Elsevier

Ecological Indicators

Volume 91, August 2018, Pages 679-688
Ecological Indicators

Original Articles
Assessing benthic ecological status under impoverished faunal situations: A case study from the southern Gulf of Mexico

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.048Get rights and content

Abstract

Biological indices such as AZTI’s Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) and multivariate AMBI (M-AMBI) have been used in monitoring programs worldwide to assess the benthic ecological status (ES) of transitional and coastal waters. However, their reliability is reduced under faunal impoverishment and defaunation, low abundance/number of taxa, and/or high percentage of taxa not assigned or mis-assigned to ecological group, which imply removing these data from the analysis. In order to avoid loss of robustness when these situations are met, here we propose an approach based on decision criteria that utilize these indices together with environmental and contaminants data. Our area of study is the southern Gulf of Mexico seafloor, where a survey was carried out during the rainy season across a sampling grid of 75 sites. To achieve this, we first distinguished homogeneous groups of sites and then defined states (‘good’, ‘fair’, and ‘bad’) from three sediment quality elements: benthic indices, environmental data by quartile values, and contaminant concentrations in the context of sediment quality guidelines. Overall, 69% of sampling sites showed low abundance and defaunation, mainly at sites located on the continental shelf, where most of them ranged from ‘moderate’ to ‘poor’ ES, principally by ‘fair’ environmental data and secondly, oil-related disturbance. Conversely, sites located near the mouths of rivers and coastal lagoons recorded the highest abundance and showed diverse sensitivity levels, ranging from ‘high’ to ‘bad’ ES. In conclusion, the use of this states-based approach allowed us to support and interpret the results of AMBI and M-AMBI, since their values were related to environmental and contaminants data. This approach may be useful in many contexts to avoid the loss of data when assessing the ES of the seafloor under defaunation or low abundance conditions.

Introduction

Macroinfauna species are often used as bioindicators of natural disturbance and anthropogenic pollution of aquatic systems (Borja et al., 2000). These organisms are used in monitoring programs because they are relatively sedentary, they have relatively long life-spans and they participate in cycling nutrients and transference of energy to top trophic levels (Pearson and Rosenberg, 1978, Rosenberg, 2001). Their ecological responses allow them to be classified in a range from sensitive to opportunistic species, and their abundances have been used in marine biotic indices aimed at assessing benthic community health. For example, one application is the Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) developed by AZTI (Borja et al., 2000) along with the multivariate AMBI application (M-AMBI) (Borja et al., 2004b, Muxika et al., 2007).

The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) includes AMBI and M-AMBI methodologies to assess the ecological status of macroinvertebrates in transitional and coastal waters, as well as other biological (e.g. phytoplankton, macroalgae, fishes), physicochemical (e.g. salinity, temperature, nutrients, dissolved oxygen, contaminants) and hydrodynamic (e.g. waves, tides) elements (Borja et al., 2009). Among the biological elements, macroinfauna is of major importance. If for example, macroinfauna has a ‘moderate’ status and the remainder of the elements have a ‘high’ status, the ecological status should be ‘moderate’, after the ‘one out, all out’ principle (Borja et al., 2003, Borja et al., 2004b). Part of this approach is used by Borja et al. (2009) as a decision-tree to integrate different elements into a unified ecological status assessment.

AMBI and M-AMBI are sensitive and representative indices (Borja et al., 2015), but their reliability is reduced under faunal impoverishment and defaunation situations, i.e. sediment samples with low abundance/number of taxa (1–3) and/or a high percentage of taxa not assigned (>20%) or mis-assigned to an ecological group, which imply that sites with these characteristics must be removed from the analyses (Borja et al., 2004a, Borja and Muxika, 2005, Checon et al., 2018).

In some benthic areas that are naturally impoverished (i.e. coastal lagoons, dynamic beaches, oligohaline stretches), some authors (e.g. Dauvin, 2007, Munari and Mistri, 2008) have cautioned against the use of benthic indices, and alternate indices based on higher taxa have been proposed for use in such environments (Munari et al., 2009).

AMBI and M-AMBI have been considered as the most suitable biotic indices to assess ecological status, both in the southern (Granados-Barba et al., 2009, Domínguez-Castanedo, 2012) as in the northern Gulf of Mexico (Gillett et al., 2015, Pelletier et al., 2018). However, some areas have faunal impoverishment and even defaunation, which reduce the reliability of these indices. In order to avoid loss of data when calculating ecological status under these circumstances, the objective of this study was to develop an approach based on decision criteria considering benthic indices, environmental and contaminant data in a case study from the southern Gulf of Mexico (sGM).

Section snippets

Study area and sampling design

The study was carried out in the sGM between 18°9′29.99″–22°45′ N and 96°00′–88°00′ W (Fig. 1). The oceanographic features of this region are regulated by: (i) surface runoff into the southwestern Gulf of Mexico and ground water discharges in the Yucatan Peninsula area influence; (ii) the circulation pattern, which is dominated by wind conditions—during spring and summer the Lazo Current reaches maximum speed in a south to south-west direction, and during autumn and winter the flow reverts to a

Sedimentary environments

Based on sediment texture, three sedimentary environments were distinguished: terrigenous, transition and carbonated, principally identified by the differences in carbonate content (χ2 = 62.1; d.f. = 2; P < 0.001), and secondly, by clay (χ2 = 19.1; d.f. = 2; P < 0.001) and silt content (χ2 = 16.1; d.f. = 2; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Thus, we used a range of carbonate content (20.9–76.9%) to show the sediment texture change along the transition zone from calcareous to terrigenous (Table 2). In

Discussion

We propose decision criteria that consider the benthic indices jointly with environmental and contaminant data when faunal impoverishment and defaunation situations occur at sites without high disturbance conditions. We defined states through methodologies tested in tropical areas exposed to several anthropogenic pressures (Venturini and Tommasi, 2004, Herrera-Silveira and Morales-Ojeda, 2009, Borja et al., 2015). The relative weight of these three sources of data has to be equal because

Conclusions

This is the first attempt to analyze benthic indices under faunal impoverishment and defaunation situations, using data recorded in the sGM. To accomplish the macroinfauna ecological status assessment, we classified the study area based on sedimentary environments determined in accordance with sediment texture, depth of the water column and benthic composition. Then we assigned states to each environment, which are not value judgments on ecological consequence, but represent instead

Acknowledgments

The data used in this study resulted from the ‘Programa de Monitoreo Ambiental del sur del Golfo de México,’ carried out jointly by PEMEX Exploración y Producción, Regiones Marinas and Cinvestav Unidad Mérida; in particular, we are grateful to the laboratories of ‘Bentos’, ‘Química Marina’, and ‘Geoquímica’ which generated these data. Thanks are also due to Maria Teresa Herrera-Dorantes (Laboratory of Benthos, Cinvestav) for her support in sampling in the field, laboratory procedures and

References (61)

  • J.C. Dauvin

    Paradox of estuarine quality: Benthic indicators and indices, consensus or debate for the future

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • J.A. de-la-Ossa-Carretero et al.

    A methodology for applying taxonomic sufficiency and benthic biotic indices in two Mediterranean areas

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2012)
  • D.J. Gillett et al.

    Effect of ecological group classification schemes on performance of the AMBI index benthic in US coastal waters

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2015)
  • D. Hering et al.

    The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • H.A. Hernandez-Arana et al.

    Transitional carbonate-terrigenous shelf sub-environments inferred from textural characteristics of surficial sediments in the southern Gulf of Mexico

    Cont. Shelf Res.

    (2005)
  • H.A. Hernández-Arana et al.

    Large-scale environmental influences on the benthic macroinfauna of the southern Gulf of Mexico

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2003)
  • J. Herrera-Silveira et al.

    Evaluation of the health status of a coastal ecosystem in southeast Mexico: assessment of water quality, phytoplankton and submerged aquatic vegetation

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2009)
  • I. Karakassis et al.

    Methodological considerations on the coastal and transitional benthic indicators proposed for the water framework directive

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2013)
  • N.B. Keeley et al.

    Exploiting salmon farm benthic enrichment gradients to evaluate the regional performance of biotic indices and environmental indicators

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2012)
  • C. Munari et al.

    The performance of benthic indicators of ecological change in Adriatic coastal lagoons: throwing the baby with the water

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2008)
  • I. Muxika et al.

    The suitability of the marine biotic index (AMBI) to new impact sources along European coasts

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2005)
  • I. Muxika et al.

    Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • N. Venturini et al.

    Petroleum contamination impact on macrobenthic communities under the influence of an oil refinery: integrating chemical and biological multivariate data

    Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.

    (2008)
  • N. Venturini et al.

    Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and changes in the trophic structure of polychaete assemblages in sediments of Todos os Santos Bay, Northeastern, Brazil

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2004)
  • D. Zarate-Lomelí et al.

    Terms of reference towards an integrated management policy in the coastal zone of the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean

    Ocean Coast. Manage.

    (1999)
  • Abbott, R.T., 1974. American Seashell: The Marine Mollusca of the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts of North America, second...
  • L. Alpuche-Gual et al.

    Hidrocarburos totales en sedimentos cercanos a plataformas de exploración y de extracción de petróleo en la Sonda de Campeche

  • American Public Health Association

    Standard Methods for the Analysis of Water and Wastewater

    (1985)
  • Borja, A., Franco, J., Muxika, I., 2003. Classification tools for marine ecological quality assessment: the usefulness...
  • J.B. Buchanan

    Sediment analysis

  • Cited by (9)

    • Sustainability situations for the southern Gulf of Mexico seafloor, based on environmental, benthic, and socioeconomic indicators

      2021, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sediment is supplied by river discharges (70%) and hurricanes (30%) from coastal to abyssal zones (Harris et al., 2020). Recovery of the deep-sea benthic infauna has been recorded after sublethal exposures to oil, with faunistic attributes decreasing in 2012 and increasing in 2013 (Salcedo et al., 2017; Santibañez-Aguascalientes et al., 2018, 2020). Furthermore, sensitive sites have been found where benthic quality was negatively impacted by human pressures, affecting goods and services (e.g. primary productivity, climate regulation, pharmaceutical resources) that ensure human well-being (Yoskowitz et al., 2016).

    • Influence of bottom environment conditions and hydrographic variability on spatiotemporal trends of macrofaunal amphipods on the Yucatan continental shelf

      2020, Continental Shelf Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The direct influence of the bottom environmental conditions, over the amphipod community characteristics, has been used to assess the ecological status of soft-sediment benthic habitats impacted by human-induced disturbances (Gómez-Gesteira and Dauvin, 2000; Marsden and Rainbow, 2004; Dauvin and Ruellet, 2007). The karstic nature and sediment characteristics on the YCS provide a mosaic of potential spaces to maintain diverse benthic macrofauna assemblages, and hence to impact largely the distribution patterns of abundance and species composition (Hernández-Arana et al., 2003; Domínguez-Castanedo et al., 2007; Santibañez-Aguascalientes et al., 2018), as has been noticed on other similar shelves (Williams et al., 2010; Zajac et al., 2013; Henkel and Politano, 2017). Previous studies on benthic macrofauna of shallow habitats in the YCS have highlighted changes in community attributes and species composition as an adaptive response to the environmental variability of nearshore ecosystems, e.g., beach, lagoon (Pech et al., 2007; Hernández-Guevara et al., 2008; Rodríguez-Pliego et al., 2011; Paz-Ríos and Ardisson, 2018) and spatial complexity (Paz-Ríos et al., 2019).

    • Setting reference conditions to assess the ecological status of the sublittoral and bathyal benthic communities of the southern Gulf of Mexico

      2020, Ecological Indicators
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the case of the southern Gulf of Mexico (sGM) the bathymetry and sedimentary characteristics of the basin, as well as the dynamics of the water masses, determine, in a large extent, the macroinfauna structure and its temporal variations in composition, abundance, and species diversity (Escobar-Briones et al., 1999; Hernández-Arana et al., 2003; Granados-Barba et al., 2009). However, the quantitative estimation and interpretation of benthic health, in terms of changes in assemblages’ structure, is, for the most part, fragmentary and fairly incomplete (Granados-Barba et al., 2009; Santibañez-Aguascalientes et al., 2018). Hence, it is necessary to identify the variables leaving a detectable imprint on the macroinfauna assemblages, permitting thus to predict changes in the faunal attributes to support the decision-making process in a region with great ecological and commercial importance (Escobar-Briones, 2004; Soto et al., 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text