Elsevier

Electrochimica Acta

Volume 307, 1 June 2019, Pages 164-175
Electrochimica Acta

Advantages of CO over CO2 as reactant for electrochemical reduction to ethylene, ethanol and n-propanol on gas diffusion electrodes at high current densities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.142Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Straight comparison of CO and CO2 electrochemical reduction towards C2 and C3 products achieved using a flow cell and commercial Cu-powders deposited on gas diffusion layers.

  • Higher current densities for C2 and C3 products at lower working electrode potentials with CO as the reactant, rather than with CO2.

  • High selectivity for ethylene, ethanol, and propanol using CO as the reactant with a cumulative Faradaic efficiency of 89% at −300 mA cm-2.

  • 20 hours of ethylene production with ∼ 44% Faradaic efficiency at −200 mA cm-2.

Abstract

The electrochemical conversion of CO2 to value-added chemicals is a technology gaining broader interest as society moves towards a carbon-neutral circular economy. Nonetheless, there are still several challenges to overcome before this technology can be applied as an industrial process. In the reaction path of the electrochemical reduction of CO2 with Cu as an electrocatalyst, it is known that carbon monoxide is the key intermediate to chemicals such as ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol. However, a better understanding of the electrochemical reduction of CO is still necessary to improve selectivity and efficiency at high current densities. In this work, the electrochemical reduction of CO2 and CO towards C2 and C3 products is investigated using gas diffusion electrodes in a flow cell. Thereby the electrochemical reaction is not limited by the solubility of the feed gas in the electrolyte, and current densities of industrial relevance can be achieved. The electrodes are prepared using commercial Cu-powders consisting either of nano- or microparticles that are deposited on gas diffusion layers. Potentiostatic experiments show that with CO as the reactant, higher current densities for C2 and C3 products can be achieved at lower working electrode potentials compared to CO2 as the reactant. Galvanostatic CO electrochemical reduction at −300 mA cm−2 with Cu-nanoparticles (40–60 nm) results in a cumulative Faradaic efficiency of 89% for C2 and C3 products. This represents a two-fold increase in selectivity to ethylene and a three-fold increase towards ethanol and n-propanol compared to the selectivity obtained with CO2 as the reactant. This enhancement of selectivity for C2 and C3 products at current densities of industrial relevance with CO as reactant provides a new perspective regarding a two-step electrochemical reduction of CO2.

Introduction

The electrochemical reduction of CO2 is an opportunity to support a low carbon economy by producing value-added chemicals out of CO2 while utilizing low-cost renewable energy [1,2]. For decades the combustion of fossil fuels has been the least expensive means of electricity production, resulting in emission of carbon dioxide [1], a compound which has been shown to be responsible for climate change [3]. Over the last few years the cost of renewable electricity has decreased drastically and currently tends to be competitive with traditional electricity production technologies, and soon will become the least expensive source of energy [4]. However, the challenges of intermittency of energy production and grid balancing remain [1]. Within this context, electrochemical conversion of CO2 to fuels and feedstocks using aqueous electrolytes and renewable energy is a very attractive option to close the carbon cycle [1,2,[5], [6], [7]]. In order to make that possible, high conversion at high current densities and low overpotentials, together with a selective and long term stable operation have to be achieved [2,6,8,9].

Different products can be obtained from the electrochemical reduction of CO2 by using specific transition metals as electrocatalysts. Depending on the ability of each metal to adsorb CO, known as the main intermediate in the CO2 reduction reaction, different products can be generated [5,10]. These electrocatalysts have been extensively studied in the last decade focusing mainly on three approaches: the first being the electroreduction of CO2 to syngas, i.e. a mixture of CO and H2, using Ag and Au electrodes, which is getting closer to practical applications [[11], [12], [13]]; the second is the conversion of CO2 to formate on Sn electrodes with Faradaic efficiencies (FE) over 70% at current densities between −100 mA cm−2 and −300 mA cm−2 [14,15]; and the third and most challenging approach is the reduction of CO2 to C2 and C3 hydrocarbons such as ethylene, ethanol and n-propanol, which occurs when using Cu as electrocatalyst [[16], [17], [18], [19]].

Taking into account that it is possible to electroreduce CO2 into more than ten products with Cu as an electrocatalyst [16,20,21], there are still a number of opportunities to explore, especially regarding the ability of copper to convert carbon monoxide into C2 and C3 products [22]. Although poor selectivity and stability, together with high overpotentials [16], seem to be the main challenges, significant improvements have been made reaching lower activation overpotentials and high Faradaic efficiencies to ethylene and ethanol [17,18,[23], [24], [25], [26], [27]]. Several studies regarding Cu catalyst structure [17,28,29] and Cu oxidation states [3,16,17] have been performed. Recently the introduction of gas diffusion electrodes with nanostructured surfaces on carbon gas diffusion layers have enabled process operation at current densities around −150 mA cm−2 in flow cells, improving selectivity and activity towards ethylene [17,18,24,30]. To our knowledge, the best results up to now have been achieved under alkaline conditions using flow cells [18,24]. However, the formation of carbonates out of CO2 in an alkaline medium (equations (1), (2)) [5,31] can lead to complications for up-scaling, since the non desired reaction rate between CO2 and the electrolyte would be higher than the reaction rate of the desired electrochemical reactions [32]. The use of CO instead of CO2 as the reactant in alkaline conditions should not represent drawbacks since CO does not react with aqueous electrolytes.CO2+OHHCO3HCO3+OHCO32 + H2O

Within this context, a two-step electrochemical reduction of CO2 has been proposed as an alternative to increase the selectivity towards ethanol and acetate, in which CO2 is reduced to CO as the first step, followed by CO reduction to hydrocarbons [22,33,34]. However, the CO electroreduction has been mainly investigated in setups where the electrochemical reaction is limited by the solubility of CO in aqueous electrolytes, reaching geometrical partial current densities for hydrocarbons lower than −1 mA cm−2 [10,20,22,35,36]. There is scarce research on CO electrolysis performed in flow cells with gas diffusion electrodes [21,32]. Recently, Han et al. [32] reported CO electrochemical reduction using Cu-nanoparticles on gas diffusion electrodes with a maximal FE for ethylene of 17.8% and a partial current density for ethylene of −50.8 mA cm−2. The formation of liquid products in their case has not been addressed. Furthermore, Schmid et al. [21], as part of their investigation of the CO2 electrochemical reduction mechanisms at high current densities, performed galvanostatic CO bulk electrolysis at a current density of −170 mA cm−2 using an in situ-grown copper nano-dendritic catalyst on a gas diffusion layer. They reported an increment in the selectivity towards acetate and ethanol, but no significant increase in the ethylene Faradaic efficiency compared to the one achieved with CO2 as reactant, which was around 40% FE. Nevertheless, the nanodendritic Cu electrode decreases its activity dramatically after the first hour of experiment. With the progress made regarding Cu nanostructured-GDEs [24], flow cells [9] and the high Faradic efficiencies achieved in the conversion of CO2 to CO at high current densities [11], a two-step electrochemical reduction as depicted in Fig. 1 becomes certainly worthy of further exploration.

In order to get some insights about the feasibility of a two-step electrochemical reduction of CO2, we compare CO2 and CO as reactants regarding selectivity towards C2 and C3 products using gas diffusion electrodes, a flow cell, and a mild electrolyte (KHCO3). This allows a straight comparison of the electrochemical reduction of CO and CO2. The overall cathodic half reactions using either CO2 or CO as the reactant are shown in Table 1. For each reactant we studied four commercial Cu-powders with different particle sizes in the nano- and micro-scale, aiming to obtain further knowledge about the effect of morphology on the electrochemical activity. These Cu-powders were deposited onto carbon based gas diffusion layers, obtaining gas diffusion electrodes. We also investigated the stability of the system by performing 20 h electrolysis. Additionally, the catalyst layers were characterized by TEM and XRD before and after electrolysis. The obtained results show a remarkable increase in the selectivity towards ethylene (C2H4), ethanol (C2H5OH), and n-propanol (C3H7OH) using CO as the reactant instead of CO2.

Section snippets

Cathode preparation

Cu-powders delivered by Sigma Aldrich were used for the preparation of the electrodes. Three Cu-powder samples consist of nanoparticles with different particle size ranges, namely 40–60 nm, 60–80 nm, and <100 nm. The last one is passivated with <3% oxygen. These particle size ranges were selected based on previous studies that reported high efficiencies for C2 and C3 products [18,24,32]. Additionally, for comparison between micro- and nanoparticles a Cu powder with a particle size of 5 μm was

CO2 electrochemical reduction − potential variation

The electrocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction of four commercial Cu-powders deposited onto a gas diffusion layer was investigated by performing potentiostatic experiments at room temperature using 1 M KHCO3 as the catholyte. Fig. 2 shows the partial current densities for C1 (1a), C2 (1b) and C3 (1c) products plotted as a function of the working electrode potential. A table listing the Faradaic efficiencies for each product can be found in Table S5 of the supporting information. The partial

Conclusion

The electrochemical reduction of CO2 and CO towards C1, C2, and C3 products is investigated. The focus lies on the production of ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol using Cu-nanopowders deposited on gas diffusion layers as electrodes. This allows a fair comparison of the reactants, where neither solubility nor mass transport limits the reduction reaction. We report a remarkable increase in the selectivity towards ethylene, ethanol, and n-propanol of more than two-fold using CO as the reactant

Acknowledgments

The Authors thank Prof. Eisenreich from the Technical University of Munich for his support with the NMR measurements; Dr. Ralf Krause and Dr. Christian Reller from Siemens AG for their support with the XRD characterization. N.S. Romero Cuellar would like to express her gratitude to the TUM Graduate School, to Riley Mather for language editing, and to her Siemens colleagues Dr. Erhard Magori, Dr. Remik Pastusiak, Dr. Angelika Tawil, Christian Scherer and Bernhard Schmid for the valuable

References (40)

  • Lazard Ltd

    Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis

    (Noviembre 2017)
  • Y. Hori

    Electrochemical CO2 reduction on metal electrodes

  • W. Zhang et al.

    Progress and perspective of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction for renewable carbonaceous fuels and chemicals

    Adva. Sci.

    (2018)
  • A.J. Martín et al.

    Towards sustainable fuels and chemicals through the electrochemical reduction of CO2: lessons from water electrolysis

    Green Chem.

    (2015)
  • Y. Hori et al.

    Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to methane and ethylene at a copper electrode in aqueous solutions at ambient temperature and pressure

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1987)
  • T. Haas et al.

    Technical photosynthesis involving CO2 electrolysis and fermentation

    Nature Catalysis

    (2018)
  • S. Verma et al.

    Insights into the low overpotential electroreduction of CO2 to CO on a supported gold catalyst in an alkaline flow electrolyzer

    ACS Energy Letters

    (2017)
  • C. Oloman et al.

    Electrochemical processing of carbon dioxide

    ChemSusChem: Chemistry & Sustainability Energy & Materials

    (2008)
  • D. Kopljar et al.

    Electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate at high current density using gas diffusion electrodes

    J. Appl. Electrochem.

    (2014)
  • K.P. Kuhl et al.

    New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Carbon conversion: opportunities in chemical productions

      2023, Surface Process, Transportation, and Storage: Volume 4
    • Computational insight into electro-catalytic reduction of carbon monoxide by two-dimensional metal-embedded poly-phthalocyanine

      2023, Catalysis Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In recent years, theoretical efforts have been devoted to the discovery of suitable electro-catalysts for CORR with low energy cost and high selectivity, [19–22] especially the 2D materials, such as heteroatom-decorated MXene, [23] boron atom decorated C2N monolayer, [24] and heteroatom doped black phosphorene. [25,26] The advantages of CO reduction reaction (CORR) beyond CO2RR have been elucidated experimentally, such as higher current densities and selectivity for C2 and C3 products at lower working electrode potentials. [27] However, the existence of competing reaction pathways, such as the formation of HCOOH, makes it difficult for some of the electro-catalysts like MPPc to further reduce CO2 into other C1 products (HCHO, CH3OH, and CH4).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text