressed both physiologically and morphologically through altered gene expression, modified hormonal levels, metabolite biosynthesis and antioxidant activity (Zhang et al., 2014). Seeds, seedlings, and mature plants can be treated with compounds to induce protection against drought (Ashraf et al., 2011), and the environment itself (i.e. light quantity and quality or soil structure and chemistry) can be modified to provide protection (Kammann et al., 2011).

Common physiological adaptations to improve water use efficiency upon drought stress perception include reducing leaf area growth and increasing root growth, modifying cellular relative water content via osmotic adjustment, and abscisic acid-induced stomata closure (Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Taiz and Zeiger, 2006). An equilibrium exists between reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which occurs even under healthy conditions, and ROS scavenging. Biotic or abiotic stresses disrupt this equilibrium and result in damaging levels of ROS. ROS concentrations increase under drought and become most toxic in organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts which facilitate a high rate of electron flow (Gill and Tuteja, 2010). A common drought stress response is therefore the induction of antioxidative enzymes and metabolites to neutralize the damaging effects of ROS (Bernstein et al., 2010). The specific antioxidant compounds (enzymatic and non-enzymatic) upregulated during stress conditions, and the degree of their expression are influenced by the developmental state of the plant, the duration of the stress, and subcellular localization of ROS accumulation (Gill and Tuteja, 2010).

Drier and hotter climate conditions are predicted in the coming decades, so it is crucial to improve water use efficiency with techniques that confer drought tolerance on current crop varieties, in addition to breeding more stress-resistant varieties. Developing new water-saving cultivation strategies, such as controlled-environment agriculture, can also reduce overall water use to meet current and future crop demands (Taulavuori et al., 2017; Bantis et al., 2018).

Blue (400−500 nm) and red (600−700 nm) light wavelengths, which are selectively absorbed by photosynthetic pigments, influence the development and efficiency of photosynthetic machinery, as well as phytochemical synthesis and plant architecture (Chen and Yang, 2018). Specialized photoreceptors for red- (phytochromes; Mathews, 2006) and blue-light (cryptochromes, phototropins, zeaxanthin; Ahmad et al., 2002; Valverde et al., 2004) regulate specific responses to the nature of incident light either separately or in a co-regulatory manner (Fraikin et al., 2013; Christie, 2007).

Expression of both red and blue photoreceptors above a critical threshold is needed for proper activation of specific morphological and physiological responses to light, such as inhibition of hypocotyl elongation (Hernández and Kubota, 2016), or enhancement of flavonoid biosynthesis via chalcone synthase (CHS) (Wade et al., 2001), a phenomenon known as photoreceptor “co-action” (Mohr, 1994). Flavonoids are involved in the absorption of high-energy wavelengths, ROS scavenging, and developmental regulation in the form of phytohormone transport and protein kinase activation (Brunetti et al., 2018). Guard cells, which open and close stomata, are particularly sensitive to blue light (Frechijia et al., 1999). Optimal plant growth is therefore promoted by the combined exposure to blue and red light, as opposed to monochromatic light (Hogewoning et al., 2010; Hernández and Kubota, 2016).

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have become increasingly popular among agronomists and researchers because of their ability to efficiently modify plant growth and development by providing specific wavelengths of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), especially in the blue and red ranges.

While not all of the spectrum produced by fluorescent/incandescent lighting is equally utilized by plants, use of blue-light LEDs can target processes leading to increases in biomass and in polyphenol, antioxidant, and carotenoid concentrations across various plant species (Johkan et al., 2010; Kopsell and Sams, 2013). Supplemental treatment with red LED light resulted in increased beta-carotene in pea (Wu et al., 2007), polyphenolics in lettuce (Samuolienė et al., 2012) and yield in tomato (Xu et al., 2012). Phytomedicinal properties can also be increased, as pigments upregulated by both blue and red light are associated with anti-carcinogenic activity and enhanced resistance to chronic disease (Kopsell et al., 2014).

Spectral effects on carotenoid biosynthesis are of considerable interest because of their antioxidant activity (Hannoufa and Hossain, 2012). In addition, the carotenoid zeaxanthin is a metabolic precursor of abscisic acid (ABA) (Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005). ABA facilitates communication of stress from roots to shoots, controls stomatal closure to optimize water use efficiency, and regulates expression of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins – all of which protect cells from dehydration (Hanin et al., 2011; Vishwakarma et al., 2017). Red light promotes transcription of phytoene synthase (PSY), the enzyme which catalyzes the first committed step of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway (Cazzonelli and Pogson, 2010) and blue-light-induced stomata opening is facilitated by and increases with zeaxanthin concentration (Frechijia et al., 1999; Taiz and Zeiger, 2006). Altering light quality by using LEDs could therefore enhance stress tolerance by increasing the production of ABA precursors and antioxidant compounds.

Rocket (Eruca sativa), also known as arugula, and lettuce (Lactuca sativa) leaves are popular in salads and are two of the crops most commonly grown indoors and under LEDs (Agrilyst, 2017). However, the artificial environments of indoor farms are susceptible to failures of support systems for temperature and light control, as well as for crop irrigation (Goddek et al., 2019). The effect of LED pre-exposure on drought tolerance has not received much attention (Ahmadi et al., 2019). We investigated the effect of exposure to different ratios of red and blue light on the growth efficiency, nutritional quality, and drought tolerance of the two leafy greens rocket and lettuce.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Heirloom cultivated rocket (Eruca sativa) and romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa, cv.'Dov') seeds (Genesis Seeds, Israel) were planted in 50 mL of 2:1 and 4:1 horticultural peat:potting soil mix (Kekkilä Professional, Vantaa, Finland; EN12580, Tuf Merom Golan, Merom Golan, Israel), respectively. In each experiment there were (4 replicates per light regime) x (3 plants per replicate) x (6 light regimes) for each species, and the experiment was repeated seven times, for a total of n = 28 for each

Pre- and mid-drought physiology

Total chlorophyll measured in rocket seedlings before drought increased 26 % on average under 50R:50B and 25R:75B, compared to white light (Table 1). Seedlings grown under both R:B light regimes maintained higher total chlorophyll concentrations at mid-drought than did control. All blue light treatments increased total chlorophyll in lettuce seedlings pre-drought, with an average increase of 31 % in combined R:B treatments (Table 1). This relationship was maintained at mid-drought. In lettuce

Pre-drought plant morphology

Although leaf development was similar in rocket and lettuce across light treatments, leaf area pre-drought was affected differently in the two species (Fig. 2). The decrease in leaf area in both rocket and lettuce under 25R:75B compared to 50R:50B, though, suggests an inhibitory effect of blue light on leaf area development. This supports the existence of a blue-light mediated defense-growth tradeoff, whereby photosynthetic carbon allocation under blue light is directed into production of

Phytochemicals and antioxidant activity

Carotenoids and flavonoids are both antioxidant metabolites (Hannoufa and Hossain, 2012; Brunetti et al., 2018). Rocket antioxidant activity, but not that of lettuce, closely mirrored the concentration profile of carotenoids and flavonoids as influenced by lighting regime at both pre- and mid-drought (Table 1, Table 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4. Since the DPPH scavenging assay measures only non-enzymatic antioxidant activity (Bartosz, 2010), the disparity between lettuce antioxidant activity and

Conclusion

Light quality can profoundly yet dissimilarly affect many aspects of rocket and lettuce morphology and physiology. Therefore, optimizing a given phenotype in a given species or cultivar may require a specific light quantity and quality (Bantis et al., 2018; Taulavuori et al., 2018). Lettuce is a popular model crop for academic research (Hogewoning et al., 2010; Chen and Yang, 2018) and is also the most cultivated crop in indoor vertical farming systems (Bantis et al., 2018). The variation in

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Daniel N. Ginzburg: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Joshua D. Klein: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Melanie Yelton of LumiGrow Corporation for generously donating two Pro Series 325e LED Grow Lights. At ARO-Volcani Center, we thank Felix Shaya and Mira Weissberg for their assistance in hormonal analysis; Eduard Belausov for assisting in microscopy; Gilor Kelly for providing materials for measuring stomatal development; and Leonid Korol, Galina Shklar, and Lyudmilla Schlizerman for their extensive and generous support in molecular techniques and analyses. We thank two anonymous

References (89)

  • C.I. Cazzonelli et al.

    Source to sink: regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2010)
  • X.L. Chen et al.

    Effects of intermittent light exposure with red and blue light emitting diodes on growth and carbohydrate accumulation of lettuce

    Sci. Hortic.

    (2018)
  • J. Deikman et al.

    Drought tolerance through biotechnology: improving translation from the laboratory to farmers’ fields

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • S.S. Gill et al.

    Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants

    Plant Physiol. Biochem.

    (2010)
  • A. Hannoufa et al.

    Regulation of carotenoid accumulation in plants

    Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • R. Hernández et al.

    Physiological responses of cucumber seedlings under different blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs

    Environ. Exp. Bot.

    (2016)
  • D. Jiménez-Arias et al.

    Lettuce plants treated with L-pyroglutamic acid increase yield under water deficit stress

    Environ. Exp. Bot.

    (2019)
  • M.K. John et al.

    Differential effects of cadmium on lettuce varieties

    Environmental Pollution (1970)

    (1976)
  • S.J. Kim et al.

    Effects of LEDs on net photosynthetic rate, growth and leaf stomata of chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro

    Sci. Hortic.

    (2004)
  • H.K. Lichtenthaler

    Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes

    (1987)
  • D. Ma et al.

    Expression of flavonoid biosynthesis genes and accumulation of flavonoid in wheat leaves in response to drought stress

    Plant Physiol. Biochem.

    (2014)
  • K. Maalekuu et al.

    The relationship between water loss, lipid content, membrane integrity and LOX activity in ripe pepper fruit after storage

    Postharvest Biol. Technol.

    (2006)
  • G.L. Petretto et al.

    Effect of salinity (NaCl) on plant growth, nutrient content, and glucosinolate hydrolysis products trends in rocket genotypes

    Plant Physiol. Biochem.

    (2019)
  • A.M. Shohael et al.

    Effect of light on oxidative stress, secondary metabolites and induction of antioxidant enzymes in Eleutherococcus senticosus somatic embryos in bioreactor

    Process. Biochem.

    (2006)
  • N. Sreenivasulu et al.

    Contrapuntal role of ABA: does it mediate stress tolerance or plant growth retardation under long-term drought stress?

    Gene

    (2012)
  • K. Taulavuori et al.

    Responses of phenolic acid and flavonoid synthesis to blue and blue-violet light depends on plant species

    Environ. Exp. Bot.

    (2018)
  • G. Trouwborst et al.

    Plasticity of photosynthesis after the ‘red light syndrome’ in cucumber

    Environ. Exp. Bot.

    (2016)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Leaf morphology, photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll fluorescence, stomatal development of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to different ratios of red light to blue light

    Front. Plant Sci.

    (2016)
  • M.C. Wu et al.

    A novel approach of LED light radiation improves the antioxidant activity of pea seedlings

    Food Chem.

    (2007)
  • H.L. Xu et al.

    Applications of xerophytophysiology in plant production—LED blue light as a stimulus improved the tomato crop

    Sci. Hortic.

    (2012)
  • Agrilyst

    State of Indoor Farming 2017

    (2017)
  • M. Ahmad et al.

    Action spectrum for cryptochrome-dependent hypocotyl growth inhibition in Arabidopsis

    Plant Physiol.

    (2002)
  • P. Ahmad et al.

    Roles of enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress

    Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.

    (2010)
  • R. Alonso et al.

    Interactive effects of ozone and drought stress on pigments and activities of antioxidative enzymes in Pinus halepensis

    Plant Cell Environ.

    (2001)
  • M. Bajji et al.

    The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat

    Plant Growth Regul.

    (2002)
  • D. Bartels et al.

    Drought and salt tolerance in plants

    Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.

    (2005)
  • G. Bartosz

    Non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity assays: limitations of use in biomedicine

    Free Radic. Res.

    (2010)
  • C.J. Blackman et al.

    Leaf hydraulics and drought stress: response, recovery and survivorship in four woody temperate plant species

    Plant Cell Environ.

    (2009)
  • A. Brazaitytė et al.

    The effect of light-emitting diodes lighting on the growth of tomato transplants

    Zemdirbyste Agric.

    (2010)
  • C. Brunetti et al.

    Modulation of phytohormone signaling: a primary function of flavonoids in plant–environment interactions

    Front. Plant Sci.

    (2018)
  • R.S. Caine et al.

    Rice with reduced stomatal density conserves water and has improved drought tolerance under future climate conditions

    New Phytol.

    (2019)
  • L.J. Chen et al.

    Effects of light quality on the interaction between Cucumber Mosaic Virus and Nicotiana tabacum

    J. Phytopathol.

    (2015)
  • J.M. Christie

    Phototropin blue-light receptors

    Annual Reviews of Plant Biology

    (2007)
  • W.J. Davies et al.

    Long-distance ABA signaling and its relation to other signaling pathways in the detection of soil drying and the mediation of the plant’s response to drought

    J. Plant Growth Regul.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text