Elsevier

Ecological Indicators

Volume 21, October 2012, Pages 1-6
Ecological Indicators

Editorial
Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.008Get rights and content

Section snippets

Integrated quantification, modeling, and valuing of ecosystem services

For integrated assessments we have to be aware that each ecosystem service approach contains uncertainties and generalizations related to scale issues, methodological issues, vague classifications and definitions (Scolozzi et al., 2012). Several ideas were proposed for a better taxonomy and classification of ecosystem services, because there is still no consensus on a common strategy (Seppelt et al., 2012, Burkhard et al., 2012). Bastian et al. (2012) emphasize the need for a clear

Accounting for ecosystem services at the landscape level

The application potentials in landscape analysis, planning and management is the second key theme of this Special Issue. In regional planning, whole landscapes with multiple needs and demands, for example for different forms of land use, have to be considered (Koschke et al., 2012, Burkhard et al., 2012). Hence, tools for assessments of whole landscapes’ ecosystem service potentials are needed (Busch et al., 2012) to bridge gaps between sectoral management landscape approaches and regional

Adaptive management of ecosystem services

Tools, strategies and institutions are urgently needed, because the demand of ecosystem service-based instruments has currently been higher than scientists were able to deliver (Seppelt et al., 2012). Ecosystem services are very significant for adaptive management (Syrbe and Walz, 2012), but they have often been applied not appropriately or inconsistently. One reason could be that ecosystem service studies are often too complex for direct use in practical assessments (Koschke et al., 2012).

Environmental, social and economic trade-offs

The evaluation of environmental, social and economic trade-offs requires a combined view of how the various ecosystem or landscape function approaches are linked (Bastian et al., 2012). Trade-offs normally occur when the maximization or increase of one ecosystem service results in reduction of other ecosystem services (Busch et al., 2012); this situation regularly arises in multifunctional landscapes (Haines-Young et al., 2012, Scolozzi et al., 2012). Approaches for strategic environmental

Conclusion “Salzau Message

Finally, as a synthesis of the presentations and discussions at the “Solutions for Sustaining Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services” conference, the “Salzau Message on Sustaining Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital” has been distilled and signed by the workshop participants (see Box 1). Ecosystem services are truly coming of age, and while there is still much to be done, the possibilities for using this concept to improve and sustain human well-being are enormous. The Ecosystem Services

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (188)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text