Elsevier

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volume 37, February 2021, Pages 66-71
Current Opinion in Psychology

Future directions in personality pathology development research from a trainee perspective: Suggestions for theory, methodology, and practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.006Get rights and content

Research on personality disorder (PD) development has received increased attention in the last two decades, spurring reconceptualization in theoretical models of etiology, use of advanced methods, and development of effective treatments. The current manuscript briefly reviews the state of the field and proposes avenues of new research on the development of personality pathology in theoretical, methodological, and clinical veins. We identify the need to adopt a unifying and comprehensive theory to describe PD development across the lifespan, novel statistical methods to complement traditional methods relied on thus far, and the adoption of developmentally sensitive interventions that are disseminated to professionals and trainees alike. These directions for future research aim to augment prevention efforts to reduce the burden of PDs earlier in life.

Section snippets

Theory

The field has shifted away from a view of PDs as discrete, categorical, non-overlapping, intransigent, and static diagnoses that onset in adulthood to a view of personality pathology as a transdiagnostic [2] hybrid [3,4] of dimensional [5] and categorical [6] elements, beginning in childhood/early adolescence [7], that is heterotypic in its development [8, 9, 10] and that is amenable to treatment in adults [11] and early intervention in childhood and adolescence [7]. These conceptual shifts

Future directions

Adopt and validate a unifying framework for PD and its development that cuts across a) theoretical orientations, b) age ranges, and c) types of PD, incorporating the strong empirical support for a dimensional foundation of PD. Research on the limited reliability and validity of specific PD diagnoses reflects the need for a framework that cuts across PDs and employs a common personality architecture with explicable heterogeneity in manifestation. Such a framework should integrate three levels of

Methodology

With the increase of interest in youth onset of personality pathology across the last decade, a greater number of studies have been designed with repeated measurements to assess risk mechanisms as early as childhood as predictors of later PD symptoms. These designs enable researchers to examine the predictive value of a range of constructs, mostly in relation to BPD with results largely supporting theories of transaction between biology and environment in BPD development [30]. Other studies

Clinical practice

The majority of early interventions or prevention efforts that target emergent personality pathology either utilize adult-based treatments that are downwardly applied to adolescents (e.g. mentalization-based therapy groups in adolescents with BPD symptoms [47]) or address broadband dimensions of psychopathology (e.g. impulsivity; externalizing symptoms) that may undergird aspects of PDs but that are non-specific and often do not take into account the insights afforded by the PD development

Future directions

Either integration across treatment approaches or better tailoring of interventions to specific individuals is needed. Evidence is clear that PD treatments from a range of theoretical backgrounds are moderately effective [11], though the bulk of this research has been conducted on BPD [56]. Given this, it is likely that interventions drawn from various approaches might be integrated into early interventions to maximize benefits. On the other hand, given evidence of multifinality, trajectories

Conclusion

Together, we suggest several avenues for future research and practice that incorporate the most recent insights in the field of personality pathology development. These consist of a more comprehensive, integrative, and lifespan-informed view of personality pathology that explains the development of personality pathology and how it interdigitates with other common forms of mental illness. We suggest tailored methodological techniques that match the complexity of non-linear and reciprocal

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Benjamin N Johnson: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Salome Vanwoerden: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.

References (69)

  • B.N. Johnson et al.

    Identifying unstable and empty phenotypes of borderline personality through factor mixture modeling in a large nonclinical sample

    Personal Disord Theory Res Treat

    (2019)
  • M.H. Waugh

    Psychological assessment with the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders: tradition and innovation

    Prof Psychol Res Pract

    (2017)
  • A.N. Shields

    The p factor and dimensional structural models of youth personality pathology and psychopathology

    Curr Opin Psychol

    (2020)
  • J. Hutsebaut et al.

    The identification of a risk profile for young people with borderline personality pathology to assist in personalizing treatment: a review of recent literature

    Curr Opin Psychol

    (2020)
  • A.M. Chanen et al.

    The development of personality disorders

  • A.L. Chapman

    Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation

    Dev Psychopathol

    (2019)
  • L.A.E. Laheij-Rooijakkers

    Development of a tool to detect older adults with severe personality disorders for highly specialized care

    Int Psychogeriatr

    (2020)
  • C. Sharp

    Borderline criterion function across age-groups: a cross-sectional mixed-method study

    Assessment

    (2019)
  • B.N. Johnson

    Psychotherapy for personality disorders

  • E.A. Kaufman

    Reciprocal influences of parent and adolescent borderline personality symptoms over 3 years

    J Personal Disord

    (2020)
  • P. Fonagy

    What we have changed our minds about: part 2. Borderline personality disorder, epistemic trust and the developmental significance of social communication

    Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregulation

    (2017)
  • P. Fonagy

    What we have changed our minds about: part 1. Borderline personality disorder as a limitation of resilience

    Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregulation

    (2017)
  • P. Luyten

    Borderline personality disorder, complex trauma, and problems with self and identity: A social-communicative approach

    J. Pers. Pers

    (2020)
  • S.W. Karterud et al.

    A temperament-attachment-mentalization-based (TAM) theory of personality and its disorders

    Front. Psychol. Psychol

    (2019)
  • A. Bogaerts

    Identity impairment as a central dimension in personality pathology

    J Psychopathol Behav Assess

    (2020)
  • C. Winsper

    The aetiology of borderline personality disorder (BPD): contemporary theories and putative mechanisms

    Curr Opin Psychol

    (2018)
  • C. Winsper

    Associations between infant and toddler regulatory problems, childhood co-developing internalising and externalising trajectories, and adolescent depression, psychotic and borderline personality disorder symptoms

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (2020)
  • T. Takahashi

    Olfactory sulcus morphology in teenagers with first-presentation borderline personality disorder

    Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging

    (2019)
  • K. Dittrich

    Alterations of empathy in mothers with a history of early life maltreatment, depression, and borderline personality disorder and their effects on child psychopathology

    Psychol Med

    (2020)
  • T.A. Widiger

    Personality in a Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology

    Clin. Psychol. Sci. Psychol Sci

    (2019)
  • R. Kotov

    The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (2017)
  • A. Caspi

    The p factor: one general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders?

    Clin Psychol Sci

    (2014)
  • E. Sloan

    Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: a systematic review

    Clin Psychol Rev

    (2017)
  • R. Abdi et al.

    The mediating role of emotion dysregulation as a transdiagnostic factor in the relationship between pathological personality dimensions and emotional disorders symptoms severity

    Personal Individ Differ

    (2019)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text