Elsevier

Electrochimica Acta

Volume 354, 10 September 2020, 136618
Electrochimica Acta

Augmentation of conductive pathways in carbon black/PLA 3D-printed electrodes achieved through varying printing parameters

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136618Get rights and content

Abstract

3D-printing of conductive carbon materials in sensing applications and energy storage devices has significant potential, however high resistivity of 3D-printed filaments poses a challenge. Strategies to enhance sensors post printing are time consuming and can reduce structural integrity. In this work, we investigated the effects different printing layer thickness and orientation can have on the electron transfer kinetics and resistivity of conductive materials. The response of these electrodes was investigated by cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and imaging. Electrodes printed with the lowest layer thickness of 0.1 mm in a vertical orientation had the greatest conductivity. With increasing print layer thickness and printing in a horizontal orientation, the electrode was more resistive. This work is the first to demonstrate the significant impact 3D-printing parameters can have on the electron transfer kinetics of carbon conductive electrodes. The implications of this study are important in defining the manufacturing process of electrodes for all applications.

Graphical abstract

Electron transfer in 3D-printed electrodes: 3d-printed electrodes are printed in vertical and horizontal orientation with thickness ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 mm. Electron transfer kinetics are enhanced in vertical orientation at lower print layer thickness due to the formation of less air voids and more conductive pathways.

Image 1
  1. Download : Download high-res image (212KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) fused filament fabrication (FFF) printing has emerged as an important manufacturing approach for the development of conductive carbon materials, mainly in the fields of electronics, sensors and energy storage devices as it offers flexibility in design and potential that supersedes traditional manufacturing systems [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. Studies have shown that commercial conductive carbon 3D-printed filament has poor conductivity [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. To overcome these limitations, varying post-printing modifications have been utilised in order to enhance the electrical properties of the 3D-printed material, such as chemical and electrochemical treatment [[11], [12], [13], [14]]. Although these strategies can effectively enhance the electron transfer kinetics of the printed electrode [15], they add an additional time consuming step, which is often detrimental to the electrode geometry when making small fine prints.

On the other hand, studies that focus on enhancing the conductivity of 3D-printed devices through the improvement of printing parameters are seldom explored [[16], [17], [18]]. There are various parameters that govern the properties of the printed artefact. Studies have shown that anisotropy and orientation of print layers are two factors in the construct of 3D-printed materials which introduce significant variations in electrochemical activity [18]. This study aims to understand the influence of print layer thickness and orientation on the electron transfer kinetics of 3D-printed carbon black (CB)/polylactic acid (PLA) electrodes.

Herein, we utilise cone-shaped CB/PLA electrodes printed with layer thicknesses varying from 0.1 to 0.4 mm in vertical and horizontal orientation. Electrochemical characterisation was conducted using voltammetric measurements of two different redox species, via cyclic voltammetry (CV) and impedance electrochemical spectroscopy (EIS). Structural integrity of the different layer thicknesses was analysed through chemical pre-treatment with tetrahydrofuran (THF) while the CB particles present within the 3D-printing filament were characterized using SEM and particle size analysis. Our findings show that layer thickness and printing orientation has significant influence on the electrochemical activity of the printed material and determines the prevalence of conductive pathways and resistivity within the structure.

Section snippets

Fabrication of 3D-printed carbon black/PLA electrodes of varying layer thickness

For the electrodes, a cone with a 4.5 mm diameter at base and length of 3 mm was printed using a commercial polylactic acid (PLA)/carbon black (CB) filament (Protopasta, WA, USA) at varying layer thicknesses in either a horizontal or vertical orientation (Fig. 1). The electrodes were printed on a Wanhao Duplicator 4 with a 0.4 mm brass nozzle at 220 ̊C and a bed temperature of 50 ̊C at 3600 mm/min. The layer height was varied from 0.1 to 0.4 mm, with 2 shells (outer perimeter toolpaths) and

Results and discussion

The enhancement of electrochemical activity thought manipulation of 3D-printng parameters has rarely been studied in comparison to methods such as electrochemical pre-treatment or chemical pre-treatment which are post-printing methods. Herein, we study the effects on printing CB/PLA sensors vertically versus horizontally, at different layer thicknesses ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 mm.

Fig. 1 shows the cone shaped electrodes printed in varying layer thicknesses and orientation. The geometric surface

Conclusions

We have shown that 3D-printing parameters can have a significant influence on the electron transfer kinetics of 3D-printed CB/PLA electrodes. Within our study, we have shown that with increasing print layer thickness, there is a reduction in conductivity of the material, which is further reduced if the print is in a horizontal rather than vertical orientation. Our study highlights the important influence that 3D printing parameters have on electron transfer kinetics and therefore provides key

Credit Author Statement

A. Abdalla, was responsible for electrochemical characterisation of the electrodes, was responsible for material characterisation studies, were responsible for the analysis of the data, designed experiments and prepared the manuscript. H.H. Hamzah, was responsible for electrochemical characterisation of the electrodes, were responsible for the analysis of the data, designed experiments and prepared the manuscript. O. Keattch, were responsible for the design and fabrication of the 3D printed

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by CRUK ESPRC Multidisciplinary Project Award (C57783/A24316; NS/A000065/1) and IMPRESSPlus EPSRC grant (EP/N027345/1). Authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Jon Salvage, Mareike Hermann, and Emma Ward for experimental assistance and Dr. Marcus Dymond for valuable theoretical discussions.

References (36)

  • S.D. Keighley et al.

    Optimization of label-free DNA detection with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy using PNA probes

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2008)
  • S.W. Kwok et al.

    Electrically conductive filament for 3D-printed circuits and sensors

    Appl. Mater. Today

    (2017)
  • M. Cheng et al.

    3D printing of electrochemical energy storage devices: a review of printing techniques and electrode/electrolyte architectures

    Batter. Supercaps

    (2020)
  • A. Zhakeyev et al.

    Additive manufacturing: unlocking the evolution of energy materials

    Adv. Sci.

    (2017)
  • U. Gulzar et al.

    Additive manufacturing for energy storage: methods, designs and materials selection for customizable 3D printed batteries and supercapacitors

    Curr. Opin. Electrochem.

    (2020)
  • M.P. Browne et al.

    Impurities in graphene/PLA 3D-printing filaments dramatically influence the electrochemical properties of the devices

    Chem. Commun.

    (2019)
  • C.L. Manzanares Palenzuela et al.

    3D-Printed graphene/polylactic acid electrodes promise high sensitivity in electroanalysis

    Anal. Chem.

    (2018)
  • V. Katic et al.

    3D printed graphene electrodes modified with prussian blue: emerging electrochemical sensing platform for peroxide detection

    ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

    (2019)
  • Cited by (64)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text