Review
Nature and timing of post-approval manufacturing changes of tumour necrosis factor α inhibitor products: A 20-year follow-up study of originators and biosimilars

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106227Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Manufacturing changes (MCs) might impact quality attributes of biopharmaceuticals.

  • Post-approval MCs are frequently introduced to both originators and biosimilars.

  • Differences between originators and biosimilars were limited to manufacturing process and site.

  • Incidence rate of MCs for originators and biosimilars were comparable.

  • Introducing MCs is stimulated by technical advancement, upscaling and innovation.

Abstract

The manufacturing of biopharmaceuticals is complex, and minor changes in the process may affect quality attributes (QAs) that may, in turn, impact clinical outcomes. Regulatory documents from the European Medicines Agency were used to characterize two aspects, nature and timing, of post-approval MCs for originators and biosimilars TNF-α inhibitors that were on the European market up to May 2021. The nature of MCs was evaluated in two ways: (1) the type of MCs related to the drug substance (DS) or drug product (DP), classified as manufacturing, quality control, composition, packaging, or stability with various subtypes; and (2) the risk level according to the potential impact of the MCs on QAs, classified as low, medium, or high. Timing was defined as the date of the regulatory decision on the MC in relation to the approval date. We identified 801 post-approval MCs implemented to originators (mean: 137, range: 112–175) and biosimilars (mean: 30, range: 0–133). Most of implemented MCs for originators and biosimilars were classified as low and medium risk (88.1%), and a small fraction were considered high-risk (11.9%). The average incidence rates were comparable for both originators and biosimilars (7.0/year for MCs, 0.8/year for high-risk MCs). In 20% of MCs introduced to biosimilars, the DP manufacturing site was involved (9% for originators). In contrast, 16% of MCs introduced to originators were related to the DS manufacturing processes (only 7% for biosimilars). In conclusion, while the overall MC incidence rate and the risk level of MCs was not substantially different between TNF-α inhibitor products, we observed some differences in a few types of MCs related to DS manufacturing process and DP manufacturing site between originators and biosimilars. As far as our data shows there is no reasons to assume that post-approval MCs will lead to differences between TNF-α-i originators and biosimilars in clinical practice.

Keywords

Biopharmaceuticals
Tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors
Reference products
Originators
Biosimilars
Comparability
Manufacturing changes
Quality attributes
Consistency

Cited by (0)