Elsevier

Energy

Volume 165, Part A, 15 December 2018, Pages 630-638
Energy

Experimental study of a PH-CAES system: Proof of concept

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.109Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We present a novel energy storage system based on CAES and Pumped-Hydro.

  • We test the performance of the PH-CAES prototype.

  • The generation efficiency reached 45%, despite the system reduced scale.

  • Experiments have shown that the PH-CAES can be competitive.

Abstract

This article presents the experimental results of a novel energy storage system that combines CAES (Compressed Air Energy Storage) with PHES (Pumped Hydro Energy Storage) technologies. As a reference, we called this system PH-CAES. In this alternative solution two storage tanks, the first with compressed air and the second with water, are separated by a valve. When electric power is required, the valve is opened and water flows to a Pelton turbine, which is coupled to an electric generator. Water from the Pelton turbine is discharged into a third tank. To store energy and recover the initial state, water is pumped back. We built a prototype to assess the PH-CAES performance, with focus on the power generation system. Experimental conversion efficiency was 45%, whilst the rational efficiency remained close to 30%. We also presented a discussion based on the second law of thermodynamics to show that there is a compromise between tanks exergies that maximizes the system performance. We also provide an operating map of this PH-CAES system to assist authors on new studies about this novel technology.

Introduction

The concept of CAES (Compressed Air Energy Storage) systems first appeared in the 1940s, when Stal Laval filed a patent, using an underground cavern for compressed air storage [1]. By the mid-1970s, the interest in the CAES technologies increased, and currently two large-scale CAES power plants are operating [2,3]. One of them, with a 321MW current capacity was built in the 1970s in Huntorf, Germany, and the other was built in 1991 in McIntosh, Alabama, USA, with an installed capacity of 110MW [[4], [5], [6]].

Recent interest in CAES relies on the application to renewable and intermittent sources to pressurize atmospheric air and store it inside natural or artificial caves. This stored compressed air is released and expanded into a turbine [4] generating energy, when needed.

During the compression stage, heat is generated as the air pressure increases. This heat may or may not be stored and recovered to increase the CAES round-trip efficiency. In this sense, authors usually divide CAES systems into three main categories [4]: adiabatic (A-CAES), diabatic (D-CAES) and isothermal (I-CAES). In the first one, heat generated by compression is stored in Thermal Energy Storage (TES) tanks, and recovered when expansion takes place [[7], [8], [9]]. Conversely, on D-CAES, heat is lost to the surroundings, and during the expansion process, the compressed air must be heated by an external source before entering the turbine [10,11]. On the latter, I-CAES, fluids and structures are used to prevent air to change temperature during the compression and expansion [12,13]. Other different approaches can be found in the literature. Facci et al. [14] proposes a trigenerative (T-CAES) approach to small scale CAES in which heat is taken from the system between compression stages and returned during the expansion. Sun et al. [15], conversely, studied integrating a conventional wind turbine with a CAES system, which in turn, utilizes a scroll turbine, with power conversion efficiency peaking at 55%. In Ref. [16], authors studied the integration of a CAES system to a diesel generator for applications in remote areas, resulting in fuel consumption from 50 to 77% of a similarly sized conventional diesel system. Similarly [17], proposes a hybrid Wind-Diesel-Compressed Air Energy Storage system, in which the energy surplus is stored as compressed air, later used to assist diesel combustion in an electric generator, focusing in isolated rural areas. Kantharaj et al. [18] suggested to use compressed air of a CAES system as input of a liquefaction cycle, and thus, storing liquefied air close to ambient pressures. In Ref. [19], authors examined an offshore underwater Compressed Air Storage System (named OCAES) to store energy coming from offshore wind turbines, and concluded that this concept is not economically viable yet. In Ref. [20], it is presented a multiple stage 2MW underwater CAES (named UWCAES), with exergetic efficiency of around 54%. Cheung et al. [21] also worked with UWCAES, but instead of working with an offshore wind turbine, it operates with surplus energy coming from the power grid, and storage takes place underwater in air accumulators. Finally [22], performed a study in the application of CAES in aquifers (CAESA), coupled with Aquifers Thermal Energy Storage (ATES).

Despite the enthusiasm with the technology potential, CAES still suffer with more basic issues. CAES turbines work only with air at relatively low temperature and with variable inlet pressure. In terms of commercialized turbines, it is an off-design condition. To deal with this problem, Ennil [23] built a small-scale axial turbine with 1.0 kW, which is optimized to work with compressed air. Thales et al. [24] built a turbine from an automotive turbocharger, and the overall efficiency found was up to 45%. Reduced scale studies such as provided by Refs. [23] and [24] are very important to evaluate the technology potential, before producing it in commercial scales. This step of design is called here proof of concept.

In this work we present a novel solution for CAES systems, using a small scale hydraulic turbine, as the expansion mechanism. Hydraulic turbines were already proposed as alternatives for CAES [[25], [26], [27], [28]], but experimental studies were not found in the literature. Hydraulic turbines can provide energy with high efficiency [29], and has a competitive investment cost. Also, using hydraulic turbines, the external source of heat is unnecessary. A prototype was built using a Pelton turbine. We entitled this CAES system as PH-CAES, where PH stands for pumped-hydro.

In the next section the PH-CAES prototype is presented.

Section snippets

PH-CAES prototype

A picture and a schematic view of the PH-CAES prototype is shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, respectively. In order to better understand the PH-CAES prototype, we present the system operation through the following steps: (1) water charging, (2) air charging and (3) generation. The storage tanks are initially depressurized (open to the atmosphere), and all water is stored in tank TK-03. Also all valves are assumed open.

Methodology

Following, we present the experimental procedure and theoretical formulation used to evaluate the PH-CAES system performance.

Results

From the mechanical point of view, PH-CAES dynamic behaviour is directly impacted by the turbine inlet pressure. To demonstrate this we present the results of four different pressure levels maintaining electrical load constant (1.10Ω), as shown in Fig. 8, left side. It is possible to notice a short transient period in the first seconds, as a result of HV-07 opening. After this, power output becomes nearly constant for 300 to 500kPa. While an usual CAES system takes minutes to hours to stabilize

Discussion on the PH-CAES technology

We presented, in the latter section, the experimental results of the PH-CAES generation system. In the next step of this project, we are going to design the charging system, looking to maximize the PH-CAES round trip efficiency. In this sense, it is important to point out that the PH-CAES may operate with a reversible pump-turbine system. If this is the case, the pump can be used to compress the air contained in the tank TK01 and TK-02 after the generation process. The compressor is needed only

Conclusions

We presented in this work the experimental performance of a PH-CAES (Pumped-Hydro Compressed Air Energy Storage) prototype operating with a Pelton turbine. Two storage tanks were needed, the first with compressed air and the second with water. The compressed air pressurizes the water in the second tank, providing hydraulic energy to the Pelton turbine. We coupled the turbine with an electric generator, and this latter to a variable load. Therefore, tests could be performed varying the water

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from FAPEMIG project APQ-00117-14, CNPq and the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PRPq-UFMG).

References (33)

Cited by (20)

  • Performance comparison and multi-objective optimization of improved and traditional compressed air energy storage systems integrated with solar collectors

    2023, Journal of Energy Storage
    Citation Excerpt :

    Installing appropriate energy storage devices into a power station can effectively solve the problem [2]. Among the commonly used energy storage devices, including pumped storage, accumulator and superconducting magnetic energy storage devices [3], compressed air energy storage (CAES) has better application prospects due to its low construction cost, large capacity and long life [4]. The initial conventional CAES system burns fossil fuels and does not have a regenerator.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text