Protein–polysaccharide interactions and aggregates in food formulations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2020.03.002Get rights and content

Abstract

The protein–polysaccharide combinations that lead to electrostatic complex and coacervate formation are the object of extensive research using both layer-by-layer and mixed emulsion approaches. The protein–polysaccharide conjugates demonstrated interesting physicochemical properties as stabilizers and emulsifiers, as well as texture modifiers in food products. Furthermore, they are potential optimal nutrient delivery systems. Their complex behavior due to several factors such as pH, ionic strength, concentration, heat, and mechanical treatments is the main reason behind the continuous growth of the research field. The review is reporting some recent advances on the topic, along with an overview of the possible interactions between protein and polysaccharide, from Maillard reaction to enzymatic cross-linking passing through coacervates.

Introduction

The organization of food constituents at multiple spatial scales and their interactions is the so-called food structure [1, 2, 3]. The food structure is a function of the food ingredients and production process. The composition of the food and its structure determines the texture, the perceived attribute, and the mechanical properties [4]. Food goes through several steps during consumption. The initial mechanical breakdown of the food structure starts with the mastication and mixing using the tongue. The second step is the lubrication, hydration, and dissolution due to the enzymatic action of the saliva, the small broken piece of food is then converted to bolus and swallowed through the esophagus into the stomach. Food industries are facing the problem to make foods healthier and at the same time not diminish sensory quality [5,6]. Moreover, nutrient delivery systems, microencapsulation, and protection of active ingredients and as consequence dispersant agents are to be taken into account during structural design [7∗]. Manufactured foods commonly exist in the colloidal state as emulsions, foams, gels, and dispersions. The food colloidal science investigates the influence of ingredient composition and formulation conditions on structure, stability, and mechanical properties [8∗]. The texture concern is mainly the flow behavior for dispersions, while breaking force, breaking strain, and the size distribution of the newly formed particles are the main physical parameters that can be correlated to hardness, brittleness, crispness, crunchiness, and crumbliness for solid-like foods. The mouthfeel of food emulsions is strongly influenced by the type, concentration, and interactions of the particles and macromolecules present. The perceived fattiness, creaminess, and thickness of oil-in-water emulsions have been found to increase as the droplet concertation increases [9]. The creaminess was also found to depend on droplet size and on the emulsifier type, which might be due to droplet flocculation and emulsion viscosity. During the consumption of some food emulsions, there is a cooling sensation associated with melting of emulsified fat in the mouth due to the endothermic enthalpy change associated with fat crystal melting [10,11].

To obtain proper texture and to stabilize the food products, several emulsifiers, solubilizers, and dispersing agents are adopted. The focus of this review will be the protein–polysaccharide combinations in conjugates or complex structures and their multiple applications in food industries. The protein–polysaccharide combinations are particularly interesting because they are able to change product shelf life by varying food texture, that is, rheological properties of food colloids [12, 13, ∗∗14], for such reason they have been the object of intense research [15, ∗∗16, ∗∗17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Since then there are several interesting reviews on the matter [4,∗7, ∗8,∗∗14, ∗∗17,21,22∗] along with a vast literature. This review should not be considered fully comprehensive, while the intent is to provide a general overview of the topic along with the most recent findings.

Food proteins can avoid flocculation of emulsion droplets because they have a strong tendency to adsorb onto hydrophobic–hydrophilic interfaces and subsequently unfold (or partially unfold) forming relatively thin adsorbed surface layers (∼2–6 nm) that generates electrostatic and steric stabilization [23]. The van der Waals attraction force between colloidal particles overcome the electrostatic repulsion, at the same time the protein charge is the main reason for which colloidal stability can be lost. At the isoelectric point (pI) the negative and positive charges are balanced, reducing repulsive electrostatic forces and causing aggregation and precipitation [24,25]. Moreover, several studies on proteins demonstrated how pH, ionic strength, concentration, and heat treatment influence the pI [26,27].

The protein and polysaccharide combinations allow designing an amphiphilic conjugate to be strongly anchored to the oil–water interface via the protein's hydrophobic regions, leading to a viscoelastic layer, with the nonadsorbing polysaccharide (copolymer) region to provide enhanced steric stabilization [16∗∗] that can lead to gelling behavior.

There are two main kinds of interactions between polysaccharides and proteins: covalent or noncovalent bonds. The covalent bond is obtained through a Maillard-type reaction that it is leading to protein–polysaccharide conjugates with elevated heat stability. However, the reaction conditions, such as pH and temperature, should be properly settled to obtain the desired reaction. The next paragraph will address the reaction condition needed for a successful reaction. The driving forces for the noncovalent bonds are electrostatic, hydrophobic, H bonding, and Van der Waals interactions, such forces can generate coacervates that are useful tools to change food texture and encapsulate active compounds. One relevant topic of this review is the combination of the Maillard reaction with the electrostatically driven aggregates such as coacervates.

Section snippets

Maillard reaction: covalent bonds

A limited number of polysaccharide attaches to protein because of the steric hindrance of the macromolecule, usually only a couple of molecules attach to folded proteins such as ovalbumin and lysozyme, whereas several polysaccharides attach to unfolded proteins such as casein [28]. The key factor for such reaction is related mainly to the presence of lysine that undergoes a Maillard-type reaction with the reducing sugar of polysaccharides, under suitably low water activity and heat treatment

Noncovalent bonds

Proteins can be positively or negatively charged, depending on the pH. Carboxylate polysaccharides get negatively charged at a pH range higher than its pKa. These electrical charges on the backbone of protein or polysaccharide chains are responsible for electrostatic interactions [42,43]. Moreover, hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction play also a role in the stability of the protein–polysaccharide aggregates [44].

The protein–polysaccharide aggregrate can exist in a single-phase system,

Enzymatic cross-linking

Cross-linking is defined as ‘the process of forming tridimensional networks’, where polymer chains may be linked by covalent or noncovalent bonds. Cross-linking reduces the mobility of the polymer structure and usually enhances its mechanical and barrier properties [86], reducing both its water solubility [87,88] and swelling [89]. Cross-linking reactions are commonly applied to proteins than to polysaccharides because proteins have more functional groups [89]. There are several ways to obtain

Conclusions and future perspectives

Although the food industry still largely uses proteins as emulsion stabilizers and food-grade nanoparticles, this review has examined recent progress on protein–polysaccharide combination to achieve advanced emulsification performance and strong steric and in some cases electrostatic stabilization properties. The complex combinations allow designing an amphiphilic conjugate strongly anchored to the oil–water interface via the protein's hydrophobic regions, while the nonadsorbing polysaccharide

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References (97)

  • H.D. Belitz et al.

    Food chemistry

    (2009)
  • D.H.G. Pelegrine et al.

    Whey proteins solubility as function of temperature and pH

    LWT - Food Sci Technol (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft -Technol)

    (2005)
  • M. Akhtar et al.

    Whey protein-maltodextrin conjugates as emulsifying agents: an alternative to gum Arabic

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2007)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Glycation a promising method for food protein modification: physicochemical properties and structure, a review

    Food Res Int

    (2012)
  • N. Li et al.

    Hydrolysis of whey protein-dextran glycatesmade using the Maillard reaction

    Foods

    (2019)
  • E.H. Cordes et al.

    The mechanism of hydrolysis of Schiff bases derived from aliphatic amines

    J Am Chem Soc

    (1963)
  • I. Kutzli et al.

    Influence of Maillard reaction conditions on the formation and solubility of pea protein isolate-maltodextrin conjugates in electrospun fibers

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2019)
  • W. Lertittikul et al.

    Characteristics and antioxidative activity of Maillard reaction products from a porcine plasma protein-glucose model system as influenced by pH

    Food Chem

    (2007)
  • A.K. Stone et al.

    Formation and functionality of whey protein isolate-(kappa-, iota-, and lambda-type) carrageenan electrostatic complexes

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2012)
  • T. Moschakis et al.

    Biopolymer-based coacervates: structures, functionality and applications in food products

    Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci

    (2017)
  • M. Nigen et al.

    Temperature affects the supramolecularstructures resulting from α-Lactalbumin−Lysozyme interaction

    Biochemistry

    (2007)
  • A.W. Clarke et al.

    Tropoelastinmassively associates during coacervationto form quantized protein spheres

    Biochemistry

    (2006)
  • T. Croguennec et al.

    Heteroprotein complex coacervation: a generic process

    Adv Colloid Interface Sci

    (2017)
  • C. Schmitt et al.

    Protein/polysaccharide complexes and coacervates in food systems

    Adv Colloid Interface Sci

    (2011)
  • C.L. Cooper et al.

    Polyelectrolyte-protein complexes

    Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci

    (2005)
  • A.B. Kayitmazer et al.

    Protein-polyelectrolyte interactions

    Soft Matter

    (2013)
  • Y. Lan et al.

    Phase behavior and complex coacervation of concentrated pea protein isolate-beet pectin solution

    Food Chem

    (2020)
  • C. Wu et al.

    Formation and characterisation of food protein–polysaccharide thermal complex particles: effects of pH, temperature and polysaccharide type

    Int J Food Sci Technol

    (2019)
  • D. Guzey et al.

    Formation, stability and properties of multilayer emulsions for application in the food industry

    Adv Colloid Interface Sci

    (2006)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Dilatational rheological and nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of oil-water interface: impact of pH on interaction of soy protein isolated and soy hull polysaccharides

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2020)
  • C. Owens et al.

    Creaming and oxidative stability of fish oil-in-water emulsions stabilized by whey protein-xanthan-locust bean complexes: impact of pH

    Food Chem

    (2018)
  • I. Capron et al.

    Surfactant-free high internal phase emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals

    Biomacromolecules

    (2013)
  • C. Jiao et al.

    An indoor mmWave joint radar and communication system with active channel perception

  • Y.T. Xu et al.

    Novel pickering high internal phase emulsion gels stabilized solely by soy β-conglycinin

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2019)
  • T. Zeng et al.

    Development of antioxidant Pickering high internal phase emulsions (HIPEs) stabilized by protein/polysaccharide hybrid particles as potential alternative for PHOs

    Food Chem

    (2017)
  • A. Sedaghat Doost et al.

    Pickering stabilization of thymol through green emulsification using soluble fraction of almond gum –whey protein isolate nano-complexes

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2019)
  • T. Yang et al.

    Novel edible pickering high-internal-phase-emulsion gels efficiently stabilized by unique polysaccharide-protein hybrid nanoparticles from Okara

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2020)
  • I. Ullah et al.

    Structural characteristics and physicochemical properties of okara (soybean residue) insoluble dietary fiber modified by high-energy wet media milling

    LWT - Food Sci Technol (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft -Technol)

    (2017)
  • M.P. Balaguer et al.

    Functional properties of bioplasticsmade from wheat gliadinsmodified with cinnamaldehyde

    J Agric Food Chem

    (2011)
  • R.A. De Carvalho et al.

    Characterization of gelatin based films modified with transglutaminase, glyoxal and formaldehyde

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2004)
  • H.M.C. Azeredo et al.

    Crosslinking in polysaccharide and protein films and coatings for food contact - a review

    Trends Food Sci Technol

    (2016)
  • H. Chen et al.

    Development of double network gels based on soy protein isolate and sugar beet pectin induced by thermal treatment and laccase catalysis

    Food Chem

    (2019)
  • S. Qiu et al.

    Characterization and functionalities study of hemicellulose and cellulose components isolated from sorghum bran, bagasse and biomass

    Food Chem

    (2017)
  • C. Kleemann et al.

    In-vitro-digestion and swelling kinetics of whey protein, egg white protein and sodium caseinate aerogels

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2020)
  • Z. Wei et al.

    Assembly of protein-polysaccharide complexes for delivery of bioactive ingredients: aperspective paper

    J Agric Food Chem

    (2019)
  • R. Mezzenga et al.

    Understanding foods as soft materials

    Nat Mater

    (2005)
  • J. Ubbink et al.

    Food structure and functionality: a soft matter perspective

    Soft Matter

    (2008)
  • M.C. Bourne

    Food texture and viscosity: 4 principles of objective texture measurements

    (2002)
  • Cited by (119)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text