Alimentary Tract
Survival of the probiotic, L. plantarum 299v and its effects on the faecal bacterial flora, with and without gastric acid inhibition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2004.07.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction.

Probiotic bacteria have to survive passage through the gastrointestinal tract. In this placebo-controlled double-blind study, the effect of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v on the faecal flora was studied with and without gastric acid inhibition.

Methods.

Thirty-two healthy volunteers were given pantoprazole (40 mg/day) or placebo for 3 weeks from week 2 until week 4. In addition, from week 3 until week 4, L. plantarum 299v in an oatmeal-fermented drink (109 CFU/ml) was given twice daily to both groups. From each healthy volunteer, faecal samples were collected at the end of week 1, 2, 4 and 8 (4 weeks after cessation of L. plantarum 299v and pantoprazole/placebo). Several aerobically and anaerobically growing bacteria were counted and short chain fatty acid concentrations were determined.

Results.

In both the pantoprazole and the placebo group, median lactobacilli counts increased significantly in week 4 compared to week 1 (from log 4.5 to 8.0 CFU/g faeces in pantoprazole and from log 4.2 to 7.7 CFU/g faeces in placebo group) and decreased significantly in week 8 (to log 4.5 CFU/g faeces in pantoprazole and log 4.3 CFU/g faeces in placebo group). These lactobacilli were identified as L. plantarum 299v. No significant differences were observed in all other bacterial counts and short chain fatty acid concentrations.

Conclusions.

The comparable increase of faecal lactobacilli counts in both the pantoprazole and the placebo-treated group demonstrates that L. plantarum 299v survives passage through the gastrointestinal tract irrespective of gastric acidity. The increment of the intra-gastric pH in combination with L. plantarum 299v did not modulate bacterial composition and/or the production of short chain fatty acids.

Introduction

Probiotics as defined by Havenaar et al. [1] are “mono- or mixed cultures of live micro-organisms which, when applied to animal or man, beneficially affect the host by improving the properties of the indigenous microflora”. Probiotics such as lactobacilli have been reported to effect positively, gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhoea (rotavirus-associated and antibiotic-associated), inflammatory bowel disease, pouchitis, irritable bowel syndrome, colorectal cancer, lactose absorption, Helicobacter pylori infection and constipation and are increasingly used as a treatment modality [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

For therapeutic purposes, probiotics are restricted by certain selection criteria: probiotics have to be of human origin, have to be safe for the host and genetically stable [8]. Furthermore, it is important that probiotics are able to survive passage through the gastrointestinal tract irrespective of gastric acidity, pancreatic enzymes and bile acids so that they may reach the ileum and colon and can colonize the intestinal mucosa [10]. Furthermore, because of the complexity of the intestinal flora and the high bacterial load, as high as possible numbers of probiotic bacteria reaching the large intestine, being able to be metabolically active seem to be warranted.

The healthy stomach contains relatively small numbers of bacteria (0–103 colony forming units per ml gastric content) due to the intra-gastric acidity [10], [11]. In healthy volunteers, the median 24-h intra-gastric pH is below 3 in about 80% of time [12]. Most of the ingested bacteria cannot be metabolically active at pH values below 4, and 99.9% of the bacteria are killed at pH less than 4.0 within 30 min [13], [14]. The survival of lactobacilli in acid environments has been tested by in vitro studies: after 4 h, Lactobacillus GG showed no loss of viability in gastric juice within a pH range 3.0–7.0, but there was a rapid loss in viability at pH 1.0 [15]. L. plantarum 299v was able to survive at least 4 h incubation at pH 2.5 in vitro, but no growth or replication could occur [14].

In healthy volunteers, the median 24-h intra-gastric pH has been found to be 1.7 [12]. This may affect survival and/or metabolic activity of probiotic bacteria. An increase in the intra-gastric pH, for instance, by use of gastric acid inhibitors, may theoretically improve the survival of lactobacilli and may increase the metabolic activities of probiotics such as the production of short chain fatty acids.

In this double-blind placebo-controlled study, the effect of L. plantarum 299v on the faecal flora was studied with and without gastric acid inhibition. Special attention was paid to the recovery of L. plantarum 299v in the faeces.

Section snippets

Subjects

Thirty-two healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Exclusion criteria were pre-existing bowel-pathology including irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, diarrhoea and cancer. Volunteers were not allowed to use gastric acid inhibitors, laxantia, anti-diarrhoea medication or antibiotics for at least 1 month before as well as during the study. Furthermore, the consumption of other probiotics or prebiotics for at least 2 weeks before the start of the study as

Results

Twenty-nine participants completed the study (9 males, mean age 34 years ±13 and 20 females, mean age 26 years ±9). Three participants were excluded: one person did not start to take the pantoprazole/placebo for personal reasons, another person used antibiotics (flucloxacillin) during the second week of the study and the third person used antibiotics (metronidazole) in week 5 of the study. No side effects were reported after the treatment with pantoprazole and L. plantarum 299v and no

Discussion

Probiotics may be of interest as adjuvant therapy in diseases like irritable bowel syndrome, diarrhoea, inflammatory bowel diseases and lactose intolerance. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of gastric acid inhibition on the survival of L. plantarum 299v in faecal samples. Moreover, the influence of gastric acid inhibition in combination with the consumption of L. plantarum 299v on the composition of the faecal flora and metabolic activity (i.e. SCFA) was studied.

Twice

Acknowledgements

D. Goossens is a PhD fellow of the Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (Nutrim). Nutrim received substantial unrestricted educational grants from Altana Pharma Nederlands BV and Probi AB Sweden for the performance of her program.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.

References (31)

  • Havenaar R, Ten Brink B, Huis in ’t Veld J. Selection of strains for probiotic use. In: Hall CA, editor. Probiotics,...
  • F. Cremonini et al.

    Meta-analysis: the effect of probiotic administration on antibiotic-associated diarrhoea

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2002)
  • W. Kruis et al.

    Double-blind comparison of an oral Escherichia coli preparation and mesalazine in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (1997)
  • P. Gionchetti et al.

    Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Gastroenterology

    (2000)
  • S. Nobaek et al.

    Alteration of intestinal microflora is associated with reduction in abdominal bloating and pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2000)
  • J.R. Saltzman et al.

    A randomized trial of Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 to treat lactose intolerance

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1999)
  • C. Felley et al.

    Favourable effect of an acidified milk (LC-1) on Helicobacter pylori gastritis in man

    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2001)
  • A.C. Ouwehand et al.

    Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects

    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

    (2002)
  • B.R. Goldin et al.

    Effect of diet and Lactobacillus acidophilus supplements on human fecal bacterial enzymes

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1980)
  • W.H. Holzapfel et al.

    Overview of gut flora and probiotics

    Int J Food Microbiol

    (2001)
  • G.L. Simon et al.

    Intestinal flora in health and disease

    Gastroenterology

    (1984)
  • G.M. Houben et al.

    Twenty-four-hour intragastric acidity: 300 mg ranitidine b.d., 20 mg omeprazole o.m., 40 mg omeprazole o.m. vs. placebo

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (1995)
  • R.A. Giannella et al.

    Gastric acid barrier to ingested microorganisms in man: studies in vivo and in vitro

    Gut

    (1972)
  • C.N. Jacobsen et al.

    Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1999)
  • B.R. Goldin et al.

    Survival of Lactobacillus species (strain GG) in human gastrointestinal tract

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1992)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Development and validation of a GC-FID method for the analysis of short chain fatty acids in rat and human faeces and in fermentation fluids

      2020, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other separation techniques are steam distillation [29] and vacuum distillation [30,31], but they are time consuming and the possibility of losing volatile acids is high. Acidification allows SCFAs to be present mainly in their undissociated form, thus increasing both their hydrophobicity (as compared to the dissociated forms) and their volatility and thus facilitating their extraction by means of an apolar solvent [32,16] or also by means of a solid–phase microextraction (SPME) device exploiting in this case their volatility [33,34]. Another possible step in the sample pretreatment is the derivatization, which reduces SCFA polarity and improves their volatility and stability, making them more suitable for the GC analysis and eliminating also the need of using specific stationary phases of the chromatographic column.

    • Probiotic characters of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are a result of the ongoing gene acquisition and genome minimization evolutionary trends

      2017, Microbial Pathogenesis
      Citation Excerpt :

      L. plantarum has also been used in starter cultures for its ability to predominate natural fermentations and its inability to produce CO2 from hexoses [109]. The capacity of some L. plantarum strains to survive and persist in human and animal intestinal tracts has also stimulated research on its use as probiotics [30,110,111] and as a drug delivery vehicle for therapeutic compounds [112]. Molenaar et al. [89], demonstrated the association of versatility of L. plantarum in various environments and its association with the variable gene pool.

    • Efficacy of pasteurised yoghurt in improving chronic constipation: Arandomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

      2015, International Dairy Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The protective roles of inactivated bacteria against constipation are possibly related to their ability to improve the intestinal microbiota of humans and to induce osmotic stimulation of the colon. Osmotic stimulation is caused by the SCFAs synthesised by colonic microbiota fermentation (Cummings, 1984; Goossens et al., 2005; Jenkins et al., 1986). SCFAs also lower the pH in the colon.

    • Identification and evaluation of the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus paraplantarum FT259, a bacteriocinogenic strain isolated from Brazilian semi-hard artisanal cheese

      2013, Anaerobe
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surprisingly, they found that in early stage of infection, the viral titers in the lung were significantly lower in mice treated with HK-LP than in controls. Probiotics have been recognized to affect positively the treatment of several medical conditions such as intestinal inflammation, Crohn's disease, bacterial vaginosis, tooth decay, respiratory infections, antibiotic-related diarrhea, pregnancy-related and urinary tract infections, colorectal cancer, constipation and allergic diseases [3,8–11]. To qualify a microorganism as a probiotic, certain criteria have to be fulfilled: (i) identification at genus, species, and strain level, (ii) production of antimicrobial substances (e.g. bacteriocins), (iii) safety for food and clinical use, (iv) survival during intestinal passage, (v) adhesion to mucosal surfaces, (vi) colonization of the human intestine or vagina (at least temporarily), (vii) inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, (viii) clinically documented and validated health effect and (ix) stability during processing and storage [3,10–12].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Part of this study was presented as a poster at the Digestive Disease Week in Orlando, 2003.

    View full text