Change point estimation of high-yield processes experiencing monotonic disturbances☆
Section snippets
Introduction and literature review
Control charts are one of the most important statistical process control (SPC) tools in industries used to monitor the state of processes and detect the shifts by distinguishing between common and special causes of process variation. Although control charts are very useful in determining out-of-control states of processes, they do not determine the time the process had really changed (change point) or provide specific information on the root causes of process variation. When a control chart
High-yield process monitoring and derivation of the MLE
Consider a monotonic-change disturbance model for the behavior of the process fraction non-conforming of a geometric process, in which a stream of independent Bernoulli data using a possible 100% inspection is available. We assume that the process is initially in-control where observations come from a Bernoulli process with known in-control fraction non-conforming parameter p = p0 parts per million. To overcome the problem of employing either p or np chart in high-yield processes (Xie and Goh,
Comparison of the change point estimators
In this section, some Monte Carlo simulation experiments are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed change-point estimator designed for monotonic-change disturbances, , by comparing it to the change-point estimator of Noorossana et al. (2009), , designed for step-changes and the change-point estimator of Niaki and Khedmati (2013), , designed for linear-trend disturbances. Three types of non-decreasing changes including step-changes, linear-trend disturbances, and multiple
A real case
In this section, a real-world case provided by Chen et al. (2011) is used to illustrate the implementation of the proposed method. The data-set comes from an injection molding process that produces the micro-prism array of optical elements with an in-control non-conformity proportion at the level of p0 = 5 × 10−6. Based on Type-I error (α) of 0.0027, the control limits of the control chart are obtained as:
Concluding remark
Although many researchers assume the type of the process change is known a priori, the type of the change is rarely known and consequently any deviation in its true form from the assumed change type is likely to affect the performances of the change-point estimator. Instead, process engineers may know the change belongs to a family of monotonic (non-decreasing or non-increasing) changes including single-step changes, linear-trend disturbances, nonlinear trends, multiple-step changes, and an
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful for the constructive comments of anonymous reviewers. Taking care of the comments certainly improved the presentation.
References (37)
Cumulative conformance count charts with variable sampling intervals for correlated samples
Computers & Industrial Engineering
(2013)- et al.
Cumulative count of conforming chart with variable sampling intervals
International Journal of Production Economics
(2006) - et al.
Diagnosing the source(s) of a monotonic change in the process mean vector
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
(2012) - et al.
An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information
Annals of Mathematical Statistics
(1955) - et al.
Active set algorithms for monotonic regression: A unifying framework
Mathematical Programming
(1990) Quality control techniques for zero defects
IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology
(1983)- et al.
Cumulative probability control charts for geometric and exponential process characteristics
International Journal of Production Research
(2002) - et al.
Cumulative sum charts for high yield processes
Statistica Sinica
(2001) - et al.
Cumulative conformance count chart with variable sampling intervals and control limits
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry
(2011) - et al.
Drift time detection and adjustment procedures for processes subject to linear trend
International Journal of Production Research
(2006)
Cumulative sum charts and charting for quality improvements
A new statistical high-quality process monitoring method: The counted number between omega-event control charts
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Statistical control charts based on a geometric distribution
Journal of Quality Technology
A conditional decision procedure for high-yield processes
IIE Transactions
EWMA control charts for monitoring high yield processes
Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods
Change point estimation of high-yield processes with a linear trend disturbance
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Identifying the period of a step change in high-yield processes
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Estimating the change point of a normal process mean with a monotonic change
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Cited by (12)
A novel phase I fuzzy profile monitoring approach based on fuzzy change point analysis
2018, Applied Soft Computing JournalCitation Excerpt :However, as this paper focuses on the application change point analysis in statistical process control and more specifically in simple linear profile monitoring, we only report research on change point identification in statistical process control. Most of these investigatins use maximum likelihood to tackle the problem of change point identification (Samuel et al. [38,39]), Hawkins et al. [40], Pignatiello and Samuel [41], Pignatiello and Simpson [42], Pery and Pignatiello [43], Niaki and Khedmati [44,45], Dogu [46], Movaffagh and Amiri [47]). Beside maximum likelihood method, non-parametric methods (Zhou et al. [48], Ross et al. [49], Ross and Adams [50], Huang et al. [51]) and approaches based on new techniques, such as Artificial Neural Networks, Fuzzy Clustering, etc., are also proposed to estimate the change point in statistical process control problems (Wu [52], Fazel Zarandi et al. [53], Ghazanfari et al. [54], Alaeddini et al. [55], Harnish et al. [56], Fazel Zarandi and Alaeddini [57], Atashgar and Noorossana [58], Ghiasabadi et al. [59], Amiri et al. [60], Kazemi et al. [61], Lu et al. [62]).
Detecting change-points for shifts in mean and variance using fuzzy classification maximum likelihood change-point algorithms
2016, Journal of Computational and Applied MathematicsCitation Excerpt :The work in phase I includes detecting CPs and estimating in-control process parameters, but in phase II, in-control process parameters are assumed known. The CP problems in quality control were often solved by the maximum likelihood approach (see e.g., [1–10]). Recently, the artificial neural networks methodology was applied for CP detection (see [11–14]).
Change-point detection for shifts in control charts using fuzzy shift change-point algorithms
2016, Computers and Industrial EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Multiple step shifts of an isotonic nature are investigated here. This kind of process behavior could be resulted from a single influential factor changing several times or some influential factors changing at different times (cf. Niaki & Khedmati, 2014). Table 8 shows the biases and the associated standard errors of CP estimates for all cases considered are less than 0.6 and 0.16 respectively; moreover, the percentage of each CP estimate within 5 subgroups from the actual CP is at least 73% of trials.
Identifying the time of step change in process parameter for Maxwell distribution
2023, Journal of Statistical Computation and SimulationMonitoring Industrial Processes with Multiple Operation Modes: a Transition-Identification Approach Based on Process Variability
2022, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry ResearchFuzzy maximum likelihood change-point algorithms for identifying the time of shifts in process data
2019, Neural Computing and Applications