Elsevier

Engineering Structures

Volume 31, Issue 10, October 2009, Pages 2317-2326
Engineering Structures

Bridge support elastic reactions under vertical earthquake ground motion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.001Get rights and content

Abstract

In North America, bridges are not typically designed for vertical earthquake ground motion. Design codes, AASHTO in the USA and S6-06 in Canada, do not explicitly consider the effect of vertical earthquake ground motion in the design of highway bridges. However, analytical and field evidences have often drawn engineers’ attention to the damage potential of vertical earthquake ground motion to engineered bridges. This paper proposes a simplified method to calculate elastic support reactions under vertical earthquake ground motion. Support reactions are first calculated by exact dynamic method. By applying a few assumptions, a simplified method has been developed. The developed method can be readily used in the design of typical bridges with regular span distribution. This simplified method has been demonstrated with several examples.

Introduction

Vertical earthquake ground motion is not explicitly considered in American and Canadian design codes for bridges [1], [2]. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code [2] takes into account the vertical earthquake ground motion in a simplified way by increasing and decreasing the dead load action in load combinations, irrespective of earthquake magnitude, fault distance, and site soil condition. In the Caltrans seismic design criteria [3], vertical ground motion is only considered as an equivalent static vertical load when the site peak rock acceleration is 0.6g or greater. The recent edition of Eurocode [4] has proposed to take into account the effect of vertical earthquake ground motion when the bridge is located within 5 km of an active seismotectonic fault or in high seismic zones.

When the effects of vertical earthquake ground motion are explicitly considered in the design process, the vertical response spectrum is taken typically as the two-thirds of the horizontal response spectrum for the entire period range of engineering interest. This approach was originally proposed by Newmark et al. [5] and has since been widely used. However, analyses of strong motion data indicate that in the vicinity of moderate to strong motion earthquakes, vertical to horizontal (V/H) peak ground acceleration ratio often exceeds unity; hence, the 2/3 rule is not reasonable [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. In addition, a recent research investigation has also shown that V/H spectral ratio can approach 1.8 at large magnitude earthquake events for short site source distances and short periods [10]. Some recent studies have focused on the shape of the vertical response spectrum and proposed design vertical acceleration response spectrum consisting of a flat portion at short periods (0.05–0.15 s) and a decaying spectral acceleration at longer periods [8], [10], [11]. Typically, the vertical ground motion has lower energy content than the horizontal ground motion over the frequency range of interest. However, all its energy is concentrated in a narrow frequency band and can be destructive to the engineered structures having vertical frequencies within that range (5–20 Hz).

A literature survey indicates that only a few studies have been conducted to quantify the effect of vertical ground motion on bridges [12], [13], [14], [15]. Analytical studies, in line with field observations, found that certain failure modes are directly related to high vertical ground acceleration [15]. In addition to the possibility of compressive over-stressing or failure due to direct compression, vertical motion may induce failure in shear and flexure and can cause bearing and expansion joint failures. All the analytical studies carried out to date are based on finite element modelling of the bridges and emphasize the importance of incorporating the vertical ground motion in the design process [12], [13], [14], [15]. However, these studies have not clearly defined the way to incorporate the effects of vertical ground motion into the design process. One of the studies emphasized the need to develop a simplified method for the inclusion of the vertical earthquake ground motion in the design process [15].

The purpose of the current study is to develop a simplified method to quantify the elastic support reactions of bridges under vertical earthquake ground motion. It is noted that nonlinear effect is not generally considered for the vertical earthquake ground motion [4]. The developed method requires few calculations and can be readily used by design offices for the design of simple highway bridges and preliminary design of more complex bridges. The method has been found to be in excellent agreement with the analytical results.

Section snippets

Calculations of support reactions under vertical earthquake ground motion

Generally, three methods are used in practice for the calculation of support reactions: (i) Rayleigh method: This method has been recommended by American and Canadian bridge design codes [1], [2] for irregular ordinary multispan bridges and regular essential or emergency-route bridges in seismic performance zone 2 or less. Rayleigh method is generally not recommended for vertical ground motion since the choice of deflection shape for a complex system is not straightforward [16] and does not

Simplified method for support reactions

As mentioned earlier, calculating support reactions from Eq. (12) is tedious; however, the equation can be simplified assuming the bridges as rigid or flexible.

Code recommendations for vertical earthquake ground motion

Vertical earthquake ground motion is not explicitly considered in the American and Canadian design codes for bridges [1], [2] and hence no proposal has been made for vertical earthquake response spectra. It has been discussed in Section 1 that scaling the horizontal response spectra by 2/3 to get the vertical response spectra is non-conservative, particularly in the short period range. The recent edition of Eurocode [4] can be considered as a significant improvement over other design codes.

Summary of the simplified method for rigid bridges

  • (i)

    Identify class of bridge, unit weight w and span length L.

  • (ii)

    Determine seismic acceleration coefficient (or zonal acceleration ratio) A [1], [2]. Identify the a-value as the maximum response spectral acceleration (Fig. 5). For site specific vertical acceleration response spectrum, a-value represents the plateau of the response spectrum.

  • (iii)

    Determine value of bi from Fig. 2.

  • (iv)

    Calculate reaction of each support i as: Ri=abiwL.

Summary of the simplified method for flexible bridges

  • (i)

    Identify class of bridge, unit weight w and span length L.

  • (ii)

    Identify type of soil,

Conclusions and recommendations

A theoretical approach to calculate support reactions of bridges under vertical earthquake ground motion has been presented. Based on this theoretical approach, a simplified method has been developed that enables the calculation support reactions efficiently with less computational efforts. The method can be easily adopted in the seismic design of highway bridges.

Using the developed simplified method, the dominant vertical modal period of the bridge can be calculated, which can be used to check

Acknowledgments

The research work described in this paper commenced since the first author worked at SETRA-Large Bridge Division in France. Invaluable contributions from several individuals of SETRA including P. Corfdir, M. Kahan, R. Tardy, T. Kretz, E. Bouchon and A. Chabert, are gratefully acknowledged. Invaluable contribution by undergraduate student Mathieu Pacocha has been gratefully acknowledged. Financial support from Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada is also gratefully

References (22)

  • AASHTO

    AASHTO LFRD bridge design specifications

    (2007)
  • CAN/CSA-S6-06

    Canadian highway bridge design code

    (2006)
  • Caltrans

    Seismic design criteria (version 1.3)

    (2004)
  • EN1998-2:2005. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2: Bridge. Brussels: European committee for...
  • N.M. Newmark et al.

    Seismic design spectra for nuclear power plants

    J Power Div ASCE

    (1973)
  • N.A. Abrahamson et al.

    Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration

    Bull Seismol Soc Am

    (1989)
  • M. Niazi et al.

    Behavior of near-source peak horizontal and vertical ground motions over SMART-1 array, Taiwan

    Bull Seismol Soc Am

    (1991)
  • A.S. Elnashai et al.

    Procedure and spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loads

    J Earthq Eng

    (1997)
  • C.J. Collier et al.

    A procedure for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effects

    J Earthq Eng

    (2001)
  • Y. Bozorgnia et al.

    The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra

    J Earthq Eng

    (2004)
  • A.S. Elnashai

    Seismic design with vertical earthquake motion

  • Cited by (11)

    • Effects of vertical ground acceleration on the seismic moment demand of bridge superstructure connections

      2022, Engineering Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      This shear strength degradation due to axial load fluctuation had also been shown experimentally [12,13] and the tensile force generated by the vertical excitation was deemed as the main cause [14]. A study by Legeron and Sheikh [15] showed that the elastic support reactions due to vertical ground acceleration could be estimated using simplified analysis that could also estimate the vertical modal period of the bridge. While the importance of incorporating the vertical accelerations was emphasized following damage to or collapse of bridges in the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, as previously discussed, some studies have shown that the vertical acceleration was not primarily responsible for the corresponding damage or collapse [16–19].

    • Simplified equivalent static methods for seismic analysis of shallow buried rectangular underground structures

      2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      It worked as some accumulation on the top slabs and had a weak link with other surrounding soil during the subsequent earthquake process [47]. In fact, the vertical inertia force changed the axial compression load of supported components, and then the shear strength and deformation capacity were decreased obviously, which was very disadvantageous for the safety of structures, including underground structures [48,49] and bridges [50]. According to the studies about the failure mechanism of the Daikai subway station [46–48], the central columns would share larger shear force caused by the horizontal deformation of the field and the columns broke before the lateral walls, which resulted in the collapse of the whole structure.

    • Estimating the response of steel structures subjected to vertical seismic excitation: Idealized model and inelastic displacement ratio

      2017, Engineering Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gulerce et al. [30] derived seismic demand models for typical highway overcrossings, which could be used as risk-based design tools and included in probabilistic seismic risk assessments. Legeron and Sheikh [31] proposed a simplified method to calculate the elastic support reactions of typical bridges with regular span distribution subjected to VSEs. Generally, the accurate structural responses induced by severe earthquakes can only be obtained via the nonlinear response history analysis (RHA) method.

    • Effects of vertical earthquake ground motions on seismic response of steel-concrete plate composite beam bridges

      2020, Proceedings - 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data and Smart City, ICITBS 2020
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1 819 821 7395; fax: +1 819 821 7974.

    View full text