Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 51, Issue 16, November 2015, Pages 2304-2313
European Journal of Cancer

Prognosis, stage and oestrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer in relation to characteristics of the first tumour, prior endocrine treatment and radiotherapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

A contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is today treated as an independent primary tumour, although recent data suggest risk and prognosis of CBC to be influenced by characteristics of and treatment given for the first tumour (BC1). We hereby investigate phenotypical and prognostic features of the second tumour (BC2) in relation to prior endocrine treatment and radiotherapy.

Methods

From a well-defined population-based cohort of CBC-patients, we have constructed a unique tissue-microarray including 600 pairs of primary tumours and CBCs. Breast cancer mortality was primary end-point for prognosis.

Results

Both oestrogen receptor (ER) status and stage was strongly correlated between BC1 and BC2 within CBC-pairs. Although BC2 had the highest prognostic impact, BC1 continued to influence prognosis after diagnosis of CBC. Patients diagnosed with two high stage tumours within a short time-interval had a particularly bad prognosis. Prior endocrine therapy and radiotherapy both correlated to ER-negativity of BC2. An ER-negative BC2 was associated with an inferior prognosis compared to an ER-positive BC2 regardless of ER-status of BC1 or prior endocrine therapy.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that both the residual prognostic impact of BC1, the possibility of contralateral metastasis, as well as prior treatment given, need to be considered when determining appropriate diagnostic work-up and treatment of CBC. In addition, radiation to the contralateral breast and risk of inducing CBC with an aggressive ER-negative phenotype should be considered when establishing new radiation treatment techniques. This study indicates loss of ER-expression as an important ‘endocrine treatment escape mechanism’, although further studies are warranted.

Introduction

Prior breast cancer patients have a life-time risk of 2–20% of developing a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) [1], [2], [3]. A CBC is today treated as a new independent primary tumour, although recent data suggest that the second tumour (BC2) may in some cases be a metastasis of the first (BC1) [4], [5]. In addition, CBC diagnosed in close connection to prior adjuvant treatment is presumably resistant to the treatment given. Indeed, prior endocrine therapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have all been associated with a worse prognosis once diagnosed with CBC [4], [6], [7]. CBC may hence be used as an in vivo model for studies of adjuvant treatment resistance. In addition, with new radiotherapy techniques becoming clinically available, importance of scattered dose to the contralateral breast and risk of radiation induced CBC need to be further evaluated.

We have hereby studied TNM-stage, oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of BC2 in relation to characteristics of BC1 and prior treatment, using a unique tissue-microarray (TMA) including >700 CBC-patients. This is to our knowledge the largest cohort of CBC-patients with access to detailed patient, tumour and treatment information as well as tumour tissue ever studied. We hereby wish to clarify the biological relationship between CBC-pairs, and find indications as to when contralateral metastasis should be suspected and clonal relationship further investigated. We also want to investigate phenotypical and prognostic features of BC2 in relation to prior treatment. This could not only give us important information on how to optimise treatment for patients with CBC, but also increase our knowledge on treatment escape mechanisms in vivo.

Section snippets

Tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry

Inclusion criteria and data abstraction have been described before [4]. Briefly all patients within the Southern Swedish Healthcare Region with two breast cancers reported in the Swedish Cancer Registry, and BC2 diagnosed between 1977 and 2007 were included. Clinical data were abstracted from individual charts and paraffin-embedded tissue collected. We focused on patients with metachronous CBC (⩾3 months between tumours), excluding patients with synchronous CBC, patients with distant metastasis

Tumour characteristics

Patient and tumour characteristics are described in Table 1. Median follow-up time was 11.4 years for patients without breast cancer related death, and 9.1 years in the whole patient cohort. BC2 was generally smaller than BC1 and more often PR-negative. In addition, BC2 was less often treated with radiotherapy, but more often with endocrine therapy. No general difference was seen between BC1 and BC2 in type of surgery used, lymph-node status, TNM-stage, or ER-status. When comparing tumours

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of CBC-patients with access to detailed patient information, a long follow-up period, as well as tumour-tissue, ever studied. As previously suggested, we found hormone-receptor status within tumour-pairs to be highly correlated [9], [10]. In addition, TNM-stage was correlated between tumours. This may in part be explained by individual patient’s delay in reporting symptoms and compliance to follow-up. Other explanations are genetic and environmental

Financial support

This work was supported by the Swedish Breast Cancer Association (BRO) (2011, 2014); the Skåne University Hospital Foundation (2014-94413); the Percy Falk Foundation (2011); the Swedish Cancer Society (13 0499); the Swedish Research Council (B0262601, 521-2011-3021); the Gunnar Nilsson Cancer Foundation (2013); the Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation (13/2013); the Anna and Edwin Bergers Foundation (2014); Skane County Council’s Research and Development Foundation (REGSKANE-434091); and Governmental

Role of the funding sources

None of the funding sources had any impact on study design; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Kristina Lövgren for construction of the TMA and for retrieving tumour paraffin blocks. We also want to thank Gunilla Chebil for locating and collecting paraffin blocks, and Sara Baker for data base construction and collection of paraffin blocks.

In addition we are indebted to the South-Swedish Oncological Centre providing us with data from the Cancer Register, and to the skilled and helpful staff at the surgical, oncological and pathological clinics, and at the medical archives

References (37)

  • Y. Chen et al.

    Epidemiology of contralateral breast cancer

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (1999)
  • S. Alkner et al.

    Prediction of outcome after diagnosis of metachronous contralateral breast cancer

    BMC Cancer

    (2011)
  • V. Vichapat et al.

    Tumor stage affects risk and prognosis of contralateral breast cancer: results from a large Swedish-population-based study

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • M.E. Sandberg et al.

    Prognostic implications of estrogen receptor pattern of both tumors in contralateral breast cancer

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2012)
  • M. Hartman et al.

    Incidence and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • S.M. Swain et al.

    Estrogen receptor status of primary breast cancer is predictive of estrogen receptor status of contralateral breast cancer

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2004)
  • E. Janschek et al.

    Contralateral breast cancer: molecular differentiation between metastasis and second primary cancer

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2001)
  • G.M. Tse et al.

    Clonal analysis of bilateral mammary carcinomas by clinical evaluation and partial allelotyping

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (9)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text