Forward light scatter and contrast sensitivity in keratoconic patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2011.07.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to obtain intraocular forward light scatter (FLS) data in keratoconus patients and to explore possible relationships with contrast sensitivity.

Method

Intraocular straylight was assessed in the right eye of 10 visually-normal subjects (31 ± 5 years) and 5 keratoconus patients (34 ± 9 years) using the van den Berg straylight meter. Contrast sensitivity was also measured in both groups, with and without a glare source provided by the Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT), using a Pelli–Robson chart. Inclusion criteria for the keratoconic patients were chosen to avoid natural causes of increased scatter and to limit the influence of factors that could affect the straylight measurements.

Results

Intraocular light scatter was significantly greater in the keratoconic patients than in normal subjects for each of the three eccentricities tested (Mann–Whitney U test (2-tailed): Z  −2.2, p  0.027). Baseline Pelli–Robson contrast sensitivity was also found to be lower in the keratoconus group than in the normal subjects (Mann–Whitney U test: Z = −2.2, p = 0.023). Under glare conditions contrast loss was significantly greater in the keratoconic patients than in the normal subjects (Mann–Whitney U test: Z = −2.5, p = 0.013). High levels of negative correlation were found between the magnitudes of intraocular straylight and baseline contrast sensitivity in the keratoconus group (Spearman's correlation coefficient (RS)  −0.87, p  0.027).

Conclusion

The high values of straylight measured in the keratoconic patients cannot be explained by age or scarring and could be related to the structural degradation of the cornea. Further investigation of intraocular scatter in keratoconus is warranted to improve our current understanding of the visual deficits associated with this pathology.

Introduction

Keratoconus is a common, non-inflammatory ectatic disorder in which the cornea adopts a steepened, conical profile [1]. These modifications can severely degrade the optical quality of the eye and the associated retinal image. Several studies have shown that both ocular [2], [3], [4] and corneal [5], [6], [7] higher-order aberrations are significantly elevated in keratoconic eyes compared to normal eyes. Vision correction can often be difficult to achieve using spectacles or contact lenses in patients with keratoconus. The literature suggests that best-corrected visual performance in non-scarred eyes with keratoconus, irrespective of the method of correction, is reduced compared to normal [8], [9], [10]. Several authors have suggested that large magnitudes of uncorrected, residual higher-order aberrations (persisting even with rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses in place) are a probable cause of this reduced visual performance [11], [12], [13], [14].

Besides higher-order aberrations, changes in the transparency of the cornea could also impact on visual performance. The transparency of the cornea is related to its highly organised structure [15], and when this complex configuration becomes altered (e.g. oedema [16], [17], [18], with penetrating keratoplasty [19] or after corneal refractive surgery [20], [21]) light scatter is increased. Scattered light which is deviated more than 90° (referred to as backward light scatter) mainly results in a reduction of the amount of light reaching the retina. On the contrary, scattered light deviated less than 90° (referred to as forward light scatter (FLS) or straylight) results in a veiling luminance superimposed upon the retinal image, leading to a reduction in retinal image contrast and possible disability glare [22], [23].

In keratoconus, changes to the corneal structure such as alterations to the epithelia [24], [25], [26], stromal keratocytes [27], [28], [29], stromal collagen lamellae [30], [31] and Bowman's layer [32], [33], [34], [35] can occur. In view of these corneal structural alterations, it seems reasonable to assume that some of the decrease in contrast sensitivity experienced by the keratoconic patient [36], [37] can perhaps be attributed to FLS. Although the measurement of FLS in patients with keratoconus could provide useful information, this has only previously been investigated in one study using Hartmann-Shack spot images [38]. To date, FLS has not been explored in patients with keratoconus using the straylight meter developed by van den Berg and co-workers [39].

The aim of this study was to measure FLS in patients with keratoconus and to investigate possible relationships with contrast sensitivity measured with and without a glare source. Keratoconic data were compared to measurements made in visually-normal, control subjects. As the concept of aberration-controlling contact lenses has already been proposed [40], [41], knowledge of how keratoconic eyes scatter light could improve our current understanding of the limit in visual improvement afforded by successfully correcting higher-order aberrations alone. The results of this study may provide useful information to enhance our current understanding of the visual deficits associated with keratoconus.

Section snippets

Method

Ten visually-normal participants and five keratoconic patients took part in this study. This number is small but if it were assumed that the straylight values for normal subjects are similar to those reported by Elliott et al. [42], and if the effect size is large (d = 1.8) (i.e. slightly less than that reported by Elliott et al. [42] between young and older normal subjects), then this would provide a reasonable power (power = 0.8, α = 0.05) for a two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test.

The inclusion criteria

Results

Table 1 presents a summary of the keratoconic and control groups’ demographic data. Table 2 shows the average age, baseline contrast sensitivity (CS), contrast sensitivity loss due to the glare source (CSL) and straylight values for both subject groups evaluated. Although statistical analysis showed no significant difference in age between the two groups (Mann–Whitney test (two-tailed): Z = −0.50, p = 0.62), both the CS and CSL scores were noticeably poorer in the keratoconic patients compared to

Straylight

The results show that intraocular straylight measurements were noticeably higher in the keratoconic group than in the control group. The straylight values for the control subjects, the angular dependence of these values and their variation with age are in agreement with findings from previous studies [62]. The values for keratoconic patients correspond to values that could be expected for patients aged over 65 years old or with early signs of cataract [42].

In view of the inclusion criteria for

Declaration

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Amit Jinabhai is supported by a PhD studentship from The College of Optometrists (UK). We would like to thank Prof. Shahina Pardhan (Anglia Ruskin University, UK) for the use of the van den Berg stray-light meter.

References (78)

  • J.J.G. Beerthuizen et al.

    Straylight values 1 month after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy

    J Cataract Refract Surg

    (2007)
  • J.K. IJspeert et al.

    The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy volunteers; dependence on angle, age and pigmentation

    Vis Res

    (1990)
  • M. Mäntyjärvi et al.

    Normal values for the Pelli–Robson contrast sensitivity test

    J Cataract Refract Surg

    (2001)
  • A. Jinabhai et al.

    A comparison between subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients and control subjects

    Curr Eye Res

    (2010)
  • L. Lim et al.

    Evaluation of higher order ocular aberrations in patients with keratoconus

    J Refract Surg

    (2007)
  • J. Bühren et al.

    Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2007)
  • J. Schwiegerling et al.

    Keratoconus detection based on videokeratoscopic height data

    Optom Vis Sci

    (1996)
  • K. Zadnik et al.

    Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) study

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1998)
  • J.T. Barr et al.

    Corneal scarring in keratoconus. Measurements and influence on visual acuity

    ICLC

    (1991)
  • L.G. Carney

    Contact lens correction of visual loss in keratoconus

    Acta ophthalmol

    (1982)
  • K. Negishi et al.

    Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2007)
  • R. Kosaki et al.

    Magnitude and orientation of Zernike terms in patients with keratoconus

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2007)
  • J.D. Marsack et al.

    Uncorrected wavefront error and visual performance during RGP wear in keratoconus

    Optom Vis Sci

    (2007)
  • C. Okamoto et al.

    Higher-order wavefront aberration and letter-contrast sensitivity in keratoconus

    Eye

    (2008)
  • D.M. Maurice

    The structure and transparency of the cornea

    J Physiol

    (1957)
  • A. Caldicott et al.

    Diffraction haloes resulting from corneal oedema and epithelial cell size

    Ophthal Physiol Opt

    (2002)
  • T. Feuk et al.

    The angular dependence of light scattered from rabbit corneas

    Invest Ophthalmol

    (1971)
  • J.J. Rozema et al.

    Straylight before and after LASEK in Myopia: Changes in Retinal Straylight

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2010)
  • A. Nieto-Bona et al.

    Intraocular straylight and corneal morphology six months after LASIK

    Curr Eye Res

    (2010)
  • P.W. de Waard et al.

    Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1992)
  • V. Nourrit et al.

    Intraocular scatter and visual performances

    Optom Pract

    (2009)
  • K. Tsubota et al.

    Corneal epithelium in keratoconus

    Cornea

    (1995)
  • W.L. Jongebloed et al.

    The keratoconus epithelium studied by SEM

    Doc Ophthalmol

    (1987)
  • J.G. Hollingsworth et al.

    Correlation of the appearance of the keratoconic cornea in vivo by confocal microscopy and in vitro by light microscopy

    Cornea

    (2005)
  • S. Somodi et al.

    Confocal in vivo microscopy and confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy in keratoconus

    Ger J Ophthalmol

    (1996)
  • K.M. Meek et al.

    Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2005)
  • A. Daxer et al.

    Collagen fibril orientation in the human corneal stroma and its implication in keratoconus

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (1997)
  • M.W. Scroggs et al.

    Histopathological variation in keratoconus

    Cornea

    (1992)
  • S. Sawaguchi et al.

    Three-dimensional scanning electron microscopic study of keratoconus corneas

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1998)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Clinical features and visual function in a patient with Fish-eye disease: Quantitative measurements and optical coherence tomography

      2018, American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      A correlation between corneal guttae and stralylight was reported in patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.20 Moreover, in keratoconic eyes or dry eyes, an increase in straylight has been reported.21–24 Several studies have assessed straylight in eyes after keratoplasty.25–30

    • Response to Plainis

      2013, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
    • Correlation of visual quality with satisfaction and function in a normal cohort of pseudophakic patients

      2013, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      We used a new testing apparatus that simulated car headlights with 1 on each side of a 10% contrast logMAR chart. Our rationale for this approach is the finding that there is not a linear relationship between the degree of straylight in the eye and visual loss with many glare testing apparatus, including the BAT.12–16 It is assumed that the reason is the pupil-constricting effect of the BAT, which decreases the amount of straylight to the point that visual acuity actually increases until the pupil is maximally constricted, at which point increasing straylight does linearly correlate with visual loss.

    • History of ocular straylight measurement: A review

      2013, Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik
      Citation Excerpt :

      It was also used as a gold standard to assess the validity of glare tests [40]. However, outside the laboratory it sometimes proved to be a difficult technique [84,85], but which was nevertheless favored in a recent study where straylight was measured in keratoconus patients [86]. In a field study involving 112 subjects drawn from the patients and visitors of the outpatient departments of three clinics, the standard deviations of differences between repeated measurements found in such a field study were 0.15 and 0.18 log units, for two different implementations of the Direct Compensation method [45,56,57].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text