Research Paper
Incarceration history, antiretroviral therapy, and stigma: A cross-sectional study of people with HIV who inject drugs in St. Petersburg, Russia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103907Get rights and content

Highlights

  • History of incarceration very common among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Russia.

  • Low rates of prior antiretroviral therapy (ART) treatment among PWID.

  • Prior incarceration in jail or prison did not predict prior ART treatment.

  • High levels of self-stigma among people with HIV (PWH) and opioid use disorder.

Abstract

Background

The HIV epidemic is intertwined with substance use and incarceration in Russia. The relationships between incarceration history, HIV treatment history, and stigma experiences among people with HIV (PWH) who inject drugs in Russia have not been well described.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of a cohort of PWH with opioid use disorder who inject drugs (n=201) recruited at a narcology (substance use treatment) hospital in St. Petersburg, Russia from September 2018 to December 2020. The primary analysis evaluated the association between self-reported prior incarceration and prior antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for demographic, social, and clinical covariates. We used multivariable linear regression models to analyze associations between prior incarceration and two secondary outcomes: HIV stigma score (11-item abbreviated Berger scale) and substance use stigma score (21-item combination of Substance Abuse Self-Stigma Scale and Stigma-related Rejection Scale).

Results

Mean age was 37 (SD 5) years; 58.7% were male. Participants had been living with HIV for a mean of 13 (SD 6) years. Over two thirds (69.2%) of participants reported prior incarceration. One third (35.3%) of participants reported prior ART initiation. Prior incarceration was not significantly associated with prior ART initiation (AOR 1.76; 95% CI: 0.81, 3.83). Prior incarceration was associated with a lower HIV stigma score (adjusted mean difference in z-score: −0.50; 95%CI: −0.81, −0.19) but was not significantly associated with substance use stigma score (adjusted mean difference in z-score: −0.10; 95%CI: −0.42, 0.21).

Conclusion

Prior incarceration was common, and rates of prior ART initiation were low even though most participants had been living with HIV for at least a decade. We did not find an association between prior incarceration and prior ART initiation, which suggests a need to explore whether opportunities to initiate ART during or after incarceration are missed.

Clinical Trial Number

NCT03290391.

Introduction

The HIV epidemic in the Russian Federation (“Russia”), which accounts for over half of all new HIV cases in the WHO Europe region (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control & WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2021), has been fueled by mass incarceration, opioid use disorder, and injection drug use (Altice et al., 2016)—i.e., a syndemic (Singer et al., 2017) where multiple disease entities and social vulnerabilities coincide within a population and interact synergistically. Due to punitive drug policies and weak investments in HIV prevention and treatment for key populations, people who inject drugs (PWID) in Russia experience very high rates of HIV infection, high rates of incarceration, intense stigma and marginalization, and poor access to high-quality care for HIV and drug dependency (Altice et al., 2016; Golichenko & Sarang, 2013; Jolley et al., 2012; Yasaveev, 2020). As examples of these punitive national policies, possession of small amounts of an illicit substance (e.g. for personal use) is a criminal offense punishable by incarceration; opioid agonist therapies for the treatment of opioid use disorder remain legally banned; and people with a drug dependency who seek narcology care at governmental clinics are placed on a government registry which restricts their access to drivers’ licenses and other resources (and facilitates targeting by police) (Altice et al., 2016; Golichenko & Sarang, 2013; Jolley et al., 2012).

While prior research has explored the role of police brutality and incarceration in shaping the HIV risk environment of PWID in Russia and other Eastern European countries (Lunze et al., 2014, 2015, 2016; Sarang et al., 2006, 2010), the relationship between incarceration and HIV care engagement among people with HIV (PWH) who inject drugs is not well described. If HIV care is relatively available in carceral facilities, then an incarceration—despite its potential deleterious effects on health (Brinkley-Rubinstein, 2013; Massoglia & Pridemore, 2015; Wildeman & Wang, 2017)—might serve as a touchpoint for vulnerable populations that otherwise might not be able to access care (Westergaard et al., 2013). However, in most of Russia, ART coverage is low overall (Beyrer et al., 2017; Parfitt, 2011), especially for PWID, who comprise the majority of PWH (Jolley et al., 2012). Historically carceral institutions have often had poorly resourced medical facilities (Parfitt, 2010), although a recent study of HIV in the Russian penitentiary system reported substantial improvement in ART coverage from 21.7% in 2014 to 89.6% in 2020 (Ponomarev et al., 2022). Even after release, experiences of incarceration can have immediate and lasting effects which create ongoing barriers to HIV care (Iroh et al., 2015; Rich et al., 2016; Westergaard et al., 2011), such as mistrust of medical providers (Teoharov et al., 2018), disruptions in the social resources (e.g. employment, housing) that support care engagement (Brinkley-Rubinstein & Turner, 2013; Pecoraro et al., 2013; Taweh et al., 2021), and the risk of relapse during post-incarceration reentry (Cepeda, Niccolai, et al., 2015; Cepeda, Vetrova, et al., 2015; Joudrey et al., 2019). A better understanding of the link between incarceration experiences and HIV treatment history would help gauge how well public institutions are utilizing this critical touchpoint and could illuminate challenges and opportunities for community providers seeking to better engage this population.

Moreover, in combination with criminal-legal and health system policies and practices, stigma may also be a key barrier to care for PWH who inject drugs in Russia (Jolley et al., 2012; Lunze et al., 2015). Generally, stigma refers to the social process of labeling, stereotyping, separation, discrediting, devaluing, and discrimination of individuals with stigmatized identities in a setting where power is exercised (Link & Phelan, 2001). A variety of stigma manifestations can impact targeted individuals' access to health care and health outcomes: experiences of discrimination (e.g., mistreatment by health care professionals, exclusion from housing), internalization of stigma (i.e., of negative views of self), and anticipated stigma (e.g., avoidance of settings where discrimination is expected) (Hatzenbuehler et al., 2013; Major et al., 2018; Stangl et al., 2019). In societies around the world, the stigma attached to having HIV has been identified as a key driver of access to care and health outcomes for PWH (Earnshaw et al., 2013; Sayles et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2020), and similar dynamics have been described for those who face stigma related to substance use (Earnshaw, 2020; Hammarlund et al., 2018). Many individuals in the syndemic of HIV, poor mental health and incarceration due to drug criminalization in Russia face additional forms of stigma related to mental illness or criminal legal status (e.g. prior incarceration) (Howell et al., 2022). While this study focuses on HIV and substance use stigmas due to the limited scope of our data, their intersection with other forms of stigma may affect health care utilization and health outcomes. The relationships between drug use stigma, HIV stigma, and health care utilization have previously been studied among PWID in Russia (Calabrese et al., 2016; Sereda et al., 2020; Vetrova et al., 2021), but less is known about the role, potentially positive or negative, that prior incarceration (and related stigma) has on their experiences of stigma or on ART use. Research to better understand these relationships might inform new approaches for counteracting stigma in this population.

Using cross-sectional data from a cohort of PWH who inject drugs with opioid use disorder in St. Petersburg, Russia, we sought to characterize the association between prior incarceration and whether one had ever initiated ART. Secondarily, we evaluated the associations of incarceration with measures of HIV stigma and substance use stigma.

Section snippets

Data source and cohort selection

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Linking Infectious and Narcology Care – Part II (LINC-II) trial, a randomized controlled trial that tested the effectiveness of a multi-faceted clinical intervention for PWH who inject drugs which combined rapid access to ART, naltrexone for the treatment of opioid use disorder, and strengths-based case management (Gnatienko et al., 2020). From September 2018 to December 2020, LINC-II recruited patients who were admitted at a

Results

As shown in Table 1, the sample was young and mostly male, consistent with general demographics of PWID in Russia. A majority of participants reported lacking full-time employment for most of the past year (57.7%) and having run out of money for basic necessities at some point (56.7%). All participants met DSM-5 criteria for moderate or severe opioid use disorder (all but 2 participants were severe; data not shown). High-risk alcohol use (AUDIT) and moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms

Discussion

In this cohort of PWH who inject drugs in St. Petersburg, Russia, approximately 70% of participants had been previously incarcerated, and, even though most of them had been living with HIV for over a decade, only a third of participants had ever initiated ART. We found no statistically significant association between incarceration history and prior ART initiation. Although most participants reported substantial degrees of HIV-related and substance use-related stigmas, prior incarceration was

Conclusions

Among a cohort of PWH who inject drugs in Russia, this study found a high prevalence of incarceration histories and a low rate of prior ART initiation—even though most participants had been living with HIV for over a decade. We did not detect an association between prior incarceration and prior ART initiation, possibly due to this study's limited statistical power. To explore potential missed opportunities to initiate ART during or after incarcerations, additional research is needed on the link

Ethics approval

The authors declare that they have obtained ethics approval from an appropriately constituted ethics committee/institutional review board where the research entailed animal or human participation.

Declarations of Interests

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to report.

Acknowledgements

We thank all LINC-II subjects for their participation and our colleagues at Boston University and Pavlov University for their support.

Funding

  • The LINC-II trial was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA; R01DA045547).

  • BBA was supported by training grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to The Miriam Hospital, Lifespan (T32DA013911 - HIV and Other Infectious Consequences of Substance Abuse; and R25DA037190 - Lifespan/Brown Criminal Justice Research Training Program on Substance Use and HIV) and from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to Boston Medical Center (T32AI052074 -

Disclaimer

The funding institutions had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (67)

  • C. Wildeman et al.

    Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the USA

    The Lancet

    (2017)
  • K. Wright et al.

    Stigma scale revised: Reliability and validity of a brief measure of stigma for HIV+ youth

    Journal of Adolescent Health

    (2007)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5®)

    (2013)
  • B.E. Berger et al.

    Measuring stigma in people with HIV: Psychometric assessment of the HIV stigma scale

    Research in Nursing & Health

    (2001)
  • C. Beyrer et al.

    The expanding epidemic of HIV-1 in the Russian Federation

    PLOS Medicine

    (2017)
  • L. Brinkley-Rubinstein

    Incarceration as a catalyst for worsening health

    Health & Justice

    (2013)
  • L. Brinkley-Rubinstein et al.

    Health impact of incarceration on HIV-positive African American males: A qualitative exploration

    AIDS Patient Care and STDs

    (2013)
  • S.K. Calabrese et al.

    Internalized HIV and drug stigmas: Interacting forces threatening health status and health service utilization among people with HIV who inject drugs in St. Petersburg, Russia

    AIDS and Behavior

    (2016)
  • J.A. Cepeda et al.

    Community reentry challenges after release from prison among people who inject drugs in St. Petersburg, Russia

    International Journal of Prisoner Health

    (2015)
  • J. Csete

    Lessons not learned: human rights abuses and HIV/AIDS in the Russian Federation

    (2004)
  • K.A. Dolan et al.

    HIV education in a Siberian prison colony for drug dependent males

    International Journal for Equity in Health

    (2004)
  • V.A. Earnshaw

    Stigma and substance use disorders: A clinical, research, and advocacy agenda

    American Psychologist

    (2020)
  • V.A. Earnshaw et al.

    HIV stigma mechanisms and well-being among PLWH: A test of the HIV stigma framework

    AIDS and Behavior

    (2013)
  • HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe 2021 –2020 data

    (2021)
  • N. Gnatienko et al.

    Design of a randomized controlled trial to Link Infectious and Narcology Care (LINC-II) in St. Petersburg, Russia

    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

    (2020)
  • M. Golichenko et al.

    Atmospheric pressure: Russian drug policy as a driver for violations of the UN convention against torture and the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights

    Health and Human Rights

    (2013)
  • R. Hammarlund et al.

    Review of the effects of self-stigma and perceived social stigma on the treatment-seeking decisions of individuals with drug- and alcohol-use disorders

    Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation

    (2018)
  • D.S. Hasin et al.

    DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders: Recommendations and rationale

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • M.L. Hatzenbuehler et al.

    Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2013)
  • B.A. Howell et al.

    The stigma of criminal legal involvement and health: A conceptual framework

    Journal of Urban Health

    (2022)
  • P.A. Iroh et al.

    The HIV care cascade before, during, and after incarceration: A systematic review and data synthesis

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2015)
  • E. Jolley et al.

    HIV among people who inject drugs in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia: A systematic review with implications for policy

    BMJ Open

    (2012)
  • P.J. Joudrey et al.

    A conceptual model for understanding post-release opioid-related overdose risk

    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

    (2019)
  • View full text