Elsevier

Composite Structures

Volume 232, 15 January 2020, 111567
Composite Structures

Seismic evaluation of ordinary RC buildings retrofitted with externally bonded FRPs using a reliability-based approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111567Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite the extensive literature on reinforced concrete (RC) members retrofitted with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, few studies have employed a reliability-based approach to evaluate the seismic performance of RC buildings in terms of their collapse capacity and ductility. In this study, the performance of a poorly-confined RC building structure is investigated for different FRP retrofitting schemes using different configurations and combinations of wrapping and flange-bonded FRPs, as two well-established techniques. A nonlinear pushover analysis is then implemented with a computational reliability analysis based on Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) to determine the collapse capacity and ductility of the case-study structure. The variations in material properties and applied loads are examined using a rational probabilistic procedure. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the reliability approach as it is capable of providing reliable and accurate comparisons between the retrofitting schemes implemented. In addition, the failure modes of the original and retrofitted frames are scrutinized for a more detailed study. It was found that the failure mode of the case-study building is remarkably dependent on the variations of both the input parameters and the adopted retrofitting scheme.

Introduction

The advantageous properties of externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites such as high tensile strength, corrosion resistance, and ease of installation have nominated them as a distinct option for seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. Over the past two decades, FRP composites have received wide acceptance worldwide and many research endeavors have conducted to explore the different aspects of their application and to address the associated challenges. The results of these studies have been beneficially employed in developing design codes and guidelines for real field applications.

In general, FRP composites can be implemented to enhance both the loading capacity and ductility of RC structures using different retrofitting schemes. Flexural retrofitting is a widely used approach that would serve not only to increase the loading capacity of members and structures but also under certain circumstances, to relocate plastic hinges in beams away from the column interface as well [1], [2], [3]. The latter capability can change the failure mode from a column-sway to a beam-sway one. A viable scheme to enhance flexural capacity is the flange-bonded FRPs in which FRP composites can be applied to critical regions of both beams and columns without any extreme damage to the slab. However, debonding is still a major issue of concern that can decrease the efficiency of such externally bonded FRP flexural retrofits. As a remedy, newly proposed anchorage systems are reliable solutions to overcome this undesirable failure mode [1], [4], [5], [6].

In an experimental investigation, Eslami and Ronagh [1] investigated the retrofitting of damaged/undamaged RC Beam-Column sub-assemblages using the flange-bonded FRP composites. Their results showed that the proposed technique when combined with a grooving anchorage system was effective in both increasing the flexural capacity and relocating plastic hinges away from the column interface. Compared to the pre-cracked control specimen, the retrofitted joints led to an increase of 30% in ultimate capacity. As expected, however, the displacement ductility factor of the retrofitted joint reportedly decreased due to the increased reinforcement ratio provided by the externally bonded FRPs.

Flange-bonded FRPs have also been used to improve the lateral behavior of an 8-story RC building by Ronagh and Eslami [7]. Comparison of the capacity curves obtained from nonlinear pushover analysis confirmed increments of 43% and 80% in the capacity of the selected building as a result of using glass FRP (GFRP) and carbon FRP (CFRP) composites, respectively. Although CFRP was observed to outperform GFRP in terms of lateral capacity, the former was associated with a lower ductility. Eslami et al. [8] used the nonlinear time-history analysis to find that CFRP flange-bonded retrofits were able to reduce the maximum inter-story drift of the same 8-story building under near-fault ground motions from 3.3% in the as-built to 2.4% in the retrofitted building.

On a par with flexural retrofitting scenario, FRP wraps can be effectively used for additional confinement in regions prone to plastic deformations. Towards this, Di Ludovico et al. [9] investigated the seismic performance of a 3-story RC building retrofitted with a combination of wrapped and web-bonded glass FRPs (GFRPs). The results obtained from their pseudo-dynamic loading showed that the retrofitted building was able to resist by around 50% higher peak ground accelerations (PGA). Further, the findings demonstrated the efficiency of FRP composites in improving the global performance of the building in terms of both ductility and energy dissipation capacity. Similar conclusions have been also reported elsewhere [10], [11], [12].

The studies cited above used deterministic procedures to investigate the performance of FRP retrofitted RC structures neglecting the fact that these structures might behave differently due to unpredicted uncertainties in loads, material properties, and geometry. In reaction to this shortcoming, some studies used reliability-based approaches in the element scale to study the performance of RC members such as beams [13], [14], [15], [16] and columns [17], [18], [19] retrofitted with externally bonded FRP composites. However, few studies were focusing on implementation of such reliability-based approaches to upgrade the performance of RC structures at the macro level.

To achieve a predefined performance in RC structures, Zou et al. [20] proposed a reliability-based algorithm to optimize the amount of FRP confinement in a building. Focusing solely on earthquake uncertainties, their study ignored structural uncertainties such as those associated with material properties in order to reduce the size of the optimization problem to a reasonable level. Using a reliability-based approach, Ali et al. [21] compared the effects of FRP confinement (in columns) with those of a combined flexural (in beams and columns) and confining (in columns) FRPs in a 3-story RC building. For these two retrofitting options, fragility curves were compared based on the maximum lateral drift of the top story. The results confirmed a notable increase (32%) in the reliability of the RC building treated with both flexural and confining FRPs, while sole application of the FRP wraps was only able to improve the reliability of the building by approximately 16%. Although their study demonstrated the effectiveness and significance of reliability assessment, little attention was paid to the collapse capacity of the building. A probabilistic procedure seems necessary when seeking an accurate judgment of the collapse capacity of the structure and a rationale comparison of the different retrofitting solutions.

The above considerations were the main motivation beyond the current study aimed at investigating the seismic behavior of ordinary RC buildings retrofitted with externally bonded FRP composites. To achieve this objective, the flexural and confining FRP composites, as the most prevalent techniques in FRP applications, were used in different configurations and combinations. As a case-study building, a 4-story ordinary RC building was considered and the results were examined in terms of collapse capacity, displacement ductility, and failure mode.

Section snippets

Methodology

The seismic performance of structures retrofitted with externally bonded FRP composites may be affected by uncertainties from a variety of sources that can be classified into the categories of materials, loads, and geometry [22]. Accurate assessment of the seismic performance of such structures requires the effects of variations in each of the input variables to be taken into account in order to obtain the distribution of structural responses. Using an appropriate sampling method, inputs may be

Description of the original building

The structure considered in this study was an ordinary moment-resisting RC frame as part of a lateral resisting system of a four-story residential building with three equal bays of 5 m. Each story was taken to be 3 m in height. The structural design of the frames was based on the ordinary provisions of ACI 318-14[34]. In addition, the base shear seismic design was determined considering a peak ground acceleration of 0.3 g that is related to a high seismic zone based on the Iranian seismic

Retrofitting schemes

The retrofitting strategies adopted were assumed to enhance the flexural and/or ductility behavior(s) of the structure. Towards this, different schemes of CFRP composites were applied to the regions prone to plastic deformations near the beam-column connections in the case-study frame as schematically shown in Fig. 3. In order to assess the influences of flexural and confining retrofits separately, all the CFRP layers were assumed to be unidirectional.

The first scheme contained the application

Nonlinear model

The nonlinear modeling and pushover analysis of the original and retrofitted frames were carried out in the OpenSees environment [38]. Since the fiber section can consider the P-M interaction inherently, both the beams and columns were modeled using the Displacement-Based Beam-Column element with fiber formulation [38], [39]. It is also possible to model the progressive failure of a section by removing fibers that meet material failure. All the structural members were divided into three parts:

Capacity and ductility assessments

In seismic evaluation of structures, ductility is defined as their ability to sustain large post-yield deformations without a considerable loss in their lateral resistance. As different parts of a structure would not yield concurrently, there is no obvious yield point in nonlinear load–displacement curves of a structure subjected to lateral loading. Consequently, locating a yield point to determine the ductility factor for the overall behavior of the structure is somehow subjective. A widely

Results and discussions

The nonlinear models of the original and retrofitted frames were analyzed for each input vector generated by LHS. The number of needed samples (N) was calculated using Eq. (2) for all the output variables (Vmax,δu, etc.). For better illustration, Fig. 7 shows the number of samples (N) still needed for LHS to converge after k0 samples have been drawn for ultimate roof displacements (δu) of 6-flexural, 6-confined, and 6-combined models. As indicated, the convergence criterion was fulfilled after

Conclusions

Using a reliability-based approach, this paper examined the collapse capacity and ductility of ordinary RC frames retrofitted with externally bonded FRPs. To this end, wrapping and flange-bonded FRPs, as two well-known techniques, were used in different configurations and combinations to retrofit a poorly-confined four-story building. The performance of retrofitting schemes was evaluated using a reliability approach taking into account different sources of uncertainty. Based on the obtained

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (51)

  • O. Ali et al.

    Seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame structures strengthened with FRP laminates using a reliability-based advanced approach

    Compos B Eng

    (2018)
  • A. Deylami et al.

    Probabilistic seismic demand assessment of residual drift for Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames as a dual system

    Struct Saf

    (2016)
  • S.M. Diniz et al.

    Safety evaluation of slender high-strength concrete columns under sustained loads

    Comput Struct

    (2003)
  • O. Ali et al.

    Comparative durability analysis of CFRP-strengthened RC highway bridges

    Constr Build Mater

    (2012)
  • J.H. Kim et al.

    Reliability assessment of reinforced concrete rectangular columns subjected to biaxial bending using the load contour method

    Eng Struct

    (2017)
  • R.A. Atadero et al.

    Calibration of resistance factors for reliability based design of externally-bonded FRP composites

    Compos B Eng

    (2008)
  • S. Ribeiro et al.

    Reliability-based design recommendations for FRP-reinforced concrete beams

    Eng Struct

    (2013)
  • L. Lam et al.

    Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete

    Constr Build Mater

    (2003)
  • S. Rocca et al.

    Interaction diagram methodology for design of FRP-confined reinforced concrete columns

    Constr Build Mater

    (2009)
  • A. Eslami et al.

    Effect of FRP wrapping in seismic performance of RC buildings with and without special detailing–a case study

    Compos B Eng

    (2013)
  • H. Baji et al.

    Development of a nonlinear FE modelling approach for FRP-strengthened RC beam-column connections. Structures

    (2015)
  • A. Eslami et al.

    Experimental investigation of an appropriate anchorage system for flange-bonded carbon fiber–reinforced polymers in retrofitted RC beam–column joints

    J Compos Constr

    (2013)
  • D. Mostofinejad et al.

    Grooving as alternative method of surface preparation to postpone debonding of FRP laminates in concrete beams

    J Compos Constr

    (2010)
  • M. Eftekhar et al.

    Using boring to postpone debonding of CFRP-composite concrete beams

    J Compos Constr

    (2015)
  • A. Eslami et al.

    Analytical assessment of CFRP retrofitted reinforced-concrete buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions

    J Perform Constr Facil

    (2016)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Upgrading cyclic response of heat-damaged RC beam-column joints using CFRP sheets

      2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      For seismically deficient and/or heat-damaged reinforced concrete B-C joints, various strategies have been used to overcome this deficiency, as well as improve, and increase their ductility and flexural capacity. Such as fiber-reinforced concrete mixtures, steel plates, bracing steel bars, reinforced concrete jackets, steel stirrups, steel jacketing, Cementitious Composites, externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), and FRP reinforcement in grooves [1,17–29], etc. Additionally, the use of basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) proved that it could be utilized for upgrading the behavior of RC beam-column joints and postpone the crack propagation in the joint region.

    • Probabilistic calibration of environmental reduction and partial safety factors for the design of reinforced concrete beams strengthened by flax fibre reinforced polymers based on two-factor accelerated degradation tests

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Design equations for civil engineering structures are generally based on coefficients that are calibrated to meet reliability requirements expressed in terms of guaranteed levels of performance under given conditions of use and for a given period [49]. For failure modes occurring over short periods of time, such as earthquakes, this notion of guaranteed performance is expressed in terms of the probability that an indicator defining the resistance of the structure is less than or equal to the stress applied at a given time [50–53]. This indicator could be an admissible displacement, a failure strength, an acceptable level of vibration, etc.

    • External GFRP confinement to decrease near-fault earthquake damage of reinforced concrete structures considering soil-structure interaction

      2021, Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      The fundamental period of the fixed-base 8-storey frame is 1.24 s (Fig. 11a) which is approximate to the period 1.28 s that was obtained by Ronagh and Eslami [46]. The fundamental period of the fixed-base 4-storey frame is 0.765 s (Fig. 11d) which is approximate to the period 0.78 s obtained by Mahdavipour et al [38]. The fundamental periods of the un-strengthened and the FRP strengthened frames are almost the same because FRP confinement does not change the elastic stiffness of the frames.

    • Reliability-based optimization of external wrapping of CFRP on reinforced concrete columns considering decayed diffusion

      2021, Engineering Failure Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      FRP strengthening has been extensively used since the mid-1980 s to improve RC column performance because of its light weight, high tensile strength, relatively low cost, ability to quickly restore structural capacity beyond its original capacity, and its excellent mechanical and chemical properties [9,10]. The use of FRP-wrapping for restoration of corroded RC members has been the subject of many studies [9,11–17]. In the present study, FRP materials have been applied as externally bonded reinforcement.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text