Modeling patient's value using a stochastic approach: An empirical study in the medical industry
Introduction
With the increasing competition among companies, a business may strategically focus on customers to gain more market share. Today customers are intangible assets of an organization [1], hence establishing a beneficial relationship with each customer is considerably important. Customer relationship management (CRM) is a managerial endeavor that ranks customers to enhance loyalty [2] and it is used to fulfill customer needs during their interactions [3]. In all CRM applications it is important to separate customers based on their value, to continue building the best relationship with them; to do so, customer lifetime value (CLV) is a useful concept. CLV is defined as the present value of the future stream expected given a time horizon by Kotler in 1974, where it is gaining increasing importance as a marketing metric in both academia and practice [4].Customer lifetime value plays an important role in CRM endeavors, since it enables companies to segment customers and identifies those who bring largest profit [5].
Due to the fierce competition of enterprises in many industries, using CRM has become necessary. Applying CLV can help to rank customers based on their value [6]. The growing competition in the medical industry and the increasing requirements of health care quality makes IT techniques more and more useful [7]. For example, as a cutting edge IT technique, big data analytics have been used in the medical industry [8]. As a result, many health centers have tried to build a successful CRM to recognize target and potential customers, increase loyalty and satisfaction, as well as maximize their profitability [9]; holding the view that the customers in this industry are the patients of health centers.
Loyal patients represent the competitive advantage of an organization. Loyalty follows one or repeat occasions of patient satisfaction; in particular, patient loyalty is enhanced by offering efficient and comprehensive services to patients [10,11]. In health centers it is possible to maximize profit by offering appropriate services to each group of patients.
Many studies have been undertaken in the CLV field. They can be divided into two main groups. The first comprises studies that develop a new CLV model [12], [13], [14]; the second includes papers which use CLV models to help with managerial decision making, strategy development, ranking, promotion planning and so on [15], [16], [17], [18], [19].
In this section we will explain important terms, and also describe the methods that will be utilized in paper modeling.
There are different definitions in the literature for the customer lifetime value, that we mention some of them here. Dwyer defined CLV as the present value of the expected benefits less the burdens from customers in 1997 [20], while Gupta and Lehmann defined CLV as the present value of all future profits generated from a customer [21]. Venkatesan and Kumar referred to CLV as the application of contemporary finance principles in the assessment of customer value and relationship management [23] and it was used as a metric for customer selection and marketing resource allocation, but in some researches, CLV is used as an indication or prediction of net profit attributed to the entire future relationship with a customer [22] What's more, CLV has been defined as a core customer-centric metric that is calculated as the net present value of all future profits derived from a customer over his or her lifetime with a firm [24].
To count customer lifetime value, different models were introduced in the first group of papers discussed above [12]. We will review some of them below.
RFM is an applicable CLV model used in various industries [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30] which tries to count customer lifetime value by three parameters containing Recency, Frequency and Monetary. Recency (R), as days since last purchase, identifies how many days ago the last purchase occurred. Frequency (F), as total number of transactions, denotes how many times the customer has purchased a service or product from the firm. Finally, Monetary (M), as total money spent, shows how much a customer has spent in the firm. To get M value, simply total the money from all transactions. As mentioned in the literature review of the RFM model, M refers to the revenue created by each customer during their lifetime. Weighted RFM is another model weighing R, F and M based on their effectiveness in the related industry. Extended RFM is used to count CLV too. In extended RFM models, other effective parameters are added to R, F and M [28], [31], [32], [33].
Another useful approach to count CLV is stochastic approach. Take for example, Markov chain model which can help researchers to predict the future value that will be created by customers [13], [34], [35], [36].
Data mining techniques are used in numerous CLV papers. Clustering and classification help grouping customers based on their similarities or value and help to better manage them [18], [37], [38], [39].
Due to the important of using CRM concept in the medical industry in this section we are going to review papers which studies CRM in the medical industry.
In 2003, Etheron highlighted the importance of patients’ differentiation to optimize the costs of an organization; he used CLV to count the value of dental patients [40]. Yeh in 2011 attempted to predict the hospitalization of hemodialysis patient's data to develop a decision-making support system [38]. Also in 2012, Chen sought to identify target patients to appropriately allocate resources for them in health care centers [7]. He integrated RFM and data mining approaches to optimize health care services. In 2016, Zare's research sought to learn more about patient's behavior via data mining techniques and CLV models in a public health care service. The CLV model utilized in that research was eRFM, an extension to RFM [9].
Based on the importance of calculating customers’ value in enterprises, many CLV studies have been conducted in recent decades; some were mentioned in the background section and an overview is provided in Table 1.
Two techniques of data mining containing clustering and classification are used in this research. Clustering is an unsupervised method which is the process of organizing objects into groups whose members are similar in some way [8], and classification is a supervised method which entails assigning labels to existing situations or classes. K-means is a popular clustering algorithm, partitioning n observations (data) into K clusters in which each observation belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean. Decision tree algorithm solves classification problems by using tree representation. Knowledge extracted from the resulting decision tree can help to better understand the data.
The basic concept of Markov chain model was introduced in 1970 by Andrey Andreyvich Markov. Markov chain is a stochastic process with the Markov property. Markov chain refers to the sequence of random variables such a process moves through, with the Markov property defining serial dependence only between adjacent periods.
The stochastic process contains a set of random variables that all special values that the random variables take on are named as a state (Xi). The set that each state accepts is called state space. The state space of the desired Markov chain in this research will be types of customers’ behaviors. The probabilities of moving from one state to another in a single period are called transition probabilities [36]. There will be a (one-step) transition probability matrix that describes the probability of each transition among two states, named as P. The t-step transition matrix is defined to be the matrix of probabilities of moving from one state to another in exactly t periods (Pt). It is a well-known property of Markov chain modeling that the t-step transition matrix is simply the matrix product of t one-step transition matrices [36]. In fact the (i,j) element of matrix Pt is the probability that the customer will have behavior j at the end of time t given that he started at behavior i.
In this paper we seek to predict value of a dental clinic's patients. We develop a CLV model using Markov chain model and data mining techniques. A RFM model is used to model revenue vector of patients with similar behaviors.
Each group of patients shows different behavior types. Each type needs different attention and capital allocation in order to increase profitability.
Using patients’ data and data mining techniques, we become able to model patients’ behaviors. Utilizing Markov chain model, we can predict future behavior of patients, therefore in this paper we will become able to segment customers based on their behavior types.
In the next section of this paper we will explain the research methodology. Section 3 describes the experiment in detail. Section 4 presents the results and Section 5 contains the discussion and conclusion is represented in Section 6.
Section snippets
Methodology
This study develops a new stochastic model to calculate CLV. Since patients with different behaviors under certain business conditions produce various values, we need to analyze different behavior types. To do so, we use data mining techniques to model patients’ behaviors, and then try to analyze each extracted group.
First, we clustered patients to extract the main behavior types. The RFM parameters of Recency, Frequency and Monetary contribute to this step. Second, we tried to extract
Experimental data
Customer-centric applications are necessary in the medical industry due to the increase of competitive pressure. Measuring CLV can help health centers to develop beneficial strategies that increase their satisfaction rate. Because of the importance of CLV concepts in the medical industry, we used a client database of a dental clinic in Tehran, and validated the proposed model by an achieved dataset. The aforementioned dental clinic has been active since 2001; however, patients’ records have
Results
4830 data of a dental clinic relating to a six year period was gathered and analyzed. Data comprise 11 demographical and transactional parameters such as Recency, Monetary, Customer length, Frequency, Sex, Age, Received service, and so on.
Discussion
Customer satisfaction has an important role in firms’ profitability; therefore, constructing beneficial relationships with customers can be useful. Having said that, we cannot say all customers have the same effect on a company's success. Hence, it is recommended that managers separate customers based on their value in order to better understand their relative effectiveness in the company's profitability. Based on the achieved efficiency measures, managers may become able to design appropriate
Conclusion
The aim of this study is to model customers’ revenue. CLV models help managers of organizations to separate customers based on their value. As a result, managerial efforts and decision making will fit customers, and this causes economical improvements inside the organization. Based on our study, a firm should adjust its relationships to customers according to their created revenue.
This research models customers’ revenue using two computer-based methods: data mining and Markov chain model. The
Conflict of interest
No financial support, grant or funding source from the university or organizations.
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank anonymous referees for very helpful suggestions that substantially improved this article.
References (50)
- et al.
Knowledge discovery of weighted RFM sequential patterns from customer sequence databases
J. Syst. Softw.
(2013) - et al.
Identifying patients in target customer segments using a two-stage clustering-classification approach: a hospital-based assessment
Comput. Biol. Med.
(2012) - et al.
Customer lifetime value prediction by a Markov chain based data mining model: application to an auto repair and maintenance company in Taiwan
Sci. Iran.
(2012) - et al.
Can you get a ticket ? Adaptive railway booking strategies by customer value
J. Public Transp.
(2016) - et al.
Strategies for new product di ff usion: whom and how to target ?
J. Bus. Res.
(2018) - et al.
Analysis of customer lifetime value and marketing expenditure decisions through a Markovian-based model
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Successful customer value management : key lessons and emerging trends
Eur. Manage. J.
(2013) - et al.
A purchase-based market segmentation methodology
Expert Syst. Appl.
(2004) - et al.
Expert systems with applications classifying the segmentation of customer value via RFM model and RS theory
Expert Syst. Appl.
(2009) - et al.
Knowledge discovery on RFM model using Bernoulli sequence
Expert Syst. Appl.
(2009)
Using data mining techniques for pro fi ling pro fi table hotel customers: an application of RFM analysis
Tour. Manage. Perspect.
Modeling customer relationships as Markov chains
J. Interactive Mark.
A novel data mining mechanism considering bio-signal and environmental data with applications on asthma monitoring
Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed.
Using data mining techniques to predict hospitalization of hemodialysis patients
Decis. Support Syst.
Customer value anticipation, product innovativeness, and customer lifetime value: the moderating role of advertising strategy
J. Bus. Res.
Customer relationship management: maximizing customer lifetime value
Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and management Science
A numerical approach to the customer lifetime value
iBusiness
Modeling and application of customer lifetime value in online retail
Informatics
Customer portfolio management (CPM) for improved customer relationship management (CRM): are your customers platinum, gold, silver, or bronze?
J. Bus. Res.
Informatics in medicine unlocked discovery of medical big data analytics: improving the prediction of traumatic brain injury survival rates by data mining patient informatics processing software hybrid Hadoop hive
Inf. Med. Unlocked
Knowledge discovery from patients ’ behavior via clustering-classification algorithms based on weighted eRFM and CLV model : An empirical study in public health care services
Iran. J. Pharm. Res.
Customer-perceived value and loyalty: how do key service quality dimensions matter in the context of B2C
Serv. Bus.
Online determinants of e-customer satisfaction : application to website purchases in tourism
Serv. Bus.
Customer lifetime value models: a literature survey
Int. J. Ind. Eng. Prod. Manage.
Estimating customer potential value using panel data of a Spanish bank
J. Bus. Econ. Manage.
Cited by (12)
Customer relationship management analysis of outpatients in a Chinese infectious disease hospital using drug-proportion recency-frequency-monetary model
2021, International Journal of Medical InformaticsCitation Excerpt :Lee EW (2012) applied the K-means algorithm according to the RFM model (M is the total cost of patients) to classify 1-year hospitalized patients into 2 categories: loyal patients (70 %) and general patients (30 %), and then used the decision tree algorithm to build a model for the 2 types of patients [21]. However, the study performed a very simple classification that is unsuitable for the patients’ data over 2 years [16–18]. In the work of Tarokh MJ (2019) [16], CRM, the customer life cycle value (CLV), K-means clustering algorithm and decision tree algorithm were used to analyze, group and rank the patients and identify target ones.
Predicting User Churn of Smart Home-based Care Services Based on SHAP Interpretation
2024, Data Analysis and Knowledge DiscoveryImproving the Omnichannel Customers’ Lifetime Value Using Association Rules Data Mining: A Case Study of Agriculture Bank of Iran
2022, Iranian journal of Management Studies