Elsevier

Journal of Chromatography A

Volume 1217, Issue 16, 16 April 2010, Pages 2561-2568
Journal of Chromatography A

Review
Analysis of amphetamine and methamphetamine as emerging pollutants in wastewater and wastewater-impacted streams

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.014Get rights and content

Abstract

The identification and quantitation of the non-ecstasy amphetamine-type stimulants (ATSs) amphetamine and methamphetamine in lakes, rivers, wastewater treatment plant influents, effluents, and biosolids are reviewed. Neither monitoring nor reporting is required of these ATSs, which are considered emerging pollutants, but they have been identified in the environment. Amphetamine and methamphetamine enter our water supply by human excretion after legal or illegal consumption and via manufacturing in clandestine laboratories. Analytical methodology for sampling, sample preparation, separation, and detection of ATSs is discussed. Reported occurrences of ATSs in the environment and their use in municipal sewage epidemiology are noted. Future research needs that challenge applications of analytical techniques are discussed. The review focuses on research reported from 2004 to 2009.

Introduction

The phrase “emerging pollutants” can be defined as substances that are not presently known to cause impairments in water systems but that have characteristics such as the ability to bioaccumulate, persistence in the environment, and toxicity and potentially impact the integrity of the water [1]. Neither monitoring nor reporting is required of these substances, but they may still be present in the urban water cycle. Much of the peer-reviewed literature has focused on pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), but recent research has also included groups of illicit drugs such as cocaine, opioids, opioid pharmaceuticals, cannabis, and amphetamine-type stimulants (ATSs). Although drugs in all of these categories have been found in environmental samples, this review will focus on analytical determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine.

Amphetamine and methamphetamine enter our water supply by human excretion after legal or illegal consumption and via manufacturing in clandestine laboratories. Amphetamines and methamphetamines are sometimes legally prescribed for certain medical conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and exogenous obesity; therefore, their presence in wastewater cannot be attributed solely to illegal consumption. However, according to the United Nations Office of Drug and Crime (UNODC), the global problem with clandestine ATS markets is worsening, with estimates showing that between 230 and 640 metric tons of amphetamine-group substances (excludes ecstasy-group substances) were manufactured in 2007 [2].

Approximately 62% of methamphetamine [3] and 30–40% of amphetamine [4] consumed is excreted in urine within 24 h of an oral dose, and both amphetamine and methamphetamine are primarily excreted as the intact drug [5]. Once these drugs enter the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) as influent, they can potentially enter surface or groundwater from inadequately treated WWTP effluent, wet-weather run-off, landfill seepage, contaminated streams and lakes, drainage from fields irrigated with effluent, and even from effluent used to recharge aquifers [6]. Jones-Lepp et al. [6] also noted that unlike non-polar pollutants of historic concern, these polar compounds are not readily sorbed to the subsoil, increasing the potential to enter surface and groundwaters.

The purpose of this manuscript is to compile a review of state-of-the-art analytical methodology used for sampling, sample preparation, separation, and detection of ATSs in environmental samples. Reported occurrences of ATSs in the environment are noted, and future research needs that challenge applications of analytical techniques are discussed.

Section snippets

Sample types and collection

Samples from surface waters (rivers and lakes) and WWTP influent and effluent were collected in Europe and the United States. The types of water sampled, the geographic regions in which they were sampled, and the types of samples collected, for analysis of ATSs are summarized in Table 1.

Sampling methods varied and included (1) grab samples, (2) 24 h composite samples, and (3) passively collected samples. A grab sample is collected simultaneously and reflects a single data point in time. A 24 h

Occurrence

Occurrence reports of emerging pollutants including ATS-type stimulants were reviewed [21]. Wastewater treatment did not remove amphetamine or methamphetamine completely from the effluent in most cases (Table 5); however, in instances in which ATSs were found in the influent, they were greatly reduced in the effluent.

The efficiency in removing ATSs strongly depended on the wastewater technologies used in the WWTPs [9], with two different types of treatment technology studied at two treatment

Municipal sewage epidemiology

Although the UNODC has reported an increase in the production of illegal amphetamine and methamphetamine from clandestine laboratories in different countries based on crime statistics, drug monitoring, and seizure rates, some consumption data are based on information supplied by drug consumers themselves. These estimation techniques create a high level of uncertainty [2]. Additionally, because data collection and analysis are time consuming, it is not always possible to detect changing patterns

Drinking water impacts

Because contaminated surface waters can be used as source waters for drinking water production, the presence and removal of ATSs in conventional drinking water treatment processes is of concern, and has been reviewed elsewhere [26]. Huerta-Fontela et al. [27] determined that non-ecstasy ATSs were completely eliminated by pre-chlorination, flocculation, and sand filtration during drinking water treatment.

Future research needs

Further work must be done in the area of WWTPs to determine which method(s) of treatment best removes the ATSs from wastewater. The question unanswered to date is even if a substance is found, is it a threat to human or aquatic life? Zuccato et al. [7] stated that even if environmental concentrations are low, risks for human health and the environment cannot be excluded. ATSs and other illicit drugs have potent pharmacological activities, and their presence as complex mixtures in surface waters

References (27)

  • E. Zuccato et al.

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • B. Kasprzyk-Hordern et al.

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • B. Kasprzyk-Hordern et al.

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • S.L. Bartelt-Hunt et al.

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2009)
  • M. Huerta-Fontela et al.

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2008)
  • L. Bijlsma et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2009)
  • B. Loganathan et al.

    Chemosphere

    (2009)
  • C. Postigo et al.

    Trends Anal. Chem.

    (2008)
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National Program Office,...
  • United Nations Office of Drug and Crime; World Drug Report 2009,...
  • RxList, The Internet Drug Index,...
  • RxList, The Internet Drug Index,...
  • R.C. Baselt

    Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man

    (2004)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Preparation of polydopamine-functionalized mesoporous silica-coated core/shell magnetic nanocomposite for efficiently extracting five amphetamine-type stimulants from wastewater followed by UPLC-MS/MS determination

      2022, Journal of Hazardous Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the two methods obtained the similar sensitivity, GC-MS required an additional derivatization process to vapor ATSs. Meanwhile, LC-MS or LC-MS/MS was more used than GC-MS in WBE study (Boles and Wells, 2010). Based on these results, the MSPE-UPLC-MS/MS method was sensitive and economic for monitoring ATSs in wastewater, which also possessed the advantages of time-saving and labor-saving.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text