Effect of surface charge and agglomerate degree of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on KB cellular uptake in vitro
Introduction
The diagnostic and therapeutic applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MNPs) such as drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hyperthermia techniques, cell separation and tissue repair expanded enormously in the past decades [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Such applications of MNPs owed to their low toxicity to human beings and the possibility to exploit their outstanding magnetic properties [7], [8], For those applications, it is desired that MNPs have potential to interact with cells strongly and enter into them. So understanding the interactions of nanoparticles with cells is a key gap in nanotechnology that needs to be filled. Nanoparticle size [9], [10], surface chemistry [11], and charge [12] have a profound effect on internalization capability. Considerable researches have been devoted to improving the cell internalizing efficiency by changing the size of nanoparticles [13], by the attachment on the nanoparticle surface with protein transduction domains [14], [15], or by utilizing transfection agents [16], [17].
Noted that, due to the magnetic dipole–dipole attractions between nanoparticles, these particles are prone to agglomerate and form large clusters, resulting in increased particle size. So far only limited data are available regarding MNPs agglomerations within the biological systems. A recent study on the in vitro uptake of oxide nanoparticles in human lung cells has underlined the effect of nanopaticles agglomeration and size [18]. Wick et al. explored the cytotoxic effects about the degree and kind of agglomerations of carbon nanotube [19]. But to the best of our knowledge, not much is known about their impact on biological systems including humans.
In present study, we prepared three types of MNPs, which were DMSA coated MNPs (17.3 ± 4.8 nm, negative charge), CS coated MNPs (16.5 ± 6.1 nm, positive charge) and CS magnetic agglomerates (85.7 ± 72.9 nm, positive charge) through electrostatic interaction respectively. Subsequently, we evaluated the effect of these MNPs by utilizing Oral Squamous Carcinoma Cell KB as an in vitro model. CS magnetic agglomerates were more uptakes by KB cells than CS coated MNPs, while DMSA coated MNPs were less uptakes than CS coated MNPs. These in vitro findings can be applied to in vivo studies for further investigations on quantitative assessment of health effects.
Section snippets
Synthesis of chitosan coated MNPs
Magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized by co-precipitation of ferrous and ferric chlorides in aqueous solution [20]. Solutions of FeCl3·6H2O and FeCl2·4H2O (molar ratio 2:1) were mixed and precipitated with concentrated ammonia while being stirred vigorously under N2 protecting. The black precipitate was formed and washed several times with deionized water. The final magnetite nanoparticles were dispersed in deionized water with pH 3.0 and oxidized into more stable MNPs (γ-Fe2O3) by air at the
Characterizations of magnetic nanoparticles
Fig. 1 showed FTIR spectra of CS, CS@MNPs, DMSA@MNPs and CS-DMSA@MNPs. The characteristic absorption bands of CS (Fig. 1(a)) appeared at 1646 cm−1(amide I), 1618 cm−1 (amide II) and 1400 cm−1(amide III). In the spectrum of CS@MNPs (Fig. 1(b)) and CS-DMSA@MNPs (Fig. 1(d)), compared with the specrum of CS, the 1646 cm−1 peak of –NH2 bending vibration shift to 1621 cm−1, and a new peak 1406 cm−1 appeared. It could be attributed to the linkage between carboxyl group and ammonium ion [23]. The results
Conclusions
In conclusion, low-toxic DMSA@MNPs, CS@MNPs and CS-DMSA@MNPs have been prepared and characterized in vitro by various physicochemical means. Cellular uptakes of MNPs by KB cells were dependent on incubation time, nanoparticle concentration and properties. The higher cellular uptake of CS-DMSA@MNPs compared with CS@MNPs results from the high surface charge and large agglomerate size. CS@MNPs with positive zeta potential also showed higher cellular uptake compared to DMSA@MNPs with negative zeta
Acknowledgements
This work has been carried out under financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 60571031, 60501009 and 60725101) and National Basic Research Program of China (nos. 2006CB933206 and 2006CB705602).
References (34)
- et al.
Nanotoday
(2007) - et al.
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
(2006) - et al.
Cancer Lett.
(2004) - et al.
Biomaterials
(2007) - et al.
Biomaterials
(2004) - et al.
Int. J. Pharm.
(2008) - et al.
Toxicol. Lett.
(2007) - et al.
J. Mol. Liquids
(1999) - et al.
Biomaterials
(2005) - et al.
Biomaterials
(2002)
Coll. Surf. A: Physicochem.
Eng. Aspects
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
Biomaterials
Science
Science
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Adv. Mater.
Cited by (156)
Endosomal escape in magnetic nanostructures: Recent advances and future perspectives
2024, Materials Today AdvancesDiethylaminoethyl-dextran and monocyte cell membrane coated 1,8-cineole delivery system for intracellular delivery and synergistic treatment of atherosclerosis
2023, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesIntroduction to nanoengineering and nanotechnology for biomedical applications
2023, Emerging Nanotechnologies for Medical ApplicationsNovel neurolisteriosis therapy using SPION as a drivable nanocarrier in gallic acid delivery to CNS
2023, Journal of Controlled ReleaseSynthesis of a novel magnetic composite based on graphene oxide, chitosan and organoclay and its application in the removal of bisphenol A, 17α-ethinylestradiol and triclosan
2022, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering