Integrating forest biomass and distance from channel to develop an indicator of riparian condition
Introduction
The condition of vegetation adjacent to streams has been shown to exert a major effect on water quality in downstream rivers, lakes, and estuaries (Boyer et al., 1994, Garten and Ashwood, 2003, Pinckney et al., 1998, Stanley, 1988, Stanley, 1993, Stow et al., 2001). The condition of headwater riparian ecosystems is particularly important because headwaters constitute the majority of the stream length in watersheds (Brinson, 1993, Gomi et al., 2008, Rheinhardt et al., 2007b). Because most headwater reaches in agricultural landscapes lack sufficient buffers, the headwater portions of most agricultural stream networks provide a direct conduit for the introduction of most diffuse-source pollution into stream networks (Allan, 2004, Freeman et al., 2007, Naiman and Decamps, 1997), particularly nitrogen and sediment. Unfortunately, stream maps are usually too coarse to include the most-headwater reaches of stream networks (Baker et al., 2006). As a result, studies relating buffer condition to water quality have overlooked the most important portion of the stream network, and as a consequence, have likely underestimated the relationship between buffer condition and water quality at a landscape level. Further, many resource agencies have neglected to manage the buffer zone of headwater reaches, which are the places most in need of protection for maintaining or improving water quality.
Forest vegetation in near-stream buffer zones is important because it can assimilate and detain diffuse-source nutrients in surface and surficial groundwater that would otherwise be transported downstream (Dosskey et al., 2010, Jacobs and Gilliam, 1985, Peterjohn and Correll, 1984). Tree roots not only supply exudates that can be used as a carbon (energy) source for microbial denitrification, but they also supply a heterogeneous microenvironment for the denitrifying microbes (Groffman et al., 1996). In contrast, roots of herbaceous vegetation are much less suitable for providing exudates and a heterogeneous microenvironment for denitrifying bacteria, which means that forested riparian zones are much more conducive to denitrification than herbaceous-dominated ones. Detritus, in the form of leaves, snags, and large down wood, also stores nutrients and provides the labile organic carbon needed for denitrification (Tesoriero et al., 2004). Thus, organic matter in a riparian ecosystem, in both living and detrital forms, represents its capacity for assimilating nitrogen (and other nutrients) and for denitrification.
Although the difference between mature and younger forests in their capacity to remove nutrients is unknown, in general, biomass accumulation in regenerating forests should allow a net uptake of nutrients, while more mature forests would be more active in detaining nutrients through recycling mechanisms, assuming that they are already at steady state (Fisk et al., 2002, Vitousek and Reiners, 1975). Also, the root systems of older trees provide more complex microenvironments for denitrification than younger trees and although nitrogen retention is affected by site-specific conditions of soil, hydrology, and vegetation (Groffman et al., 1996, Ranalli and Macalady, 2010), the capacity to remove and recycle nutrients over sustained periods would be expected to be greater in mature forests relative to younger forests and greater in forested reaches than in reaches dominated by herbaceous vegetation. Thus, streams with natural channels and buffered by forest have the capacity to intercept and remove nutrients and sediments originating from uplands, and help protect downstream water quality (Brinson et al., 2006). This is particularly true in agricultural landscapes where excess nitrogen applied to crops commonly flows into headwater streams from adjacent cropland and where sediment often is eroded from plowed fields. Further, not only does biomass increase as a forest matures (Bradford and Kastendick, 2010), but also older forests tend to have higher structural diversity (resulting in more niches and higher species richness) (Ecke et al., 2002, Ishii et al., 2004), and a P:R ratio closer to one than younger forests and altered non-forests (Odum, 1969). Thus, habitat condition (biological integrity) also increases as forested ecosystems mature, which means that riparian zone biomass can be an indicator of both habitat condition and pollution retention potential.
Considering that problems with water quality are so pervasive nationwide, many regulatory and planning agencies have been developing riparian assessment approaches to characterize watershed condition and identify problems and possible solutions. While the emphasis of indicator development has usually focused on chemical water quality, a more recent focus has been to also develop indicators of habitat quality to characterize biological integrity, sensu Section 101 of the Clean Water Act. The strongest predictors of condition would be those that could characterize the degree to which a channel is hydrologically connected to its floodplain and the condition of the associated riparian buffer, including vegetation type and maturity (Brinson et al., 2006, Mayer et al., 2005), distance from stream channel (King et al., 2005), and spatial arrangement (Baker et al., 2006, Van Sickle and Johnson, 2008).
Numerous stream and wetland assessment procedures are in use today, each designed to meet a particular regulatory or planning objective (Stein et al., 2009) and most of these protocols incorporate biological and physical data to determine condition of stream resources (Somerville and Pruitt, 2004). Riparian assessment procedures could benefit from an approach that incorporates an indicator of the capacity of riparian zone vegetation to ameliorate nonpoint source pollution, based on biomass (a surrogate for age and condition) and distance from stream channel. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (1) measure and relate living and detrital biomass to forest age since clearcut and non-forest cover-types, (2) characterize the composition of forests along a successional gradient from recently clearcut to mature forest, and (3) using biomass as a surrogate for nutrient removal and habitat quality potential, develop a forest biomass/inverse-distance indicator to (a) characterize the capacity of a riparian buffer to ameliorate pollution (nutrients and sediment) from upslope areas and (b) characterize habitat quality related to physical structure.
All reaches for biomass were located within or near the Little Contentnea drainage basin, centered on Farmville, North Carolina (Fig. 1). This basin is located in the Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, in the Atlantic Coast Flatwoods Major Land Resource Area (MLRA 153A) (USDA, 2006), and the Southeastern Evergreen Forest Region (Braun, 1950). The drainage basin is approximately 4800 km2 with 75–85% of stream length comprising first and second order streams (Rheinhardt et al., 2007a). These low order reaches, also herein referred to as headwater reaches, begin in the flat landscape of interstream divides and in the areas between the divides and the broad bottomlands of higher order streams.
In the small agricultural watersheds of the study area, vegetation in most buffer zones have been altered, even along reaches where floodplains have not been converted to cropland (Brinson et al., 2006). In addition, headwater channels have often been deepened and straightened to accelerate the removal of water from arable cropland. Such channelization increases the slope of the water table, allowing nutrient-laden groundwater (from fertilizers applied to increase crop production) to move rapidly from cropland to streams (Spruill, 2000), thus bypassing the root zone of riparian vegetation where denitrification potential is greatest. Most higher-order streams are either deeply channelized, with levees comprised of spoil material along their channels, or if unchannelized, support wide, forested floodplains too wet to farm.
Urban headwater stream networks have been truncated with impervious surfaces, converted to underground pipes and culverts (Brinson et al., 2006, Hardison et al., 2009), and vary more widely in buffer zones cover-types than rural reaches. Because urban riparian zones are so different from rural ones, this paper will only focus on developing an indicator for rural riparian condition.
Section snippets
Field data collection
Biomass was sampled in belt transects along 16 headwater stream reaches that corresponded to eight general pre-defined cover types, each representing an age or cover class commonly occurring along headwater riparian ecosystems in rural eastern North Carolina: (1) Annual Rowcrop, (2) Perennial Herb (usually fallow field), (3) Shrub/Saplings (usually occurring along channelized first order streams), (4) Recently Clearcut forest (< 5 y since last clearcut), (5) Regenerating Forest (5–25 y old),
Results
Regression equations were developed for shrubs in five species groups (Table 2) while mean weights were calculated for sapling and subcanopy tree species for seven species groups (Table 3). Bulk density determined for the five LDW decay classes ranged from 531 kg/m3 for decay class 1 (least decayed) to 92.3 kg/m3 for decay class 5 (most decayed) (Table 4). When all sources of biomass (except roots) were calculated for plots and grouped by cover type, total biomass ranged from 483.4 Mg/ha for
Discussion
The cover type categories recognized in this study represent the range of landuse conditions that typically occur along riparian buffer zones in small agricultural landscapes in Coastal Plain North Carolina (Rheinhardt et al., 2007a). However, this buffer zone indicator is probably useful for estimating the condition of riparian zones in agricultural landscapes of small watersheds elsewhere, particularly where temperate deciduous forest is the potential climax vegetation. This is because
Acknowledgments
This paper is dedicated to Mark Brinson, who was an instrumental co-PI for this research, and many other projects involving studies of riparian ecosystems and wetlands. Support was provided by a grant from the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) state grant program. Partial funding was also provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Estuarine and Great Lakes (EaGLe) program
References (50)
- et al.
Characteristics of overland flow generation on steep forested hillslopes of central Japan
Journal of Hydrology
(2008) A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor
Geoderma
(2010)- et al.
The importance of the riparian zone and in-stream processes in nitrate attenuation in undisturbed and agricultural watersheds – a review of the scientific literature
Journal of Hydrology
(2010) - et al.
Development of a referenced-based method for identifying and scoring indicators of condition for coastal plain riparian reaches
Ecological Indicators
(2007) - et al.
Long-term changes in watershed nutrient inputs and riverine exports in the Neuse River, North Carolina
Water Resources Research
(2001) - et al.
Geochemistry of shallow ground water in coastal plain environments in the southeastern United States: implications for aquifer susceptibility
Applied Geochemistry
(2004) Landscapes and riverscapes. The influence of land use on stream ecosystems
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
(2004)Analysis of soils
- et al.
Effects of stream map resolution on measures of riparian buffer distribution and nutrient retention potential
Landscape Ecology
(2006) - et al.
Dynamics of NH4+ and NO3− uptake in the water column of the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina
Estuaries
(1994)
Age-related patterns of forest complexity and carbon storage in pine and aspen–birch ecosystems of northern Minnesota, USA
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Deciduous Forests of East North America
Changes in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients
Wetlands
Biomass of species and stands of West Virginia hardwoods
Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests
Oecologia
The role of riparian vegetation in protecting and improving chemical water quality in streams
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Population dynamics of small mammals in relation to forest age and structural habitat factors in northern Sweden
Journal of Applied Ecology
Nitrogen storage and cycling in old- and second-growth Northern Hardwood Forests
Ecology
Hydrologic connectivity and the contribution of stream headwaters to ecological integrity at regional scales
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
A landscape level analysis of potential excess nitrogen in east-central North Carolina, USA
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
Microbial nitrate processing in shallow groundwater in a riparian forest
Journal of Environmental Quality
Urban land use, channel incision, and water table decline along Coastal Plain streams, North Carolina
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Cited by (18)
Carbon stocks in riparian buffer systems at sites differing in soil texture, vegetation type and age compared to adjacent agricultural fields in southern Ontario, Canada
2020, Agriculture, Ecosystems and EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Belowground living biomass, mostly the large root system of trees, was not sampled since it can cause an undesirable level of soil disturbance on private lands close to the streams. However, biomass stored in root systems were estimated as a percentage of aboveground biomass based on literature values for various species and age classes (e.g. Kurz et al., 1996; Cairns et al., 1997; Rheinhardt et al., 2012; Addo-Danso et al., 2016). Further, the conversion of biomass dry weight to biomass C in both above and below ground vegetation was determined by using the % C values from a previously published paper (Thomas and Martin, 2012).
The assessment of the changes of biomass and riparian buffer width in the terminal reservoir under the impact of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China
2018, Ecological IndicatorsCitation Excerpt :Buffer width and biomass are the two of the most important indicators of riparian condition, because sedimentation and nutrients in the terminal reservoir decrease with increasing buffer width and production (Owers et al., 2012; Weissteiner et al., 2013; Klemas 2014). Changes in water levels affect the condition of the riparian zone and may lead to ecological crises in the adjacent waters (Ducros and Joyce, 2003; Rheinhardt et al., 2012). Measurement of riparian buffer width and biomass become important in assessing the success of buffer conservation and restoration (Klemas, 2014).
Effects of riparian zone buffer widths on vegetation diversity in southern Appalachian headwater catchments
2016, Forest Ecology and ManagementPotential tree and soil carbon storage in a major historical floodplain forest with disrupted ecological function
2015, Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and SystematicsCitation Excerpt :Soil carbon alone typically represents about half of forest carbon (Turner et al., 1995), and perhaps greater in hydric soils of floodplain forests that have limited carbon cycling due to poor aeration (Pregitzer and Euskirchen, 2004). Aboveground tree biomass excluding foliage may account for 33% to 65% of the total carbon budget (Turner et al., 1995; Rheinhardt et al., 2012). We accounted for the two major carbon pools but not for smaller diameter trees or other carbon components including foliage, non-tree vegetation, roots, snags and coarse woody debris.
Forest cover change and its drivers in the upstream area of the Minjiang River, China
2014, Ecological IndicatorsCitation Excerpt :However, it is still uncertain how much of this variable could explain the patterns of FCC in an exclusive regime of land property in China. Spatial variables, such as topography (Turner et al., 1996), soils (Radeloff et al., 2000), population density (Black et al., 2003), urbanization (Zhang and Nagubadi, 2005), and distance from roads and urban centers (Turner et al., 1996; Rheinhardt et al., 2012), also constrain the rates and pathways of land cover change. Despite all this, the nature and magnitude of these relationships can vary greatly among landscapes (Wimberly and Ohmann, 2004).
Estimation of floodplain aboveground biomass using multispectralremote sensing and nonparametric modeling
2014, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationCitation Excerpt :We compare our SGB- and MARS-based estimates with those from a baseline method, Cubist©, a hybrid tree-based algorithm used by the U.S. Forest Service to generate a national-scale forest biomass map (Blackard et al., 2008). Although SGB has been used for AGB estimation based on ALOS PALSAR data (Carreiras et al., 2012, 2013; Silva et al., 2013), and for related vegetation studies (Moisen et al., 2006; Razakamanarivo et al., 2011), to our knowledge, SGB and MARS have only very rarely been employed for remote estimation of AGB (e.g., the study of Moisen and Frescino (2002) based on low spatial-resolution data, and the study of Filippi et al. (2014) based on hyperspectral data). The algorithms we investigate here are tested at the meander-bend scale, but SGB- and MARS-based models can be developed and applied at any scale and across vegetation types.
- 1
Present address: Bureau of Land Management, Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Kanab, UT 84741, United States.