Development and external validation of a nomogram for predicting the conditional probability of survival after D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: A multicentre study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have elucidated that on average, long-term cancer survivors have better prognoses than newly diagnosed individuals. This study aimed to devise a nomogram to predict the conditional probability of cancer-specific survival (CPCS) in gastric cancer (GC) patients after D2 lymphadenectomy.

Methods

Clinicopathological data for 2,596 GC patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy in an Eastern institution (the training cohort) were retrospectively analysed. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was predicted using Cox regression models. A nomogram was constructed to predict CPCS at 3 and 5 years post-gastrectomy. Two external validations were performed using a cohort of 2,198 Chinese patients and a cohort of 504 Italian patients.

Results

In the training cohort, the 5-year CPCS was 59.2% immediately post-gastrectomy and increased to 68.8%, 79.7%, and 88.8% at 1, 2, and 3 years post-gastrectomy, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that age; tumour site, size and invasion depth; numbers of examined and metastatic lymph nodes; and surgical margins were independent prognostic factors of CSS (all P < 0.05) and formed the nomogram predictor variables. Internal validation showed that the conditional nomogram exhibited good discrimination ability at 3 and 5 years post-gastrectomy (concordance index, 0.794 and 0.789, respectively). External validation showed a 3- and 5-year concordance index of 0.788 and 0.785, respectively, in the Chinese cohort, and 0.792 and 0.787, respectively, in the Italian cohort. Calibration of the nomogram predicted that survival corresponded closely with actual survival.

Conclusions: we developed a robust nomogram to predict CPCS after D2 lymphadenectomy for GC based on survival duration.

Introduction

The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in China is much higher than that in any other country [1]. Moreover, in China, GC is the second leading cause of cancer-related death [2]. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node (LN) dissection is the standard treatment for curable GC in eastern Asia [3]. Recent reports revealed a trend towards improved cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates in patients who have undergone D2 lymphadenectomy, especially when lymphadenectomy was performed in a high-volume center [[4], [5], [6], [7]].

Death risk assessments for GC patients are customarily based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumour Node Metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging system or on more detailed nomograms [8,9]. Most reports evaluate the risk of death only from the time of surgery. However, recent studies have shown that the risk of death in patients with GC is not constant [10,11]. The conditional probability of CSS (CPCS) represents the probability of remaining life expectancy for a specific number of postoperative years based on the length of time that the patient has already survived. The benefits of CPCS estimates have already been demonstrated in various types of cancers [[12], [13], [14]]. For cancer survivors, CPCS estimates might allow patients to quantify improvements in their prognosis over time. CPCS estimates are equally necessary for clinicians because they might allow adjustment of the frequency and type of follow-up over time. In contrast to conventional survival estimates, CPCS estimates can provide cancer survivors and clinicians with a more accurate evaluation of the changes in the risk of death.

A nomogram is a useful tool for predicting the probability of survival of an individual patient with a simple way and for improving personalized decision-making in cancer treatment accordingly [15]. Recently, nomograms based on different databases have been constructed for predicting individual survival of GC [9,16,17]. Few studies have focused on the correlation of D2 lymphadenectomy to CSS; more importantly, these models cannot be applied to the prediction of CPCS. In assessing the prognosis of cancer survivors, CPCS estimates may drastically differ from baseline CSS predictions, especially after several years of cancer mortality-free follow-up.

Because of the high incidence of GC in eastern Asia, surgeons in these areas have accumulated substantial experience in GC-related surgical techniques, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is routinely performed with low morbidity and mortality rates [18,19]. The previously reported static GC nomograms did not provide an accurate prediction of the dynamic outcomes for cancer survivors because the prediction of the previous nomograms was only based on conventional CSS. Therefore, to date, the dynamic prognosis of GC patients who have undergone D2 lymphadenectomy has not been precisely predicted. Considering the sustainable surveillance requirement, this study aimed to construct a new conditional survival nomogram for predicting CPCS in GC patients from a large-volume institution after D2 lymphadenectomy. The performance of the nomogram model was validated using a cohort of 2,198 patients from China and another cohort of 504 patients from Italy.

Section snippets

Population and covariates

We retrospectively collected data for 2,596 patients who underwent GC surgery between June 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013, in the Department of Gastric Surgery at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJUH) and who satisfied the following inclusion criteria: the presence of primary gastric adenocarcinoma, the absence of combined malignancy, neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy), and distant metastasis, treatment with D2 lymphadenectomy according

Clinicopathologic characteristics

The baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of the FJUH training cohort (n = 2,596), SYSUCC validation cohort (n = 2,198), and IMIGASTRIC validation cohort (n = 504) are provided in Table 1. The mean numbers of examined LNs were 31.3 ± 12.8, 24.6 ± 11.0 and 30.0 ± 11.3 in the FJUH training cohort, SYSUCC validation cohort, and IMIGASTRIC validation cohort, respectively.

Survival of study population

In the FJUH training cohort, the median follow-up time was 56.0 months (range 1–113 months). Of the 2,596 patients, 988

Discussion

The increasing number of postsurgical GC survivors [29] has made the simple and accurate prediction of CSS in GC patients who have undergone D2 lymphadenectomy a clinically urgent problem. Therefore, in the interest of providing individualized and accurate CSS predictions for GC patients after surgery, different kinds of nomograms for the prediction of CSS have been constructed [16,30]. However, the present study showed that the likelihood of cancer-specific death in patients after D2

Author contributions

Conception/Design: Chen QY, Zhong Q, Amilcare Parisi, and Huang CM;

Provision of study materials or patients: Huang CM, Zhou ZW, Zheng CH, and Amilcare Parisi;

Collection and/or assembly of data: Chen QY, Zhong Q, Amilcare Parisi, Huang CM, Li P, Zhou ZW, Wang W, Desiderio J, Zheng CH, Lin JX, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, and Tu RH;

Data analysis and interpretation: Huang CM, Zhou ZW, Liu Zhi-Yu, Amilcare Parisi, Chen QY, Zhong Q, and Wang W;

Manuscript writing: Huang CM, Li P, Chen QY,

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer for their management of our gastric cancer patient database. This study supported by the Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province (2016Y9031); the Construction Project of Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center (No. [2017]171); the Second Batch of Special

References (42)

  • D.S. Han

    Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • S.J. Wang

    Conditional survival in gastric cancer: a SEER database analysis

    Gastric Cancer

    (2007)
  • P. Wang et al.

    Conditional survival of patients with gastric cancer who undergo curative resection: a multi-institutional analysis in China

    Cancer

    (2017)
  • R. Thuret

    Conditional survival predictions after surgery for patients with penile carcinoma

    Cancer

    (2011)
  • M.Y. Polley

    Conditional probability of survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

    J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2011)
  • M.D. Nazareno Suardi

    A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

    Cancer

    (2010)
  • A. Iasonos

    How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • M.W. Kattan

    Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • Y. Hu

    Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial

    J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol

    (2016)
  • Q.Y. Chen

    Which method is more suitable for advanced gastric cancer with enlarged lymph nodes, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy or open gastrectomy?

    Gastric Cancer

    (2018)
  • J.G.C. Association

    Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3)

    Gastric Cancer

    (2011)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Long Term Outcomes After Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer in an Italian Cohort of Patients

      2022, Journal of Visceral Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The corrected C-Index for DFS based on the AJCC staging system revealed better prediction (C-Index 0.75), while the corrected C-Index for OS had worse discrimination ability compared with the current nomogram (C-Index 0.72). Several nomograms have been developed in the last few decades to provide simple and reliable tools to predict gastric cancer patient prognosis following surgical resection [6,8,12,18–22]. The models proposed in 2014 by Kim et al. using data from the Gastric Cancer Collaborative Group included age, sex, tumor site, depth of invasion and LNR as factors that influenced survival, and demonstrated good predictive abilities in terms of DFS (C-index 0.711) and OS (C- index 0.702) [13].

    • Dynamic Prediction of Survival after Curative Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A landmarking-based analysis

      2022, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gastric adenocarcinoma is a disease with heterogeneous outcomes following resection with a 5-year survival ranging from 5% to 90% [5,34,35]. As such, several nomograms and prognostic models have been developed to better characterize the long-term outcomes of individual patients undergoing surgery [14,17–21]. However, most instances of death and recurrence among patients with gastric adenocarcinoma occur within the first 2 years after surgery [36,37].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Chen QY, Zhong Q, and Wang W contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

    View full text