Thin film processing using S-layer proteins: Biotemplated assembly of colloidal gold etch masks for fabrication of silicon nanopillar arrays

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.01.015Get rights and content

Abstract

We explored the bionanofabrication of silicon nanopillar structures using ordered gold nanoparticle arrays generated from microbial surface layer (S-layer) protein templates. The S-layer template used for these thin film processing experiments was isolated from the Gram-positive bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. In this preliminary work, S-layers preimmobilized onto chemically modified silicon substrates were initially used to template the fabrication of a nanolithographic hard mask pattern comprised of a hexagonally ordered array of 5-nm gold nanoparticles (lattice constant = 18 nm). Significantly, the use of the biotemplated gold nanoparticle mask patterns in an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching process successfully yielded silicon nanopillar structures. However, it was found that the resultant nanopillars (8–13 nm wide at the tip, 15–20 nm wide at half-height, 20–30 nm wide at the base, and 60–90 nm tall) appeared to lack any significant degree of translational ordering. The results suggest that further studies are needed in order to elucidate the optimal plasma processing parameters that will lead to the generation of long-range ordered arrays of silicon-based nanostructures using S-layer protein templates.

Introduction

Silicon nanopillars (SNPs) are a class of low-dimensional structures which have recently sparked considerable interest in a wide range of fields. Nanometer-scale silicon structures present novel electrical and optical properties, e.g., room temperature visible photoluminescence [1], that are different from those of bulk silicon materials. In particular, Si nanopillar arrays with sub-100 nm periodicities are expected to find many applications in, for example, solid state photovoltaic devices/electroluminescent displays [2], field emission devices [3] and 2-D photonic crystals/waveguide elements [4]. In the semiconductor electronics industry, SNP arrays may offer an attractive route to the creation of vertically oriented field-effect transistors [5], which permit decoupling of device density from the channel length.

Within the past several years, various technologies have been proposed for the nanofabrication of devices incorporating nanopillar structures. Regarding the patterning of ordered Si nanopillar arrays, the highly precise fabrication of ultrafine target features (<50 nm) with sub-100 nm periodicities remains a significant processing challenge. For example, Wellner et al. [6] recently reported the parallel fabrication of ordered arrays of SNPs (with pillar diameter  20–40 nm) using a patterned reactive ion etch (RIE) mask created by metal deposition through a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of polymer particles. However, this colloidal lithography method required the use of relatively large particles (0.5 μm) to form the polymer mask, resulting in a relatively low density of pillars on the surface (with interpillar spacings >200 nm). Others [7] have successfully employed electron-beam lithography (EBL) (in combination with reactive ion etching) and focused ion beam lithography (FIBL) for the fabrication of submicrometer semiconductor nanopillar arrays. Unfortunately, EBL and FIBL methods have major disadvantages in being both relatively slow and extremely costly.

One promising alternative approach to the advanced fabrication of ordered nanostructures is the application of prokaryotic surface layer (S-layer) proteins [8], [9], [10] as biomacromolecular templates. S-layers are naturally occurring 2-D protein crystals which have a highly periodic morphological structure containing a well-defined arrangement of functional groups. These properties make S-layers ideal support matrices for the synthesis (‘bionanofabrication’) of metallic and semiconductor nanocrystal superlattices using a variety of methods [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. In this new work, we explore the fabrication of vertically aligned silicon nanopillars using ordered gold nanoparticle (NP) arrays generated from an S-layer template isolated from the Gram-positive radiotolerant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. The D. radiodurans S-layer – also known as the ‘hexagonally packed intermediate’ (HPI) – has a p6 rotational symmetry with a reported spacing of 18 nm between each protein core region [19]. The core region itself consists of six identical protein monomers (each with molecular weight = 98 kDa) enclosing a single central pore (Fig. 1A), and is in turn surrounded by six vertex regions of identical size [20]. In Fig. 1A, the black dotted lines indicate a regular hexagonal lattice model overlaid on top of a schematic illustration of the HPI layer. The lattice model is aligned in the figure illustration such that: (1) the corners of the hexagons correspond to the vertex regions in the HPI layer; (2) the geometric center of each hexagon corresponds to the location of the central pore of the S-layer. The blue double-headed arrows in Fig. 1A indicate the following dimensional parameters for the native HPI S-layer structure [17]: (i) diameter of the vertex region (7.1 ± 0.5 nm); (ii) spacing between adjacent core regions (“HPI lattice constant”) (18.5 ± 0.7 nm).

The set of procedures we followed to produce arrays of silicon nanostructures using the HPI S-layer protein lattice as a nanoarchitectural biotemplate is schematically illustrated in Fig. 2. In this bionanofabrication scheme, bionanomask patterns were first generated by exposing the HPI S-layer protein fragments (preimmobilized on chemically modified silicon wafer substrates) to an aqueous solution of 5-nm Au NPs. The resulting hexagonally ordered Au NP arrays were then employed as an etch mask in an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching process using either HBr or SiCl4 gas chemistries. Finally, the morphology and translational ordering of the resulting nanopillar arrays were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and image processing techniques.

Section snippets

Reagents and other chemicals

The following reagents and chemicals (ACS grade or better) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI) and used as received: glacial acetic acid, acetone, and 2-propanol (IPA). The silane reagents (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) and dimethyldichlorosilane (DDS) (ACS grade or better) were purchased from Gelest Co. (Milwaukee, WI) and used as received. Figure S1 in the Supporting Information illustrates the chemical structures of APTES and DDS.

All aqueous solutions were

Silicon surface modification and S-layer adsorption studies

In order to facilitate the generation of a reasonably high surface density of bionanofabricated nanostructures, we first performed a series of experiments to evaluate the adsorption behavior of isolated HPI S-layer protein fragments on various types of model substrates. More specifically, our objective in conducting these preliminary investigations was to determine which set of chemical functionalization strategies leads to a high amount of S-layer protein adsorption to silicon (Si) surfaces.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated in this preliminary report that silicon(1 0 0) substrates chemically modified with either APTES or DDS could be used to immobilize S-layer (HPI) proteins isolated from D. radiodurans with a relatively high level of efficiency, compared to unmodified Si surfaces. The immobilized S-layers, in turn, served as effective biotemplates for the fabrication of self-organized gold nanoparticle arrays. S-layers adsorbed to DDS-modified Si substrates led to the generation of a

Supporting information available

Figure S1 (chemical structures of APTES and DDS), Figure S2 (schematic illustration of the major lattice orientations in an ideal 2-D hexagonal array structure), Figure S3 (AFM scans of HPI S-layer fragments adsorbed to (chemically unmodified) native oxide silicon substrates), and Figure S4 (N 1s XPS scan of biotemplated gold nanoparticle etch masks before and after O2 plasma descum process). This material is available via the Internet at www.sciencedirect.com.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Nanobiotechnology Center (NBTC), an STC Program of the National Science Foundation under Agreement Number ECS-9876771. We also acknowledge additional funding support from the National Science Foundation under a Nanoscale Interdisciplinary Research Team (NIRT) grant (NSF-0403990). Finally, we wish to note that this work made use of the Cornell Center for Materials Research (CCMR) Facilities supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Number

References (61)

  • H.I. Liu et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (1992)
  • A. Malinin et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. B

    (2000)
  • P.A. Lewis et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2001)
  • V.V. Poborchii et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2002)
  • M. Masahara et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2006)
  • A. Wellner et al.

    Microelectron. Eng.

    (2001)
  • T. Tada et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1997)
  • D. Pum et al.

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (1999)
  • U.B. Sleytr et al.

    Prog. Surf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • M. Sára et al.

    J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.

    (2005)
  • W. Shenton et al.

    Nature

    (1997)
  • S. Dieluweit et al.

    Supramol. Sci.

    (1998)
  • M. Mertig et al.

    Eur. Phys. J. D

    (2001)
  • S.R. Hall et al.

    ChemPhysChem

    (2001)
  • E. Györvary et al.

    J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.

    (2004)
  • M. Bergkvist et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2004)
  • S.S. Mark et al.

    Langmuir

    (2006)
  • S.S. Mark et al.

    Biomacromolecules

    (2006)
  • W. Baumeister et al.

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1986)
  • D.J. Müller et al.

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1996)
  • G. Witucki

    J. Coat. Technol.

    (1993)
  • M. Bergkvist et al.

    J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A

    (2003)
  • H. Jansen et al.

    J. Micromech. Microeng.

    (1996)
  • K. Nishikawa et al.

    Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.

    (1996)
  • C.C. Cheng et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (1996)
  • G.S. Oehrlein et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (1990)
  • W.E. Frank

    Microelectron. Eng.

    (1997)
  • C.D.W. Wilkinson et al.

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.

    (2004)
  • H.G. Tompkins et al.

    Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Reflectometry: A User's Guide

    (1999)
  • Digital Instruments Veeco Metrology Group, Scanning Probe Microscopy Training Notebook

    (2000)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Microbial nanotechnology

      2023, Nanoremediation: Modern Technologies for Treatment of Environmental Pollutants
    • Growth of silicon nanowires from bio-templated gold nanoparticles

      2018, Superlattices and Microstructures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, bottom-up methods such as colloidal lithography [10], block copolymers [11], and porous alumina membranes [12] have been exploited to grow Nanowires via patterning of the catalyst on the substrate. One alternative method to fabricate ordered nanostructures is utilization of surface layer proteins [13–18] as templates. Surface layer (S-layer) proteins form the outer surface of prokaryotes cell wall and are the most plentiful proteins produced by cells.

    • Nanoengineered polymeric S-layers based capsules with targeting activity

      2011, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
      Citation Excerpt :

      2D Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) was used to determine lattice constant and symmetry. To this aim 400 nm × 600 nm of the surface of S-layer containing capsules were scanned and the 2DFFT of the AFM image were analyzed using SPIP software [41,42]. In order to promote antibody binding onto the surface of S-layer containing capsules, carboxylic groups of S-layer proteins were activated by 2 mM EDC for 20 min at 20 °C.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Nanobiotechnology Center at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.

    2

    Present address: Boston College School of Law, Boston, MA 02215, United States.

    View full text