Development and external validation of a nomogram for predicting the conditional probability of survival after D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: A multicentre study
Introduction
The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in China is much higher than that in any other country [1]. Moreover, in China, GC is the second leading cause of cancer-related death [2]. Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node (LN) dissection is the standard treatment for curable GC in eastern Asia [3]. Recent reports revealed a trend towards improved cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates in patients who have undergone D2 lymphadenectomy, especially when lymphadenectomy was performed in a high-volume center [[4], [5], [6], [7]].
Death risk assessments for GC patients are customarily based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumour Node Metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging system or on more detailed nomograms [8,9]. Most reports evaluate the risk of death only from the time of surgery. However, recent studies have shown that the risk of death in patients with GC is not constant [10,11]. The conditional probability of CSS (CPCS) represents the probability of remaining life expectancy for a specific number of postoperative years based on the length of time that the patient has already survived. The benefits of CPCS estimates have already been demonstrated in various types of cancers [[12], [13], [14]]. For cancer survivors, CPCS estimates might allow patients to quantify improvements in their prognosis over time. CPCS estimates are equally necessary for clinicians because they might allow adjustment of the frequency and type of follow-up over time. In contrast to conventional survival estimates, CPCS estimates can provide cancer survivors and clinicians with a more accurate evaluation of the changes in the risk of death.
A nomogram is a useful tool for predicting the probability of survival of an individual patient with a simple way and for improving personalized decision-making in cancer treatment accordingly [15]. Recently, nomograms based on different databases have been constructed for predicting individual survival of GC [9,16,17]. Few studies have focused on the correlation of D2 lymphadenectomy to CSS; more importantly, these models cannot be applied to the prediction of CPCS. In assessing the prognosis of cancer survivors, CPCS estimates may drastically differ from baseline CSS predictions, especially after several years of cancer mortality-free follow-up.
Because of the high incidence of GC in eastern Asia, surgeons in these areas have accumulated substantial experience in GC-related surgical techniques, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is routinely performed with low morbidity and mortality rates [18,19]. The previously reported static GC nomograms did not provide an accurate prediction of the dynamic outcomes for cancer survivors because the prediction of the previous nomograms was only based on conventional CSS. Therefore, to date, the dynamic prognosis of GC patients who have undergone D2 lymphadenectomy has not been precisely predicted. Considering the sustainable surveillance requirement, this study aimed to construct a new conditional survival nomogram for predicting CPCS in GC patients from a large-volume institution after D2 lymphadenectomy. The performance of the nomogram model was validated using a cohort of 2,198 patients from China and another cohort of 504 patients from Italy.
Section snippets
Population and covariates
We retrospectively collected data for 2,596 patients who underwent GC surgery between June 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013, in the Department of Gastric Surgery at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJUH) and who satisfied the following inclusion criteria: the presence of primary gastric adenocarcinoma, the absence of combined malignancy, neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy), and distant metastasis, treatment with D2 lymphadenectomy according
Clinicopathologic characteristics
The baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of the FJUH training cohort (n = 2,596), SYSUCC validation cohort (n = 2,198), and IMIGASTRIC validation cohort (n = 504) are provided in Table 1. The mean numbers of examined LNs were 31.3 ± 12.8, 24.6 ± 11.0 and 30.0 ± 11.3 in the FJUH training cohort, SYSUCC validation cohort, and IMIGASTRIC validation cohort, respectively.
Survival of study population
In the FJUH training cohort, the median follow-up time was 56.0 months (range 1–113 months). Of the 2,596 patients, 988
Discussion
The increasing number of postsurgical GC survivors [29] has made the simple and accurate prediction of CSS in GC patients who have undergone D2 lymphadenectomy a clinically urgent problem. Therefore, in the interest of providing individualized and accurate CSS predictions for GC patients after surgery, different kinds of nomograms for the prediction of CSS have been constructed [16,30]. However, the present study showed that the likelihood of cancer-specific death in patients after D2
Author contributions
Conception/Design: Chen QY, Zhong Q, Amilcare Parisi, and Huang CM;
Provision of study materials or patients: Huang CM, Zhou ZW, Zheng CH, and Amilcare Parisi;
Collection and/or assembly of data: Chen QY, Zhong Q, Amilcare Parisi, Huang CM, Li P, Zhou ZW, Wang W, Desiderio J, Zheng CH, Lin JX, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, and Tu RH;
Data analysis and interpretation: Huang CM, Zhou ZW, Liu Zhi-Yu, Amilcare Parisi, Chen QY, Zhong Q, and Wang W;
Manuscript writing: Huang CM, Li P, Chen QY,
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer for their management of our gastric cancer patient database. This study supported by the Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province (2016Y9031); the Construction Project of Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center (No. [2017]171); the Second Batch of Special
References (42)
Cancer statistics in China, 2015
Ca - Cancer J Clin
(2016)Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial
Lancet Oncol
(2010)Development and external validation of a nomogram for overall survival after curative resection in serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer
Ann Oncol
(2014)Standard cancer patient population for age standardising survival ratios
Eur J Cancer
(2004)GLOBOCAN 2012: estimated cancer incidence mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012
(2013)Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4)
Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc
(2017)Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer
Ann Surg
(2007)Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Br J Surg
(2014)Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of extended lymphadenectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer
Br J Surg
(2014)AJCC cancer staging manual
JAMA, J Am Med Assoc
(2010)
Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer
J Clin Oncol
Conditional survival in gastric cancer: a SEER database analysis
Gastric Cancer
Conditional survival of patients with gastric cancer who undergo curative resection: a multi-institutional analysis in China
Cancer
Conditional survival predictions after surgery for patients with penile carcinoma
Cancer
Conditional probability of survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol
A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
Cancer
How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis
J Clin Oncol
Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma
J Clin Oncol
Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial
J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol
Which method is more suitable for advanced gastric cancer with enlarged lymph nodes, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy or open gastrectomy?
Gastric Cancer
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3)
Gastric Cancer
Cited by (12)
Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Long Term Outcomes After Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer in an Italian Cohort of Patients
2022, Journal of Visceral SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The corrected C-Index for DFS based on the AJCC staging system revealed better prediction (C-Index 0.75), while the corrected C-Index for OS had worse discrimination ability compared with the current nomogram (C-Index 0.72). Several nomograms have been developed in the last few decades to provide simple and reliable tools to predict gastric cancer patient prognosis following surgical resection [6,8,12,18–22]. The models proposed in 2014 by Kim et al. using data from the Gastric Cancer Collaborative Group included age, sex, tumor site, depth of invasion and LNR as factors that influenced survival, and demonstrated good predictive abilities in terms of DFS (C-index 0.711) and OS (C- index 0.702) [13].
Dynamic Prediction of Survival after Curative Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A landmarking-based analysis
2022, European Journal of Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :Gastric adenocarcinoma is a disease with heterogeneous outcomes following resection with a 5-year survival ranging from 5% to 90% [5,34,35]. As such, several nomograms and prognostic models have been developed to better characterize the long-term outcomes of individual patients undergoing surgery [14,17–21]. However, most instances of death and recurrence among patients with gastric adenocarcinoma occur within the first 2 years after surgery [36,37].
Development and validation of a nomogram for Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis
2024, Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
- 1
Chen QY, Zhong Q, and Wang W contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.