Experimental study of a PH-CAES system: Proof of concept
Introduction
The concept of CAES (Compressed Air Energy Storage) systems first appeared in the 1940s, when Stal Laval filed a patent, using an underground cavern for compressed air storage [1]. By the mid-1970s, the interest in the CAES technologies increased, and currently two large-scale CAES power plants are operating [2,3]. One of them, with a current capacity was built in the 1970s in Huntorf, Germany, and the other was built in 1991 in McIntosh, Alabama, USA, with an installed capacity of [[4], [5], [6]].
Recent interest in CAES relies on the application to renewable and intermittent sources to pressurize atmospheric air and store it inside natural or artificial caves. This stored compressed air is released and expanded into a turbine [4] generating energy, when needed.
During the compression stage, heat is generated as the air pressure increases. This heat may or may not be stored and recovered to increase the CAES round-trip efficiency. In this sense, authors usually divide CAES systems into three main categories [4]: adiabatic (A-CAES), diabatic (D-CAES) and isothermal (I-CAES). In the first one, heat generated by compression is stored in Thermal Energy Storage (TES) tanks, and recovered when expansion takes place [[7], [8], [9]]. Conversely, on D-CAES, heat is lost to the surroundings, and during the expansion process, the compressed air must be heated by an external source before entering the turbine [10,11]. On the latter, I-CAES, fluids and structures are used to prevent air to change temperature during the compression and expansion [12,13]. Other different approaches can be found in the literature. Facci et al. [14] proposes a trigenerative (T-CAES) approach to small scale CAES in which heat is taken from the system between compression stages and returned during the expansion. Sun et al. [15], conversely, studied integrating a conventional wind turbine with a CAES system, which in turn, utilizes a scroll turbine, with power conversion efficiency peaking at . In Ref. [16], authors studied the integration of a CAES system to a diesel generator for applications in remote areas, resulting in fuel consumption from 50 to of a similarly sized conventional diesel system. Similarly [17], proposes a hybrid Wind-Diesel-Compressed Air Energy Storage system, in which the energy surplus is stored as compressed air, later used to assist diesel combustion in an electric generator, focusing in isolated rural areas. Kantharaj et al. [18] suggested to use compressed air of a CAES system as input of a liquefaction cycle, and thus, storing liquefied air close to ambient pressures. In Ref. [19], authors examined an offshore underwater Compressed Air Storage System (named OCAES) to store energy coming from offshore wind turbines, and concluded that this concept is not economically viable yet. In Ref. [20], it is presented a multiple stage underwater CAES (named UWCAES), with exergetic efficiency of around . Cheung et al. [21] also worked with UWCAES, but instead of working with an offshore wind turbine, it operates with surplus energy coming from the power grid, and storage takes place underwater in air accumulators. Finally [22], performed a study in the application of CAES in aquifers (CAESA), coupled with Aquifers Thermal Energy Storage (ATES).
Despite the enthusiasm with the technology potential, CAES still suffer with more basic issues. CAES turbines work only with air at relatively low temperature and with variable inlet pressure. In terms of commercialized turbines, it is an off-design condition. To deal with this problem, Ennil [23] built a small-scale axial turbine with 1.0 kW, which is optimized to work with compressed air. Thales et al. [24] built a turbine from an automotive turbocharger, and the overall efficiency found was up to 45%. Reduced scale studies such as provided by Refs. [23] and [24] are very important to evaluate the technology potential, before producing it in commercial scales. This step of design is called here proof of concept.
In this work we present a novel solution for CAES systems, using a small scale hydraulic turbine, as the expansion mechanism. Hydraulic turbines were already proposed as alternatives for CAES [[25], [26], [27], [28]], but experimental studies were not found in the literature. Hydraulic turbines can provide energy with high efficiency [29], and has a competitive investment cost. Also, using hydraulic turbines, the external source of heat is unnecessary. A prototype was built using a Pelton turbine. We entitled this CAES system as PH-CAES, where PH stands for pumped-hydro.
In the next section the PH-CAES prototype is presented.
Section snippets
PH-CAES prototype
A picture and a schematic view of the PH-CAES prototype is shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, respectively. In order to better understand the PH-CAES prototype, we present the system operation through the following steps: (1) water charging, (2) air charging and (3) generation. The storage tanks are initially depressurized (open to the atmosphere), and all water is stored in tank TK-03. Also all valves are assumed open.
Methodology
Following, we present the experimental procedure and theoretical formulation used to evaluate the PH-CAES system performance.
Results
From the mechanical point of view, PH-CAES dynamic behaviour is directly impacted by the turbine inlet pressure. To demonstrate this we present the results of four different pressure levels maintaining electrical load constant (), as shown in Fig. 8, left side. It is possible to notice a short transient period in the first seconds, as a result of HV-07 opening. After this, power output becomes nearly constant for 300 to . While an usual CAES system takes minutes to hours to stabilize
Discussion on the PH-CAES technology
We presented, in the latter section, the experimental results of the PH-CAES generation system. In the next step of this project, we are going to design the charging system, looking to maximize the PH-CAES round trip efficiency. In this sense, it is important to point out that the PH-CAES may operate with a reversible pump-turbine system. If this is the case, the pump can be used to compress the air contained in the tank TK01 and TK-02 after the generation process. The compressor is needed only
Conclusions
We presented in this work the experimental performance of a PH-CAES (Pumped-Hydro Compressed Air Energy Storage) prototype operating with a Pelton turbine. Two storage tanks were needed, the first with compressed air and the second with water. The compressed air pressurizes the water in the second tank, providing hydraulic energy to the Pelton turbine. We coupled the turbine with an electric generator, and this latter to a variable load. Therefore, tests could be performed varying the water
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from FAPEMIG project APQ-00117-14, CNPq and the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq-UFMG).
References (33)
- et al.
A review on compressed air energy storage: basic principles, past milestones and recent developments
Appl Energy
(2016) - et al.
LTA-CAES a low-temperature approach to adiabatic compressed air energy storage
Appl Energy
(2014) - et al.
Thermodynamic analysis of an improved adiabatic compressed air energy storage system
Appl Energy
(2016) - et al.
Dynamic simulation of Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) plant with integrated thermal storage link between components performance and plant performance
Appl Energy
(2017) - et al.
A novel mathematical model for the performance assessment of Diabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage systems including the turbomachinery characteristic curves
Appl Energy
(2016) - et al.
Dynamic modelling of a hybrid diabatic compressed air energy storage and wind turbine system
- et al.
Design, modeling and experimental validation of a novel finned reciprocating compressor for Isothermal Compressed Air Energy Storage applications
Energy
(2017) - et al.
Trigenerative micro compressed air energy storage: concept and thermodynamic assessment
Appl Energy
(2015) - et al.
Feasibility study of a hybrid wind turbine system integration with compressed air energy storage
Appl Energy
(2015) - et al.
Integrating compressed air energy storage with a diesel engine for electricity generation in isolated areas
Appl Energy
(2016)
Study and design of a hybrid wind-diesel-compressed air energy storage system for remote areas
Appl Energy
Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension
Appl Energy
A techno-economic assessment of offshore wind coupled to offshore compressed air energy storage
Appl Energy
Conventional and advanced exergy analyses of an underwater compressed air energy storage system
Appl Energy
Parameters affecting scalable underwater compressed air energy storage
Appl Energy
Numerical investigation of a joint approach to thermal energy storage and compressed air energy storage in aquifers
Appl Energy
Cited by (20)
Parameter impact and sensitivity analysis of a pumped hydro compressed air energy storage system
2024, Applied Thermal EngineeringPerformance comparison and multi-objective optimization of improved and traditional compressed air energy storage systems integrated with solar collectors
2023, Journal of Energy StorageCitation Excerpt :Installing appropriate energy storage devices into a power station can effectively solve the problem [2]. Among the commonly used energy storage devices, including pumped storage, accumulator and superconducting magnetic energy storage devices [3], compressed air energy storage (CAES) has better application prospects due to its low construction cost, large capacity and long life [4]. The initial conventional CAES system burns fossil fuels and does not have a regenerator.