LED pre-exposure shines a new light on drought tolerance complexity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and rocket (Eruca sativa)
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The complex mechanisms by which plants tolerate or respond to drought involve chemical signaling and gene expression at the molecular level and altered morphology and physiology at the organism level. Drought, defined as the lack of sufficient water in the plant root zone to sustain maximum growth and productivity (Deikman et al., 2012), is one of the leading contributors to global crop loss (Lesk et al., 2016). Plant tolerance to drought can result from genetic adaptation and/or to horticultural practice and is expressed both physiologically and morphologically through altered gene expression, modified hormonal levels, metabolite biosynthesis and antioxidant activity (Zhang et al., 2014). Seeds, seedlings, and mature plants can be treated with compounds to induce protection against drought (Ashraf et al., 2011), and the environment itself (i.e. light quantity and quality or soil structure and chemistry) can be modified to provide protection (Kammann et al., 2011).
Common physiological adaptations to improve water use efficiency upon drought stress perception include reducing leaf area growth and increasing root growth, modifying cellular relative water content via osmotic adjustment, and abscisic acid-induced stomata closure (Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Taiz and Zeiger, 2006). An equilibrium exists between reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which occurs even under healthy conditions, and ROS scavenging. Biotic or abiotic stresses disrupt this equilibrium and result in damaging levels of ROS. ROS concentrations increase under drought and become most toxic in organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts which facilitate a high rate of electron flow (Gill and Tuteja, 2010). A common drought stress response is therefore the induction of antioxidative enzymes and metabolites to neutralize the damaging effects of ROS (Bernstein et al., 2010). The specific antioxidant compounds (enzymatic and non-enzymatic) upregulated during stress conditions, and the degree of their expression are influenced by the developmental state of the plant, the duration of the stress, and subcellular localization of ROS accumulation (Gill and Tuteja, 2010).
Drier and hotter climate conditions are predicted in the coming decades, so it is crucial to improve water use efficiency with techniques that confer drought tolerance on current crop varieties, in addition to breeding more stress-resistant varieties. Developing new water-saving cultivation strategies, such as controlled-environment agriculture, can also reduce overall water use to meet current and future crop demands (Taulavuori et al., 2017; Bantis et al., 2018).
Blue (400−500 nm) and red (600−700 nm) light wavelengths, which are selectively absorbed by photosynthetic pigments, influence the development and efficiency of photosynthetic machinery, as well as phytochemical synthesis and plant architecture (Chen and Yang, 2018). Specialized photoreceptors for red- (phytochromes; Mathews, 2006) and blue-light (cryptochromes, phototropins, zeaxanthin; Ahmad et al., 2002; Valverde et al., 2004) regulate specific responses to the nature of incident light either separately or in a co-regulatory manner (Fraikin et al., 2013; Christie, 2007).
Expression of both red and blue photoreceptors above a critical threshold is needed for proper activation of specific morphological and physiological responses to light, such as inhibition of hypocotyl elongation (Hernández and Kubota, 2016), or enhancement of flavonoid biosynthesis via chalcone synthase (CHS) (Wade et al., 2001), a phenomenon known as photoreceptor “co-action” (Mohr, 1994). Flavonoids are involved in the absorption of high-energy wavelengths, ROS scavenging, and developmental regulation in the form of phytohormone transport and protein kinase activation (Brunetti et al., 2018). Guard cells, which open and close stomata, are particularly sensitive to blue light (Frechijia et al., 1999). Optimal plant growth is therefore promoted by the combined exposure to blue and red light, as opposed to monochromatic light (Hogewoning et al., 2010; Hernández and Kubota, 2016).
Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have become increasingly popular among agronomists and researchers because of their ability to efficiently modify plant growth and development by providing specific wavelengths of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), especially in the blue and red ranges.
While not all of the spectrum produced by fluorescent/incandescent lighting is equally utilized by plants, use of blue-light LEDs can target processes leading to increases in biomass and in polyphenol, antioxidant, and carotenoid concentrations across various plant species (Johkan et al., 2010; Kopsell and Sams, 2013). Supplemental treatment with red LED light resulted in increased beta-carotene in pea (Wu et al., 2007), polyphenolics in lettuce (Samuolienė et al., 2012) and yield in tomato (Xu et al., 2012). Phytomedicinal properties can also be increased, as pigments upregulated by both blue and red light are associated with anti-carcinogenic activity and enhanced resistance to chronic disease (Kopsell et al., 2014).
Spectral effects on carotenoid biosynthesis are of considerable interest because of their antioxidant activity (Hannoufa and Hossain, 2012). In addition, the carotenoid zeaxanthin is a metabolic precursor of abscisic acid (ABA) (Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005). ABA facilitates communication of stress from roots to shoots, controls stomatal closure to optimize water use efficiency, and regulates expression of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins – all of which protect cells from dehydration (Hanin et al., 2011; Vishwakarma et al., 2017). Red light promotes transcription of phytoene synthase (PSY), the enzyme which catalyzes the first committed step of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway (Cazzonelli and Pogson, 2010) and blue-light-induced stomata opening is facilitated by and increases with zeaxanthin concentration (Frechijia et al., 1999; Taiz and Zeiger, 2006). Altering light quality by using LEDs could therefore enhance stress tolerance by increasing the production of ABA precursors and antioxidant compounds.
Rocket (Eruca sativa), also known as arugula, and lettuce (Lactuca sativa) leaves are popular in salads and are two of the crops most commonly grown indoors and under LEDs (Agrilyst, 2017). However, the artificial environments of indoor farms are susceptible to failures of support systems for temperature and light control, as well as for crop irrigation (Goddek et al., 2019). The effect of LED pre-exposure on drought tolerance has not received much attention (Ahmadi et al., 2019). We investigated the effect of exposure to different ratios of red and blue light on the growth efficiency, nutritional quality, and drought tolerance of the two leafy greens rocket and lettuce.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Heirloom cultivated rocket (Eruca sativa) and romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa, cv.'Dov') seeds (Genesis Seeds, Israel) were planted in 50 mL of 2:1 and 4:1 horticultural peat:potting soil mix (Kekkilä Professional, Vantaa, Finland; EN12580, Tuf Merom Golan, Merom Golan, Israel), respectively. In each experiment there were (4 replicates per light regime) x (3 plants per replicate) x (6 light regimes) for each species, and the experiment was repeated seven times, for a total of n = 28 for each
Pre- and mid-drought physiology
Total chlorophyll measured in rocket seedlings before drought increased 26 % on average under 50R:50B and 25R:75B, compared to white light (Table 1). Seedlings grown under both R:B light regimes maintained higher total chlorophyll concentrations at mid-drought than did control. All blue light treatments increased total chlorophyll in lettuce seedlings pre-drought, with an average increase of 31 % in combined R:B treatments (Table 1). This relationship was maintained at mid-drought. In lettuce
Pre-drought plant morphology
Although leaf development was similar in rocket and lettuce across light treatments, leaf area pre-drought was affected differently in the two species (Fig. 2). The decrease in leaf area in both rocket and lettuce under 25R:75B compared to 50R:50B, though, suggests an inhibitory effect of blue light on leaf area development. This supports the existence of a blue-light mediated defense-growth tradeoff, whereby photosynthetic carbon allocation under blue light is directed into production of
Phytochemicals and antioxidant activity
Carotenoids and flavonoids are both antioxidant metabolites (Hannoufa and Hossain, 2012; Brunetti et al., 2018). Rocket antioxidant activity, but not that of lettuce, closely mirrored the concentration profile of carotenoids and flavonoids as influenced by lighting regime at both pre- and mid-drought (Table 1, Table 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4. Since the DPPH scavenging assay measures only non-enzymatic antioxidant activity (Bartosz, 2010), the disparity between lettuce antioxidant activity and
Conclusion
Light quality can profoundly yet dissimilarly affect many aspects of rocket and lettuce morphology and physiology. Therefore, optimizing a given phenotype in a given species or cultivar may require a specific light quantity and quality (Bantis et al., 2018; Taulavuori et al., 2018). Lettuce is a popular model crop for academic research (Hogewoning et al., 2010; Chen and Yang, 2018) and is also the most cultivated crop in indoor vertical farming systems (Bantis et al., 2018). The variation in
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Daniel N. Ginzburg: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Joshua D. Klein: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgements
We thank Melanie Yelton of LumiGrow Corporation for generously donating two Pro Series 325e LED Grow Lights. At ARO-Volcani Center, we thank Felix Shaya and Mira Weissberg for their assistance in hormonal analysis; Eduard Belausov for assisting in microscopy; Gilor Kelly for providing materials for measuring stomatal development; and Leonid Korol, Galina Shklar, and Lyudmilla Schlizerman for their extensive and generous support in molecular techniques and analyses. We thank two anonymous
References (89)
- et al.
Lettuce quality loss under conditions that favor the wilting phenomenon
Postharvest Biol. Technol.
(2011) - et al.
Improvement in drought tolerance of lemon balm, Melissa officinalis L. Under the pre-treatment of LED lighting
Plant Physiol. Biochem.
(2019) - et al.
Relative membrane permeability and activities of some antioxidant enzymes as the key determinants of salt tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.)
Environ. Exp. Bot.
(2008) - et al.
Drought tolerance: roles of organic osmolytes, growth regulators, and mineral nutrients
(2011) - et al.
Guard cell sensory systems: recent insights on stomatal responses to light, abscisic acid, and CO2
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
(2016) - et al.
Artificial LED lighting enhances growth characteristics and total phenolic content of Ocimum basilicum, but variably affects transplant success
Sci. Hortic.
(2016) - et al.
Current status and recent achievements in the field of horticulture with the use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs)
Sci. Hortic.
(2018) - et al.
Stomatal density and metabolic determinants mediate salt stress adaptation and water use efficiency in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.)
J. Plant Physiol.
(2012) - et al.
Involvement of the plant antioxidative response in the differential growth sensitivity to salinity of leaves vs roots during cell development
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
(2010) - et al.
Kinetics and mechanisms of antioxidant activity using the DPPH. Free radical method
LWT-Food Science and Technology
(1997)