Editorial overview
Discovery and development of biopharmaceuticals: current issues

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2009.10.012Get rights and content

The establishment of recombinant DNA technologies in the past several decades has made it possible to develop a wide variety of therapeutic proteins to address a corresponding variety of unmet medical needs. Therapeutic proteins have had a major impact on health care, and are likely to grow in importance in the future. As the field of biotherapeutics evolves, there are many current and future challenges to be met. A highly competitive environment has emerged, in many cases with multiple products designed to modulate the same therapeutic target or pathway. The competition is resulting in more effective therapeutics as the need to differentiate among similar products becomes crucial. The costs and timelines for development of therapeutic proteins are increasing dramatically, leading to the tendency to focus primarily on those molecules with the greatest chance for success in late-stage clinical programs. As the field of therapeutic proteins continues to mature, the challenge of follow-on biologics needs to be addressed with the establishment of regulatory guidelines appropriate for the complexity of biotherapeutics.

Section snippets

Introduction—impact of therapeutic proteins on health care

Therapeutic proteins have been around for nearly 115 years, since the first development of commercial ‘Blutserumtherapie’ (serum therapy) by Behring and Kitasato. Behring's diphtheria serum therapy was first tested clinically in 1891 and by 1894, Faberwerke Hoechst launched the first therapeutic ‘protein’, anti-diphtheria serum (e.g., crude polyclonal antibody preparation), to combat a serious diphtheria epidemic in Europe [1••]. One of the next advances in therapeutic proteins was the

Challenges for therapeutic proteins

There are many current and future challenges for biologics, ranging from spiraling development costs, to increased competition for targets and therapeutic indications, to the greater need for differentiation, to immunogenicity issues, to increasing competition from follow-on biologics, and the pressure on pricing from third party payors [1••, 5]. In this introductory paper, we will briefly touch on three main challenges: competition including the increased need for differentiation,

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of the review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Dr. William R. Strohl received his PhD in microbiology from Louisiana State University, and worked as a guest researcher at the GBF in Braunschweig, Germany. From 1980 to 1997, he rose from assistant to full professor in the Department of Microbiology and the Program of Biochemistry at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. There he pursued the molecular biology and biochemistry of polyketide biosynthesis pathways, particularly doxorubicin, in actinomycetes, and the physiology of E. coli in

References (26)

  • Williams BR, Strohl WR: Follow-on protein products: what, where, when, how? In An, Zhiqiang. Therapeutic Antibodies,...
  • R. Osborne

    Brand biologics grab 12 years’ exclusivity, for now

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2009)
  • S.D. Roger et al.

    Biosimilars: it's not as simple as cost alone

    J Clin Pharm Ther

    (2008)
  • Cited by (73)

    • Optimizing zinc-HisTag coordination remote loading of proteins in PLGA microspheres

      2022, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      This process can expose the protein molecules to stressors including micronization, organic/aqueous interfaces, air/water interfaces, high shear stress, organic solvents, and high temperatures (Ando et al., 1999; Cohen and Bernstein, 1996; Giovagnoli et al., 2004; Han et al., 2016; Reinhold et al., 2012; Schwendeman, 2002; Schwendeman et al., 1996; Wu and Jin, 2008). Another issue that is particularly challenging during drug discovery and early development is that the standard batch formulation process requires large amounts of the drug molecule, which can be cost-prohibitive or simply infeasible at these stages (Murray et al., 1984; Strohl and Knight, 2009). To avoid these stressors and reduce the mass of protein required during formulation, aqueous remote loading and self-healing encapsulation has been developed with our group being pioneers in the space (Reinhold et al., 2012; Schwendeman, 2005; Schwendeman et al., 2011; Shah and Schwendeman, 2014; Wang et al., 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr. William R. Strohl received his PhD in microbiology from Louisiana State University, and worked as a guest researcher at the GBF in Braunschweig, Germany. From 1980 to 1997, he rose from assistant to full professor in the Department of Microbiology and the Program of Biochemistry at The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. There he pursued the molecular biology and biochemistry of polyketide biosynthesis pathways, particularly doxorubicin, in actinomycetes, and the physiology of E. coli in computer-controlled high cell density fermentations. Dr. Strohl moved to Merck in 1997 to head up Natural Products Microbiology, which he did for 4 years before being asked to start a new department in the field of recombinant monoclonal antibodies. From 2001 to 2008, Dr. Strohl was a leader in Merck's efforts to develop therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, as well as in-licensing of therapeutic targets and technologies associated with monoclonal antibodies. As part of this effort, Dr. Strohl was the scientific leader in the acquisition and integration of Abmaxis and GlycoFi into the Merck Biologics organization. In April 2008, Dr. Strohl was named leader of Antibody Drug Discovery at Centocor. With evolution of biologics at Johnson & Johnson to serve additional therapeutic areas beyond Immunology and Oncology, Dr. Strohl was recently named as VP and Head, Biologics Research, in the newly formed J&J Biotechnology Center of Excellence. Dr. Strohl has over 100 publications and several patents, and has edited two books.

    Dr. Knight received his PhD in molecular biology from the University of California, Berkeley, and completed a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford University School of Medicine. He joined Centocor in 1985, rising to the position of Vice President, Biopharmaceutical Research. Dr. Knight played key roles in the discovery and development of Centocor's marketed biotherapeutics including ReoPro™, Remicade™. Simponi™, and Stelara™. He is the author of numerous publications and holds more than 50 issued US patents. Centocor became part of Johnson and Johnson in 1999, and Dr. Knight is currently a Distinguished Research Fellow in the J&J Biotechnology Center of Excellence.

    View full text