Elsevier

Energy

Volume 160, 1 October 2018, Pages 378-387
Energy

Forecasting U.S. shale gas monthly production using a hybrid ARIMA and metabolic nonlinear grey model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.047Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Forecasting U.S. shale gas production can help better understand the gas market.

  • Better forecasting U.S. shale gas production requires better forecasting model.

  • A linear forecasting technique is used to correct nonlinear predictions.

  • The proposed technique performs more accurate than other three techniques.

  • The proposed technique can better predict shale gas and other fuels production.

Abstract

Changes in shale gas production directly determine natural gas output in the United States (U.S.), and indirectly impact the global gas market. To better forecast shale gas output, we hybridized a nonlinear model with a linear model to develop a metabolic nonlinear grey model–autoregressive integrated moving average model (or MNGM-ARIMA). The proposed hybrid forecasting technique uses a linear model to correct nonlinear predictions, which effectively integrates the advantages of linear and nonlinear models and mitigates their limitations. Based on existing U.S. monthly shale gas output data, we applied the proposed hybrid technique to forecast U.S. monthly shale gas output. The results show that the proposed MNGM-ARIMA technique can produce a reliable forecasting results, with a mean absolute percent error of 2.396%. Then, using the same set of data, we also ran three other forecasting techniques developed by former researchers: the metabolic grey model (MGM), ARIMA, and non-linear grey model (NGM). The results of the comparison show that the proposed MNGM-ARIMA technique has the smallest mean absolute percent error. This indicates the proposed hybrid technique can produce more accurate forecasting results. We therefore conclude that the proposed MNGM-ARIMA technique can service us better forecasting shale gas output, as well as other fuels output.

Introduction

The U.S. shale gas production in 2016 doubled compared to 2011, reaching 16,582.41 billion cubic meters [1], which has been heavily impacting on energy markets in the U.S and the world [[2], [3], [4]]. The large-scale exploitation of shale gas production has exerted influence on the energy market in U.S. from the following three aspects. First of all, it changed supply dynamics for U.S. natural gas, leading to changes in the structure of supply and demand [4,5]. More in detail, the surge in shale gas production has met natural gas demand and caused the U.S. to overtake Russia as the world's largest gas producer. Secondly, the development of the supply side of natural gas has promoted the independence of natural gas in the United States [6]. On the basis of self-sufficiency of natural gas, in the first half of 2017, the U.S. became a natural gas net exporter. Finally, the increase in shale gas supply caused a drop in U.S. natural gas prices [7,8]. In 2016, natural gas prices reached 1.61 USD/million British thermal units. This price was one-third to one-fifth the Asian market price and hit a new 20-year low [9,10]. In addition to its impact on the United States, the import and export of domestic natural gas also exerted influence on the world energy market. The changes in shale gas production directly determine the net exports of natural gas from the U.S., resulting in an increase in export and a decrease in imports of global natural gas energy [11]. Better predicting future U.S. shale gas production can provide reference information about the natural gas market in the U.S. and the world.

To better forecast U.S. shale gas output, we hybridized a nonlinear model (Metabolic nonlinear grey model, or MNGM (MNGM (1,1, α)) with a linear model (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, or ARIMA) to develop the MNGM (1,1, α)-ARIMA forecasting technique. The method adopts the principle of correcting nonlinear prediction values using a linear model and applies two different models to a combined model. This method broadens the scope of application for the prediction model, and provides a reference value to predict data with large jumps. The forecasted result will provide a reasonable and effective reference value for global energy policy makers and natural gas market participants.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews the existing literature in this field. The related methodologies of the MNGM (1,1, α)-ARIMA are introduced in Section 3. In Section 4, the forecasting process and evaluation of prediction merit are illustrated with the data of the shale gas production of the United States. The conclusion is given in Section 5.

Section snippets

Literature review

Since the predictive model used in this paper is the MNGM (1,1, α)-ARIMA model, this study will comb the existing researches with several sub-models involved in this combined model, which include grey model, the improved grey model and the ARIMA model. In addition, clues to the literature review will be given at the end of this section. Based on this, the idea of constructing this combined model will be clearly presented.

Methodology

The computational principle of the combined MNGM-ARIMA model is closely related to each single model, MNGM and ARIMA. For the calculation formula, the formula of this combination model is made up by two. For the calculation flow, the steps of the combined model are connected by both. In this section, the calculation steps will be followed to demonstrate the model construction process. Before that, the respective calculation steps of the two single models are briefly described here.

For metabolic

Empirical results

In this chapter, the implementation of the MNGM (1,1, α)-ARIMA model for shale gas production forecasting will be demonstrated. The monthly production data for shale gas period 2014–2016 used in this paper were derived from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) [1]. A 2D area plot of the monthly data for this period shows there is no seasonal trend in shale gas production, further indicating the reasonableness of developing forecasts using monthly data. The chart below shows that

Conclusion

This study developed and applied a metabolic nonlinear grey-autoregressive integrated moving average (MNGM (1,1, α)-ARIMA) model to forecast U.S. shale gas monthly production. This new model combines linearity and non-linearity to overcome the bias of a single model in predicting results. In addition, time series corrections significantly broaden the scope of application for the combined model. This makes it reliable when applying monthly data for forecasting. This provide guiding value for

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful and thorough reading of this manuscript and for the thoughtful comments and constructive suggestions, which help to improve the quality of this manuscript. This work is supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2018MG016), the Initial Founding of Scientific Research for the Introduction of Talents of China University of Petroleum (East China) (YJ2016002), and the Fundamental Research Funds

References (42)

  • P. Zhou et al.

    A trigonometric grey prediction approach to forecasting electricity demand

    Energy

    (2006)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    Application of grey modeling method to fitting and forecasting wear trend of marine diesel engines

    Tribol Int

    (2003)
  • H. Zhao et al.

    An optimized grey model for annual power load forecasting

    Energy

    (2016)
  • S. Arora et al.

    Rule-based autoregressive moving average models for forecasting load on special days: a case study for France

    Eur J Oper Res

    (2018)
  • S. Barak et al.

    Forecasting energy consumption using ensemble ARIMA–ANFIS hybrid algorithm

    Int J Electr Power Energy Syst

    (2016)
  • C.C. Wang

    A comparison study between fuzzy time series model and ARIMA model for forecasting Taiwan export

    Expert Syst Appl

    (2011)
  • EIA

    U.S. Energy Information Administration

    (2017)
  • A. Paylor

    The social–economic impact of shale gas extraction: a global perspective

    Third World Q

    (2017)
  • O.L. Anderson

    Shale gas revolution or evolution: opportunities and challenges for europe

    ONE J

    (2017)
  • J. Gao et al.

    Design and optimization of shale gas energy systems: overview, research challenges, and future directions

    Comput Chem Eng

    (2017)
  • M. Harleman et al.

    Natural resource ownership, financial gains, and governance: the case of unconventional gas development in the UK and the us

    (2017)
  • Cited by (109)

    • Grey prediction of carbon emission and carbon peak in several developing countries

      2024, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
    • A non-linear grey Fourier model based on kernel method for seasonal traffic speed forecasting

      2024, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text