Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 287, Part 4, January 2022, 132369
Chemosphere

A critical review on various remediation approaches for heavy metal contaminants removal from contaminated soils

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132369Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Impact of heavy metal toxicity towards the environment and human health.

  • Physical, chemical, and bioremediation approaches were used for contaminated soils.

  • Land filling, soil cleaning and solidification methods are well-established.

  • Treatability studies are crucial in the selection of soil sanitation techniques.

  • Future prospect and challenges of remediation would provide insights for readers.

Abstract

Heavy metal pollution remains a global environmental challenge that poses a significant threat to human life. Various methods have been explored to eliminate heavy metal pollutants from the environment. However, most methods are constrained by high expenses, processing duration, geological problems, and political issues. The immobilization of metals, phytoextraction, and biological methods have proven practical in treating metal contaminants from the soil. This review focuses on the general status of heavy metal contamination of soils, including the excessive heavy metal concentrations in crops. The assessment of the recent advanced technologies and future challenges were reviewed. Molecular and genetic mechanisms that allow microbes and plants to collect and tolerate heavy metals were elaborated. Tremendous efforts to remediate contaminated soils have generated several challenges, including the need for remediation methodologies, degrees of soil contamination, site conditions, widespread adoptions and various possibilities occurring at different stages of remediation are discussed in detail.

Introduction

Owing to the fast industrialization and overpopulation during the last few decades, there has been a massive increase in xenobiotic components including metals in the environment (Qin et al., 2020). The excessive entry of these components into the environment leads to human and environmental health issues. Even at low concentrations, heavy metals affect plants, soil, humans, plants, and animals, because these metal wastes are generally toxic in nature (Priya and Nagan, 2015; Elizabeth Rani et al., 2021). Due to various pollution exposures into the environment, the air, water, and land get contaminated. Air pollution can impact the quality of soil and water resources significantly (ECCC, 2013). Soil pollution occurs when pollutants, such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and pesticides, are released or disposed of. By contaminating precipitation and falling into water and soil habitats, air pollution can have an impact on the quality of soil and water bodies (Manisalidis et al., 2020). Water pollution can contribute to soil pollution and vice versa (Ahmed and Sulaiman, 2001; Lu et al., 2015). Harmful substances from wastewater can permeate into the soil from the water bodies. These may impose serious consequences on human health and the environment (Ashbolt, 2015). Subsequently, there are many new blooming advances to the recycling/re-use of wastewater. This effluent must be cleaned and recycled according to the most basic requirements, such as usability, recycling and cost. This is a major concern for developing nations (Jawed et al., 2020).

Wastewater usually contains toxins, such as cleansers, pesticides, prepared nourishment, drugs, and, organic/inorganic toxins (e.g. heavy metals and organic or inorganic salts). The improper disposal of wastewater into the environment contaminates the soil. The spectrum of nonbiodegradable heavy metals, such as chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), iron (Fe), arsenic (As) and selenium (Se), brings exceptional prosperity but also frequent issues. There is also an insistent need for these metals to be separated from wastewater to make wastewater reusable. Traditional innovations remain accessible for effective remediation, for example, substance precipitation, surface adsorption (Jawed et al., 2020), film filtration (Chen et al., 2018; Naghdali et al., 2019), particle trade, photocatalysis, and flocculation. In all these methods, the most capable method to remove heavy metals from wastewater is the adsorption on nanomaterials because other methods do not adequately remove such heavy metals and their cut-off emphasis has pursued appropriate clearing (Hasan et al., 2018; Meepho et al., 2018). This would decrease the accumulation of waste metals into the soil underneath.

It is therefore vital to deploy advanced and site-specific remediation technologies that can effectively and safely remediate soils polluted by heavy metals (Ok et al., 2020). In the last several decades, different soil remediation technologies have been implemented (Murtaza et al., 2014; Sabir et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2021). These methods focus on decreasing the maximum and/or bioavailable heavy metal concentrations in the soil and their possible mechanisms in the food supply chain (Bhargava et al., 2012; Hou et al., 2020). Traditional methods for remediating heavy metals from polluted soils are based on physical, chemical, and biological methods that can be used to remediate contaminated soil in conjunction with each other. The majority of these methods, despite their high performance, are expensive, environmentally harmful, and time-consuming (Ahmed et al., 2021). Financial and technological effects and challenges have made soil clean-up a difficult job. The realistic application of these traditional methods to remediate soils poses many limitations and a certain degree of threats.

This present review examines the various technologies currently available for heavy metal remediation in terms of mechanisms, advantages, drawbacks, applicability, and costs. This review examines the methods for treating heavy metal-contaminated soils using physicochemical, biological, and techniques that combine these approaches, as well as the potential toxicity of metals after treatment, the interaction of metals with soil constituents, the difficulties of using this modification for site remediation, and potential opportunities. This review has also focused on remediation strategies for soils polluted with heavy metals, which include essential things required to properly remediate contaminated soils. This includes particular approaches that are implemented and being used at various locations. This paper explores the origins and risks of heavy metals in the soil and addresses methods and influencers for microbial remediation thereby this offers a valuable guide for restoring the health of the soil ecosystem. The data are used to determine the most useful remedial technology for the treatment of contaminated soils. This study will be of great use to industrial site owners who are tainted by long-term historical waste. This study has also focused on farmers with soils that are currently polluted with metal and are interested in improving the quality of their goods, or to urban gardeners who intend to improve the quality of the land.

Section snippets

Heavy metals and their pollution

Many heavy metals are dangerous in nature since they can easily aggregate in soils, dust and water, posing a serious impact on the environment. For instance, if the polluted farmland soil is exposed to heavy metal contaminants, these contaminants can be rapidly transferred to the surrounding water environment (e.g. surface water and groundwater) (Khan et al., 2015). As a result, these toxic metal poses many hazardous impacts in regards to the agricultural products, accumulate inside the food

Remediation methods for extracting heavy metals

Heavy metals are converted into various forms after they have been released into the environment. Their accessibility decreases versus their resting duration in the soil (Li et al., 2018). Types of exchangeable metals and aqueous solvents are considered suitable for plants. Due to their presence of toxic circumstances, these heavy metals can be remedied again from soil (Caussy et al., 2003). Table 2 evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of these developments in remediation.

Future challenges and prospects

Soil contamination by heavy metals has occurred through man-made activities at millions of sites with a total of 20 million hectares of land. Heavy metal soil pollution appears to be of crucial importance, given the possible consequences on human and environmental life, as a result of rapid industrialization and urbanization. Cultivation through industrial effluents, for instance, has contributed to a wide area of agricultural land being contaminated but has indirectly contributed to crop

Conclusion

The evaluation of remediation strategies used to clean up polluted soil discovered that the efficiency of these procedures was below expectations. The multiple technical and economical components of remediation make it tough. As a result, typical soil remediation methods are ineffective on polluted areas. Heavy metal removal from polluted soil is an expensive and time-consuming technique. Furthermore, the extra pollutants released into the environment by these cleanup approaches are limited.

Credit author statement

Saravanan Rajendran: Conceptualization, Writing - Original Draft, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources. T A.K. Priya: Conceptualization, Formal analysis. Kuan Shiong Khoo: Writing - Review & Editing, Investigation, Visualization. Tuan K.A. Hoang: Writing - Review & Editing. Hui-Suan Ng: Writing - Review & Editing. Heli Siti Halimatul Munawaroh: Writing - Review & Editing. Ceren Karaman: Writing - Review & Editing. Yasin Orooji:

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The author (SR) acknowledges the support of ANID through the project ANID/FONDAP/1511001. The author (AKP) grateful to KPRIET for providing resources and infrastructure for the preparation of this article. This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Malaysia [FRGS/1/2019/STG05/UNIM/02/2] and MyPAIR-PHC-Hibiscus Grant [MyPAIR/1/2020/STG05/UNIM/1]. This work was also supported by the UCSI University Research and Innovation Grant under project code [REIG-FAS-2020/028]. This

References (119)

  • T.H. Cheng et al.

    Removal of protein wastes by cylinder-shaped NaY zeolite adsorbents decorated with heavy metal wastes

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (2021)
  • E. Gabal et al.

    7 - carbon nanomaterial applications in air pollution remediation

  • F.E. García et al.

    Iron-based nanoparticles prepared from yerba mate extract. Synthesis, characterization and use on chromium removal

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2019)
  • A. Gebrekidan et al.

    Toxicological assessment of heavy metals accumulated in vegetables and fruits grown in Ginfel river near Sheba Tannery, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (2013)
  • H. Hallaji et al.

    A novel electrospun PVA/ZnO nanofiber adsorbent for U(VI), Cu(II) and Ni(II) removal from aqueous solution

    J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.

    (2015)
  • A. Hasan et al.

    Self-assembled monolayers in biomaterials

    Nanobiomaterials

    (2018)
  • M.T. Hoang et al.

    Removal and recovery of lead from wastewater using an integrated system of adsorption and crystallization

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2019)
  • M. Hojamberdiev et al.

    Ligand-immobilized spent alumina catalyst for effective removal of heavy metal ions from model contaminated water

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2018)
  • D. Hou et al.

    Integrated GIS and multivariate statistical analysis for regional scale assessment of heavy metal soil contamination: a critical review

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2017)
  • D. Huang et al.

    Combination of Fenton processes and biotreatment for wastewater treatment and soil remediation

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • G. Iervolino

    6 - visible light active photocatalysts for the removal of inorganic emerging contaminants

  • A. Jawed et al.

    Engineered nanomaterials and their surface functionalization for the removal of heavy metals: a review

    J. Water Process Eng.

    (2020)
  • S. Khan et al.

    Global soil pollution by toxic elements: current status and future perspectives on the risk assessment and remediation strategies–A review

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2021)
  • Y.K. Leong et al.

    Bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae: recent advances and mechanisms

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2020)
  • W.H. Leong et al.

    Impact of various microalgal-bacterial populations on municipal wastewater bioremediation and its energy feasibility for lipid-based biofuel production

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2019)
  • H.-S. Lim et al.

    Heavy metal contamination and health risk assessment in the vicinity of the abandoned Songcheon Au–Ag mine in Korea

    J. Geochem. Explor.

    (2008)
  • Y. Lu et al.

    Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China

    Environ. Int.

    (2015)
  • M. Meepho et al.

    Samaria-doped ceria nanopowders for heavy metal removal from aqueous solution

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2018)
  • M. Oetken et al.

    Evidence for endocrine disruption in invertebrates

    Int. Rev. Cytol.

    (2004)
  • G. Petruzzelli

    Recycling wastes in agriculture: heavy metal bioavailability

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (1989)
  • T.D. Pham et al.

    Adsorption characteristics of molecular oxytetracycline onto alumina particles: the role of surface modification with an anionic surfactant

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2019)
  • H. Qin et al.

    The improved methods of heavy metals removal by biosorbents: a review

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • L.R. Rad et al.

    Removal of Ni2+ and Cd2+ ions from aqueous solutions using electrospun PVA/zeolite nanofibrous adsorbent

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • B.S. Rathi et al.

    A review on effective removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic systems: current trends and scope for further research

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2021)
  • B. Ren et al.

    3D CoFe2O4 nanorod/flower-like MoS2 nanosheet heterojunctions as recyclable visible light-driven photocatalysts for the degradation of organic dyes

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2018)
  • D. Rogival et al.

    Transfer and accumulation of metals in a soil–diet–wood mouse food chain along a metal pollution gradient

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2007)
  • I. Saxena et al.

    Nitric oxide (NO) in alleviation of heavy metal induced phytotoxicity and its role in protein nitration

    Nitric Oxide

    (2013)
  • S. Sharma et al.

    Engineered nanoporous materials mediated heterogeneous catalysts and their implications in biodiesel production

    Mater. Sci. Energy Technol.

    (2018)
  • M.I. Ahamed et al.

    Water Pollution and Remediation: Heavy Metals

    (2020)
  • J.U. Ahmad et al.

    Heavy metal contamination in water, soil, and vegetables of the industrial areas in Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Ahmed et al.

    Evaluation of groundwater and soil pollution in a landfill area using electrical resistivity imaging survey

    Environ. Manag.

    (2001)
  • S.F. Ahmed et al.

    Recent developments in physical, biological, chemical, and hybrid treatment techniques for removing emerging contaminants from wastewater

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2021)
  • E. Amare et al.

    Field-based investigation on phytoremediation potentials of Lemna minor and Azolla filiculoides in tropical, semiarid regions: case of Ethiopia

    Int. J. Phytoremediation

    (2018)
  • A. Amine et al.

    Biosensors for Food Safety and Environmental Monitoring

    (2006)
  • I.M. Anekwe et al.

    Wastewater and bioventing treatment systems for acid mine drainage–contaminated soil

    (2021)
  • I. Ara et al.

    Reduction of chromium in water and soil using a rhamnolipid biosurfactant

    Geotech. Eng.

    (2015)
  • N.J. Ashbolt

    Microbial contamination of drinking water and human health from community water systems

    Curr. Environ. Health. Rep.

    (2015)
  • L. Atari et al.

    Removal of heavy metals by conventional water treatment plants using poly aluminum chloride

    Toxin Rev.

    (2019)
  • J.L. Bader et al.

    Chromium-Resistant bacterial populations from a site heavily contaminated with hexavalent chromium

    Water Air Soil Pollut.

    (1999)
  • F. Ben Rebah et al.

    Microbial flocculants as an alternative to synthetic polymers for wastewater treatment: a review

    Symmetry

    (2018)
  • Cited by (285)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text