Elsevier

Contraception

Volume 94, Issue 1, July 2016, Pages 81-86
Contraception

Original research article
Twelve-month discontinuation of etonogestrel implant in an outpatient pediatric setting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.030Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant is the most effective reversible contraceptive method. Uptake remains limited in adolescents, a population at high risk for unintended pregnancy. The objectives of this study were to determine the 12-month discontinuation rate of the ENG implant among adolescents in an outpatient setting and to characterize risk factors for discontinuation.

Study design

A retrospective chart review identified adolescent females aged 12 to 22 years who received the ENG implant in one pediatric institution between January 1, 2011, and April 15, 2014. Patients were categorized into ENG discontinuers (removed prior to 12 months) and ENG continuers (continued for ≥ 12 months). Associations between demographic, clinical and postplacement characteristics with ENG discontinuation category were assessed with t tests, χ2/Fisher's Exact Tests and backwards stepwise logistic regression.

Results

Of the 750 patients who had an ENG implant inserted, 77 (10.3%) had the device removed prior to 12 months of use. The mean length of implant use for those who discontinued was 7.5 months. Problematic bleeding was the most commonly cited reason for discontinuation. Older age at time of insertion, history of pregnancy and ≥ 1 medical visit for implant concerns (not including removal) were independently predictive (p < .01) of method discontinuation.

Conclusion

The vast majority of adolescents continued the ENG implant at 12 months, making it an excellent contraceptive choice for adolescents within the outpatient pediatric setting. Greater efforts should be made to increase its use by pediatric providers.

Implications

The ENG implant is an excellent contraceptive option for adolescents in the outpatient pediatric setting.

Introduction

Despite recent declines, the United States leads the developed world in teen births [1], [2], [3]. US adolescents have unacceptably high rates of pregnancy (~ 4/5 unintended) and birth [4], [5]. Low use of highly effective contraceptive methods contributes to high teenage pregnancy rates [6], [7]. In 2013, only 25.3% of sexually active high school students reported use of a hormonal contraceptive or intrauterine device (IUD) at last intercourse [8]. American teens who do use contraceptives predominantly rely on pills and condoms, which are relatively less effective but more commonly prescribed [6], [9], [10]. Only a small minority of teens use long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), the most effective methods available. In 2011–2013, approximately 5% of adolescent and young adult women aged 15–24 using birth control chose a LARC method [11].

LARC methods demonstrate first-year failure rates of 0.8%, 0.2% and 0.05% for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, copper IUD and etonogestrel (ENG) implant, respectively [9]. Prior studies have established the superior effectiveness, safety and acceptability of IUDs and the ENG implant for adolescent females [12], [13], [14]. The Institute of Medicine and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identify reducing unintended and teen pregnancy as a national priority and call for increased utilization of LARCs [15], [16]. In September 2014, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended that LARCs be first-line contraceptive choices for adolescents [17].

Improving adolescents' access to LARCs in the primary care pediatric office setting could increase uptake of LARC methods by adolescents and lead to significant reductions in teen pregnancy [18], [19]. The ENG implant (Nexplanon®) may appeal to pediatricians due to ease and simplicity of placement, perceived noninvasiveness and lack of need for pelvic examination. However, pediatrician concern about appropriateness of LARCs for adolescents may limit adoption of new contraceptive practices. Few large studies have evaluated adolescents' experiences with the ENG implant, leaving pediatricians and adolescent health care providers in need of more adolescent-specific evidence.

The objectives of this study were to (a) determine 12-month discontinuation and (b) characterize risk factors for discontinuation of the ENG implant in a sample of adolescents seen in a variety of outpatient clinical settings at an urban children's hospital.

Section snippets

Participants and setting

The Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all adolescent females ages 12–22 who received the ENG implant between January 1, 2011, and April 15, 2014, at any outpatient clinic within the NCH system. Eligible patients were identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes (V25.5, V25.43), Current Procedural Terminology codes (11981, 11983) and medication orders for ENG

Results

Of the 750 patients who had an ENG implant inserted during the study period, 77 (10.3%) had the device removed prior to 12 months. Mean age was approximately 1 year older (p < .001) for those who discontinued as compared to those who continued the method (Table 1). ENG discontinuers were significantly more likely to have had a prior pregnancy (p = .004) and to have used one or more contraceptive methods in the preceding 2 years (p = .048). Postplacement, ENG discontinuers were more likely to contact

Discussion

ENG implant discontinuation prior to 12 months was low among adolescents in an outpatient clinical setting. Problematic bleeding was the most common reason for removal. Younger age at placement was not a risk factor for early discontinuation, whereas prior pregnancy was associated with removal prior to 12 months. To our knowledge, ours represents the largest study of adolescent ENG users in a pediatric office setting to date.

Our finding of 10.3% discontinuation at 12 months is within the range of

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Hannah L.H. Lange, MPH, for her thoughtful input and edits of the manuscript.

References (26)

  • G. Martinez et al.

    Teenagers in the United States: sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2006–2010 national survey of family growth

    Vital Health Stat

    (2011)
  • J.E. Darroch et al.

    Differences in teenage pregnancy rates among five developed countries: the roles of sexual activity and contraceptive use

    Fam Plan Perspect

    (2001)
  • L. Kann et al.

    Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2013

    MMWR Surveill Summ

    (2014)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Tamoxifen for the Treatment of Etonogestrel Implant-Associated Bleeding in an Adolescent Gynecology Practice

      2022, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, all of the patients included in our study received medication management, which could indicate that our cohort was experiencing either more severe or more bothersome bleeding. A retrospective study of 750 adolescents found that 61% of patients cited “bleeding problems” as their reason for ENG implant removal, with only 6.6% of implant continuers and 20.8% of discontinuers trialing temporizing measures including NSAIDs and hormonal medications prior to discontinuation.6 There are limited published papers investigating therapeutic options to address bothersome bleeding among implant users.

    • Does Obesity Influence Body Mass Index Changes in Nulliparous Adolescent Users of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives?

      2021, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, use of LARCs compared to short-acting contraceptive methods is still low, despite LARCs being recommended by national medical societies as first-line contraceptive options for adolescents.2,3 Although adolescents discontinue LARCs at much lower rates than short-acting contraceptive methods, they nevertheless are discontinued at rates of up to 17% within 1 year.4-7 Perceived weight gain is a common reason given by both adolescents and adults for discontinuation of progestin-releasing LARCs such as the etonogestrel subdermal implant (ENG-implant) and the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD), whereas weight gain has not been identified as a reason for discontinuation of the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD).8,9

    • The Etonogestrel Implant in Adolescents: Factors Associated With Removal for Bothersome Bleeding in the First Year After Insertion

      2021, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our study of a diverse, primarily nulligravid and nulliparous AYA population, 12-month implant continuation was high. The 80% continuation rate in our study is consistent with those in other studies of AYA implant users, reporting rates ranging from 78% to 91%.3-9 In all, 22% of our patients reported bothersome bleeding within the first year after insertion.

    • Twelve-month Continuation of the Etonogestrel Implant in Adolescents With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

      2021, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reasons for ENG implant discontinuation before 1 year of use in this population of adolescents with PCOS were also similar to those in other studies. Problematic bleeding was the most commonly cited reason (41%) for discontinuation, which is consistent with other research in youths.12 A total of 23% reported concerns about weight gain as the reason for ENG implant discontinuation, and these individuals did indeed gain weight.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: This work was supported by Research Data & Computing Services at Nationwide Children's Hospital and the Center for Clinical and Translational Science at The Ohio State University (CTSA grant UL1TR001070) and by the OSU College of Medicine Bennett Research Scholarship awarded to Ms. Mizraji.

    View full text