Dissecting innate immune responses with the tools of systems biology
Introduction
Systems biology is concerned with understanding the dynamic outcome of molecular interactions between biomolecules (e.g. DNA, RNA, proteins, lipids and metabolites) at the pathway, organelle, cell, organ and organism levels (Figure 1). The methodology of systems biology is an iterative process that begins with the identification of component parts and their respective interactions. This information is then integrated into a predictive (usually mathematical) model of system behavior, which is in essence a hypothesis that can be tested experimentally. The experimental results lead to the refinement of the model and, hence, new hypotheses.
Because of its complex dynamic behavior, its wealth of intricate intra- and inter-cellular interactions, and its medical significance, the immune system offers an ideal focus for systems biology. The innate immune response is highly context dependent, suggesting unplumbed complexity. Depending on the context, host and pathogen factors can be both protective and injurious. For example, Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 and myeloid differentiation antigen 88 (MyD88) protect against systemic spread of Group B Streptococcus during low dose challenge; by contrast, TLR2 and MyD88 promote lethality to high doses of the same pathogen [1]. Moreover, all infections and inflammatory disorders are not created equal; TNF antagonism is an efficacious therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis [2], but can exacerbate systemic lupus erythematosus [3] and mycobacterial infections [4].
Thus, interactions, feedback, dynamic behavior, complexity and context are widespread in, and essential to, innate immunity. These are exactly the issues that systems biology aims to address; raising hopes for early and accurate diagnoses, the instigation of preventative strategies, and the development specific treatments for infectious and inflammatory diseases. Systems biology also presents the opportunity to personalize diagnoses and therapies, taking into account the genetic and environmental factors that make each individual unique.
The rest of this review is divided into two sections reviewing the current technologies and computational tools of systems biology with particular emphasis on applicability to innate immune studies. Because of our backgrounds, we have focused on studies in the biology of TLRs as a representative facet of innate immunity.
Section snippets
Genomic technologies
Genomic technologies aim to define both static and dynamic aspects of genomes within biological systems, including sequence, sequence variation and gene expression. In addition, genomic tools can be used to manipulate genetic sequence and gene expression to help us to better understand biological systems.
Conclusions
The systems biology of innate immunity is in its infancy, with many of the efforts still directed at defining the parts lists and connectivity for the regulatory networks that control these responses. The promise of personalized genomics combined with high throughput diagnostics will revolutionize our understanding of innate immunity and the treatment of its disorders. These advances are predicated on further developments in technologies that quantitatively define biological systems, and of
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgements
We thank Adrian Ozinsky, Erica Andersen-Nissen, Colleen Sheridan and Alan Aderem for helpful comments. KS and HB are supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (U54AI54523 [HB] and R01AI052286 [KS]).
References (56)
- et al.
Drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus associated with etanercept therapy
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Identification of unknown target genes of human transcription factors using chromatin immunoprecipitation
Methods
(2002) - et al.
ChIP-chip: considerations for the design, analysis, and application of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments
Genomics
(2004) - et al.
Unbiased mapping of transcription factor binding sites along human chromosomes 21 and 22 points to widespread regulation of noncoding RNAs
Cell
(2004) - et al.
IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling
Cell
(2002) - et al.
SOCS1/JAB is a negative regulator of LPS-induced macrophage activation
Immunity
(2002) - et al.
MyD88S, a splice variant of MyD88, differentially modulates NF-kappaB- and AP-1-dependent gene expression
FEBS Lett
(2003) - et al.
The murine IRAK2 gene encodes four alternatively spliced isoforms, two of which are inhibitory
J Biol Chem
(2004) - et al.
LPS-Induced Upregulation of SHIP Is Essential for Endotoxin Tolerance
Immunity
(2004) - et al.
Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips
Science
(2001)