Elsevier

Energy

Volume 36, Issue 5, May 2011, Pages 2473-2482
Energy

A life cycle approach to Green Public Procurement of building materials and elements: A case study on windows

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.01.039Get rights and content

Abstract

Green Public Procurement (GPP) is a significant policy tool for reducing the environmental impacts of services and products throughout their whole life cycle. Scientific and easily verifiable environmental criteria, based on a life cycle approach, should be developed and used within procurement procedures. In this paper, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is applied to wood windows showing how it can support the criteria definition. After a foreword on GPP development in Italy, the evaluation features of the environmental performances of building materials and components are outlined. The LCA case study is then presented, describing the use of the analysis results to define the environmental criteria. LCA allowed to identify the main impacts and the critical processes of the window life cycle, giving a scientific framework to discuss GPP criteria with manufacturers associations and stakeholders. Nevertheless, it couldn’t help neither in identifying detailed criteria for GPP nor to define numerical thresholds to be used as reference in procurement procedures. The appropriate strategies should be selected taking into account the technical status of the market, the standard development and the voluntary industry commitments, involving manufacturers associations. Finally, some elements to develop a structured approach for GPP of construction materials are presented.

Highlights

► Major environmental impact of buildings is the operational energy to compensate for the heat losses. ► LCA can be used to support the selection of environmental criteria for GPP. ► LCA results should be integrated with market and voluntary industry commitments, ► The environmental impact of production processes cannot be neglected. ► To select the GPP criteria the involvement of industry associations is essential.

Introduction

Sustainable Consumption and Production policies of European Union (EU) has considered Green Public Procurement (GPP) a fundamental policy instrument to reduce the environmental impacts of products throughout their life cycle, increasing innovation and efficiency in the use of energy and materials. Recently, the European Commission has set up a GPP strategy, developing guidelines and training tools and renewing the relevant regulations to encourage public authorities to reduce the environmental impact of their purchases, thanks to the introduction of environmental criteria into tendering procedures. As part of this strategy, the Commission adopted in 2008 a Communication on green procurement to give guidance on environmental criteria and propose ways of approaching voluntary or mandatory target setting [1].

Public authorities spend approximately two trillion Euros every year, equivalent to some 17% of the EU’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), for buying goods and services [2] and many are spent in sectors responsible for high environmental impacts, such as transport, buildings and furnishings. Consequently, by using their market leverage to opt for products that also respect the environment, public authorities can influence suppliers and manufacturers to produce more eco-friendly goods and services. The market created by GPP has also the potential to influence private companies and the consumers to change their consumption habits, making a significant contribution toward sustainable consumption and production [3]. As a result, the growth of GPP is seen as a means of creating a more sustainable market, allowing also to foster innovative environmental technologies, both at EU and national level.

The development of scientifically sounded, shared and easily verifiable environmental criteria, based on consistent and reliable data and methods, is a key element of this policy. Over recent years, the European Commission has encouraged Member States to develop and adopt National Action Plans (NAPs) for greening their public procurement, outlining the priority objectives at national level and setting out the environmental criteria for some priority product categories.

In Italy, the NAP for GPP was approved in April 2008 [4]. Its strategic environmental aims are fostering efficiency and savings in the use of natural resources, with a particular focus on energy and its impacts (for instance greenhouse effect), reducing both the use of dangerous substances and the waste production. According to the European guidelines, this plan identifies some priority sectors of intervention selected among others on the basis of their environmental improvement potential, public expenditure, potential impact on the supply side, political sensitivity, market availability and economic efficiency. The construction sector, which accounts for more than 10% of the EU’s GDP [5], is one of Europe’s most considerable industries with significant and complex relationships with the economic, social and environmental spheres of sustainable development. Italian NAP identifies this sector and all related activities, services and products (which include construction materials, such as wood, aluminum, steel, concrete, glass; construction products, such as windows, wall and floor coverings; heating and cooling equipment; operational and end-of-life aspects of buildings; maintenance services; on-site performance of works contracts) as a priority one for which to develop detailed GPP criteria.

Despite the diffusion of some green building rating and certification schemes and the availability of some Type III eco-labels (Environmental Product Declarations) of construction materials, in Italy, since now, only limited activities have been undertaken on GPP of building products. Consequently, a technical working group has been set up by the Italian Ministry of Environment with the aim of defining minimum environmental requirements that qualify a product as environmental preferable along its whole life cycle, while ensuring an appropriate response of the market. Therefore, a case study founded on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology has been developed on windows by the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), with the aim of evaluating the environmental impacts of this building element along its entire life cycle in order to define the environmental criteria for public tender processes.

The aim of this paper is to present this case study showing as LCA methodology can support the definition of scientifically sounded GPP criteria for construction products, based on consistent and reliable data and methods.

Section snippets

The environmental performance of building materials and products

The assessment of the environmental performances of construction materials and products is a complex issue which requires the use of a set of comprehensive criteria [6]. The environmental impacts of these materials can be observed, in fact, at several levels: locally, if we look at the effects of activities such as quarrying or at specific impact of the manufacturing processes (e.g. dust emissions, noise); globally, as a result of the greenhouse emissions linked to the energy consumption or

The case study of windows

In GPP context, the need to adopt a scientifically sound life cycle approach to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or systems is well recognized. Therefore, GPP requirements are usually derived from existing EU (or, where suitable, national) eco-labels, as well as from information over the product life cycle collected from the manufacturing industries. In this case study, LCA methodology was used to identify the key environmental impacts of windows and their critical processes. The

Discussion

The case study carried out on windows allows to highlight some considerations which can be used to develop a structured approach for GPP of construction products with the support of LCA methodology. As marked by Sterner [20], the availability of input data can be a problem when applying LCA in construction sector and the large number of construction products on the market can discourage to adopt this approach. Substantial amount of data and time are in fact required to conduct a detailed LCA.

Conclusions

A case study has been carried out on windows to define GPP criteria. LCA was used to identify the key environmental impacts of this building element and the key responsible processes. In general terms the study presented in this paper confirmed the usefulness of LCA methodology, stated by various authors [8], [9], [11], in highlighting the potential impacts of a building product and in identifying its critical processes. Moreover, it allowed to give a robust scientific framework to discuss GPP

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge and thank Dr. Ilaria Oberti, Eng. Michele Zinzi, Eng. Paolo Neri and all the manufacturers associations for their invaluable contribution to this work.

References (41)

  • National action plan on green public procurement–GPP NAP

    (2008)
  • Research–Industrial technologies

  • S. Edwards et al.

    Construction products and life-cycle thinking

  • A. Horvath

    Construction materials and the environment

    Annual Review of Environment and Resources

    (2004)
  • F. Nemry et al.

    Environmental improvement potential of residential buildings (IMPRO-building). European Commission, Joint Research Center, EUR 23493 EN

    (2008)
  • Directive 2002/91/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 16 december 2002 on the energy performance of buildings

    (2002)
  • Istituto per l’Innovazione e Trasparenza degli Appalti e la Compatibilità Ambientale (ITACA) (in Italian). See also,...
  • Climate House Agency–Casa Clima (in Italian). See also, http://www.agenziacasaclima.it/index.php?id=3&L=1. visited in...
  • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System. See also,...
  • E. Sterner

    “Green procurement” of buildings: a study of Swedish clients’ considerations

    Construction Management and Economics

    (2002)
  • Cited by (125)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text