Elsevier

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Volume 42, April 2021, Pages 22-31
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

Meta-analysis
Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, insulin index, insulin load and risk of diabetes-related cancers: A systematic review of cohort studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.02.008Get rights and content

Summary

Background & aims

It is believed that diets high in glycemic index (GI), glycemic load (GL), Insulin index (II), and Insulin load (IL) are associated with the increased risks of certain cancers through increasing serum glucose or insulin levels.

Methods

We conducted this systematic review of cohort studies to evaluate the possible relation between GI, GL, II, and IL with diabetes-related cancers, including colorectal, bladder, breast, endometrium, liver, pancreas, and prostate cancers. Two separate investigators conducted a literature search through PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to February 2020, plus reference lists of relevant articles.

Results

Fifty-three cohort studies with a total of 100 098 cancer cases were included in this systematic review. Fifteen out of eighteen studies among breast cancer cases reported no significant association between GI/GL and cancer risk. These numbers were 4 out of 13 for colorectal cancer, 7 out of 9 for endometrial cancer, 2 out of 3 for liver cancer, 8 out of 10 for pancreatic cancer, and 3 out of 3 for prostate cancer. Only one cohort investigated this association in terms of bladder cancer and reported a significant association. Also, five studies reported this relation in terms of II/IL, and only one cohort among endometrial cancer patients observed a significant positive association between the risk of cancer and IL.

Conclusion

We concluded a weak association between dietary GI/GL and no association between II/IL with diabetes-related cancer risk. More cohort studies are required to be performed regarding II/IL and the risk of cancer.

Introduction

Diabetes and cancer are among the most prevalent diseases worldwide, with cancer being the second and diabetes being the twelfth leading cause of death [1,2]. Based on a large body of epidemiological evidence, diabetic patients are at a greater risk of heterogeneous cancer types including liver, pancreas, colorectal, breast, endometrial, and bladder cancers [3]. However, diabetes may act as a protective factor for prostate cancer [4]. The underlying mechanism for this association is not yet well-understood, but it appears that hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and chronic inflammation existing in diabetes provide the opportunity for the cancer cells to proliferate [5,6]. It is also notable that these two diseases share many of the same risk factors, including age, sex, obesity, physical activity, diet, alcohol, and smoking [7].

Food intake has been strongly linked with chronic diseases such as diabetes and cancer, not only regarding the volume of food but also the composition and quality of diet [8,9]. The Glycemic Index (GI) reflects how the carbohydrate content of each food affects blood glucose levels. Glycemic load (GL) reflects the effect of total dietary carbohydrate on postprandial glucose [9]. However, since carbohydrates were not the only stimulus for insulin secretion, dietary insulin index (II) and insulin load (IL) were introduced [10]. II represents the postprandial insulin response to a food consisting of carbohydrates, protein, and fat, compared to an isoenergetic portion of a reference food (glucose or white bread). IL is calculated by multiplying the DII of each food by its energy content and the consumption frequency [11]. In other words, GI and II show the quantity, and GL and IL represent the quality of the diet.

High dietary GI, GL, II, and IL are equal to increased serum insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) [12]. Insulin can stimulate cell proliferation and inhibit cell apoptosis [13]. IGF-1 can also exert mitogenic effects and inhibit apoptosis through multiple cell pathways and regulate gene expression [14]. Insulin and IGF-1 can also stimulate the secretion of leptin from adipose tissue, and since leptin is involved in cell growth and proliferation, insulin can indirectly promote cancer cell growth and proliferation [15].

Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analysis showed that there exists an association between high GI and GL and risk of endometrial, breast, and prostate cancer [[16], [17], [18]], while no association was found between GI and GL and colorectal cancer risk [19]. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review has investigated the association of II and IL with the risk of cancer. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether dietary GI, GL, II, and IL could affect the risk of diabetes-related cancers. The most similar study to the present research is the meta-analysis by Choi et al. [1]; nevertheless, since II and IL had not been assessed and more than 8 years has passed from the publication of the mentioned study, we decided to perform this study as a more comprehensive update to that of Choi et al.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, this systematic review was conducted. The review question was whether or not dietary GI, GL, II, and IL are associated with diabetes-related cancers (endometrial, breast, colorectal, liver, pancreas, bladder, and prostate cancer). The protocol of this study was made visible through the website of www.researchgate.net (//www.researchgate.net/publication/346470937_The_protocol_of_a_systematic_review_A_Systematic_Review_of_The_Association_between_Glycemic_and_Insulin_index_and_load_on_diabetes_related_cancers

The overall risk of diabetes-related cancers

In this paper, we hypothesized that a high GI/GL/II/IL diet characterized by a high intake of rapidly absorbable macronutrients from mixed diets is associated with the risk of cancers related to diabetes, including liver, pancreas, colorectal, breast, endometrial, prostate and bladder cancers.

We summarized the data from 53 cohort studies in Table 2. All studies used either self- or interviewer-administered FFQs to calculate GI/GL/II/IL with 61–208 food items. Forty-one studies were conducted in

Discussion

This systematic review is that a high GI/GL diet does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related cancers. In particular, high GI may be weakly associated with increased risk of colorectal, breast, and bladder cancers, and high GL with increased risk of endometrial, breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer in cohort studies. We also found no protective or harmful effect for a high GI/GL diet on the risk of prostate cancer. Few studies, however, have been conducted

Conclusion and recommendations

The current systematic review found that the risk of diabetes-related cancers, including colorectal, bladder, breast, endometrium, liver, pancreas, and prostate cancers, seems not to be influenced by dietary GI or GL levels. However, cohort studies assessing II and IL were insufficient, and thus, further investigations in future cohort studies are recommended.

Authorship

The concept of the study was developed by FA and MHM. FA searched through the databases, ZSH and MHM screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of the eligible articles and did the data extraction. Disagreements were solved by consulting with FA. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation, editing, review and approval the final version to be submitted.

Funding sources

No fund was received for this research.

Declaration of competing interest

None to be declared.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

References (105)

  • N.C. Howarth et al.

    The association of glycemic load and carbohydrate intake with colorectal cancer risk in the Multiethnic Cohort Study

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2008)
  • E. Vogtmann et al.

    Dietary glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrates on the risk of primary liver cancer among Chinese women and men

    Ann Oncol

    (2013)
  • V. Fedirko et al.

    Glycemic index, glycemic load, dietary carbohydrate, and dietary fiber intake and risk of liver and biliary tract cancers in Western Europeans

    Ann Oncol

    (2013)
  • M.M. Heinen et al.

    Glycemic load, glycemic index, and pancreatic cancer risk in The Netherlands Cohort Study

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2008)
  • U. Nöthlings et al.

    Dietary glycemic load, added sugars, and carbohydrates as risk factors for pancreatic cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort Study

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2007)
  • Y. Bao et al.

    Dietary insulin load, dietary insulin index, and risk of pancreatic cancer–

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2011)
  • D. Aune et al.

    Dietary fructose, carbohydrates, glycemic indices and pancreatic cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

    Ann Oncol

    (2012)
  • S. Liu et al.

    Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (2001)
  • S. Liu et al.

    High dose human insulin and insulin glargine promote T24 bladder cancer cell proliferation via PI3K-independent activation of Akt

    Diabetes Res Clin Pract

    (2011)
  • E. Giovannucci et al.

    The role of obesity and related metabolic disturbances in cancers of the colon, prostate, and pancreas

    Gastroenterology

    (2007)
  • T. Wolever

    Relationship between dietary fiber content and composition in foods and the glycemic index

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1990)
  • M.O. Weickert et al.

    Impact of dietary fiber consumption on insulin resistance and the prevention of type 2 diabetes

    J Nutr

    (2018)
  • Y. Choi et al.

    Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis

    Br J Nutr

    (2012)
  • A.D. Lopez et al.

    Global burden of disease and risk factors

    (2006)
  • M. Wang et al.

    Diabetes and cancer: epidemiological and biological links

    World J Diabetes

    (2020)
  • A.A. Onitilo et al.

    Prostate cancer risk in pre-diabetic men: a matched cohort study

    Clin Med Res

    (2013)
  • W.W.T. Phua et al.

    An aPPARent functional consequence in skeletal muscle physiology via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

    Int J Mol Sci

    (2018)
  • P. Mullie et al.

    Relation between breast cancer and high glycemic index or glycemic load: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr

    (2016)
  • W. Sami et al.

    Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review

    Int J Health Sci

    (2017)
  • P. Mirmiran et al.

    Dietary insulin load and insulin index are associated with the risk of insulin resistance: a prospective approach in tehran lipid and glucose study

    J Diabetes Metab Disord

    (2015)
  • Z. Alboghobeish et al.

    Carbohydrate intake, glycemic index, and glycemic load and the risk of breast cancer among Iranian women

    Nutr Canc

    (2020)
  • R. Vigneri et al.

    Insulin, insulin receptors, and cancer

    J Endocrinol Invest

    (2016)
  • P.F. Christopoulos et al.

    The role of the insulin-like growth factor-1 system in breast cancer

    Mol Canc

    (2015)
  • D. Cirillo et al.

    Leptin signaling in breast cancer: an overview

    J Cell Biochem

    (2008)
  • C.M. Nagle et al.

    Glycemic index, glycemic load and endometrial cancer risk: results from the Australian National Endometrial Cancer study and an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Eur J Nutr

    (2013)
  • A. Sadeghi et al.

    Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load and the risk of prostate cancer: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

    Nutr Canc

    (2020)
  • S. Schlesinger et al.

    Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

    Nutr Rev

    (2017)
  • D. Aune et al.

    Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

    Canc Causes Control : CCC (Cancer Causes Control)

    (2012)
  • S.M. George et al.

    Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of cancer: a prospective cohort study

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • M.D. Holmes et al.

    Dietary carbohydrates, fiber, and breast cancer risk

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2004)
  • S. Higginbotham et al.

    Dietary glycemic load and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study

    Canc Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers

    (2004)
  • C.R. Jonas et al.

    Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of incident breast cancer in postmenopausal women

    Canc Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers

    (2003)
  • E. Cho et al.

    Premenopausal dietary carbohydrate, glycemic index, glycemic load, and fiber in relation to risk of breast cancer

    Canc Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers

    (2003)
  • J.M. Shikany et al.

    Dietary glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrate and risk of breast cancer in the Women's Health Initiative

    Nutr Canc

    (2011)
  • S.C. Larsson et al.

    Glycemic load, glycemic index and breast cancer risk in a prospective cohort of Swedish women

    Int J Canc

    (2009)
  • S.A.N. Silvera et al.

    Dietary carbohydrates and breast cancer risk: a prospective study of the roles of overall glycemic index and glycemic load

    Int J Canc

    (2005)
  • A.L. Frazier et al.

    Adolescent diet and risk of breast cancer

    Canc Causes Control

    (2004)
  • G.G. Giles et al.

    Dietary carbohydrate, fibre, glycaemic index, glycaemic load and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer

    Int J Canc

    (2006)
  • M.S. Farvid et al.

    Adolescent and early adulthood dietary carbohydrate quantity and quality in relation to breast cancer risk

    Canc Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers

    (2015)
  • I. Castro-Quezada et al.

    Glycemic index, glycemic load and invasive breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women: the PREDIMED study

    Eur J Canc Prev

    (2016)
  • Cited by (11)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text