Elsevier

Ecological Modelling

Volume 220, Issue 19, 10 October 2009, Pages 2543-2558
Ecological Modelling

From meso- to macro-scale dynamic water quality modelling for the assessment of land use change scenarios

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.043Get rights and content

Abstract

The implementation of the European Water Framework Directive requires reliable tools to predict the water quality situations in streams caused by planned land use changes at the scale of large regional river basins. This paper presents the results of modelling the in-stream nitrogen load and concentration within the macro-scale basin of the Saale river (24,167 km2) using a semi-distributed process-based ecohydrological dynamic model SWIM (Soil and Water Integrated Model). The simulated load and concentration at the last gauge of the basin show that SWIM is capable to provide a satisfactory result for a large basin. The uncertainty analysis indicates the importance of realistic input data for agricultural management, and that the calibration of parameters can compensate the uncertainty in the input data to a certain extent. A hypothesis about the distributed nutrient retention parameters for macro-scale basins was tested aimed in improvement of the simulation results at the intermediate gauges and the outlet. To verify the hypothesis, the retention parameters were firstly proved to have a reasonable representation of the denitrification conditions in six meso-scale catchments. The area of the Saale region was classified depending on denitrification conditions in soil and groundwater into three classes (poor, neutral and good), and the distributed parameters were applied. However, the hypothesis about the usefulness of distributed retention parameters for macro-scale basins was not confirmed. Since the agricultural management is different in the sub-regions of the Saale basin, land use change scenarios were evaluated for two meso-scale subbasins of the Saale. The scenario results show that the optimal agricultural land use and management are essential for the reduction in nutrient load and improvement of water quality to meet the objectives of the European Water Framework Directive and in view of the regional development plans for future.

Introduction

The increasing input of nutrients in rivers induced or caused by point sources (sewage treatment plants, industrial enterprises and municipal wastewater) and diffuse sources (agricultural land, atmosphere) often leads to pollution and degradation of water quality and can cause ecological changes in freshwater. As the discharge of polluted wastewater has been notably reduced by wastewater treatment in the recent decades, agriculture is generally perceived as the main source of nutrient input to rivers in Europe (De Wit et al., 2002). In recognition of the importance of water quality problem and the need for integrated management in river basins, the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) was adopted in 2000, aiming to restore the “good ecological status” at the scale of large river systems until 2015 (EC, 2000).

Water quality models could provide an important and valuable support for the assessment and analysis of pollution loads in river basins and possible measures to improve water quality, and therefore they could be a useful instrument for fulfilling the requirements of the Water Framework Directive. Hence, various water quality models for the basin scale were developed and tested in the last decades (Arheimer and Brandt, 1998, Whitehead et al., 1998, Bicknell et al., 1997, Arnold et al., 1998, Krysanova et al., 1998). These models vary in the level of complexity, from statistical and conceptual models based on statistical and empirical relationships to process-based and physically based models derived from physical and physicochemical laws and including also some equations based on empirical knowledge. Due to the lack of description of important physical processes, the simplified conceptual models have limited applicability, and are not appropriate for simulation of some essential spatially distributed processes. The physically based models are by definition fully distributed accounting for spatial variations in all variables. However, these models are often considered too complex without a guarantee of better performance (Beven, 1989, Beven, 1996). The requirement of large amount of input data and computation resources for such models is also a particulate concern, especially for large basin simulations (Lunn et al., 1996). This indicates that using the process-based models (Krysanova et al., 2005a) of intermediate complexity for the basin-scale water quality assessment may be sufficient and even more promising. Numerous studies have proven that the process-based models are spatially explicit and sufficiently adequate to represent major hydrological, biogeochemical and vegetation growth processes at the catchment scale (Arnold and Allen, 1996, Chaplot et al., 2004, Krysanova et al., 2005b, Stewart et al., 2006, Hattermann et al., 2006). The models SWAT (Arnold et al., 1998), HSPF (Bicknell et al., 1997), SWIM (Krysanova et al., 1998) and DWSM (Borah et al., 2004) belong to the process-based modelling tools for river basins. However, in the most of the published studies the validation is performed using the catchment outlet data only, which provides no information on how they perform spatially (Cherry et al., 2008).

Besides, most of the current catchment scale studies with dynamic process-based models focus on micro-scale and small catchments ranging from 1 to 100 km2 (Du et al., 2006, Chaplot et al., 2004, Eisele et al., 2001 and Bogena et al., 2003) and meso-scale basins with the drainage area from 100 to 5000 km2 (Abbaspour et al., 2007, Saleh et al., 2000 and Volk et al., 2008). The process-based modelling at the macro-scale is very rare in literature, where the statistical and conceptual riverine load models are usually applied. One example is by Even et al. (2007), who simulated water quality conditions in the Seine River basin (78650 km2) using four coupled deterministic models with satisfactory seasonal results at different stations. Since the WFD requires the assessment on large river basin scale, more efforts are needed on improving the capabilities of describing nutrient fluxes in large basins.

As all necessary input data, such as crop rotations and fertilization schedule, and parameters of the current process-based models usually cannot be precisely defined at the basin scale, there are considerable uncertainties in the water quality modelling. Moreover, the process-based water quality models often confront the problem of over-parameterization, which results in the equal or very similar model result using various parameter combinations (problem of equifinality) (Oreskes et al., 1994). There are already many published studies on uncertainty in water quality modelling related to physical data such as rainfall (Bertoni, 2001), spatial data such as land use maps (Payraudeau et al., 2004), and parameters (Abbaspour et al., 2007, Hattermann et al., 2006). The uncertainty analysis allows to find the most important factors controlling the model behaviour, and to represent the modelling results in a more reliable way.

Recent studies on land use change impacts have demonstrated that the process-based water quality models are effective tools to simulate the hypothetic land use scenarios. They are helpful to either evaluate the long-term impacts of implementation of the current management practices (Santhi et al., 2005), or to investigate the optimal solutions in order to reduce the nutrients loads in rivers (Zammit et al., 2005, Hesse et al., 2008 and Volk et al., 2008). However, these studies did not account for some new tendencies in land use, like the influence of introducing energy plants on the water quality aspect in the future. In this study the land use scenarios are based on various measures of controlling nutrient emissions, and include the potential agricultural practice changes due to the development of the energy market.

Hence, the objectives of the study were:

  • -

    to test the applicability of the process-based ecohydrological model SWIM for simulating nitrogen dynamics in a macro-scale basin considering the outlet and intermediate gauges as validation points,

  • -

    to investigate the uncertainties related to input data and parametrization,

  • -

    to test the hypothesis about the usefulness of distributed retention parameters for nitrogen simulation in a macro-scale basin, and to establish ranges of retention parameters depending on the catchment characteristics, and

  • -

    to evaluate impacts on nitrate nitrogen load under the potential land use changes.

In this study, both input data and a set of most sensitive parameters for nitrogen dynamics were included in the uncertainty analysis. The most effective factors revealed in the analysis could explain the difficulties in simulating nutrient loads simultaneously in a large basin and its subbasins, and to suggest the ways for improvement.

Section snippets

Model SWIM

The dynamic process-based ecohydrological model SWIM (Soil and Water Integrated Model) was developed on the basis of the models SWAT (Arnold et al., 1993) and MATSALU (Krysanova et al., 1989). Until now, SWIM was intensively tested, validated and applied for simulating water discharge in meso- to macro-scale basins, and water quality in meso-scale basins (Krysanova et al., 1998, Hattermann et al., 2006 and Hesse et al., 2008). An overview of processes included in SWIM is shown in Fig. 1.

SWIM

Calibration, validation and uncertainty analysis

The model calibration and validation is a basis for its further application for environmental and water quality assessment. Usually, hydrological validation is performed first, and then the model is validated for nutrient dynamics. The simulation periods for each basin are not identical because they are based on the observed data available for the respective basins. The fortnightly measurements of nitrate nitrogen are available for several gauges in the Saale basin during the period 1997–2002,

Testing the hypothesis about distributed retention parameters

It was proven that the set of global retention parameters, which are the main calibration parameters in SWIM for water quality, are sufficient to model water quality in meso-scale catchments. The results for the Saale basin show that SWIM with the global (unique for a basin) parameter settings is capable to reproduce the nitrate dynamics at the last gauge of the basin, but some improvement for intermediate gauges is still needed. Therefore, it was decided to test the hypothesis about

Search for retention parameter ranges in meso-scale basins

Although the hypothesis of the distributed parameters in large basins was not confirmed, the different retention parameter values obtained for the meso-scale basins can still indicate some distinct characteristics in different sub-regions. Hence, a search for realistic parameter ranges could be helpful for inducting the parameter settings in the future modelling studies. As the simulated nitrogen dynamics is most sensitive to the retention times and decomposition rates in subsurface and

Land use/land management change

As discussed above, agricultural land use may influence the nitrate concentration and load significantly. Land use and land management scenarios were applied not to the whole Saale basin, which overlaps with three federal states with their different policies, but to two of its meso-scale subbasins. One is the Unstrut basin (gauge Oldisleben) located almost fully in Thuringia, and the second is the Weiße Elster (gauge Greiz) located almost fully in Saxony. The main objective was to estimate

Conclusions

The study was focused on the upscaling of dynamical water quality modelling from meso-scale to macro-scale river basins. It included uncertainty analysis, search for retention parameter ranges depending on the catchment characteristics, and testing of the hypothesis about distributed retention parameters in macro-scale basins. The study has demonstrated that the retention parameters reflect the actual denitrification conditions in the meso-scale subbasins. The uncertainty analysis revealed that

References (55)

  • V. Krysanova et al.

    Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds

    Ecol. Model.

    (1998)
  • V. Krysanova et al.

    Simulation modelling of the coastal waters pollution from agricultural watersheds

    Ecol. Model.

    (1989)
  • R. Lunn et al.

    Development and applicationof a nitrogen modelling system for large catchments

    J. Hydrol.

    (1996)
  • J.E. Nash et al.

    River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I. A discussion of principles

    J. Hydrol.

    (1970)
  • S. Payraudeau et al.

    Modelling nitrogen loads at the catchment scale under the influence of land use

    Phys. Chem. Earth

    (2004)
  • M. Volk et al.

    Integrated ecological-economic modelling of water pollution abatement management options in the upper Ems river basin

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2008)
  • P.G. Whitehead et al.

    A semi-distributed integrated flow and nitrogen model for multiple source assessment in catchments (INCA). Part I. Model structure and process equations

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (1998)
  • C. Zammit et al.

    Modeling the effects of land-use modifications to control nutrient loads from an agricultural catchment in Western Australia

    Ecol. Model.

    (2005)
  • B. Arheimer et al.

    Modelling nitrogen transport and retention in the catchments of southern Sweden

    Ambio

    (1998)
  • J.G. Arnold et al.

    SWRRB—a basin scale simulation model for soil and water resources management

    (1990)
  • J.G. Arnold et al.

    Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I. Model development

    J. Am. Water. Works. Ass.

    (1998)
  • H. Behrendt et al.

    Flussgebietsdifferenzierte Nährstoffeinträge im Einzugsgebiet der Saale

  • Bertoni, J.C., 2001. Etude hydrologique et analyse des incertitudes sur trois bassins versants semi urbanises de la...
  • K.J. Beven

    A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling

  • B.R. Bicknell et al.

    Hydrological Simulation Program—FORTRAM (HSPF): User's Manual for Release 11. EPA-600/R-97/080

    (1997)
  • D.K. Borah et al.

    Storm event flow and sediment simulations in agricultural watersheds using DWSM

    Trans. ASAE

    (2004)
  • V. Chaplot et al.

    Predicting water, sediment, and NO3–N loads under scenarios of land-use and management practices in a flat watershed

    Water Air Soil Poll.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Review of scenario analyses to reduce agricultural nitrogen and phosphorus loading to the aquatic environment

      2016, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Rode et al. (2009) defined the scenarios in close collaboration with agricultural agencies to ensure the design of realistic and site specific agricultural management practices with a high degree of acceptance by the farmers. Some of the studies included developments in the energy market to design agricultural practice changes in the scenarios (Huang et al., 2009). Tong et al. (2009) employed existing land use development plans to formulate the land use scenarios.

    • Detection of dominant nitrate processes in ecohydrological modeling with temporal parameter sensitivity analysis

      2015, Ecological Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are many studies showing the complexity of water quality model application. Within these complex water quality models, many parameters are included to simulate the nutrient cycles (Bailey and Ahmadi, 2014; Huang et al., 2009; Moriasi et al., 2013; Rode et al., 2007, 2010; Sincock et al., 2003; Wade et al., 2006). This complexity may hinder realistic estimations of these processes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text