A new design model for adhesive joints used to bond FRP laminates to steel beams: Part B: Experimental verification
Highlights
► Failure of the joints used in this study was governed by debonding at steel–adhesive interface. ► Design models, with assumption of adhesive failure, do not provide accurate failure load predictions. ► The proposed design model in this study does not need stress analysis of the joints to be designed. ► The proposed design model predicts the failure load and mode of failure with a good accuracy.
Introduction
In part A of the paper, a review of the most common failure criteria used to predict the strength of adhesive joints was presented. The drawbacks of each criterion were discussed and a new design model for adhesive joints used to bond FRP laminates to flexural steel members was proposed. The new design model is based on comparison of the axial force in the laminate at the anchorage length in a beam bonded with FRP laminate with a critical value obtained from a representative specimen. The new model aims to overcome the shortcomings involved in existing design models. In this part of the paper, some of the most important failure criteria mentioned in part A are evaluated and the accuracy of the proposed new model is investigated.
Section snippets
Specimens
Two types of tests were conducted. In the first type, double-sided strengthened steel plates, referred to as representative specimens, were prepared and tested. In the second type, full-scale steel beams, strengthened on the tension flange, were tested. Three series of representative specimens made of three different strengthening systems and in each series 10 specimens were prepared in order to obtain reliable results. Three series of beam specimens, including six specimens, made of the same
Representative specimens
Table 4 presents the strength of the representative specimens in terms of ultimate load, Pu and corresponding maximum shear, τmax, and maximum peeling stress, τmax, in the adhesive layer calculated from the analytical solution proposed by Bocciarelli et al. [2]. It is worth mentioning that, in most of the specimens, failure took place in two phases. In the first phase, a crack was formed on one side of the specimen at the end of the laminate (these initial cracks could be heard, but they were
Strength prediction and discussion
In this section, an attempt is made to evaluate some of the stress-based and fracture mechanics-based failure criteria mentioned in part A of this paper and to predict the strength of the tested specimens using the new proposed model.
Conclusions
An experimental study was carried out to study the strength of adhesive joints used to bond CFRP laminates to tensile and flexural steel members in order to evaluate the existing design methods and the new design model proposed in part A of this paper. In the light of the results obtained from this experimental work, the following conclusions can be drawn:
- (1)
Failure hypotheses based on material strength, i.e. adhesive, were found not to be suitable for the design of adhesive joints in this study.
References (6)
- et al.
Application of fracture mechanics to predict the failure load of adhesive joints used to bond CFRP laminates to steel members
Constr Build Mater
(2012) - et al.
Prediction of debonding strength of tensile steel/CFRP joints using fracture mechanics and stress based criteria
Eng Fract Mech
(2009) - et al.
Design of adhesive joints based on peak elastic stresses
Int J Adhes Adhes
(2008)
Cited by (27)
Tensile behaviour of CFRP-glass adhesively bonded connections: double-lap joint tests and numerical modelling
2022, Engineering StructuresCitation Excerpt :The Poisson’s ratios have not been experimentally determined in the present study. However, the values of 0.44, 0.30 and 0.38 are referred by Rodrigues [36], Haghani and Al-Emrani [37] and Nhamoinesu and Overend [19] for the Sikaforce, SikaDur and 3M, respectively. These values were adopted in the present study.
A nonlinear analytical model for predicting bond behavior of FRP-to-concrete/steel substrate joints subjected to temperature variations
2022, Construction and Building MaterialsAn approach for predicting fatigue life of CFRP retrofitted metallic structural details
2022, International Journal of FatigueBond behavior of hybrid FRP-to-steel joints
2020, Composite StructuresCitation Excerpt :For the strength enhancement of steel structures, CFRP is preferred rather than GFRP due to its much higher elastic modulus. Recent studies have shown that the use of externally bonded CFRP is very effective for enhancing flexural [4], compressive [5], buckling [6] and fatigue [7,8] behaviors of steel members and structures. However, for outdoor steel structures, such as steel bridges, steel towers and offshore platforms, an issue for strengthening these steel structures by externally bonded CFRP is that carbon is likely to stimulate galvanic corrosion attack on steel when steel is in direct contact with CFRP [9].
Strengthening of a 19th-century roadway metallic bridge using nonprestressed bonded and prestressed unbonded CFRP plates
2019, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :This property is mainly observed because of the distinctive mechanical and durability characteristics of CFRP reinforcements, while CFRP composites do not encounter the typical application/handling drawbacks associated with conventional steel reinforcements [2]. Since the first documented application of adhesively bonded CFRP reinforcements for the strengthening of the Tickford Bridge in the UK [3], several research studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of such strengthening systems [4–19]. However, only a small number of on-site demonstration projects have been reported in the literature (see for example Refs. [2,20–25]), while the actual application of adhesively bonded CFRP reinforcements remains limited.