Elsevier

Energy Policy

Volume 34, Issue 5, March 2006, Pages 574-582
Energy Policy

Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy–GDP ratio to composite efficiency index

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Since the 1973 world oil crisis, monitoring trends in energy efficiency at the economy-wide level has been an important component of energy strategy in many countries. To support this effort, various energy efficiency-related indicators have been developed. We examine some classical indicators which are often found in national and international energy studies in the 1970s and 1980s. We then describe the recent developments in using the index decomposition analysis to give an economy-wide composite energy efficiency index based on a bottom-up approach. This composite index is superior to the classical indicators as an economy-wide energy efficiency measure and has lately been adopted by a growing number of countries for national energy efficiency trend monitoring.

Introduction

National energy efficiency measurement and monitoring became an important component of energy strategy in many countries, especially the energy-deficient ones, in the aftermath of the 1973 world oil crisis. With substantial increases in world oil prices, many countries recognized the need to understand how effective energy was being consumed in their economies and to increase energy efficiency. To serve these purposes, appropriate energy efficiency indicators were developed and applied so that any efficiency changes that took place could be quantitatively expressed. These indicators were also used in cross-country comparisons to explain differences in energy performance between countries and for international benchmarking.

Since the late 1980s, resulting from the growing concern about global warming caused by the burning of fossil fuels, energy efficiency improvement has become yet another natural step for countries to take to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In particular, at the 1997 third Conference of the Parties held in Kyoto, participating countries agreed to a timetable of GHG emissions reductions for the years 2008–2012 relative to the 1990 levels. A key element of the strategy of most countries to meet their reduction objective is to take steps to increase energy efficiency in all sectors of the economy. It has become necessary for them to assess fulfillment of energy efficiency improvement targets in a rigorous manner. As a result, there has been new emphasis on the development and application of economy-wide energy efficiency indicators both for evaluation and monitoring purposes.

Several examples may be cited to show that energy efficiency indicators development and national energy efficiency monitoring have been attracting growing interest internationally. Started as far back as in 1992 and involving 16 countries, the European SAVE project on energy efficiency indicators with the objective to set up a permanent structure for monitoring national achievement in energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions is still an on-going effort (ODYSSEE, 2005). The US Department of Energy began its energy-efficiency analysis in 1993 and published its first comprehensive report on the development of robust energy-efficiency indicators for each of the sectors of the US economy in 1995 (Energy Information Administration, 1995). More recently, the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (2005) of the US Department of Energy has also established a new national system of indicators to track changes in the energy intensity of the US economy and economic sectors over time. The International Energy Agency has been developing energy efficiency indicators since 1995 and its first major publication on the subject appeared in 1997 (International Energy Agency, 1997). In 1997, a special issue of Energy Policy (Volume 25, Issue 7–9) was devoted entirely to the subject of energy efficiency indicators. More than 50 World Energy Council member committees participated in a collaborative process leading to a report on energy efficiency polices and indicators (World Energy Council, 2001). Energy efficiency indicators are the subject of two recent major reports by the Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre, 2001, Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre, 2002. Canada published its sixth annual review of its state of energy efficiency in 2004 (Natural Resources Canada, 2004) and New Zealand published its first in 2003 (Energy Efficiency Conservation Authority, 2003). A recent report on trends in Australian energy intensity (Tedesco and Thorpe, 2003) has been prepared under the auspices of the Australian Ministerial Council on Energy.

Energy efficiency is difficult to conceptualise and there is no single commonly accepted definition. An engineer, economist, environmentalist, etc, may each have a different concept of energy efficiency. Some relevant references that deal with the different definitions include Patterson (1996), Lovins (2004), Huntington (1994) and Boyd (2005). From the literature, energy efficiency is often measured in terms of thermodynamic indicators, physical-based indicators (energy requirements per unit physical output) and monetary-based indicators (energy requirements per dollar output). Each group of indicators tends to serve a certain purpose and the appropriate indicator to use depends on the objective, whether it is concerned with engineering/systems design, economic productivity, the environment, resource depletion, sustainability, national security, etc. Experience shows that none could be claimed to be the best in all situations. Relatively, thermodynamic indicators are not often used in national and international energy policy studies. We shall confine our discussions to physical- and monetary-based indicators. In this context, energy efficiency improvement generally means using less energy to produce the same amount of services or useful output.

We review several classical monetary-based indicators that were widely used in the 1970s and 1980s, namely the energy to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio, energy coefficient and energy elasticity. We then review the index decomposition analysis (IDA) and its application to produce an energy efficiency-related indictor. We explain how the technique of IDA has been incorporated in a bottom-up approach to produce an economy-wide composite energy efficiency index. This approach is the current “state-of-the-art” to produce indices for monitoring national energy efficiency trends and has been adopted by a growing number of countries. Based on this approach, we present the relevant formulae for a specific IDA method, i.e. the logarithmic mean Divisia index method, for the computation of the composite energy efficiency index.

Section snippets

Energy efficiency indicators

Energy efficiency indicators, or more generally energy performance indicators, give the links between energy use and some relevant monetary or physical indicators measuring the demand for energy services. They may be defined at different levels of aggregation in terms of energy demand, e.g. economy-wide, sector, sub-sector, end use, technology, process and device.

Monetary-based indicators are often used when energy efficiency is measured at a high level of aggregation, where it is not possible

Energy–GDP ratio

The ratio of total national primary energy consumption to GDP (or GNP), or the energy–GDP ratio, is one of the most enduring aggregate monetary-based energy efficiency indicators. This ratio is a measure of the energy intensity of the economy at the most aggregate level; its inverse is taken as a measure of the energy efficiency at the most aggregate level without adjustment for changes in factors unrelated to efficiency. This indictor was often employed by researchers in the 1970s and early

Energy coefficient and elasticity

The energy coefficient and energy elasticity are two other energy efficiency indicators often found in energy studies in the 1970s and 1980s. Compared to the energy–GDP ratio, these two indicators have the advantage of being an index, which allows comparisons to be made over long time periods and across country. Their underlying concept is very similar to the popular income elasticity. The UK Department of Energy (1977) and Ang (1991) deal with these indicators and the related issues. There has

Drawbacks of classical aggregate indicators

The energy–GDP ratio is an aggregate measure and the denominator, GDP, represents many diverse activities. The energy intensities of these activities may differ widely and a change in the activity mix, i.e. structural change, which is unrelated to energy efficiency, can cause significant variations in the energy–GDP ratio over time regardless of changes in the energy intensities. As an energy efficiency indicator, the energy–GDP ratio may not be a good measure of the efficiency with which

Index decomposition analysis

Assume that total energy consumption in a specific sector is the sum of consumption in n different sub-sectors and define the following variables for a certain time period:

    E=

    total energy consumption in the sector

    Ei=

    energy consumption in sub-sector i

    Q=

    total activity level of the sector

    Qi=

    activity level of sub-sector i

    Si=

    activity share of sub-sector i (=Qi/Q)

    I=

    aggregate energy intensity (=E/Q)

    Ii=

    energy intensity of sub-sector i (=Ei/Qi)

Assume that activity levels for all sub-sectors are measured

Composite energy efficiency index

While energy efficiency indictors may be developed for the various sectors, sub-sectors and end-uses, summary measures for a country are ultimately needed where national energy strategy is concerned. It is therefore logical to derive a national composite energy efficiency index by aggregating the energy efficiency indicators derived for individual sectors. An advantage of a bottom-up approach is that it provides some flexibility in the choice of activity indicators. With appropriate choices,

Conclusion

Over the last three decades, economy-wide energy efficiency indicators have evolved from the simple energy–GDP ratio to the sophisticated composite energy efficiency index derived from extensive energy and economic and physical data bases using the technique of IDA. The development and application of energy efficiency indicators were first driven by the concern on world energy supply in the 1970s and reinforced by the concern about global warming and the need to reduce the growth or cut

References (39)

  • A.B. Lovins

    Energy efficiency: taxonomic overview

  • M. Nanduri et al.

    Aggregating physical intensity indicators: results of applying the composite indicator approach to the Canadian industrial sector

    Energy Policy

    (2002)
  • S.H. Park

    Decomposition of industrial energy consumption—an alternative method

    Energy Economics

    (1992)
  • M.G. Patterson

    What is energy efficiency? Concepts, issues and methodological issues

    Energy Policy

    (1996)
  • Ang, B.W., Liu, N., 2006. A cross-country analysis of aggregate energy and carbon intensities. Energy Policy, in...
  • APEC Energy Database, 2004. The Institute of Energy Economics, Tokyo...
  • Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre, 2001. Energy efficiency indicators—a study of energy efficiency indicators in APEC...
  • Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre, 2002. Energy efficiency indicators and potential energy savings in APEC economies....
  • G.A. Boyd

    A statistical model for measuring the efficiency gap between average and best practice energy use: the ENERGY STAR™ industrial energy performance indicator

    Journal of Industrial Ecology

    (2005)
  • Cited by (252)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Paper presented at the 30 Years of World Energy Policy: The International Editorial Board Meeting of Energy Policy Journal and Workshop, 23–25 March 2004, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.

    View full text