Analysis of the transition effects of building codes and regulations on the emergence of a low carbon residential building sector
Section snippets
Introduction and objectives
It is now well established that the building sector contributes both to the economy and employment of developed countries and regions and also crucially, contributes significantly to energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [1]. Energy use in the building sector has been estimated at 25–40% of typical total consumption in economies of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries. In the Australian setting recent estimates of GHG emissions from
Methodology
This analysis comprises a series of interconnected elements that are developed in a logical sequence in order to progressively address: the question of GHG emissions from buildings; application of socio-technical transition theory to the building sector; followed by consideration of technical aspects of building design; coupled with a case study benchmarking Australia’s building code against a best practice archetype.
Firstly, the general question of GHG emissions from the built environment is
Theoretical foundation
This paper has its theoretical foundation in the application of systems theory to achieving sustainability outcomes; in government’s role as an agent for socio-technical transition; and in policies for government market intervention. This theoretical section flows through into the discursive investigation of the Australian case study that in turn is referenced against international practice.
Setting building standards
This section of the analysis explains the general process of formulating building standards and begins developing the connection between these regulations and their potential to effect socio-technical disruption in the residential building sector. Australia’s Building Code is referenced herein as a case study in order to provide context for the structural benchmarking exercise undertaken in a subsequent section of the paper.
Benchmarking Australia’s building energy code against international best practice
In this section of the paper Australia’s building energy code is benchmarked against international best practice policies by utilizing the assessment framework developed by the GBPN [12], [41], [63]. The aim of this benchmarking exercise is to use the Australian situation as an exemplar for the process of identifying improvement opportunities in the way that building standards and related policies are developed and progressively upgraded over time.
Discussion
Building policy makers must address two key objectives: firstly, defining a role for government policy interventions in the property sector to capture the economic benefits of high performance, energy efficient buildings; secondly, selecting energy policy instruments that are optimal for this task. By viewing the building industry as a socio-technical system [7] it is possible to draw upon contemporary concepts in transition theory and related disruptive innovation processes to seek answers to
Conclusions
A recent paper prepared for the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group highlights the contribution that the world’s cities could play in containing GHG emissions to levels consistent with a 2 degree Celsius global temperature rise [73]. It was demonstrated that urban actions could produce a significant decrease in global emissions through a range of actions whose salient constituents include improvements in residential building energy efficiency coupled with a transition to efficient public
Conflict of interest
We declare no conflict of interest in relation to the research presented in this paper.
Acknowledgements
Robert Enker acknowledges support for this research from the Cooperative Research Centre for Low Carbon Living and the Victorian Building Authority.
References (73)
- et al.
Potentials and costs of carbon dioxide mitigation in the world's buildings
Energy Policy
(2008) Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition
Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
(2016)- et al.
Government’s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: the case of the electric bike in China
Technovation
(2014) - et al.
Government policy and technological innovation—a suggested typology
Technovation
(2013) - et al.
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Res. Policy
(2007) - et al.
The impact of niche green developments in transforming the building sector: the case study of Lochiel Park
Energy Policy
(2013) Governing for sustainable energy system change: politics, contexts and contingency
Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
(2016)- et al.
Evaluating policy instruments to foster energy efficiency for the sustainable transformation of buildings
Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.
(2013) - et al.
A literature review of economic studies on carbon pricing and Australian wholesale electricity markets
Energy Policy
(2012) A comparative study of the design and construction process of energy efficient buildings in Germany and Sweden
Energy Policy
(2013)
Towards nearly zero-energy buildings: the state-of-art of national regulations in Europe
Energy
Compliance with building energy regulations for new-build dwellings
Energy
California energy efficiency: lessons for the rest of the world, or not?
J. Econ. Behav. Organ.
Environmentally Sustainable Buildings
Capitalising on the Building Sector’s Potential to Lessen the Costs of a Broad Based GHG Emissions Cut
An Australian Cost Curve for Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the Energy Performance of Buildings
Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Transforming the Market
Assessment of Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Buildings
Australian Suburban House Building: Industry Organisation, Practices and Constraints
Designing and Implementing Best Practice Building Codes
Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes
Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage.
Shaping Energy Efficiency in New Buildings: A Comparison of Building Energy Codes in the Asia Pacific Region
Economic Rationalism in Canberra: A Nation-Building State Changes Its Mind
Econobabble
Understanding How the Building Industry Responds to Energy Efficiency Standards
Appraisal of policy instruments for reducing buildings' CO2 emissions
Build. Res. Inf.
Climate Change Implications for Buildings
Policy autism or double-edged dismissiveness? Australia's climate policy under the Howard government
Glob. Change Peace Secur.
Garnaut Climate Change Review
The Coalition’s Direct Action Plan
Cited by (20)
The role of the quality infrastructure within socio-technical transformations: A European perspective
2024, Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeThe climate emergency: A tale of two cities
2024, HeliyonEnergy retrofit optimization for social building in temperate climate zone
2023, Energy and BuildingsBuildings sector from a sustainable carbon constrained energy generation perspective
2022, Energy and BuildingsCitation Excerpt :The majority of the buildings are owned by individuals and have very long service lives; hence, they do not have satisfactory (by today’s standards) energy saving characteristics, and enforcing remediation of insulation and similar measures proves relatively difficult. It is expected, however, that actions such as imposing building codes, enforcing building enveloping and efficient lighting will reduce the energy demand in the near future, despite the increases in population, the number of buildings, and living standards [23,24], which are taken into account in the forecasts by IEA. Regarding future energy demand, detailed information is available in the 2017 Report of IEA [8].
Influence of sizing strategy and control rules on the energy saving potential of heat pump hybrid systems in a residential building
2021, Energy Conversion and ManagementCitation Excerpt :Nowadays it is well established that the building sector significantly contributes to primary energy demand and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of developed countries [1].
Moving beyond disruptive innovation: A review of disruption in sustainability transitions
2021, Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsCitation Excerpt :For example, “[m]any local authorities operate planning rules that make the installation of [electric vehicle] charging points challenging” (Niewenhuis, 2019:40). This has led to suggestions how regulatory frameworks and policies can be reformulated and designed so that they intentionally trigger disruptive innovations and their diffusion (Enker and Morrison, 2017) or directly aim to disrupt existing sociotechnical regimes (Kivimaa and Kern, 2016). An example of the latter is a phase out of subsidies that are allocated to non-sustainable technologies or practices (Rosenbloom, 2019a), such as fossil fuels.