Elsevier

eClinicalMedicine

Volume 55, January 2023, 101747
eClinicalMedicine

Articles
Diagnostic accuracy and added value of blood-based protein biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of aggregate and individual participant data

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101747Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Summary

Background

Novel blood-based protein biomarkers may be of value for efficient, accurate, and non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of newly recognized blood-based protein biomarkers for detecting pancreatic cancer, and investigates their added value to CA19-9, the common blood-based biomarker in clinical use for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Wiley/Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception until June 2022. A meta-analysis of aggregate and individual participant data was conducted using frequentist and Bayesian hierarchical random-effects models. The added clinical utility of protein biomarkers was investigated using bootstrap bias-corrected decision curve analyses.

Findings

Aggregate data from 28 primary studies (6127 participants) were included, of which 8 studies (1790 participants) provided individual participant data. CA19-9 was significantly more accurate than MIC-1 for distinguishing pancreatic cancer from benign disease (AUC, 0.83 vs 0.74; relative diagnostic odds ratio [rDOR], 2.10 [95% CI, 0.98–4.48]; p = 0.002), THBS2 (AUC, 0.87 vs 0.69; rDOR, 4.53 [2.16–9.39]; p < 0.0001), TIMP-1 (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.70; rDOR, 8.00 [3.81–16.9]; p < 0.0001), OPN (AUC, 0.89 vs 0.74; rDOR, 4.22 [1.13–15.6]; p < 0.0001), ICAM-1 (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.68; rDOR 9.30 [0.87–99.5]; p < 0.0001), and IGFBP2 (AUC, 0.91 vs 0.68; rDOR, 4.48 [0.78–24.3]; p < 0.0001). The addition of these novel protein biomarkers to CA19-9 did not significantly improve the AUC, and resulted in minor increases or limited decreases in clinical utility.

Interpretation

Novel protein biomarkers have moderate diagnostic accuracy, do not outperform CA19-9 in differentiating pancreatic cancer from benign disease, and show limited added clinical value to CA19-9. We propose recommendations to aid the development of minimally invasive diagnostic tests with sufficient clinical utility to improve the management of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer.

Funding

Bennink Foundation, Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF Kankerbestrijding), and AIRC.

Cited by (0)

m

Both authors contributed equally.