Quantifying the effects of crack width, tortuosity, and roughness on water permeability of cracked mortars
Introduction
The permeability of concrete has an important impact on its durability since permeability controls the rate of penetration of moisture that may contain aggressive solutes and also controls moisture movement during heating and cooling or freezing and thawing [1]. While permeability of concrete is commonly measured using uncracked laboratory specimens [2], [3], in real structures, the existence of cracks (induced by restrained shrinkage or mechanical loading) can significantly increase the penetration of moisture and salts into concrete. This can especially be significant for high strength concretes which are known to have a higher tendency for cracking due to a larger autogenous and thermal shrinkage and a lower capacity for stress relaxation [4], [5], [6]. As such, for service-life predictions, it is important to account for the effect of cracks on accelerating the transport of moisture and aggressive agents inside concrete. Unfortunately, the present generation of service-life models largely overlooks the effect of cracks on durability.
Research on the water permeability of crack-free concrete has been extensive [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] and has led to a general understanding that the saturated water permeability of concrete is a function of its porosity, pore connectivity, and the square of a threshold pore diameter [10], [11], [12]. In addition to the classical flow-thru permeability measurements [2], [3], new methods (e.g., thermal expansion kinetics [13], beam bending [14], and dynamic pressurization [15]) have been offered that allow a more rapid and repeatable measurement of the saturated permeability.
In comparison, research on the permeability of cracked concrete has been limited. The pioneering works of Kermani [16], Tsukamoto and Wörner [17], and Gérard et al. [18] explored changes in permeability of concrete caused by the application of compressive or tensile stress. Wang et al. [19] measured the permeability of concrete disks fractured using a splitting tensile test, and correlated the crack opening displacement (COD) with the permeability coefficient of a crack. Their results suggested that for COD smaller than 25 μm, there is no significant increase in permeability beyond the matrix permeability. For larger cracks, permeability increases exponentially. It should be noted that in this study (as well as some future studies [20], [21], [22]), crack width was not directly measured; but assumed to be equal to the lateral displacement of the disk specimen which was measured using an LVDT setup (Fig. 1). This assumption could result in inaccuracies due to crack branching, variability of crack width along its length, and inelastic deformation of the matrix; as discussed later in this paper.
For use in service-life prediction models, it is important to establish a quantitative correlation between crack geometry and its permeability. Using the theory of laminar flow of incompressible Newtonian fluids inside a smooth parallel-plate gap, Eq. (1), often referred to as the Poiseuille law, can be derived showing that the water flow rate through a crack, Q (m3/s), is related to the cube of crack width, b (m) [23]:where Lb (m2) is the crack cross sectional area perpendicular to the direction of flow, η (Pa·s) is dynamic viscosity of fluid, and (Pa/m) is the pressure gradient that drives the flow. This equation can be combined with Darcy's law:and alternatively presented in terms of the permeability coefficient of a crack κ (m2), as a function of crack width square [24]:
Eqs. (1), (3) are strictly valid for a smooth, straight, and parallel plate crack. Real cracks in concrete never have such characteristics. As shown in Fig. 2, the crack width often varies along the length of a crack; cracks are tortuous meaning their actual length is larger than their nominal length; and crack wall surfaces are rough. These features reduce the permeability of a crack, sometimes significantly. To account for this reduction in permeability, in Eqs. (1), (3), an empirical reduction factor ξ has been included; the values of ξ = 0.001 to 0.1 have been reported for plain and fiber reinforced concrete [21], [25]. Unfortunately, these values are uncertain (vary several orders of magnitude), purely empirical, and have not been correlated to the geometric properties of cracks. For implementation in service-life models, it is important to improve the estimation of crack permeability (and other transport properties) as a function of crack geometric parameters; i.e., average or effective width, tortuosity, and roughness. The present paper pursues this objective.
Section snippets
Effective crack width
In a fractured disk specimen (Fig. 1), the actual crack profile is highly variable in both parallel and perpendicular dimensions with respect to the direction of the flow. In other words, the crack widths are variable both on the surface and through the thickness of the disk. For example, Fig. 3 shows the cumulative distribution function of crack widths on the surface of a mortar disk specimen. For comparison, the horizontal permanent displacement (after unloading), measured by LVDTs (Fig. 1),
Sample preparation
Disk-shape plain and fiber-reinforced mortar specimens were prepared, diametrically fractured, and tested for permeability. The mortar mixture proportions are provided in Table 1. Type I/II Portland cement (per ASTM C150-07), natural glacier sand (meeting the gradation requirements of ASTM C33-07), and polypropylene fibers (8 mm length, 39 μm diameter, vol. fraction 1%) were used. Disks (8.9 cm diameter × 2.5 cm thickness) were cut from 17.8 cm tall mortar cylinders after 28 days of moist curing. The
Comparison between average, effective, and LVDT crack measurements
A total of 20 plain and fiber-reinforced disk specimens were fractured and tested in this study. Fig. 7 shows comparisons among the average and effective crack widths and LVDT measurements. The average and effective crack widths are closely correlated with the effective thru crack widths approximately 13% larger than the average surface crack widths. This may suggest that when the average crack width is properly determined from the specimens' surfaces, the effective crack width can be estimated
Conclusions
Based on the results of this research, the following conclusions can be drawn:
- •
Using a digitized crack profile, an effective crack width can be calculated that results in the same permeability as the actual crack whose width is variable along its length. The effective crack width shows a reasonably good correlation with the arithmetic average of crack widths. On the other hand, horizontal displacement of disk specimen during the splitting tensile test (i.e., LVDT reading) does not correlate well
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Profs. S.P. Shah, H-W. Reinhardt, G.W. Scherer, and J. Weiss for their discussions and insightful comments. This work was conducted at the CITEL laboratory of Penn State and the Materials and Structures laboratory of the University of Hawaii; the authors acknowledge the support that has made these laboratories operational.
References (41)
- et al.
Water-permeability measurement of high performance concrete using a high-pressure triaxial cell
Cem. Concr. Res.
(1995) - et al.
Water permeability and chloride ion diffusion in portland cement mortars: relationship to sand content and critical pore diameter
Cem. Concr. Res.
(1995) - et al.
Permeability study of cracked concrete
Cem. Concr. Res.
(1997) - et al.
Crack effect on gas and water permeability of concrete
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2009) - et al.
Transport properties of water and glycol in an ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) under high tensile deformation
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2008) - et al.
Permeability and self-healing of cracked concrete as a function of temperature and crack width
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2003) - et al.
Fractal characterization of fracture surfaces in concrete
Eng. Fract. Mech.
(1990) - et al.
Roughness of fracture surfaces and compressive strength of hydrated cement pastes
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2010) - et al.
Concrete
(2003) Standard test method for water permeability of concrete
Handbook of Cement and Concrete
(1992)