A case history of field pumping tests in a deep gravel formation in the Taipei Basin, Taiwan
Graphical Abstract
Research Highlights
►Method accounting both the late-time characteristics and the early-time behavior is developed. ►Five factors involved in the hydraulic parameter estimates are taken into account in this method. ►This turns out to be of some relevance for a most reliable determination of hydraulic parameters.
Introduction
The construction site (CR) of 125 m in length and 14.9 to 25.9 m in width is located at the crossing of the Xinzhuang line and the Luzhou line of the Taipei Rapid Transit System (TRTS) (Fig. 1). As the northbound and southbound tunnels were constructed overlapping each other underneath the Tamshui River which directly runs into the Taiwan Strait, the excavation reached 39.5 to 41.5 m below the ground surface. 33 large-diameter wells embedded in 2 m thick and 63 m deep diaphragm walls along with a 5 m thick jet grouting were constructed to reduce the uplift pressures and retain substantial lateral pressures during such a massive underground excavation.
In the current study, five factors were involved in the derivation of hydraulic parameters, which include periodical fluctuation, partial penetration well effect, wellbore storage, skin, and leakage problem. As such the drawdown cannot be accommodated in theoretical well formulae, the pumping well cannot be properly and economically deployed at the construction site. For most of the coastal areas the groundwater level in the confined aquifer is affected by the tidal influence, which induces the periodical fluctuation of drawdown during the pumping test. Use of the drawdown data where there is a partial penetration well effect will result in a large error in the determination of storage coefficient. Neglecting both the wellbore storage and skin will cause serious overestimate of storage coefficient and underestimate of transmissivity. Before the derivation of parameters, it needs to know if the late-time drawdown is affected by either leakage from the overlying/underlying formation or recharge from the possible hydrogeologic boundary. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to propose a method to remove these five factors involved in the derivation of hydraulic parameters, which devotes much attention to the late-time characteristics of drawdown data and the early-time behavior of drawdown.
Section snippets
Geology and hydrogeology
Fig. 1 shows the location of the construction site CR and remote sites and two geological profiles derived from the geological database (GEOLOG) (Lee, 1990) of the Taipei Basin, which comprises the loggings from 248 boreholes drilled through a thick alluvial formation (the Sungshan formation) of alternating soft clay and silty sand layers, of which six has been distinguished, into a gravel formation (the Chingmei gravel formation). The thickness of the Sungshan formation varies from 40 to 55 m
Proposed method
The proposed method of removing those five influencing factors on the drawdown curve is described herein.
Method validation
For a confined, homogeneous, and isotropic aquifer, the dimensionless drawdown solution for a fully penetrating pumping well subject to both skin and wellbore storage is (Agarwal et al., 1970, Kabala, 2001):where τ = Tt/(rw2S) is dimensionless time, and p is the Laplace transform parameter with respect to τ, and αw = S(rw/rwc)2 is wellbore storage coefficient of the pumping well. The symbol of L−1 denotes the Laplace inversion, which can be calculated
Multi-well pumping test
The actual drawdown induced by a single-well pumping at some distance is the sum of s + Δs2 where s is derived using Theis (1935) with the estimated hydraulic parameters, T = 3.50 m2/min and S = 0.00095, and Δs2 is determined using Hantush, 1961a, Hantush, 1961b. The drawdown induced by multi-well pumping can be calculated by superimposing the drawdown induced by each single-well pumping. It can be seen from Fig. 19, the comparison between the calculated drawdowns and those measured from ELP8002,
Discussion and conclusion
As the excavation reached 40 m below the ground surface, 33 pumping wells embedded in 2 m thick and 63 m deep diaphragm walls along with a 5 m thick jet grouting were used to reduce both the uplift pressures and groundwater inflow during excavations. As the actual thickness of the pumped aquifer is unknown, the installed wells are regarded as partial penetration wells. Single-well test was conducted to derive the hydraulic parameter estimates. After the completion of single-well pumping test,
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to acknowledge Mr. G. Lee, the former graduate student, for the field investigation and the data collection that made this research possible and to express sincere thanks to one anonymous reviewer for the valuable comments and corrections to improve the article.
References (36)
- et al.
Theoretical evaluation of non-uniform skin effect on aquifer response under constant rate pumping
J. Hydrol.
(2006) Sensitivity analysis of a pumping test on a well with wellbore storage and skin
Adv. Water Res.
(2001)- et al.
Pumping test using large diameter production and observation wells
J. Hydrol.
(1986) - et al.
Hydraulics of a finite-diameter horizontal well with wellbore storage and skin effect
Adv. Water Res.
(2002) - et al.
Hydraulics of horizontal wells in fractured shallow aquifer systems
J. Hydrol.
(2003) - et al.
An investigation of wellbore storage and skin effect in unsteady liquid flow: I. Analytical treatment
Trans. Soc. Pet. Eng. AIME
(1970) - et al.
Observation well response time and its effect upon aquifer test results
J. Hydrol.
(1977) The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests
(1998)- et al.
Determining aquifer characteristics by the tidal method
Water Resour. Res.
(1969) - et al.
Effects of monitoring and pumping well pipe capacities during pumping tests in confined aquifers
Can. Geotech. J.
(2003)
Pumping test in a confined aquifer under tidal influence
Ground Water
Use of cumulative volume of constant-head injection test to estimate aquifer parameters with skin effects: field experiment and data analysis
Water Resour. Res.
A simple data analysis method for a pumping test with skin and wellbore storage effects
Terr. Atmos. Ocean Sci.
Analysis of interference test data influenced by wellbore storage and skin at the flowing well
J. Pet. Technol.
A generalized graphical method for evaluating function constants and summarizing well-field history
Trans. AGU
The effect of tidal fluctuation on a coastal aquifer in the UK
Ground Water
Cyclic fluctuations of water level as a basis for determining aquifer transmissibility
Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Publ.
Cited by (53)
Responses of groundwater and soil to dewatering considering the barrier effect of adjacent metro station on multi-aquifers
2022, Journal of HydrologyCitation Excerpt :With the rapid urbanization in many regions, a huge demand exists for the construction of underground infrastructures (Ni et al., 2011; Attard et al., 2017; Pujades et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Zeng et al., 2019c; Zheng et al., 2019a; Li et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2021; Zeng et al., 2021d).
Construction dewatering in a metro station incorporating buttress retaining wall to limit ground settlement: Insights from experimental modelling
2021, Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyCitation Excerpt :In recent years, the rapid development of urban rail transport in China gives rise to plenty of deep excavations, with mostly 15–30 m deep, usually being subject to the threat from high water levels in multi aquifers (Shen et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Li et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2018a; Tan et al., 2018b; Wang et al., 2018b; Li et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2020; Zeng et al., 2021a; Lin et al., 2021). Typically, sealing curtain, together with dewatering wells placed in front of enclosure wall, are employed as groundwater control system to ensure the construction safety, and to minimize the dewatering-induced environmental problems such as groundwater drawdown (Ni et al., 2011; Serrano-Juan et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018a; Cheng et al., 2020; Ha et al., 2020), ground settlement (Shen et al., 2013; Pujades et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018a; Zhang et al., 2018c; Goh et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2019), earth fissure (Pacheco-Martínez et al., 2013) and building damage (Tan et al., 2016). However, with the excavation depth increased, it is usually hard to totally cut off the dewatering aquifers using sealing curtain due to some technical or economic reasons.
An empirical specific storage-depth model for the Earth's crust
2021, Journal of Hydrology