Co-learning cycles to support the design of innovative farm systems in southern Mali
Introduction
Farming system design can help to generate innovative farm systems to overcome the constraints faced by farmers, increase farm productivity and profitability, and improve households’ livelihoods. Farming system design employs qualitative and quantitative approaches to support the analysis of current farm systems and the design and evaluation of alternatives (Le Gal et al., 2011, Martin et al., 2012). Farm systems are highly heterogeneous in terms of resource endowment, soil types, cropping and livestock systems, and livelihood strategies (Giller et al., 2011). This implies the need to tailor innovations to the context of the farm (Descheemaeker et al., 2016b). Tailoring innovations can be facilitated firstly by farm typologies, which are a useful tool to consider heterogeneity of resource endowment and/or production objectives (Chopin et al., 2014, Senthilkumar et al., 2012, Tittonell et al., 2010). Secondly, strong farmers’ participation in the design process may enhance the relevance of the innovations for specific farmer contexts (Schaap et al., 2013). While participatory research mainly generates qualitative insights (Dorward et al., 2003, Van Asten et al., 2009), Participatory Learning and Action Research (PLAR) was proposed to combine qualitative and quantitative insights (Defoer, 2002). In PLAR, qualitative participatory research provides information that strengthens quantitative assessments, e.g. resource flow maps drawn by farmers to derive and calculate nutrient balances. Similarly, Martin et al. (2012) employed a game board to redesign livestock systems in France. In this approach, inputs from farmers playing the game were used to calculate indicators (e.g. satisfaction of animal needs) with the help of a computerized support system. Conversely, Paassen et al. (2011) showed that quantitative outputs of multiple goal linear programming models, if presented using concepts and symbols familiar to farmers, enhanced communication between farmers, farm advisors and researchers leading to relevant farm-specific solutions. In other studies, outputs from simple models (static simulation of annual farm stocks and flows), representing farmers’ reality and concerns were an appropriate discussion support to jointly generate alternative farm systems (Sempore et al., 2015; Andrieu et al., 2015).
The approach of combining ex-ante trade-off analysis and on-farm trials in iterative learning cycles with farmers has been conceptualised in the Describe Explain Explore Design (DEED) cycle (Descheemaeker et al., 2016b, Giller et al., 2011). Where DEED was applied previously, it produced useful insights to re-design farm systems: e.g. strategies to restore soil fertility led to improved crop and cattle productivity at village scale (Rufino et al., 2011), land allocation to fodder and use of an improved cattle breed resulted in improved farm recycling efficiency (Tittonell et al., 2009). However, most existing studies applied only one DEED cycle. Having a second cycle allows to incorporate the learning from the first cycle, but there is little insight into how methods and solutions can be adapted dynamically using scientific results and farmers’ appraisals (a useful exception is Dogliotti et al. (2014)). Furthermore, modelling outputs have seldom been coupled to real on-farm testing, although farmers were usually willing to test the different technical alternatives (urea treatment of straw, compost pits) in their farms (Andrieu et al., 2012). Finally, though the empowerment of stakeholders during the participatory process is widely acknowledged (de Jager et al., 2009, Defoer, 2002, Hellin et al., 2008, Sterk et al., 2007), there is little empirical evidence that a participatory approach can increase the scaling-out potential of the research outputs (Sumberg et al., 2003).
Land shortage, climate variability and climate change (Descheemaeker et al., 2016a), unreliable institutional support (e.g. fertiliser subsidy) for crop production (Ebanyat et al., 2010), decreasing fodder availability for livestock, weak access to output markets for livestock products, and poor price setting power for cereals and livestock (Kaminski et al., 2013) are common challenges for smallholders across sub-Saharan Africa. Also the farmers in southern Mali face these constraints (Autfray et al., 2012, Coulibaly et al., 2015, Traore et al., 2013). Technical alternatives at field/cow scale (e.g. diversification with legumes, stall feeding of cows) can help farmers to cope with the challenging characteristics of their environment. These alternatives can be tested in on-farm trials. Strategic/tactical decisions (Le Gal et al., 2010) like changing field area per crop, producing a new type of fodder and/or changing the feeding strategy of cows need to be addressed at farm scale. Given the risk involved, this is often done with ex-ante analysis (Whitbread et al., 2010). Such major changes made at farm level can be referred to as “innovative farm systems” (Le Gal et al., 2011). In southern Mali, achieving food self-sufficiency and improving farm income are farmers’ main objectives (Bosma et al., 1999). An assessment of the performance of the innovations is thus needed, using relevant indicators like yield, gross margin and Cost:Benefit for technical alternatives and food self-sufficiency and income for innovative farm systems.
The objectives of this study were to (i) design innovative farm systems that improve farm income without compromising food self-sufficiency in the cotton area of southern Mali, (ii) implement the DEED cycle twice with emphasis on on-farm testing of technical alternatives, ex-ante impact assessment through modelling, and incorporation of farmers’ and researchers’ learning, (iii) illustrate the feasibility and usefulness of such an approach through its ability to generate salient farm systems for farmers and practical scaling-out guidelines for extension workers. In what follows, we start by describing the different steps and their adaptation during the learning cycles. The second section presents the assessment of the agro-economic performance of the tested innovations and an analysis of farmers’ and researchers’ learning during the cycles. The last section discusses (i) adaptation of the research methods as a key feature of this farming system design approach, (ii) the strength of the guidelines generated, (iii) the opportunities for scaling out and (iv) the broader changes needed to trigger large-scale adoption of the innovative designs.
Section snippets
Study area and farm characteristics
The study area is located in Koutiala district in the cotton zone of southern Mali where population densities reach 70 people km−2 (Soumaré et al., 2008). The uni-modal rainy season starts in May and ends in October, with total annual rainfall ranging from 500 to 1200 mm. Farmers grow maize, sorghum and millet for food consumption and cotton and groundnut to generate income. Livestock provide draught power, milk, meat, manure, and a buffer against risk (Kanté, 2001). Farming is the major
Step 1: design of a set of options based on farmers’ constraints and opportunities
The main constraints to crop production and livestock rearing cited by farmers in all the three villages were lack of oxen, poor soil fertility, animal feeding and animal diseases. Farmers mentioned declining crop yields and gross margins, poor feeding and diseases as the causes for lack of oxen. The final list of options aimed at addressing farmers concerns by increasing yield, farm gross margin and improving livestock feeding and included: (A) intensification of current crops (maize, sorghum
Research adaptation is a key feature of the DEED cycle
Performing two iterations of the DEED cycle allowed integrating generated knowledge into the research process, thus enabling the agile reorientation of project actions and increasing the chances to design promising and relevant alternatives (López-Ridaura et al., 2002, Mierlo et al., 2010, Rossing et al., 1997). In this research, farmers’ reaction and point of view in the different cycles and steps complemented researchers’ findings, thus triggering project reorientation (Table 2). After the
Conclusion
Over a period of three years researchers, development agents and farmers experimented together a wide array of technical options related to crops and livestock and explored farm reconfigurations with promising options. Two experimental cycles led to convergent learning and project reorientation: farmers and researchers were able to share a common understanding of yield variability based on local knowledge and statistical analysis of the trials. The first cycle revealed strong trade-offs between
Acknowledgements
Funding for this study was provided by the McKnight Foundation through the project ‘Pathways to Agro-ecological Intensification of Sorghum and Millet Cropping Systems of Southern Mali’ and by the CGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems. We thank all the farmers of M’Peresso, Nampossela, Nitabougouro, N’Goukan, Finkoloni, Kani, Karangasso, Koumbri and Try for their availability and willingness to participate in the research process. We are grateful to the Association Malienne d'Eveil au
References (62)
- et al.
Agricultural intensification in the Sahel – the ladder approach
Agric. Syst.
(2008) - et al.
Millet response to microdose fertilization in south-western Niger: effect of antecedent fertility management and environmental factors
Field Crops Res.
(2015) - et al.
The promising impact of ley introduction and herd expansion on soil organic matter content in southern Mali
Agric. Syst.
(1999) Learning about methodology development for integrated soil fertility management
Agric. Syst.
(2002)- et al.
Co-innovation of family farm systems: a systems approach to sustainable agriculture
Agric. Syst.
(2014) - et al.
Participatory farm management methods for assessing the suitability of potential innovations. A case study on green manuring options for tomato producers in Ghana
Agric. Syst.
(2003) - et al.
Understanding farm trajectories and development pathways: two decades of change in southern Mali
Agric. Syst.
(2015) - et al.
Unravelling the causes of variability in crop yields and treatment responses for better tailoring of options for sustainable intensification in southern Mali
Field Crops Res.
(2016) - et al.
Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development
Agric. Syst.
(2011) - et al.
Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. the MESMIS framework
Ecol. Indic.
(2002)
A modelling framework to support farmers in designing agricultural production systems
Environ. Model. Softw.
How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review
Agric. Syst.
A conceptual framework to support adaptation of farming systems – development and application with Forage Rummy
Agric. Syst.
Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics
Livest. Sci.
Cotton as an entry point for soil fertility maintenance and food crop productivity in savannah agroecosystems: evidence from a long-term experiment in southern Mali
Field Crops Res.
Understanding variability in soybean yield and response to P-fertilizer and rhizobium inoculants on farmers’ fields in northern Nigeria
Field Crops Res.
Model-based explorations to support development of sustainable farming systems: case studies from France and the Netherlands
Eur. J. Agron.
Competing use of organic resources, village-level interactions between farm types and climate variability in a communal area of NE Zimbabwe
Agric. Syst.
Participatory design of farm level adaptation to climate risks in an arable region in The Netherlands
Eur. J. Agron.
Impact of policies designed to enhance efficiency of water and nutrients on farm households varying in resource endowments in south India
NJAS – Wageningen J. Life Sci.
Prototyping and farm system modelling—partners on the road towards more sustainable farm systems?
Eur. J. Agron.
Agricultural research in the face of diversity, local knowledge and the participation imperative: theoretical considerations
Agric. Syst.
Beyond resource constraints – exploring the biophysical feasibility of options for the intensification of smallholder crop-livestock systems in Vihiga district, Kenya
Agric. Syst.
The diversity of rural livelihoods and their influence on soil fertility in agricultural systems of East Africa – a typology of smallholder farms
Agric. Syst.
Effects of climate variability and climate change on crop production in southern Mali
Eur. J. Agron.
Impact of intensification of different types of livestock production in smallholder crop-livestock systems
Livest. Sci.
How farming systems simulation can aid the development of more sustainable smallholder farming systems in southern Africa
Eur. J. Agron.
A comparison between urban livestock production strategies in Burkina Faso, Mali and Nigeria in West Africa
Trop. Anim. Health Prod.
Validating a whole farm modelling with stakeholders: evidence from a West African case
J. Agric. Sci.
Usages des résidus de récolte et gestion intégrée de la fertilité des sols dans les systèmes de polyculture élevage: étude de cas au Mali-Sud
Cah. Agric.
Knowledge systems for sustainable development
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
Cited by (45)
Co-design of diversified cropping systems in the Mediterranean area
2024, European Journal of AgronomyClimate smart agriculture for sustainable productivity and healthy landscapes
2024, Environmental Science and PolicyCan low-input agriculture in semi-arid Burkina Faso feed its soil, livestock and people?
2023, European Journal of AgronomyUnravelling the step-by-step process for farming system design to support agroecological transition
2023, European Journal of Agronomy