Elsevier

Cities

Volume 70, October 2017, Pages 111-121
Cities

Repurposing the paving: The case of surplus residential parking in Davis, CA

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We count cars parked on residential streets at peak hours of demand in Davis, CA.

  • We estimate the streets' rates of parking occupation on weekdays.

  • On average, only two of seven on-street parking spots are used during peak hours.

  • Given pavement maintenance funding shortfalls, we discuss design solutions.

  • Possible street redesign solutions include ADUs, bioswales, and traffic calming.

Abstract

The city of Davis, CA, has a rich history of high bicycling levels, and the city has ambitious transportation policies and goals. However, both the city of Davis and transportation scholars have overlooked the potential opportunities a surplus of on-street residential parking provides to cities. The existing literature on the influence of parking policy and provision has focused primarily on commercial districts and on large metropolises, neglecting parking in more purely residential areas. In this descriptive case study, we systematically observed the number of cars on a transect of residential streets in the early morning and late evening on weekdays to conservatively estimate the average peak parking demand by residents as a percentage of available parking spaces. On average, only 2 in 7 available parking spaces were occupied during peak hours. We note that the over-provision of on-street parking in residential neighborhoods could be a nexus for the city to achieve its sustainable transportation policy goals while addressing its fiscal and housing supply challenges. We discuss possible design solutions, including providing ecosystem services, implementing traffic calming measures, and creating accessory dwelling units.

Introduction

The small city of Davis, California (pop. 66,000) has a well-earned reputation as the bicycle capital of the United States (Buehler & Handy, 2008). Part of its success stems from extensive implementation of bicycle infrastructure: the city has over 50 miles of bicycle lanes and 50 miles of bicycle paths in its 10 mile2. But the city sees room for further improvement, with expansive policy goals and plans to further promote sustainable transportation, including the state-mandated Complete Streets element of its General Plan transportation element (City of Davis, 2010, Cox, 2010). We find in this paper that Davis' residential parking situation is particularly ripe for reform.

Despite its important influences on land use patterns and mode use, parking has flown under the radar in Davis and other cities throughout the US. Residential parking in small towns in particular has been overlooked by both local planners and parking scholars (Guo & Schloeter, 2013), who have traditionally focused on residential and commercial parking in higher-density urban areas (Cervero, Adkins, & Sullivan, 2010; D. C. Shoup, 2016). The parking requirements that engender the oversupply of residential parking are notoriously based on thin to non-existent evidence (Shoup, 1997, Shoup, 1999), suggesting that evidence-based analysis could encourage a hard reset of municipal parking policies.

In this descriptive case study, we systematically count the number of cars parked on residential streets in Davis at peak parking hours, offering refinements to existing methodologies as well as contributing to the underdeveloped literature on residential on-street parking utilization. After reviewing the parking literature, we provide background on the city, its policies and the state policies for complete streets. We then present the results of our on-street parking survey, demonstrating substantial underutilization of this resource even at peak parking demand by residents. We conclude with a discussion of how underutilized residential streets could be repurposed to simultaneously achieve transportation policy goals and address several related urban challenges that Davis and other cities in California and the US are currently facing.

Section snippets

Literature review

A sizeable portion of the literature on parking policy and practices has been authored by Donald Shoup, whose work has led to a focus on parking for residential and commercial uses in urban settings in the US (Marshall et al., 2008, Shoup, 2016, Smith, 2013, Weinberger and Karlin-Resnick, 2015) and internationally (Fan and Lam, 1997, Lau et al., 2005). Parking scholars have argued that minimum parking requirements exacerbate some of the most important contemporary civic challenges, including

Methodology

To study the utilization of on-street parking on residential streets, we selected a two-mile transect of low-volume local streets in Davis. This transect was chosen to include a gradient of construction dates, beginning with the oldest neighborhood built in the early 1900s near downtown Davis and the most recent built in the 1980s at Davis' northern-most city boundary. The transect begins in the Old North Davis neighborhood at 7th St, continues through the numbered streets to 12th St, then

Results

We find a wide variety in on-street parking utilization in our sample streets (Table 1). Within the Old North Davis neighborhood, which encompasses 7th through 12th streets, occupancy rates ranged from a low of one in seven to a high of just over half. Streets in the Covell Park neighborhood, which includes Baja Avenue through Lindo Place, were similarly varied, though with a lower maximum occupancy rate. In contrast, the four streets in the Northstar neighborhood (Tern Place through Merganser

Discussion

Several parking-related movements have emerged within the last decade. Probably the best known is the PARK(ing) Day movement, which protests the extensive public space used for car storage by converting a parking space into a park for the day. The event has its roots in San Francisco, but as of 2011 had expanded to 850 parks in 183 cities (Coombs, 2012) and helped usher in formal city adoption of the concept in the form of San Francisco's parklet program (Davidson, 2013). Other movements have

Conclusion

We find that the city of Davis has provided a vast oversupply of on-street parking in its residential neighborhoods. On average, and using a conservative estimate of available on-street parking, only two in seven on-street parking spots were occupied during peak parking hours, across 18 Davis streets and over 8 days of data collection. Newer, less accessible developments and larger households surprisingly were associated with lower rates of on-street parking, while the presence of apartment

Acknowledgements

Calvin would like to thank his newborn son, Koen, for providing the late-night inspiration to conduct this study as well as the impetus to conduct parking counts while simultaneously getting some exercise early in the morning and late in the evening. Jamey would like to thank his wife, Lauren, for her unwavering encouragement.

References (77)

  • R. Bloom

    AB-2299 land use: Housing: 2nd units

    (2016)
  • M.J. Brown et al.

    Understanding and appraising properties with accessory dwelling units

    The Appraisal Journal

    (2012)
  • T. Buehler et al.

    Fifty years of bicycle policy in Davis, California

    Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

    (2008)
  • K. Chapple et al.

    Yes in my backyard: Mobilizing the market for secondary units

  • City of Davis

    Appendix A: Standard plans

  • City of Davis

    City of Davis general plan

    (2010)
  • City of Davis

    Comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015

  • City of Davis

    Davis municipal code

  • City of Davis Transportation Advisory Group

    General plan: Transportation element

  • M.C. Coley et al.
  • G. Coombs

    Park(ing) day

    Contexts

    (2012)
  • C. Cox

    Update to the general plan guidelines: Complete streets and the circulation element

  • J.M. Daisa et al.
  • M.M. Davidson

    Tactical urbanism, public policy reform, and “innovation spotting” by government: From Park(ing) Day to San Francisco's parklet program

    (2013)
  • F. Des Rosiers et al.

    Landscaping and house values: An empirical investigation

    Journal of Real Estate Research

    (2002)
  • Design Community and Environment

    Yolo county general plan: Agricultural preservation techniques report

  • Environmental Protection Agency

    Reducing stormwater costs through low impact development (LID) strategies and practices

    (2007)
  • M.J. Eppli et al.

    Valuing the new urbanism: The impact of the new urbanism on prices of single-family homes

    (1999)
  • R. Ewing

    Traffic calming: State of the practice

    (1999)
  • H.S.L. Fan et al.

    Parking generation of commercial developments in Singapore

    Journal of Transportation Engineering

    (1997)
  • L. Fulton et al.

    Three revolutions in urban transportation

  • W. Fulton et al.

    Guide to California planning

    (2012)
  • E.M. Gudz et al.

    Results of the 2015–16 campus travel survey

    (2016)
  • Z. Guo

    Residential street parking and car ownership: A study of households with off-street parking in the New York City region

    Journal of the American Planning Association

    (2013)
  • Z. Guo et al.

    Amenity or necessity? Street standards as parking policy

  • Z. Guo et al.

    Street standards as parking policy

    Journal of Planning Education and Research

    (2013)
  • M. Holden et al.

    Bringing the neighbourhood into infill

  • HR Green Inc.

    A new path for stormwater: A brief review of the triple bottom line advantages of stormwater best management practices within transportation corridors

  • Cited by (10)

    • Tradable parking permits as a transportation demand management strategy: A behavioural investigation

      2022, Cities
      Citation Excerpt :

      To tackle these challenges, city planners leverage both existing infrastructures and technology innovations. While on-street, off-street parking, and minimum parking requirements often cannot strike a balance between meeting parking demand and reducing traffic and air pollution (Al-Fouzan, 2012; Barter, 2012; Thigpen & Volker, 2017), recent advances in network technology and mobile devices make car-sharing (Arnpudia-Renuncio, Guirao, Molina-Sanchez, & de Alvarez, 2020; Ferrero, Perboli, Rosano, & Vesco, 2018), bike-sharing (Fishman, Washington, & Haworth, 2013), and scooter-sharing (Aguilera-Garci, Gomez, & Sobrino, 2020) promising solutions to transport problems. However, these shared transport modes may face resistance in Confucian and South Asian cultures, where car ownership is viewed as a status symbol (Ashmore, Pojani, Thoreau, Christie, & Tyler, 2018; Pojani, Van Acker, & Pojani, 2018).

    • Support for innovative on-street parking policies: empirical evidence from an urban neighborhood

      2020, Journal of Transport Geography
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thigpen and Volker (2017) and Schlossberg and Amos (2015) point out that since on-street parking space in these neighborhoods is often oversupplied and underused there is room for reuse opportunities here as well, like space for rainwater capture, urban farming or accessory dwelling units.

    • Giving parking the time of day: A case study of a novel parking occupancy measure and an evaluation of infill development and carsharing as solutions to parking oversupply

      2018, Research in Transportation Business and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      External validity of this case study's results could be a concern, given Davis's deserved bicycling reputation. However, citizens of Davis own cars at similar rates to other Northern California cities and other US college towns (Thigpen & Volker, 2017). Consequently, cars may be parked for longer or more frequently than in other cities, if Davis residents are riding their bicycles instead of using their cars to reach their destinations (assuming mode substitution, rather than complementarity).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text